How does the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act protect my financial privacy?
First, the law requires each financial institution to tell its customers about the kinds of information it collects and the types of businesses that may be provided that information. This disclosure, called the privacy notice, is intended to help you decide whether you are comfortable with that information-sharing arrangement. The law went into effect July 1, 2001, and you should have received a privacy notice from any financial institution where you already had an account. Anytime you open a new account with a different financial institution you must be given a copy of the privacy notice at that time. Financial institutions also are required to send a privacy notice to their customers once a year.
Second, the law says that if your financial institution intends to share your information with anyone outside its corporate family, it also must give you the chance to "opt out" or say "no" to information sharing under certain circumstances. Even consumers who are not technically customers of a financial institution-such as former customers or people who unsuccessfully applied for a loan or credit card-will have the right to opt out of information sharing with outside companies.
共和党把政府削减，安插自己不相信政府运作的人进政府，把政府搞乱，然后说，你看政府什么也干不好。
共和党拒绝改善医改，还要砍obamacare的经费，然后说，你看奥巴马医改是个大失败。
共和党现在允许私人公司买卖顾客私人信息，然后说，私人隐私早就不存在了。
英文里面这叫做self fulfilling prophecy。
打个比喻，你自己在家里XX没人管，买卖XX就是违法。
另外说话不要无端夹杂脏字，你妈应该教过你。
我订了comcast，ATT, Verizon, 起码我们之间有合同，我知道我签了什么东西。
他们把我的信息卖给别人，卖给谁，我什么也不知道。
古狗出卖隐私,但没有收你的费用.理论上你可以不用它(实际上比较难)
网络公司是你出钱,选择很少,无法避免.CPN 要另外买. 说来说去,是钱的问题. 不想分享隐私?拿钱来!
隐私不多就放弃保护？好比一个女人被强奸一次就随便和别的男人睡？说不过去啊。
为了爱党，连自己的隐私都不在乎，董存瑞黄继光啊。
比如说可乐多糖，对身体不好。这个问题可能大家都有共识。但是NYC政府要给可乐加税，马上有人跳出来骂。
我们有说只有右派是这样，左派也有这样的。
共勉。
但是起码我们应该认识到微信有他的缺点。
即使我们对丢失隐私无可奈何，反对ISP买卖我们的隐私，起码也应该有个立场。
保护当然好. 但实际上真的没有多少隐私了.
https://privacy.google.com/how-ads-work.html
Google根据你的私人信息给你提供广告，这是google 卖的一个产品。但是你的私人信息从来没有给过别人。第三方广告顾客把自己的目标交给google，google用控制的用户信息发广告。
如果Comcast把你的信息直接交给第三方广告顾客，让他们直接向你推销产品，这个不是一个性质的问题。
某某"偷"了没有罪 (被控,但法庭判定是合理取得),我为什么有罪?
我也想不出更有力的反驳意见.
双重标准是，民主党做A，是偷；共和党做A，不是偷。
双重标准是，民主党做A，是偷；共和党做A，不是偷。 同意!
08医保,民主党都投赞成票,共和党推出08医保.V2, 民主党零票赞成. 也是双重标准.
但是很多人觉得无所谓。、
How does the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act protect my financial privacy?First, the law requires each financial institution to tell its customers about the kinds of information it collects and the types of businesses that may be provided that information. This disclosure, called the privacy notice, is intended to help you decide whether you are comfortable with that information-sharing arrangement. The law went into effect July 1, 2001, and you should have received a privacy notice from any financial institution where you already had an account. Anytime you open a new account with a different financial institution you must be given a copy of the privacy notice at that time. Financial institutions also are required to send a privacy notice to their customers once a year.
Second, the law says that if your financial institution intends to share your information with anyone outside its corporate family, it also must give you the chance to "opt out" or say "no" to information sharing under certain circumstances. Even consumers who are not technically customers of a financial institution-such as former customers or people who unsuccessfully applied for a loan or credit card-will have the right to opt out of information sharing with outside companies.
https://www.fdic.gov/consumers/privacy/yourrights/
身在矮檐下,哪能不低头?