Based on Soviet archival data, 335 Soviet MiG-15s are known to have been admitted as lost over Korea.[57] Chinese claims of their losses amount to 224 MiG-15s over Korea.[19] North Korean losses are not known, but according to North Korean defectors their air force lost around 100 MiG-15s during the war.[58] Thus a total of 659 MiG-15s are admitted as being lost by all causes, while USAF claims of their losses amount to 78 F-86 Sabres in air-to-air combat.[59] Overall UN losses to MiG-15s are credited as 78 F-86 Sabres and 75 aircraft of other types.[59] However, one modern source claims that the USAF has more recently cited 224 losses (circa 100 to air combat) out of 674 F-86s deployed to Korea.[60] Conversely, data-matching with Soviet records shows that US pilots routinely attributed their own combat losses to "landing accidents" and "other causes".[61] According to official US data ("USAF Statistical Digest FY1953"), the USAF lost 250 F-86 fighters in Korea: 184 were lost in combat (78 in air-combat, 19 by Anti-aircraft gun, 26 were "unknown causes" and 61 were "other losses") and 66 in incidents.</ref>[62]
More recent research by Dorr, Lake and Thompson has claimed the actual ratio is closer to 2 to 1.[63] The Soviets claimed to have downed over 600 Sabres,[64] together with the Chinese claims.[65] A recent RAND report[66] made reference to "recent scholarship" of F-86 v MiG-15 combat over Korea and concluded that the actual kill:loss ratio for the F-86 was 1.8 to 1 overall, and likely closer to 1.3 to 1 against MiGs flown by Soviet pilots.[57] However, this ratio were not count the number of aircraft of other types (B-29, A-26, F-80, F-82, F-84...) were shot down by MiG-15s.
Based on Soviet archival data, 335 Soviet MiG-15s are known to h
Based on Soviet archival data, 335 Soviet MiG-15s are known to have lost (all causes).
US F86: 184 were lost in combat (78 in air-combat, 19 by Anti-aircraft gun, 26 were "unknown causes" and 61 were "other losses") and 66 in incidents.[62]
Total loss 250 aircrafts, 31% in air-combat. Or excluding the 19 downed by AA guns, 78/231= about 34% air combat loss.
If you follow the same math, the Russian loss in air combat would have been about 110 aircrafts.
志愿军在米格走廊内不是就可以不受美军空袭的威胁了。米格走廊内的目标美军同样是狂轰滥炸的。所以共产党方面的空军始终无法进驻朝鲜境内的机场。所谓米格走廊的说法，只是表明联合国军在该区域内执行任务时，有可能和共产党军的米格战斗机遭遇，仅此而已！这点说明，别说志愿军空军，就是苏联空军也不是美国空军的对手。1:10的战损比是符合实际的。
Based on Soviet archival data, 335 Soviet MiG-15s are known to have been admitted as lost over Korea.[57] Chinese claims of their losses amount to 224 MiG-15s over Korea.[19] North Korean losses are not known, but according to North Korean defectors their air force lost around 100 MiG-15s during the war.[58] Thus a total of 659 MiG-15s are admitted as being lost by all causes, while USAF claims of their losses amount to 78 F-86 Sabres in air-to-air combat.[59] Overall UN losses to MiG-15s are credited as 78 F-86 Sabres and 75 aircraft of other types.[59] However, one modern source claims that the USAF has more recently cited 224 losses (circa 100 to air combat) out of 674 F-86s deployed to Korea.[60] Conversely, data-matching with Soviet records shows that US pilots routinely attributed their own combat losses to "landing accidents" and "other causes".[61] According to official US data ("USAF Statistical Digest FY1953"), the USAF lost 250 F-86 fighters in Korea: 184 were lost in combat (78 in air-combat, 19 by Anti-aircraft gun, 26 were "unknown causes" and 61 were "other losses") and 66 in incidents.</ref>[62]
More recent research by Dorr, Lake and Thompson has claimed the actual ratio is closer to 2 to 1.[63] The Soviets claimed to have downed over 600 Sabres,[64] together with the Chinese claims.[65] A recent RAND report[66] made reference to "recent scholarship" of F-86 v MiG-15 combat over Korea and concluded that the actual kill:loss ratio for the F-86 was 1.8 to 1 overall, and likely closer to 1.3 to 1 against MiGs flown by Soviet pilots.[57] However, this ratio were not count the number of aircraft of other types (B-29, A-26, F-80, F-82, F-84...) were shot down by MiG-15s.
共产党方面抓获了多少美军飞行员？
别的不比，比比越南战争好了。
Based on Soviet archival data, 335 Soviet MiG-15s are known to have lost (all causes).
US F86: 184 were lost in combat (78 in air-combat, 19 by Anti-aircraft gun, 26 were "unknown causes" and 61 were "other losses") and 66 in incidents.[62]
Total loss 250 aircrafts, 31% in air-combat. Or excluding the 19 downed by AA guns, 78/231= about 34% air combat loss.
If you follow the same math, the Russian loss in air combat would have been about 110 aircrafts.
杜鲁门是对的，是冷静的。当然是人都会做出这个选择。老毛是知道杜鲁门的底线的（可能是猜到的）。
但是杜鲁门是不知道老毛的底线的。
这个统计没有区分苏、中、北朝鲜空军。苏美之间的数字可能没有这么难看。而且这仅仅是双方主力歼击机之间的格斗战国，联军肯定是丢了更多的轰炸机。
苏军在空战中牺牲202名飞行员，志愿军空军牺牲烈士116名。考虑到中苏空军作战空域全部都在共产党部队控制地区，所有跳伞落地的飞行员都可以归队，而美军飞行员一旦被击落，不死就是被俘。朝鲜战争中有很多美国飞行员被俘么？看看越南战争，多少美军飞行员被俘，就知道在朝鲜，美空军的损失比在越南小多了。而中苏空军牺牲飞行员总数就超过300名，算上跳伞归队的，损失数量超过700，因飞机性能原因，美军空战结果绝大多数都是F86的战果，所以美军F86的空战战果就有700余架（约792架，如果没记错的话），美军自己在空战中仅损失F86约78架，全部都是中苏米格15的战果，这就是双方1:10交换比的来历。
不止一次给我提10：1. 不知哪个网友有更可靠的source。蒋介石的空军也是怂到家了。内战时有制空权但不会俯冲轰炸，就干脆没有这个训练科目，空投物资还尽给对方送礼。二战时，我有认识的老人亲戚经武汉逃到重庆、成都、昆明，他们亲历了日本空军的骄狂和中国空军的惨状。武汉还拼一下（有苏联人直接参战），后来警报一响，守军飞机起飞不是迎敌而是逃跑。这个事实被土共用来证明国府的腐败无能。
毕竟空战不比陆战，空中木有陆地那么多花露水，战机性能和飞行员技术决定胜败，打不过就是打不过，挨了炮弹就是机毁人亡。