“That is because the United States economy is already running near its full productive capacity, meaning it would not be able to produce enough new goods to meet Chinese demands, especially in the short term.
In that scenario, the United States would probably stop selling airplanes, soybeans and other major exports to other countries and sell them to China instead — shrinking the United States trade deficit with China but leaving the United States trade deficit with the entire world unchanged.”
【 在 dangding2013 (xiaodao) 的大作中提到: 】 : https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/17/us/politics/china-trade-trump- concessions : .html? : “That is because the United States economy is already running near its full : productive capacity, meaning it would not be able to produce enough new : goods to meet Chinese demands, especially in the short term. : In that scenario, the United States would probably stop selling airplanes, : soybeans and other major exports to other countries and sell them to China : instead — shrinking the United States trade deficit with China but leaving : the United States trade deficit with the entire world unchanged.” : WSJ 同样报道了 : ...................
【 在 dangding2013 (xiaodao) 的大作中提到: 】 : https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/17/us/politics/china-trade-trump- concessions : .html? : “That is because the United States economy is already running near its full : productive capacity, meaning it would not be able to produce enough new : goods to meet Chinese demands, especially in the short term. : In that scenario, the United States would probably stop selling airplanes, : soybeans and other major exports to other countries and sell them to China : instead — shrinking the United States trade deficit with China but leaving : the United States trade deficit with the entire world unchanged.” : WSJ 同样报道了 : ...................
【 在 dangding2013 (xiaodao) 的大作中提到: 】 : https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/17/us/politics/china-trade-trump- concessions : .html? : “That is because the United States economy is already running near its full : productive capacity, meaning it would not be able to produce enough new : goods to meet Chinese demands, especially in the short term. : In that scenario, the United States would probably stop selling airplanes, : soybeans and other major exports to other countries and sell them to China : instead — shrinking the United States trade deficit with China but leaving : the United States trade deficit with the entire world unchanged.” : WSJ 同样报道了 : ...................
【 在 dangding2013 (xiaodao) 的大作中提到: 】 : https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/17/us/politics/china-trade-trump- concessions : .html? : “That is because the United States economy is already running near its full : productive capacity, meaning it would not be able to produce enough new : goods to meet Chinese demands, especially in the short term. : In that scenario, the United States would probably stop selling airplanes, : soybeans and other major exports to other countries and sell them to China : instead — shrinking the United States trade deficit with China but leaving : the United States trade deficit with the entire world unchanged.” : WSJ 同样报道了 : ...................
【 在 dangding2013 (xiaodao) 的大作中提到: 】 : https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/17/us/politics/china-trade-trump- concessions : .html? : “That is because the United States economy is already running near its full : productive capacity, meaning it would not be able to produce enough new : goods to meet Chinese demands, especially in the short term. : In that scenario, the United States would probably stop selling airplanes, : soybeans and other major exports to other countries and sell them to China : instead — shrinking the United States trade deficit with China but leaving : the United States trade deficit with the entire world unchanged.” : WSJ 同样报道了 : ...................
【 在 dangding2013 (xiaodao) 的大作中提到: 】 : https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/17/us/politics/china-trade-trump- concessions : .html? : “That is because the United States economy is already running near its full : productive capacity, meaning it would not be able to produce enough new : goods to meet Chinese demands, especially in the short term. : In that scenario, the United States would probably stop selling airplanes, : soybeans and other major exports to other countries and sell them to China : instead — shrinking the United States trade deficit with China but leaving : the United States trade deficit with the entire world unchanged.” : WSJ 同样报道了 : ...................
【 在 Roshou16 () 的大作中提到: 】 : “That is because the United States economy is already running near its full : productive capacity”这记者水平,应该弄个金白眼奖。 : 有资本家在,有利润在,产能永远不是问题。“大豆优先供应中国”,更是扯淡。最后 : 买卖成交还是市场行为。美国政府还真能跟农场主说“为了搬回贸易逆差,你今年豆子 : 都卖给中国,别人出多少钱你不许卖,政治任务哈”?当然是谁价高卖谁去,明年多种 : 啦。 : 关键是,中国这是subscription还是buy one time. : concessions : full : leaving
【 在 dangding2013 (xiaodao) 的大作中提到: 】 : https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/17/us/politics/china-trade-trump- concessions : .html? : “That is because the United States economy is already running near its full : productive capacity, meaning it would not be able to produce enough new : goods to meet Chinese demands, especially in the short term. : In that scenario, the United States would probably stop selling airplanes, : soybeans and other major exports to other countries and sell them to China : instead — shrinking the United States trade deficit with China but leaving : the United States trade deficit with the entire world unchanged.” : WSJ 同样报道了 : ...................
川普大概认为还是直接送现金省事 【 在 dangding2013 (xiaodao) 的大作中提到: 】 : https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/17/us/politics/china-trade-trump- concessions : .html? : “That is because the United States economy is already running near its full : productive capacity, meaning it would not be able to produce enough new : goods to meet Chinese demands, especially in the short term. : In that scenario, the United States would probably stop selling airplanes, : soybeans and other major exports to other countries and sell them to China : instead — shrinking the United States trade deficit with China but leaving : the United States trade deficit with the entire world unchanged.” : WSJ 同样报道了 : ...................
这个办法是: 中国先给钱, 美国用这些钱在Alaska, Texas and Louisiana建设基础 设施生产液化天然气和石油, 然后再用天然气和石油还中国贷款。
Buying and paying up front for U.S. energy, then, amounts to little more than changing the mix of assets in its portfolio.
From the U.S. perspective, selling natural resources is less desirable than selling manufactured products. But by doing so, Trump could credibly claim to cut the bilateral trade deficit by more than half. Moreover, these contracts would allow American companies to secure loans to build oil and gas infrastructure whose construction would employ tens of thousands of American workers.
While this proposal may sound far-fetched, Governor Bill Walker of Alaska isalready seeking Chinese financing for a $43-billion deal to export LNG, and the Alaska Gasline Development Corp. has almost completed negotiations with its Chinese counterparts. The Chinese oil conglomerate Sinopec has also proposed a $7-billion, 700-mile pipeline from the Permian Basin shale oil field in western Texas to the Gulf, another effort the package could include .
“That is because the United States economy is already running near its full productive capacity, meaning it would not be able to produce enough new
goods to meet Chinese demands, especially in the short term.
In that scenario, the United States would probably stop selling airplanes,
soybeans and other major exports to other countries and sell them to China
instead — shrinking the United States trade deficit with China but leaving the United States trade deficit with the entire world unchanged.”
WSJ 同样报道了https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-farms-factories-cant-produce-enough-to-meet-white-house-goal-to-cut-china-deficit-1526558401?mod=article_inline
U.S. Farms, Factories Can’t Produce Enough to Meet White House Goal to Cut China Deficit
中国需要的多了:高品质无激素的牛羊猪肉,粮食,石油,铁矿,木材,甚至煤。与其培养amazon这样的二道贩子,不如发展这些资源,种植和养殖业。
毕业后, 美帝一概不留, 全滚蛋!
但是, 出关时, 必须交培养费: 每人10万 - 4年的奖学金都不到, 不多吧?
,中美逆差小了, 美帝总逆差还是不变。
中国其实很想买美帝液化天然气, 2017年的购买量超过了2016年 7倍。 无奈美帝生产能力有限,新的产能还要2019才能出来。 现在美帝失业率很低,工厂招不到人, 也是没办法
【 在 dangding2013 (xiaodao) 的大作中提到: 】
: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/17/us/politics/china-trade-trump-
concessions
: .html?
: “That is because the United States economy is already running near its
full
: productive capacity, meaning it would not be able to produce enough new
: goods to meet Chinese demands, especially in the short term.
: In that scenario, the United States would probably stop selling airplanes,
: soybeans and other major exports to other countries and sell them to China
: instead — shrinking the United States trade deficit with China but
leaving
: the United States trade deficit with the entire world unchanged.”
: WSJ 同样报道了
: ...................
接近40%的劳动年龄人口无业 大部分是龙虾党
【在 dangding2013(xiaodao)的大作中提到:】
:上面报道讲了, 美帝企业已经是全力生产了, 卖给了中国, 就不能卖给其它国家了
:,中美逆差小了, 美帝总逆差还是不变。
【 在 dangding2013 (xiaodao) 的大作中提到: 】
: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/17/us/politics/china-trade-trump-
concessions
: .html?
: “That is because the United States economy is already running near its
full
: productive capacity, meaning it would not be able to produce enough new
: goods to meet Chinese demands, especially in the short term.
: In that scenario, the United States would probably stop selling airplanes,
: soybeans and other major exports to other countries and sell them to China
: instead — shrinking the United States trade deficit with China but
leaving
: the United States trade deficit with the entire world unchanged.”
: WSJ 同样报道了
: ...................
都退休了,
历史最高峰也不过是67%, 现在是62%。 比历史上很多时期强,1960年前都低于60%
【 在 attain79 (蒙古国海军司令) 的大作中提到: 】
: 失业率是骗人的 美国现在employment population ratio 60%
: 接近40%的劳动年龄人口无业 大部分是龙虾党
: :上面报道讲了, 美帝企业已经是全力生产了, 卖给了中国, 就不能卖给其它国
家了
: :,中美逆差小了, 美帝总逆差还是不变。
【 在 dangding2013 (xiaodao) 的大作中提到: 】
: 上面报道讲了, 美帝企业已经是全力生产了, 卖给了中国, 就不能卖给其它国家了
: ,中美逆差小了, 美帝总逆差还是不变。
: 中国其实很想买美帝液化天然气, 2017年的购买量超过了2016年 7倍。 无奈美帝生产
: 能力有限,新的产能还要2019才能出来。 现在美帝失业率很低,工厂招不到人, 也是
: 没办法
: 楼上几个的英语水平太无语了,都是政屁出生么?写的明明白白,不是没东西可以卖,
: 而是生产不过来,生产量就这么大。如果要卖给中国,就得给其他国家减产满足各方面
: 需要。
哈哈 我也想说的
一旦有土鳖很稳靠的大单,开采天然气scale up应该是很快的
美帝消费多(浪费也多),生产忙不过来。
局部某些铁锈带的人找不到工作, 其实全国范围内,工作机会多的是, 比如现在卡车司机严重短缺(年薪10万),
【 在 acrofred (acrofred) 的大作中提到: 】
: 有多少生产力是因为供求关系被压制住的?
: 一旦有土鳖很稳靠的大单,开采天然气scale up应该是很快的
也没有那个动力
白拿钱多好
【 在 dangding2013 (xiaodao) 的大作中提到: 】
: 美帝的贸易赤字看来是结构性的。
: 美帝消费多(浪费也多),生产忙不过来。
: 局部某些铁锈带的人找不到工作, 其实全国范围内,工作机会多的是, 比如现在卡车
: 司机严重短缺(年薪10万),
【 在 dangding2013 (xiaodao) 的大作中提到: 】
: 美帝的贸易赤字看来是结构性的。
: 美帝消费多(浪费也多),生产忙不过来。
: 局部某些铁锈带的人找不到工作, 其实全国范围内,工作机会多的是, 比如现在卡车
: 司机严重短缺(年薪10万),
【 在 dangding2013 (xiaodao) 的大作中提到: 】
: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/17/us/politics/china-trade-trump-
concessions
: .html?
: “That is because the United States economy is already running near its
full
: productive capacity, meaning it would not be able to produce enough new
: goods to meet Chinese demands, especially in the short term.
: In that scenario, the United States would probably stop selling airplanes,
: soybeans and other major exports to other countries and sell them to China
: instead — shrinking the United States trade deficit with China but
leaving
: the United States trade deficit with the entire world unchanged.”
: WSJ 同样报道了
: ...................
这个贸易赤字要砍下去,唯一的办法就是改算法, 高通的芯片,德州仪器的芯片在台
积电生产,卖去了中国大陆, 就算成了台湾出口的, 其实产权,利润都是美国的。这个不算成美国的出口,完全说不过去。
【 在 acrofred (acrofred) 的大作中提到: 】
: 有多少生产力是因为供求关系被压制住的?
: 一旦有土鳖很稳靠的大单,开采天然气scale up应该是很快的
老实实要么农产品,要么自然资源,不要靠忽悠赚别人的钱。总好意思提FB,GOOG,你
还不如直接让兔子上供现金多好。
【 在 skybluewei (weilan) 的大作中提到: 】
: 别鸡巴逗了,FB,GOOGL买点儿广告,几百亿就出来了,问题是不让啊。
这些每年贸易量可以到4000亿美元,分分钟可以解决贸易问题,川普为啥不卖啊?
【 在 GiantHawk (GiantHawk) 的大作中提到: 】
: 美国可以卖大量武器军火给中国,像航母,战舰,战机,发动机,芯片。。。
: 这些每年贸易量可以到4000亿美元,分分钟可以解决贸易问题,川普为啥不卖啊?
2000刀一个,我先预订三
少买就没有逆差了。美国人能少买么?
但凡上过班的人都知道,这边孙子一天干的活儿,任何一个华人最多仨小时干完还得兼顾买买提灌水
养着这群懒猪美国不完蛋都难
【 在 skybluewei (weilan) 的大作中提到: 】
: 别鸡巴逗了,FB,GOOGL买点儿广告,几百亿就出来了,问题是不让啊。
生产不出来没关系,生产线投资在中国开厂,保证航母F35立马产能过剩,多的没人要。
【 在 dangding2013 (xiaodao) 的大作中提到: 】
: 就算肯卖,也生产不出来,航母自己还不够用, 飞机全世界都在排队,抢个F35很难很难
: 失业率是骗人的 美国现在employment population ratio 60%
: 接近40%的劳动年龄人口无业 大部分是龙虾党
: :上面报道讲了, 美帝企业已经是全力生产了, 卖给了中国, 就不能卖给其它国
家了
: :,中美逆差小了, 美帝总逆差还是不变。
自己不愿意出来干活就没治了。物流这块是看衰美帝劳动力潜力的,工人很难找啊。
business的regulation可不是无的放矢。美帝自身有足够产能,当年对日本太平洋战争,前期3艘对日本联合舰队6艘航母被搞得很狼狈,后来进入战时状态,战争后期航母下饺子,130多艘各类航母对日本联合舰队8-9艘航母各种蹂躏。但是现在时代不同了,各种regulation就搞得那些产能无法实现出来。
【 在 GiantHawk (GiantHawk) 的大作中提到: 】
: 美国11艘航母,7艘直升机航母还不够用?
: 生产不出来没关系,生产线投资在中国开厂,保证航母F35立马产能过剩,多的没人
要。
: 很难
【 在 attain79 (蒙古国海军司令) 的大作中提到: 】
: 失业率是骗人的 美国现在employment population ratio 60%
: 接近40%的劳动年龄人口无业 大部分是龙虾党
: :上面报道讲了, 美帝企业已经是全力生产了, 卖给了中国, 就不能卖给其它国
家了
: :,中美逆差小了, 美帝总逆差还是不变。
: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/17/us/politics/china-trade-trump-
concessions
: .html?
: “That is because the United States economy is already running near its
full
: productive capacity, meaning it would not be able to produce enough new
: goods to meet Chinese demands, especially in the short term.
: In that scenario, the United States would probably stop selling airplanes,
: soybeans and other major exports to other countries and sell them to China
: instead — shrinking the United States trade deficit with China but
leaving
: the United States trade deficit with the entire world unchanged.”
: WSJ 同样报道了
: ...................
不是美国不卖,是人民币不能自由兑换,中国人没法买。
美国的房地产,美国绿卡,美国股票,是国内的人最想买的东西。
【 在 dangding2013 (xiaodao) 的大作中提到: 】
: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/17/us/politics/china-trade-trump-
concessions
: .html?
: “That is because the United States economy is already running near its
full
: productive capacity, meaning it would not be able to produce enough new
: goods to meet Chinese demands, especially in the short term.
: In that scenario, the United States would probably stop selling airplanes,
: soybeans and other major exports to other countries and sell them to China
: instead — shrinking the United States trade deficit with China but
leaving
: the United States trade deficit with the entire world unchanged.”
: WSJ 同样报道了
: ...................
【 在 microfish(
航母500亿美元一艘,要二艘 = 1000亿美元
B2 20亿美元一架,要50架 = 1000亿美元
F22 3亿美元一架, 随便填
F35 1亿美元一架,随便填
2000亿美元贸易逆差马上解决,都不用等到2020年LOL。
【 在 Diors (屌丝) 的大作中提到: 】
: 在天朝开工,光那种security clearance 10年都没法通过。Trump说要减少对于
: business的regulation可不是无的放矢。美帝自身有足够产能,当年对日本太平洋战争
: ,前期3艘对日本联合舰队6艘航母被搞得很狼狈,后来进入战时状态,战争后期航母下
: 饺子,130多艘各类航母对日本联合舰队8-9艘航母各种蹂躏。但是现在时代不同了,各
: 种regulation就搞得那些产能无法实现出来。
: 要。
[在 fcty (fuckty) 的大作中提到:]
:主要是白人太懒黑人太烂
:但凡上过班的人都知道,这边孙子一天干的活儿,任何一个华人最多仨小时干完还得
兼顾买买提灌水
:养着这群懒猪美国不完蛋都难
80年代以前美国普遍女人主动放弃工作当全职主妇 这是不工作人口的主要构成 当年一个单职工普通美国工人可以以准中产的标准养活全家五口人
现在这种根本不存在了 高薪全职工作比例被大量底薪小时工代替 单职工工人再也养不起全家了 不工作的人大部分是被动失业 靠福利支撑
【在 kuzi(万年潜水员)的大作中提到:】
:63%。话说美国历史上从来没有低过62%。
:【 在 attain79 (蒙古国海军司令) 的大作中提到: 】
裤尿裤裆这种事发生
事实上美国现在一个稳定的给付保险和社金的全职体力工职位非常少
【在 higerg(higerg)的大作中提到:】
:
:【 在 attain79 (蒙古国海军司令) 的大作中提到: 】
基本原因就是生产率在世界上没啥优势了。还撑着高福利。
【 在 attain79 (蒙古国海军司令) 的大作中提到: 】
: 现在跟历史毫无可比性
: 80年代以前美国普遍女人主动放弃工作当全职主妇 这是不工作人口的主要构成 当年一
: 个单职工普通美国工人可以以准中产的标准养活全家五口人
: 现在这种根本不存在了 高薪全职工作比例被大量底薪小时工代替 单职工工人再也养不
: 起全家了 不工作的人大部分是被动失业 靠福利支撑
: :63%。话说美国历史上从来没有低过62%。
: :【 在 attain79 (蒙古国海军司令) 的大作中提到: 】
【 在 jhe123 (jhe) 的大作中提到: 】
: 就这样还怎么打贸易战?难怪当中国上次说为了减少逆差可以主动减少对美出口时,美
: 帝是坚决不干:土鳖你要让美国人民没东西用么?良心大大地坏了,哈哈。。。
: concessions
: full
: leaving
【 在 qingtianbao () 的大作中提到: 】
: 这个说到点子上了。
: 基本原因就是生产率在世界上没啥优势了。还撑着高福利。
有资本家在,有利润在,产能永远不是问题。“大豆优先供应中国”,更是扯淡。最后买卖成交还是市场行为。美国政府还真能跟农场主说“为了搬回贸易逆差,你今年豆子都卖给中国,别人出多少钱你不许卖,政治任务哈”?当然是谁价高卖谁去,明年多种啦。
关键是,中国这是subscription还是buy one time.
【 在 dangding2013 (xiaodao) 的大作中提到: 】
: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/17/us/politics/china-trade-trump-
concessions
: .html?
: “That is because the United States economy is already running near its
full
: productive capacity, meaning it would not be able to produce enough new
: goods to meet Chinese demands, especially in the short term.
: In that scenario, the United States would probably stop selling airplanes,
: soybeans and other major exports to other countries and sell them to China
: instead — shrinking the United States trade deficit with China but
leaving
: the United States trade deficit with the entire world unchanged.”
: WSJ 同样报道了
: ...................
【 在 hatwin (傻就一个字) 的大作中提到: 】
: FB,GOOG这种完全没有生产价值的东西,只有傻瓜才让他们去赚钱。你当兔子傻呀。老
: 老实实要么农产品,要么自然资源,不要靠忽悠赚别人的钱。总好意思提FB,GOOG,你
: 还不如直接让兔子上供现金多好。
美国主要是人太挑剔,特别是锈带,新厂都去南方了。
工资主要是市场决定的,技能不行,只能找体力活了。工作服利差不正是右派期望的吗?
nyt有个报道,政府有免费的课程给煤矿工人以帮助更新知识结构,可惜人家不去上啊
。这真怨不了其他人。
【 在 attain79 (蒙古国海军司令) 的大作中提到: 】
: 美国工人要是难找 就不会有什么amazon仓库操作工上班时间无法上厕所 被迫穿纸尿
: 裤尿裤裆这种事发生
: 事实上美国现在一个稳定的给付保险和社金的全职体力工职位非常少
: :
: :【 在 attain79 (蒙古国海军司令) 的大作中提到: 】
: “That is because the United States economy is already running near its
full
: productive capacity”这记者水平,应该弄个金白眼奖。
: 有资本家在,有利润在,产能永远不是问题。“大豆优先供应中国”,更是扯淡。最后
: 买卖成交还是市场行为。美国政府还真能跟农场主说“为了搬回贸易逆差,你今年豆子
: 都卖给中国,别人出多少钱你不许卖,政治任务哈”?当然是谁价高卖谁去,明年多种
: 啦。
: 关键是,中国这是subscription还是buy one time.
: concessions
: full
: leaving
buy one time
每年进口2000亿美元的天然气和大豆,你觉得可能吗?进来喂猪吃?
【 在 GiantHawk (GiantHawk) 的大作中提到: 】
: 那就卖现役的,
: 航母500亿美元一艘,要二艘 = 1000亿美元
: B2 20亿美元一架,要50架 = 1000亿美元
: F22 3亿美元一架, 随便填
: F35 1亿美元一架,随便填
: 2000亿美元贸易逆差马上解决,都不用等到2020年LOL。
【 在 xlzero (megatron) 的大作中提到: 】
: full
: buy one time
: 每年进口2000亿美元的天然气和大豆,你觉得可能吗?进来喂猪吃?
可现状是美国劳动力严重供过于求 导致人不值钱 所以美国现在制造业也跟中国一样
血汗工厂化了
http://finance.ifeng.com/a/20160514/14384168_0.shtml
美国多家大企业禁上厕所 员工被迫穿纸尿裤
据了解,早在2015年的一份报告中,“美国乐施会”即提出过警告:美国的便宜鸡肉是建立在对工人的极度剥削上。他们忍受着极低的工资、以及极恶劣的工作条和环境。
rust belt和南部很多州的州长三天两头往中国跑 都是去化缘求中国制造业老板开厂拯救本地就业的 密歇根州长号称5年去了6次中国 都是为了解决本地大量无业人口的饭碗问题 绝不是什么人不够
【 在 higerg (higerg) 的大作中提到: 】
: 亚马逊的原因就是人不够啊,人够就有机会上厕所了。
: 美国主要是人太挑剔,特别是锈带,新厂都去南方了。
: 工资主要是市场决定的,技能不行,只能找体力活了。工作服利差不正是右派期望的吗?
: nyt有个报道,政府有免费的课程给煤矿工人以帮助更新知识结构,可惜人家不去上啊
: 。这真怨不了其他人。
【 在 dangding2013 (xiaodao) 的大作中提到: 】
: 上面报道讲了, 美帝企业已经是全力生产了, 卖给了中国, 就不能卖给其它国家了
: ,中美逆差小了, 美帝总逆差还是不变。
: 中国其实很想买美帝液化天然气, 2017年的购买量超过了2016年 7倍。 无奈美帝生产
: 能力有限,新的产能还要2019才能出来。 现在美帝失业率很低,工厂招不到人, 也是
: 没办法
【 在 dangding2013 (xiaodao) 的大作中提到: 】
: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/17/us/politics/china-trade-trump-
concessions
: .html?
: “That is because the United States economy is already running near its
full
: productive capacity, meaning it would not be able to produce enough new
: goods to meet Chinese demands, especially in the short term.
: In that scenario, the United States would probably stop selling airplanes,
: soybeans and other major exports to other countries and sell them to China
: instead — shrinking the United States trade deficit with China but
leaving
: the United States trade deficit with the entire world unchanged.”
: WSJ 同样报道了
: ...................
: 其实是全球化的后果,资金和技术都流到中国,导致中国生产率大增,而自己的生产率
: 没增加,所以优势就没了。
没有全球化,哪里来的你的高工资?
【 在 dangding2013 (xiaodao) 的大作中提到: 】
: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/17/us/politics/china-trade-trump-
concessions
: .html?
: “That is because the United States economy is already running near its
full
: productive capacity, meaning it would not be able to produce enough new
: goods to meet Chinese demands, especially in the short term.
: In that scenario, the United States would probably stop selling airplanes,
: soybeans and other major exports to other countries and sell them to China
: instead — shrinking the United States trade deficit with China but
leaving
: the United States trade deficit with the entire world unchanged.”
: WSJ 同样报道了
: ...................
: 你弄反了 人不够的话应该导致人的价值提高 亚马逊这种血汗工厂就招不来人
: 可现状是美国劳动力严重供过于求 导致人不值钱 所以美国现在制造业也跟中国一样
: 血汗工厂化了
: http://finance.ifeng.com/a/20160514/14384168_0.shtml
: 美国多家大企业禁上厕所 员工被迫穿纸尿裤
: 据了解,早在2015年的一份报告中,“美国乐施会”即提出过警告:美国的便宜鸡肉是
: 建立在对工人的极度剥削上。他们忍受着极低的工资、以及极恶劣的工作条和环境。: rust belt和南部很多州的州长三天两头往中国跑 都是去化缘求中国制造业老板开厂拯
: 救本地就业的 密歇根州长号称5年去了6次中国 都是为了解决本地大量无业人口的饭碗
: 问题 绝不是什么人不够
: ...................
是人不愿意干血汗工厂的活,所以血汗工厂找不到人。找不到人要么压榨已有的工人,要么打擦边球雇劳模。
美国二战红利用完了,现在要所有人有工作,就要回归原型。以前血汗工厂的活有很多人干,现在没人了。有技术的活美国不是没有,只要肯学习,美国人就业还是有保证的。
这个办法是: 中国先给钱, 美国用这些钱在Alaska, Texas and Louisiana建设基础
设施生产液化天然气和石油, 然后再用天然气和石油还中国贷款。
Buying and paying up front for U.S. energy, then, amounts to little more
than changing the mix of assets in its portfolio.
From the U.S. perspective, selling natural resources is less desirable than selling manufactured products. But by doing so, Trump could credibly claim
to cut the bilateral trade deficit by more than half. Moreover, these
contracts would allow American companies to secure loans to build oil and
gas infrastructure whose construction would employ tens of thousands of
American workers.
While this proposal may sound far-fetched, Governor Bill Walker of Alaska isalready seeking Chinese financing for a $43-billion deal to export LNG, and
the Alaska Gasline Development Corp. has almost completed negotiations with
its Chinese counterparts. The Chinese oil conglomerate Sinopec has also
proposed a $7-billion, 700-mile pipeline from the Permian Basin shale oil
field in western Texas to the Gulf, another effort the package could include
.