亲们,柠檬兄,有人在吗?我 今天收到律师email,我那个前房客律师发的,我应该装死不回应,还是跟他比划比划?

k
kikichichi
楼主 (文学城)

亲们,这是前情提要,我前房客搬走,我扣了他部分押金,我扣的绝对是他搬进来以后造成的损坏。另外,他对房屋做的所谓的improvement, 根本没有经过我同意,属于擅自安装,但是他搬入后第一年是我pm打理的,他们之间怎么协调的我不清楚,他能返回我房子拆除吗?但是他不满,要告我:

https://bbs.wenxuecity.com/tzlc/1600681.html

 

今天收到他律师给我的email,不知道是怎么查到的,但的确是我的email. 我想问下这种情况我应该怎么办,回复,还是装死,还是找律师回应。如果装死,对方告我的话,我人在加州,法院传票怎样算送达?

拜谢各位!!!

这个是他律师信如下:

=================================================================

Ms. xxx,

 

I hope this correspondence finds you well.  As you know, Mr. Hopper moved out of your property on March 31, 2022.  Accordingly, under  Revised Statute section 3251, you were required to return the deposit of $2,100, which Mr. hhh paid to your prior property manager, Ms. JJJ, by April 30, 2022. As you know, under Louisiana law, you were required to return the full amount of the deposit.   As a lessor, you may only retain any portion of the deposit which is “reasonably necessary to remedy a default of the tenant or to remedy unreasonable wear to the premises.”  In the event of any retention, the statute further requires that you provide an “itemized statement accounting for the proceeds which are retained and giving the reasons therefor.” 

 

            As of this date, Mr. HHH has yet to receive the entire deposit which was paid to your former property manager and requests immediate payment of the entire amount.  Your retention of $759.00 was improper and constitutes “wrongful withholding” of which Mr. HHH can recover $4,200.00 (two times the deposit) if immediate payment is not made.  The document you sent a photograph of to Mr. HHH evidences that your withholding was improper. You cannot charge Mr. HHH for reasonable wear and tear to the home from his four years of tenancy.  Specifically, you cannot withhold Mr. HHH’s deposit for carpet cleaning, paint touch up, and other charges of the like.  These charges were not outlined in the leasing agreement and cannot be withheld, as supported by several Louisiana cases.  

 

The photographs you sent via text to Mr. HHH are even more perplexing. As I am sure you recall, prior to Mr. HHH moving in, areas of your property were in desolate condition following your last tenant.   Mr. HHH promptly notified your prior property manager as well as you personally about the sink issue and various holes in the walls.  This is evidenced by your former property managers handwritten notes on the leasing agreement.  Despite his request, the sink remained un-repaired and the holes remained un-patched throughout the tenure of his tenancy.  Mr. HHH will not pay for those defects which he did not cause and which you did not remedy despite ample notice. 

 

As I noted from a review of the records, you are a CA resident.  I am sure it was a dream to have a tenant like Mr. HHH who kept your home in great condition for four years.  I am sure you noticed in your most recent visit (whether in accordance with recent appraisals in 2021 or otherwise) that Mr. HHH made several improvements to your house over his four years.  He installed blinds, certain ceiling fans, sod, and landscaping in your front yard.  Under Louisiana Law, Mr. Hopper has the right to reimbursement from you for the improvements made to your property, or, alternatively, he can remove the improvements.  Mr. H has not exercised this right to reimbursement nor did he remove these improvements at the end of his tenancy.   

 

I am sure that your retention of the deposit was inadvertent, and that you did not know the prior assertions of your property manager Ms. J. It has now been more than 60 days since Mr. H vacated the property. Please promptly remit payment of $759.00 or Mr. H will have to consider all remedies.

 

b
borisg
wait for him to sue you. it may not happen.
k
kikichichi
哦了!我就等传票!不跟他们废话!
o
oldmansea
$759可能是虚张声势,没细看,有没有哪部分合理的,退一部分了事
圆萝卜
随他去。既然走到这一步了,一分不要退还,让法官判。
k
kikichichi
我没有多收他!
k
kikichichi
我也决定死磕了!我有照片有单据,有付款记录,如果哪里收的不合理,让法官断吧!
l
ljty1
清理房间,清理地毯是合理的charge,补漆不合理,厨房水管如果不是房客故意弄坏的也不应该房客付
l
ljty1
我建议你退掉补漆和厨房水管那部分,没有必要激化矛盾
圭妈
我觉得很奇怪,律师要告你一般不发 email,都是发正式的邮件。
雾蒙蒙雨霏霏
装死不如装傻或者装疯,乱其八糟的回几句有一堆语法和拼写错误的回帖,让他去猜.
老朽
哈哈哈,最好错的离谱。不要凭自己英文好和大老外斗文字功夫,弄不好留下把柄。没头没脑的英文不能成为证据。
冬前
If it were me, I would just give back the $759. Understood

upto this point you wanted to hang on, but the downside is you can lose more.  See the following from the letter.  If the tenant can't get the money back, he could just go there and do some legal-allowed damage.  On the other hand, if it does go to court, you are remote and if you are not present, you will lose.

 Under Louisiana Law, Mr. Hopper has the right to reimbursement from you for the improvements made to your property, or, alternatively, he can remove the improvements.  Mr. H has not exercised this right to reimbursement nor did he remove these improvements at the end of his tenancy.   

老朽
同意,人在外州,还759算了,不是大数,而且对方提出来的。
o
oldmansea
法官有可能盼你赔房客的律师费等
小饭粒
必需还759.

 有的入门律师只想练练手, 你就会很无辜。 一般法官不会判对方付你律师费的,即使你赢了。

N
NPshowway
Agree
h
hhtt
Me no under stand you mean. ni nainaidi gao wo de le!
柠檬椰子汁
Cannot deduct wear and tear

from https://bbs.wenxuecity.com/tzlc/1600681.html\

清理地毯 $150: wear and tear

补漆: 250: wear and tear

打扫: 220: wear and tear 

厨房水管坏掉:安装120, 材料89:  this can be deducted. 

你退人家一半钱吧,你不占理。

k
kikichichi
盼律师费我也认了,就算是积攒经验吧
k
kikichichi
多谢建议,我考虑考虑!不是钱多少,我其实很想知道正常磨损的界限在哪里
k
kikichichi
因为他们没有我的地址,虽然也可以查出来,但是费精力, 我查了email在legal notice送达上没有法律效力
o
oldmansea
厨房水管坏掉为什么房客要负责?
k
kikichichi
我觉得我更适合装死lol ~~~
k
kikichichi
其实从理智生意角度来讲就是退钱最好,还不到800,但是就是觉得不能遇事就怂,太窝囊了
k
kikichichi
才700多,的确不应该这么费神,得, 我听您的建议,退他得了,多谢!
柠檬椰子汁
I didn't make the rules.

https://rentprep.com/property-management/damage-wear-tear-security-deposit/#list_of_normal

wear and tear:  worn, dirty, faded ....

damage:  broken, cracked, torn .... 

k
kikichichi
多谢柠檬兄这么专业的答复,我听你的,退钱吧!
k
kikichichi
多谢建议
k
kikichichi
Good example for bad English! Lol~~~~~
密码忘记了
四年的老房客,一开始就应该做得漂亮一些

如果真如信中所说又是装灯又是landscape,没什么特别损坏,真没必要为了几百块钱惹麻烦的。

现在情况,退了算了。一切属实的话,法官判决,未必对你有利。

o
oldmansea
你这挺误导的,什么东西都会坏掉的,除非房客的过错造成的,都是房东的责任
o
oldmansea
“水管坏掉“和“房客打破了水管”是两码事。如果责任难以界定,是房东负责。法庭上房东具有举证的责任,而不是房客
o
oldmansea
这种索债的notice要求不高。在我们州,有email也算mail的法庭判例
柠檬椰子汁
我给的仅仅是presumption,一个起点假设。终点结论在哪里要看具体情况。

如果一个东西断了,起点假设是房客弄坏的,扣押金合理,房客要举证说那个东西是年久坏掉的。

如果一个东西脏了旧了,扣押金不合理,除非房东说这个无法修理必须换,也要看具体情况。

新手地主刚上路
+1
k
kikichichi
学习了!谢谢建议!
k
kikichichi
多谢建议!
o
oldmansea
上庭肯定输,刷漆3年后基本就没法扣了,这个光这个房客就住了4年了。楼主的收据没用,得证明是房客责任才行