Rankings of doctoral programs in the sciences published in 2022 were based solely on the results of surveys sent to academic officials in fall 2021 and early 2022 in biological sciences, chemistry, computer science, earth sciences, mathematics, physics, statistics and biostatistics.
Questionnaires were sent to the department heads and directors of graduate studies, or equivalent, at each program in each discipline.
五藤总共占1/4,谁说藤CS 差?
越发好了
没受过藤的教育哈
两波ID,不知道是不是一波人。
Rankings of doctoral programs in the sciences published in 2022 were based solely on the results of surveys sent to academic officials in fall 2021 and early 2022 in biological sciences, chemistry, computer science, earth sciences, mathematics, physics, statistics and biostatistics.
Questionnaires were sent to the department heads and directors of graduate studies, or equivalent, at each program in each discipline.
大多数还是选藤除了极少数州大如UCB EECS
因为它纯粹是看research 成绩的,没有human factor。csrankings 前20的藤就只有Cornell,Columbia 和 Penn。我觉得可以综合的来看,USnews + CSRANKING, 最好两个排名都在Top 20.
毕竟学费差很多呢
藤的教授不比top4 的质量差,是少而已。要是per capital 一下,藤或许比top 4 强,CS里面里很多细分的专业,藤可以入top 4
比如AI 近几年cs rankings的排名,康仅次于cmu 排第二,现在是AI的天下,干嘛在乎总排名啊,什么system,who cares
不过有H P的offer,肯定不去eecs
气死我了
我们这儿就有这样的,考虑学费地点等问题,没人说藤校不好哈
不可能天下人石板一块。
不过,为了十几万的差价不值得,藤的教育和这些公立很不一样
毕竟CS主要还是靠本事吃饭,如果文科金融经济之类的必须藤校啊
就是某个档次的文章数量,两个排名相差不大
把金牌等同于铜牌
藤的fringe benefits 是非常重要的。
但system 好不好对大部分做aI的人几乎没用吧。 compiler都没几个学校是必修了吧。
eventually 每个人都有自己的标准
https://drafty.cs.brown.edu/csopenrankings/
如果再去掉placement rank (graduate faculty index), 得到的就是纯科研排名。藤校排名会大幅下降,州大排名大幅提升。