SB 147 Texas Senate Bill, A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT
relating to the purchase of or acquisition of title to real property by certain aliens or foreign entities.
Sec. 5.0051. PURCHASE OF OR ACQUISITION OF TITLE TO REAL PROPERTY BY CERTAIN FOREIGN INDIVIDUALS OR ENTITIES PROHIBITED.
Not withstanding any other law, the following may not purchase or otherwise acquire title to real property in this state:
(1) a governmental entity of China, Iran, North Korea,or Russia;
(2) a company or other entity that is:
(A) headquartered in China, Iran, North Korea, or Russia;
(B) directly or indirectly held or controlled by the government of China, Iran, North Korea, or Russia; or
(C) owned by or the majority of stock or other ownership interest of which is held or controlled by individuals who are citizens of China, Iran, North Korea, or Russia;
(3) a company or other entity that is owned by or themajority of stock or other ownership interest of which is held or
controlled by a company or entity described by Subdivision (2); or
(4) an individual who is a citizen of China, Iran, North Korea, or Russia.
PROPERTY RIGHTS, HOUSING, AND THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION: THE SOCIAL BENEFITS OF PROPERTY RIGHTS PROTECTION, GOVERNMENT INTERVENTIONS, AND THE EUROPEAN COURT ON HUMAN RIGHTS' HUTTEN- CZAPSKA DECISION* Edward H. Ziegler** and Jan G. Laitos ABSTRACT Nations around the world utilize government interventions to promote the availability and affordability of housing. This Article focuses on various types of government regulatory interventions, such as rent controls, building dedications and exactions, and density and growth controls on housing. These interventions are common in the United States and in other countries and may contribute to inefficient resource allocation and poor housing outcomes. This Article examines whether these types of government interventions may require, in particular cases in the United States, judicially required compensatory damages for affected property owners. The social costs of these forms of government intervention are examined from the perspective of the benefits accruing from a regime of property rights protection. This Article further explains that there is some existing precedent under international human rights norms, as illustrated by the Hutten-Czapska v. Polandi decision, for the standards used in the United States for protecting the property rights of owners and developers of housing from excessive and unwise government regulation.
德州州长Greg Abbott亲自发推，禁止中国、伊朗、朝鲜、俄罗斯四国公民购买德州的land (也包括任何含有land的房产)
SB 147 Texas Senate Bill, A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT
relating to the purchase of or acquisition of title to real property by certain aliens or foreign entities.
Sec. 5.0051. PURCHASE OF OR ACQUISITION OF TITLE TO REAL PROPERTY BY CERTAIN FOREIGN INDIVIDUALS OR ENTITIES PROHIBITED.
Not withstanding any other law, the following may not purchase or otherwise acquire title to real property in this state:
(1) a governmental entity of China, Iran, North Korea,or Russia;
(2) a company or other entity that is:
(A) headquartered in China, Iran, North Korea, or Russia;
(B) directly or indirectly held or controlled by the government of China, Iran, North Korea, or Russia; or
(C) owned by or the majority of stock or other ownership interest of which is held or controlled by individuals who are citizens of China, Iran, North Korea, or Russia;
(3) a company or other entity that is owned by or themajority of stock or other ownership interest of which is held or
controlled by a company or entity described by Subdivision (2); or
(4) an individual who is a citizen of China, Iran, North Korea, or Russia.
https://twitter.com/GregAbbott_TX/status/1614686215676084226
PROPERTY RIGHTS, HOUSING, AND THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION: THE SOCIAL BENEFITS OF PROPERTY RIGHTS PROTECTION, GOVERNMENT INTERVENTIONS, AND THE EUROPEAN COURT ON HUMAN RIGHTS' HUTTEN- CZAPSKA DECISION*
Edward H. Ziegler** and Jan G. Laitos ABSTRACT
Nations around the world utilize government interventions to promote the availability and affordability of housing. This Article focuses on various types of government regulatory interventions, such as rent controls, building dedications and exactions, and density and growth controls on housing. These interventions are common in the United States and in other countries and may contribute to inefficient resource allocation and poor housing outcomes. This Article examines whether these types of government interventions may require, in particular cases in the United States, judicially required compensatory damages for affected property owners. The social costs of these forms of government intervention are examined from the perspective of the benefits accruing from a regime of property rights protection. This Article further explains that there is some existing precedent under international human rights norms, as illustrated by the Hutten-Czapska v. Polandi decision, for the standards used in the United States for protecting the property rights of owners and developers of housing from excessive and unwise government regulation.
https://mckinneylaw.iu.edu/iiclr/pdf/vol21p25.pdf
现在双方政府都被相对极端的智囊团包围，朝着经济利益脱钩方向走，脱钩远到可以决一雌雄时，就是大战的开始。
决一雌雄大战的结果就是，要么美国分裂从此困在美洲与南美合二为一，要么大陆分裂成几个小国，亚州大陆狼藉一片，大陆老百姓四处逃难，成为难民；
要么就是地球毁灭。
https://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/protected-classes-under-anti-discrimination-laws.html
https://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/protected-classes-under-anti-discrimination-laws.html
现在的Fair Housing Act禁止歧视Nation Of Origin. 禁止中国公民购买事实上已经歧视中国出生的legal non-citizen resident（比如，绿卡和H1b等）。
有两个疑问，一是凭正常手续进入美国并合法居留的外国人是不是protected classes？不是的话可不可直接剥夺生命和财产。好像就是对非法移民现在也不能随便射杀了吧。
二是法案只针对特定国籍的人民设限是不是种族歧视？
中国人买美国军事基地附近的土地，自然也是非法。
何况，即使是中国公民，也只能买７０年使用权，不能买永久的土地财产权。
中共利用美国法律和民主自由，进入美国，攻击美国久矣。美国亡羊补牢，也是必由之路。
打着美国自由民主旗号，只准中共放火不准美国点灯的人们，究竟打的什么算盘，真以为别人看不明白么？
你们何苦脱了裤子放屁，多此一举呢？
老老实实待在中共国享用人矿待遇，不香么？省了多少舟车劳顿。