大家转移到这里来了,好。我支持一下,发表一下昨天的DIY活。

T
ThisMyWords
楼主 (文学城)

The Trump administration is directing the Justice Department to explore whether it can sue institutions of higher education over affirmative action policies that the White House deems discriminatory against white applicants, The New York Times is reporting.

The Times based its report on a document that it obtained.

The internal announcement to the Justice Department's civil rights division puts out a call for lawyers interested in working on a new project focused on "investigations and possible litigation related to intentional race-based discrimination in college and university admissions," the Times reported.

Supporters and detractors of the project told the Times that the project was clearly going after programs that benefit black and Latino students and other groups.

Roger Clegg, a key official in the civil rights division in the Reagan and Bush administrations, told the Times that the project was "long overdue."

"The civil rights laws were deliberately written to protect everyone from discrimination, and it is frequently the case that not only are whites discriminated against now, but frequently Asian-Americans are as well," Clegg said.

But Kristin Clarke, president of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, said the project is "misaligned" with the central objectives of the department's civil rights division.

"It would be a dog whistle that could invite a lot of chaos and unnecessarily create hysteria among colleges and universities who may fear that the government may come down on them for their efforts to maintain diversity on their campuses," Clarke told the Times.

The Justice Department declined to provide details.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2017/08/02/report-trump-seeks-sue-schools-over-affirmative-action-seen-hurt-whites/531551001/

 

t
tibuko
2 楼
这种问题只有一个解:不看种族;不要搞什么矫枉过正,没人是上帝,只有往前看
大观园的贾探春
3 楼
同意。学校可以用学区贫富来做AA而不是用种族。这是学校最可能的做法一旦 race-based AA不被允许。
T
ThisMyWords
4 楼
+1。照顾穷人家的学生,没意见,取得同样成绩,他们会比条件优越的学生付出更多,但别将race因素用法律固化,这才可怕。
b
blue005
5 楼
以经济或种族标准都不会有太大区别。周围华人孩子去好学校的多,水至清则无鱼,真的都是华人的学校粉也会喳喳的...
大观园的贾探春
6 楼
实际做法上可以优待穷学区的毕业生。他们学校条件差大概连AP的课都没有。取得同样成就他们比富学区要难许多。
大观园的贾探春
7 楼
对华人不会有什么差别,但可以照顾到广大的穷白人化解一点他们的长期积怨保持美国社会的和谐。
燕京十景
8 楼
学校录取的是学生, 不是学区。只看申请人的社会背景就可以了, 跟学区无关
燕京十景
9 楼
富里没有穷学生吗? 你只提学区是在歧视他们。
大观园的贾探春
10 楼
实际做法不可能十全十美。即使race-based被判为非法按学区贫富还是合法的。这也是学校最可能采用的因为简单。
燕京十景
11 楼
那马上就会被富学区的穷学生告歧视的。走着瞧吧。你不就是想用一种更隐形的种族歧视来代替AA吗。
大观园的贾探春
12 楼
按学区贫富是合法的。法律只规定不可按种族没说不可按学区贫富。你忘了法律规定不可歧视的那几条吗?
大观园的贾探春
13 楼
社会背景不容易判断太主观也容易做假。按学区贫富简单客观无法做假。
燕京十景
14 楼
走着瞧呗。
燕京十景
15 楼
差学区里的富人賺大便宜了。你这种揣着明白装糊涂的, 左B里挺多。
大观园的贾探春
16 楼
最重要的是看学区贫富可以照顾到许多穷白人,符合川总这项政策的目的。
落花起作回风舞
17 楼
学区和个人背景结合考虑吧