You need to know HOA member is someone like you...
They are elected by all the owners, and if you want, you can compaign to be elected as one. It's a payless time consuming service. The management company is hired by the HOA to mangage day-to-day business and they have rules that could be stupid, or unreasonable, but they are rules, untill they are changed, by someone like you, every owner, including the HOA members, have to go by.
The plaintiff must have suffered an "injury in fact," meaning that the injury is of a legally protected interest which is (a) concrete and particularized and (b) actual or imminent There must be a causal connection between the injury and the conduct brought before the court It must be likely, rather than speculative, that a favorable decision by the court will redress the injury
XXXX:
作为 HOA 的房主，我在两天前给您发了电子邮件，我想进一步解释为什么移除 Bld Z 两棵白桦树的原因是错误的。
是的，树顶上的三个树枝都死了，但这不是甲虫造成的。 树艺师在去年 2 月初截断（所谓的修剪）树枝的顶部后，顶部的树枝立即死亡。修剪前树木非常健康，两棵树现在仍然健康，除了几个树枝 被树艺师杀死。 砍掉树顶的 1/2 已经阻碍了树木中养分的正常循环，导致三个树枝死亡。 但大部分树木仍然健康，无需移除它们。
过去的一年，我已经与办公室分享了修剪前后的树木照片。 这就是证据。 我希望经理尊重事实，移除树木的决定似乎是基于某人的猜测，而不是事实。
总之，我强烈反对拆除 Z号楼后面的树。
谢谢
××××××××
它们11个月前第一次砍几个树杈把树的上端弄死了，现在又说树杈是甲虫弄死的，把全树都砍了，是不是愚蠢无能罪？
请问如果到法院告它们，什么样律师受理？
你这个案子似乎没有任何法律根据。自己去看看HOA的CC&R和bylaws。
They are elected by all the owners, and if you want, you can compaign to be elected as one. It's a payless time consuming service. The management company is hired by the HOA to mangage day-to-day business and they have rules that could be stupid, or unreasonable, but they are rules, untill they are changed, by someone like you, every owner, including the HOA members, have to go by.
为什么找专业公司？不但是办事，还是规避责任。我的房子出问题，我都是找有执照的人去修，不是我不会修，而是万一出了事我有垫背的。
空房子的时候我自己去修，反正房客也看不见。
Birch Tree Dying? (Here’s Why & How to Fix It!) (havegarden.com)
专业公司把树搞死了，是疏忽；房产管理公司只要遵守专业公司的意见，就没有疏忽。
be charged for cutting them down, if the rules were so set.
You can save your money, NO, there is no loss of value. Appraisers only consider land and structure, they don't consider scenery views.
你这个案件，主要是你的损失不确定，法庭无法受理。
The plaintiff must have suffered an "injury in fact," meaning that the injury is of a legally protected interest which is (a) concrete and particularized and (b) actual or imminent There must be a causal connection between the injury and the conduct brought before the court It must be likely, rather than speculative, that a favorable decision by the court will redress the injuryhttps://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/standing
砍了，种一颗dogwood, 桃树，开起来满树银花，粉花。