我的出租房隔壁是6 acres farm land. 地的分界线刚好在driveway （一半？）. 但是我们一直在剪driveway另一边的草地。大概15feet x40 feet.
如果从前owner 开始就一直是这样的，我可以claim adverse possession? how about the driveway?
不知道该怎么证明这个。这房子已经建了50年了。
房子后院的草地是另一家在剪，我们给了easement 允许他们进入我们的草地剪草。因为我们后院大部分是树林，只有与邻居挨着的一长条是草地。
出租房隔壁的越南仔老说一块中间的草地是他的，因为割草时他连着割了。
市府地图上完全可以看出丫的就只有一屁点。
不担心被占，就是长久几十年下去会不会成问题啊？
不可能吧
这是不是就是得寸进尺的例子 。。。哈哈
usually they have to fence it off or build something that cause you not to use it
miwung lawn or driveway is not exclusive use, at least you need fence
and to claim title to adverse possessed land, you have to go to court
YouTube lehto’s law
I think you are wrong here.
at best, you can prove that you own the "easement" on that land, which means, he can't make you to tear down the driveway.
Your dream of somehow having a driveway entitles you to build a garage on that spot is pure fantasy.
This is how legal dispute starts, greedy clients, not greedy lawyers.
设想一个律师，给快兄公司代理了十年事务，快兄突然要抢占邻居地皮，这个律师能不能不顾砸饭碗，告诉快兄不可能？还是绞尽脑汁帮恶霸地主抢别人的地皮？
律师有时候也是保饭碗
五斗米哪能一天两天吃得了，
要靠一碗米救命的时候，嗟来之食不吃，不是君子，是呆子。
http://dirt.umkc.edu/dd98/dd122298.htm
教授的评论也是说最多只应是prescriptive easement
你自己去打官司好了，看看谁会代理你
另一家是farm land是关键。It's very obvious the lawn belong to the house to everyone if not looking at the servey. This indicates exclusive usage.
And the fact is the lawn was exclusively used by people living in the house.
打官司肯定能赢，应为有最高法院的案例可循。
if you use the land as yard, you at most have an easement, not complete title to build a building.
If you are in PA, maybe that case is helpful, otherwise it means nothing
不是最高法院
http://www.pacourts.us/courts/superior-court/
1。 要有Improvement，剪剪草不算的，至少要种些树，花什么的，或建个停车场。
2。没有Improvement，就要有Fence。
3。你可以Claim Driveway，如果没有Easement的话，因为这是Improvement。但人家可要你付这50年的Property Tax，而且你要从此多付Property Tax。我觉得你的Best Interest是保持现状：你用人家的地，人家给你交税。多好呀！
我的出租房隔壁是6 acres farm land. 地的分界线刚好在driveway （一半？）. 但是我们一直在剪driveway另一边的草地。大概15feet x40 feet.
如果从前owner 开始就一直是这样的，我可以claim adverse possession? how about the driveway?
不知道该怎么证明这个。这房子已经建了50年了。
房子后院的草地是另一家在剪，我们给了easement 允许他们进入我们的草地剪草。因为我们后院大部分是树林，只有与邻居挨着的一长条是草地。
出租房隔壁的越南仔老说一块中间的草地是他的，因为割草时他连着割了。
市府地图上完全可以看出丫的就只有一屁点。
不担心被占，就是长久几十年下去会不会成问题啊？
不可能吧
这是不是就是得寸进尺的例子 。。。哈哈
usually they have to fence it off or build something that cause you not to use it
miwung lawn or driveway is not exclusive use, at least you need fence
and to claim title to adverse possessed land, you have to go to court
YouTube lehto’s law
I think you are wrong here.
at best, you can prove that you own the "easement" on that land, which means, he can't make you to tear down the driveway.
Your dream of somehow having a driveway entitles you to build a garage on that spot is pure fantasy.
This is how legal dispute starts, greedy clients, not greedy lawyers.
设想一个律师，给快兄公司代理了十年事务，快兄突然要抢占邻居地皮，这个律师能不能不顾砸饭碗，告诉快兄不可能？还是绞尽脑汁帮恶霸地主抢别人的地皮？
律师有时候也是保饭碗
五斗米哪能一天两天吃得了，
要靠一碗米救命的时候，嗟来之食不吃，不是君子，是呆子。
http://dirt.umkc.edu/dd98/dd122298.htm
教授的评论也是说最多只应是prescriptive easement
你自己去打官司好了，看看谁会代理你
另一家是farm land是关键。It's very obvious the lawn belong to the house to everyone if not looking at the servey. This indicates exclusive usage.
And the fact is the lawn was exclusively used by people living in the house.
打官司肯定能赢，应为有最高法院的案例可循。
if you use the land as yard, you at most have an easement, not complete title to build a building.
If you are in PA, maybe that case is helpful, otherwise it means nothing
不是最高法院
http://www.pacourts.us/courts/superior-court/
1。 要有Improvement，剪剪草不算的，至少要种些树，花什么的，或建个停车场。
2。没有Improvement，就要有Fence。
3。你可以Claim Driveway，如果没有Easement的话，因为这是Improvement。但人家可要你付这50年的Property Tax，而且你要从此多付Property Tax。我觉得你的Best Interest是保持现状：你用人家的地，人家给你交税。多好呀！