阅读理解律师问题

移花接木
楼主 (文学城)
LAWYER: When he went, had you gone and had she, if she wanted to and were able, for the time being excluding all the restraints on her not to go, gone also, would he have brought you, meaning you and she, with him to the station?

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

..

.

OTHER LAWYER: Objection. That question should be taken out and shot.

i
ibelieu
哈哈。其实证人如果没听懂,会要求发问的律师

to rephrase the question. 而如果对方律师竟然当时就听懂了这个问题,他应该说:“Objection. The question calls for speculation."  而且问题里提到“you and she", 对方律师还可以加上“objection, compound question。” 但是回头仔细想想,如果证人是发问律师一方的,他们事先肯定预习过,所以这个问题有那么一点点(一点点哦)可能是故意整成这么复杂的,也许想着蒙混过关,稍稍影响一下jury。都是瞎猜哈。

忒忒绿
haha,don’t pay attention to the middle sentences
L
LYJiang
Talking gibberish like that, if proven, will invite disbarment.
移花接木
I'm on jury duty next week, hope they dont talk like that
b
beautifulwind
哈哈,是为了更精确还是更难懂,花懂?:)
L
LYJiang
Keep your fingers crossed.