The document referenced in the article isn't a treaty. It is a report on urban consumption released by a global network of climate-focused mayors. It is not a binding agreement, nor is it linked to the WEF.
Report is not a treaty
The article focuses on a 2019 document from C40, a network of mayors of large cities focused on fighting climate change. It includes information on the impact of zeroing out meat and dairy consumption, ending private car ownership, reducing the frequency of short-haul flights and limiting purchases of new clothing.
But the report is not any kind of agreement, nor is it connected to the WEF.
"The report is an analysis of consumption-based emissions in C40 cities, not a plan for cities to adopt, let alone a legally binding treaty," said Rolf Rosenkranz, a C40 spokesman. "It's up to individuals to make their personal lifestyle choices, including what type of food to eat and what type of clothing they prefer."
The document referenced in the article isn't a treaty. It is a report on urban consumption released by a global network of climate-focused mayors. It is not a binding agreement, nor is it linked to the WEF.
Report is not a treaty
The article focuses on a 2019 document from C40, a network of mayors of large cities focused on fighting climate change. It includes information on the impact of zeroing out meat and dairy consumption, ending private car ownership, reducing the frequency of short-haul flights and limiting purchases of new clothing.
But the report is not any kind of agreement, nor is it connected to the WEF.
＂The report is an analysis of consumption-based emissions in C40 cities, not a plan for cities to adopt, let alone a legally binding treaty," said Rolf Rosenkranz, a C40 spokesman. "It's up to individuals to make their personal lifestyle choices, including what type of food to eat and what type of clothing they prefer."
"The report is an analysis of consumption-based emissions in C40 cities -- not a plan for cities to adopt, let alone a legally binding treaty," a C40 spokesperson said in an August 29 email. "It's up to individuals to make their personal lifestyle choices, including what type of food to eat and what type of clothing they prefer."
油价涨完了，电价估计接着涨。美国十四座城市已经签署了一个世界经济论坛协议：2030年之前禁用所有私家车。这十四座城市是：奥斯汀，波士顿，芝加哥，休斯顿，洛杉矶，旧金山，迈阿密，新奥尔良，纽约，费城，凤凰城，波特兰，华盛顿特区，西雅图。具体内容可以去看相关英文媒体报道。
买比亚迪 还不如买 蔚来？买蔚来汽车 品冤种人生不是
啥意思禁用私家车？全民巴士地铁？
只能用公共交通工具。
不像是真的。能给个英文版新闻的链子吗
自己去查查看。
Our rating: False
The document referenced in the article isn't a treaty. It is a report on urban consumption released by a global network of climate-focused mayors. It is not a binding agreement, nor is it linked to the WEF.
Report is not a treaty
The article focuses on a 2019 document from C40, a network of mayors of large cities focused on fighting climate change. It includes information on the impact of zeroing out meat and dairy consumption, ending private car ownership, reducing the frequency of short-haul flights and limiting purchases of new clothing.
But the report is not any kind of agreement, nor is it connected to the WEF.
"The report is an analysis of consumption-based emissions in C40 cities, not a plan for cities to adopt, let alone a legally binding treaty," said Rolf Rosenkranz, a C40 spokesman. "It's up to individuals to make their personal lifestyle choices, including what type of food to eat and what type of clothing they prefer."
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2023/08/29/post-invents-treaty-banning-meat-dairy-in-certain-cities-fact-check/70668288007/
只是報告不是法律
只是報告不是法律
The document referenced in the article isn't a treaty. It is a report on urban consumption released by a global network of climate-focused mayors. It is not a binding agreement, nor is it linked to the WEF.
Report is not a treaty
The article focuses on a 2019 document from C40, a network of mayors of large cities focused on fighting climate change. It includes information on the impact of zeroing out meat and dairy consumption, ending private car ownership, reducing the frequency of short-haul flights and limiting purchases of new clothing.
But the report is not any kind of agreement, nor is it connected to the WEF.
＂The report is an analysis of consumption-based emissions in C40 cities, not a plan for cities to adopt, let alone a legally binding treaty," said Rolf Rosenkranz, a C40 spokesman. "It's up to individuals to make their personal lifestyle choices, including what type of food to eat and what type of clothing they prefer."
只是報告不是法律
一看就不真實，為了減碳禁肉 乳製品 私家車
全民吃菜，喝牛奶也犯法
这种事情可能是法律吗？并不是报告，而是协议。
不真实？你继续岁月静好吧。到时候别傻眼就好。
有記者都fact check 了，你還要相信這些假新聞是你自己的事
你說的那些城市都否認，你還要相信笑死人了
"The report is an analysis of consumption-based emissions in C40 cities -- not a plan for cities to adopt, let alone a legally binding treaty," a C40 spokesperson said in an August 29 email. "It's up to individuals to make their personal lifestyle choices, including what type of food to eat and what type of clothing they prefer."
你說的那些城市自己都否認了，你還要相信笑死人了
谁笑谁还不知道呢，到2030年看吧。恐怕还到不了2030年。
这个计划是有钱人私底下赞助各个城市的计划，他们公开场合不承认也正常。估计是怕韭菜觉醒的太快。今年纽约市长亚当斯就已经宣布设定该市监狱和学校的肉和奶制品供应上限了。就和药厂的人怎么敢公开抨击疫苗是一个道理。
图片:
你慢慢看你的假新聞吧davidboxer
亞當斯還能做多久市長？一個城市的政策是今天說明天做的都不用經過議會的你說的上限的的Z*F公告在哪裡？不是什麼個人呼籲，是Z*F的官方公告有嗎？davidboxer
假不假不是你说了算。一个市长是不会做多久，但是换下一个市长还是换汤不换药，因为政治背后的利益集团从来没有换过。这些市长不过只是利益集团所掌控的玩偶。现任纽约市长说没说过这些你自己不会查啊？
一個城市的政策是今天說明天做的都不用經過議會的你說的上限的的Z*F公告在哪裡？不是什麼個人呼籲，是Z*F的官方公告有嗎？davidboxer
我查了，沒有Z*F官方公告，你說有就拿出來呀
不是啥可信的媒体，也没有执行力。其实我是盼着它是真的，那时候民主党就该被扫进垃圾堆了
那个叫什么事实核查中心的说的就是真相？某党还说为人民服务呢。他叫事实核查，说的就是事实？Z*F正式公告？公告不公告的不是重点，重点是具体Z*F有没有做这件事情。纽约具体有没有消减学校和监狱的肉类食品数量才是重点。Z*F做的恶多了去了，能让百姓知道？那个事实核查中心的机构很多时候恰恰是说假话连眼都不眨的货色。这个机构估计就是主流媒体办的。没有分辨能力的看他起的这个名字就上当了。匿名是这个论坛给我的权力，我想匿就匿，我叫什么名字关你什么事情？
可信不可信是你自己的问题，真相不会随着你相信什么而改变。现在苏格兰都已经开始具体实施这项计划了。
David 现在纽约开始限肉不给吃肉吗？
你别在这搅浑水，人家说的明明是限制学校和监狱的肉类食品配额数量。可没说是限制全纽约人不吃肉。完全不吃肉那是2030的目标。
怎么个实施法？2024全面禁止私家车？
苏格兰Z*F规定：2023年路面上的所有车辆行驶总里程数减少20%。政策不会一步到位，那会激起剧烈反抗，一步步温水煮青蛙，过不了几年就能渐进式实现禁止私家车的目的。Z*F想要干这些事手段多了去了，比如高速路每mile收费3元钱，还有几个敢开出来的？还包括涨油价，涨电价，城市中心区域几乎不设停车位，等等什么手段都可以用。
限制学校和监狱的肉类的政策文件在那里？
纽约学校周一周五无肉日，但亦只是增加选择，美国农业部指南规定，必须为学生提供牛奶，但学生可自由选择是否饮用
每周无肉日不就是限制吗？参加无肉日计划的公立学校当天不会准备肉食餐点给学生。我说的是肉类，我可从来没提牛奶。
David 你不会以为学校有什么鸡腿牛排吧
无肉日只是用Vegetarian Taco 豆类代替pizza 和macaroni
限制学校和监狱的肉类的政策文件在那里
人家实际把肉食消费量限制下来就行，为什么一定要文件？有文件不执行还不是废纸一张？每周两天公立学校的无肉日能实际减少多少肉类的消耗？纽约市长说限制就是限制了，出台的无肉日计划就是限制。不限制，为什么出台这个计划？学校没有鸡腿牛排。汉堡，三明治，披萨这种的美式快餐能没有？这些餐点里面大部分都有肉不是事实？你以为我没有吃过美国学校食堂的饭菜？
David 没政策文件就是癈话
pizza 和macaroni 有多少肉
和你这种故意搞事的人无话可说。来故意找茬的就直说。和你这种人再争论下去是我犯贱。
David 就是犯贱
纽约曼哈顿倒是很快要收拥堵费了，但是离禁止私家车还差得远
我说现在了吗？那个计划是2030年要实现的计划，没说是现在。
我说现在了吗（包括拥堵费）？我也是在展望
这个倒是宣布了，但LZ扯到了私家车
反正现在除了官方，其它的都是有真有假，难以分辨
只能等官方消息啊，现在到处那些自媒体有啥信誉
都不想看新闻了
确实现在那些所谓的主媒都没法看