我28年投资经验的总结:我遵循的投资第一性原则,为儿子女儿还写了英文版

l
lionhill
楼主 (文学峸)

我遵循的投资第一性原则 
1. 价值创造是核心:投资于长期创造价值的企业
第一性原则:企业的价值来源于其为客户、行业或社会解决核心问题的能力。投资应聚焦于那些通过产品、服务或技术,持续创造真实价值的公司。
只买第一解读:优先选择在行业中占据主导地位、拥有独特竞争优势(护城河)的公司。例如,苹果(Apple)因其生态系统和品牌忠诚度在智能手机领域长期领先,而非第二梯队的竞争者。
应用:
评估企业的核心竞争力(如技术专利、品牌效应、规模经济)。
选择那些在细分市场中排名第一或拥有无可替代优势的公司(如 NVIDIA 在 AI 芯片领域的领先地位)。
避免跟随市场炒作,忽视基本面(如仅因股价波动追逐第二梯队公司)。
2. 长期主义优于短期波动
第一性原则:财富增长来自时间的复利效应,而非短期市场情绪。企业的内在价值(盈利能力、现金流)最终决定回报。
只买第一解读:选择那些长期稳健、能在经济周期中持续增长的行业领导者。例如,亚马逊(Amazon)通过长期投资云计算(AWS)和物流,超越短期亏损,成为行业第一。
应用:
关注企业的长期战略(如研发投入、客户留存率)而非季度财报波动。
投资于具有高确定性增长的行业(如 AI、清洁能源)中的龙头企业。
避免因短期市场恐慌或热潮而频繁交易。
3. 风险与回报的本质平衡
第一性原则:任何投资的回报都与承担的风险成正比,但风险可以通过深入研究和分散化管理。真正的投资机会是那些风险被市场低估、回报潜力高的标的。
只买第一解读:行业第一的公司通常有更强的抗风险能力(如更稳定的现金流、更低的破产概率)。例如,Netflix 在流媒体行业因其内容和用户规模,抗风险能力强于小众竞争者。
应用:
评估企业的财务健康(债务比率、自由现金流)。
优先选择在经济下行周期中仍能保持市场份额的龙头企业。
避免高风险的第二梯队公司,除非其估值极低且有明确翻转潜力。
4. 信息不对称是机会来源
第一性原则:市场并非完全有效,深入研究和独立思考可以发现被低估的机会。投资者的优势在于理解企业或行业的真实价值。
只买第一解读:行业第一的公司通常被市场高度关注,信息透明,但其长期价值可能被短期噪音掩盖。深入分析(如管理层质量、行业趋势)可挖掘隐藏机会。
应用:
研究行业第一公司的核心驱动因素(如 Tesla 的电池技术优势)。
关注被市场误解的龙头企业(如 2020 年疫情初期,Disney 因主题公园关闭被低估,但流媒体业务 Disney+ 推动其反弹)。
避免盲目追随市场情绪或第二梯队公司的短期题材。
5. 护城河决定持续性
第一性原则:企业的长期成功取决于其护城河(竞争壁垒),如品牌、网络效应、成本优势或技术壁垒。
只买第一解读:行业第一的公司往往拥有最强的护城河。例如,Google 在搜索引擎市场的网络效应(用户数据积累)使其难以被取代,而第二名如 Bing 难以撼动其地位。
应用:
识别企业的护城河类型(如 Apple 的生态系统、Coca-Cola 的品牌)。
优先投资于护城河不断加深的龙头公司,而非易被颠覆的第二名。
定期评估护城河是否被削弱(如技术变革、监管风险)。
6. 时间是最好的过滤器
第一性原则:时间会放大优秀企业的价值,同时暴露平庸企业的缺陷。短期投机可能带来收益,但长期投资于高质量企业更可靠。
只买第一解读:选择那些在过去 10-20 年持续证明自己是行业第一的企业,如 Microsoft 通过云计算转型重回巅峰,而非昙花一现的第二名。
应用:
回顾企业的历史表现(收入增长、盈利能力、市场份额)。
投资于那些在多个经济周期中保持领先的公司。
避免短期热门但缺乏长期竞争力的公司。
7. 心理纪律决定成败
第一性原则:投资的成功不仅取决于分析,还取决于控制情绪和坚持纪律。市场情绪(恐惧或贪婪)常导致错误决策。
只买第一解读:专注于行业第一可以减少情绪波动,因为龙头企业通常更稳定,投资者更易坚持长期持有。
应用:
制定明确的买入/卖出规则(如估值上限、止损线)。
定期复盘投资决策,减少情绪驱动的交易。
避免追逐第二名公司的高波动题材(如 meme 股票)。

The Foundational Principles of My Investing Approach Part One:
 * Value Creation is Core: Invest in Businesses That Create Long-Term Value
   First Principle: A company's value comes from its ability to solve fundamental problems for its customers, industry, or society. Investments should focus on companies that consistently create real value through their products, services, or technology.
   "Buy Only the First" Interpretation: Prioritize companies that are dominant in their industries and possess unique competitive advantages (moats). For example, Apple has long led the smartphone market due to its ecosystem and brand loyalty, unlike its second-tier competitors.
   Application:
   * Evaluate a company's core competencies, such as technological patents, brand influence, or economies of scale.
   * Choose companies that are either number one in a niche market or have an irreplaceable advantage (e.g., NVIDIA's leadership in AI chips).
   * Avoid chasing market fads and ignoring fundamentals (e.g., pursuing a second-tier company based solely on stock price fluctuations).
 * Long-Term Horizon Trumps Short-Term Volatility
   First Principle: Wealth growth comes from the compounding effect of time, not from short-term market sentiment. A company's intrinsic value—its profitability and cash flow—is what ultimately determines returns.
   "Buy Only the First" Interpretation: Choose industry leaders that are stable and can grow consistently through economic cycles. For example, Amazon became an industry leader by making long-term investments in cloud computing (AWS) and logistics, looking past short-term losses.
   Application:
   * Focus on a company's long-term strategy (e.g., R&D spending, customer retention) rather than quarterly earnings fluctuations.
   * Invest in market leaders within industries with high certainty of long-term growth, such as AI or clean energy.
   * Avoid frequent trading driven by short-term market panic or euphoria.
 * The Essential Balance of Risk and Reward
   First Principle: The return on any investment is proportional to the risk taken, but risk can be managed through in-depth research and diversification. True investment opportunities are those where risk is undervalued by the market and the potential for high returns is strong.
   "Buy Only the First" Interpretation: Number one companies typically have greater resilience to risk (e.g., more stable cash flow, lower probability of bankruptcy). For instance, due to its content and user base, Netflix has a stronger ability to withstand risk in the streaming industry than its niche competitors.
   Application:
   * Evaluate a company's financial health (debt ratios, free cash flow).
   * Prioritize market leaders that can maintain market share even during economic downturns.
   * Avoid high-risk, second-tier companies unless their valuation is extremely low and they have clear potential for a turnaround.

The Foundational Principles of My Investing Approach Part Two:
* Information Asymmetry as a Source of Opportunity
   First Principle: The market is not perfectly efficient; deep research and independent thinking can uncover undervalued opportunities. An investor's edge lies in understanding the true value of a business or an industry.
   "Buy Only the First" Interpretation: Industry-leading companies are usually under close market scrutiny, and information is transparent, but their long-term value can be obscured by short-term noise. In-depth analysis can uncover hidden opportunities.
   Application:
   * Study the core drivers of leading companies (e.g., Tesla's battery technology advantage).
   * Focus on leading companies that the market may misunderstand.
   * Avoid blindly following market sentiment or the short-term stories of second-tier companies.
 * A Moat Determines Sustainability
   First Principle: A company's long-term success depends on its moat, or competitive barrier, such as its brand, network effect, cost advantage, or technological barrier.
   "Buy Only the First" Interpretation: Number one companies often possess the strongest moats. For example, Google's network effect in the search engine market (user data accumulation) makes it difficult to replace.
   Application:
   * Identify the type of moat a company has (e.g., Apple's ecosystem)
   * Prioritize investing in leading companies whose moats are continuously deepening, rather than second-place firms that are easily disrupted.
   * Periodically assess whether a moat is being weakened by technological change, regulatory risk, or other factors.
 * Time is the Best Filter
   First Principle: Time amplifies the value of great companies and exposes the flaws of mediocre ones. While short-term speculation may bring gains, investing in high-quality companies for the long term is more reliable.
   "Buy Only the First" Interpretation: Choose companies that have consistently proven to be number one over the past 10-20 years.
   Application:
   * Review a company's historical performance (revenue growth, profitability, market share).
   * Invest in companies that have maintained their leadership through multiple economic cycles.
   * Avoid short-term hot stocks that lack long-term competitiveness.
 * Psychological Discipline Determines Success or Failure
   First Principle: Investment success depends not only on analysis but also on controlling emotions and sticking to a disciplined plan. Market sentiment (fear or greed) often leads to poor decisions.
   "Buy Only the First" Interpretation: Focusing on industry leaders can reduce emotional volatility because they are typically more stable, making it easier for investors to hold them for the long term.
   Application:
   * Establish clear rules for buying and selling.
   * Regularly review investment decisions to reduce emotionally driven trading.
   * Avoid chasing the high-volatility stories of second-place companies.

 

零起点
感恩分享,字字珠玑
穆丹之乡
感谢分享,非常值得学习
p
parentb
写得很好,但是,你不断增持数字货币和相关股票是不是投资理念有某些变化?
l
lionhill
没有变化,digital currency因风险大一般人不接受没有纳入讨论
l
lionhill
而且crypto 相关投资没有超过我股票资产5%,但会逐渐超过这个比例
凊荷
赞!

佩服能始终如一坚持学习的人!

 

0
007爸爸
感谢分享,有时候一些机构投资者

如果看好某个行业,会同时买这个行业的前几名公司股票,这种策略您怎么看?

l
lionhill
我不会这么做,说明研究不够深入怕自己看走眼,但也有例外我专门写过为什么持有AVGO,看我博客
l
lionhill
早期看不清楚时可以选择等待不像PE同一赛道压注多家公司
6
6degrees
投资时间越长是不是越不敢向别人提建议了?因为看多了,明白人算不如天算。

有几个问题:

INTC不曾经是最具垄断性的长期创造价值的企业?

Apple还能长期领先吗?

Nvidia现在拥有无可替代优势的公司,CISCO也曾经是;

2000年,什么风险深入研究和管理也没有能避免大面积投资损失;

今年四月以来的信息不对称,让华尔街远远落后了,被誉为华尔街投资圣贤的Jamie Dimon、Bond King Jeffrey Gundlach、桥水Dalio都一直在唱衰,信誓旦旦地告诉大家大难临头了;

。。。

 

真不敢给孩子们建议了。听天由命吧。

 

l
lionhill
没有任何公司能永远常青,所以需要conatantly evaluate. Cisco和Intel的例子不能作为现在不投
l
lionhill
NVDA和Apple的理由,我观察你的思维过于谨小慎微,反复读读亮线这段话

在股市里,风险都是无法回避的。但正是因为有风险、有不确定性,我们才会更加珍惜那些小小的确定和安稳。与其追求一个不存在的“无风险”,不如学会在风险中享受,在波动中发现价值。股市的险,让收益更真。

6
6degrees
金融世界千变万化,唯一不变的是人性。
6
6degrees
我的铁律是不投个股,所以只专注和QQQ有关的,也无法摆脱NVIDIA、Apple。最近手痒试水了CRCL,需要及时纠正。

在风险中享受?汗颜呀,应该是没经历过或是忘了2000年,那叫生不如死,哪里有什么享受可言?

l
lionhill
找到适合你自己的就好包括考虑risk tolerance,各人目标不一样
l
lionhill
人性可以用理性control
6
6degrees
希望如此

巴菲特几百billions搁置一边很多年了,要显示股神的神算和预见,最近在股市高点买入UNH。。。

听天由命吧。我觉得猛牛有一句话说的挺到位,股市靠运气。2000年全世界唯一运气好的是Mark Cuban,也可能还有别人?我不得而知。

t
tom_high
应该置顶一下
天意悠悠
我可以理解你,相信很多人跟你的想法一致:-)

我是在疫情的时候乘着大跌(和在家工作省了通勤的时间)买入了一些个股(还玩了一下AMC这种meme股票,乘乱赚了点小钱),后来也大多都卖掉了换成了QQQ,毕竟对我们才四十来岁的双职工来说大部分时间还是得花在本职工作上。我们现在只有五个个股(Nvidia, apple, Tesla, SPG, TSM),而且量不大(所以也错过了靠nvidia暴富的机会)。虚拟货币我也是五年前就开始关注了,但一直到今年年初才开始买入,量也很小。不过我打算开始定投虚拟货币(用的是可以忘记的钱)。

l
lionhill
和选大学一样适合每个人的就是最好的选择
天意悠悠
所以投资也是“一命二运三风水” :-)
成功的兔
是,握手
天意悠悠
是的,我认为投资跟养娃一样“因人而异”

最怕的是盲目的想去copy别人的成功模式。还是要像狮山兄一样独立思考研究,然后审视自己的内心(包括恐惧和贪婪的欲望)再做出适合自己的决定

l
lionhill
不要太相信天意,个人努力还是有作用,俗话说你不理财,财不理你
我是一只井底蛙
想不赚钱都难。
我是一只井底蛙
大多数人输给人性。谁战胜了自我,理性control,战胜了人性,谁就是赢家。
天意悠悠
小富当然要理财,想大富才要靠天意(运气) :-)

过去若干年我们基本都是all in股市的状态。但我个人不会期望能“一夜暴富"

l
lionhill
是的,任何人都不要期望一夜暴富,财不进急门
浪迹天涯_YBG
感恩分享价值投资理念!
文心兰1
感恩分享!
x
xuanwater812
非常感谢, 认真读每个字
*
*江南雨*
谢谢,谢谢! 想得非常周到,幸亏有英文,也分享给孩子了。