我想起诉我的 BUYER'S ATTORNEY, 请各位大侠支招。 谢谢

p
puma_bill
楼主 (文学城)

背景:

在CLOSING 之后的当天早上,我在一大叠CLOSING的材料中发现水费结算单里有WATER DEPARTMENT的大写的

NOTE: There is a SUMP PUMP VIOLATION letter attached which must be addressed within 30 days of this facsimile.

我赶忙联络WATER DEPARTMENT, 他们告知我,在CLOSING 10 天之前就已将VIOLATION NOTICE 及这份水费结清单通过E-MAIL送到买卖双方的律师。

我连忙同我律师联系,他强调:

1. 他没收到VIOLATION的消息

2. 他同卖方律师联络,卖方律师ASSUMING我方已知这状况,所以在CLOSING中没特别强调。

解决这VIOLATION 花了我$4000. 请问:

1. 由于金额有限,我打算自己提告到SMALL CLAIM COURT (告我的律师疏忽), 这CASE是SURE WIN 吗?有没有什么要点要注意?

2. 我在CLOSING时也拿到WATER DEPARTMENT 的结算单,也没留意到"NOTE", 这是否能被我的律师来作为借口推卸他的疏忽责任?

3. 整个CASE 我付了律师费$700, 我的CLAIM AMOUNT 是否将它也算上( 即$4700, 因他没履行好他的买方律师的职责)?

谢谢各种建议。

b
borisg
CLOSE的时候文件在那里自己没看见,活该倒霉。
s
sweetptt
No yes no

1. 只要不在title record里的,请查阅title report, 里面有责任分担条例

2. 你应该不可以起诉他。没有开庭前就会被驳回。

3. water department是你打个电话就能发现问题的地方,所以是你due diligence的一部分。你自己有很大的责任。

 

p
puma_bill
我想

he is responsible to clear the title including advising any violation

 
柠檬椰子汁
the notice is not a lien, so title was clear

You need to find out what is the punishment for not fixing the violation, I don't think it's a lien though. 

 

p
puma_bill
i cured the violation

i still though it is my buyer's responsibility to let me know any violation on this property.  even, the water department noticed him 10 days before the closing.

越王剑
Did seller disclose it?

If not, sue the seller and seller agent for not disclose it.

柠檬椰子汁
well, the notice is there, you just didn't see it.

You can ask for 4000, realistically, getting 1/2 is a win. 

s
sweetptt
title知道如果你起诉他即使title赢了也是输了。title所以不给你机会起诉他。任何起诉只有在mediation失败的情况

mediation是个付个的。要起诉起码还得投资500以上。

s
starter2013
五年至十年以后这都不是事。要是我的话就Move On, 就当一个教训,不值得让这种事烦恼。
p
puma_bill
the violation notice was sent out when the water department read

i assumed that seller didn't know before.  any way, i though the seller and her attorney don't have the obligation to me.  And since my attorney received the same e-mail as they got.  it will be no case to sue them instead of my attorney.

p
puma_bill
i though

even the letter was there during the closing.  my argument is:  i am not the expert but he is,  it is the reason i spent $700 for his advising the whole transaction because his negligence cost me the $4000 damage.

 

 

柠檬椰子汁
I think you are talking about arbitration clause

not sure where the LZ is, they seems to require attorney as title agent.  If that's the case, it is rare for attorney to have arbitration clause. 

柠檬椰子汁
Some clients ...

This is why I only volunteer my service to my friends.  Because once you collect nominal fees they think they are some big shot can order you around and blame you for everything.  

you only spent $700, what the fxxk do you expect?  

 

西
西部探险
我觉得这个violation是closing前的事情,原则上seller 应该clear。你因该可以告赢。
p
puma_bill
you are wrong if you are an attorney and it is what you though

$700 is what we are agree on for the guranted smooth transaction.  If you told me $700 is not a guranted smooth transaction i would tell you go fxxk yourself.

不开窍
Greedy attorney!!!
p
puma_bill
i am in NY

十里荷花香
这个人心里阴暗,我为租房的事曾在法坛发帖求助,被他攻击

赖房租,还有那儿的版主,正经主意出不了,专好人身攻击。他如今又在投坛撒野,坏水柠檬。

s
sweetptt
坏柠檬?
N
NPshowway
I would 先跟他们沟通,看最好有一折中的办法,心里肯定不服气,与收$700 无关
螺丝螺帽
柠檬, 你的ID被偷了?这个700是正常的价格,律师应该帮买房人搞定的, 这4000的问题, 应该要事先搞定的

而不是事后。

 

是买方律师没做好这件事

p
puma_bill
好吧,让我试试。

p
puma_bill
谢谢

p
puma_bill
谢谢

YOU MADE THE POINT.

p
puma_bill
谢谢

YOU MADE THE POINT.

螺丝螺帽
我以前买房, 发生了我方律师没有算对钱, 好在就100多

closing后, 我方律师就不睬我了。。。

 

气人的是, 这律师是朋友给介绍的, 收费980, 大于一般价格。

 

我后来卖房两单就付律师费600/each

單身老貓
小姐,要打架也來法壇打,不要背後捅刀