If you didn't give him your passcode or otherwise grant permission and you didn't leave it lying around unlocked and the screen on, then it's a legit issue. Reduce anyone's temptation to take a casual glance by making sure you're already taking basic privacy measures, Judge Keith Cutler says. Change your passcode and passwords and remove notifications from your lock screen.
Under U.S. law, people have a right to an expectation of privacy, even with close loved ones, Judge Keith Cutler explains. This means that if he hands you his phone and shows you something or leaves his screen unlocked and open where you can obviously see it, he is not expecting it to stay private. Other than that, you have to ask first. It can be frustrating to be with someone who will share a toothbrush with you but not their phone, but ultimately that's their call to make. (And it's your call to decide if this is something you can live with in a relationship.)
”This means that if he hands you his phone and shows you something or leaves his screen unlocked and open where you can obviously see it, he is not expecting it to stay private.“
If you didn't give him your passcode or otherwise grant permission and you didn't leave it lying around unlocked and the screen on, then it's a legit issue. Reduce anyone's temptation to take a casual glance by making sure you're already taking basic privacy measures, Judge Keith Cutler says. Change your passcode and passwords and remove notifications from your lock screen.
Read deeply and understand the nuances. 否则会被别人忽悠
Can J2 transfer to H1 without waver? Thanks.
Under U.S. law, people have a right to an expectation of privacy, even with close loved ones, Judge Keith Cutler explains. This means that if he hands you his phone and shows you something or leaves his screen unlocked and open where you can obviously see it, he is not expecting it to stay private. Other than that, you have to ask first. It can be frustrating to be with someone who will share a toothbrush with you but not their phone, but ultimately that's their call to make. (And it's your call to decide if this is something you can live with in a relationship.)
READ AND UNDERSTAND LOGICALLY.
楼主的情况是，男方在开车，需要她帮忙在手机上查地图。她得到的准许是地图，不是短信历史。况且他俩只是一般性伴，连同居关系都没有。
不要自我吓唬
”This means that if he hands you his phone and shows you something or leaves his screen unlocked and open where you can obviously see it, he is not expecting it to stay private.“
她是男朋友递给她手机，所以，她看是没有问题的。
她现在担心的是男方告她，不是完全没有legal ground。只要法庭受理，楼主就得请律师，男的就达到报复她的目的了。
请不要偷换概念，我们在讨论案件能否成立的问题
我相信你的真诚意见，但是你的个人意见不是法律。你引用的文章也不支持你的论点
男的并不是没有赢的希望。这个案子，法律并不像你认为的完全站在她一边（btw你我都在表达个人对法律的解读，都不是法律），因为她不光未经允许看了，还散布给第三者...
如果你仔细看我引用的文章，分清句子里and or的例子，就会发现文章支持我的观点
这英文，顶呱呱啊！还有好多好多笑话呢，我都懒得贴了。