Sally Yates deserved to get canned. Now, the bar association should consider yanking her license to practice law.
In defying President Trump’s executive order on immigration, the Acting Attorney General flouted the law and violated ethics that govern lawyers.
It is not the prerogative of the Attorney General to decide what laws are constitutional. That is the job of the courts. As the chief law enforcement officer, she does not get to pick and choose which laws to enforce and which ones to ignore. She is duty-bound to defend and enforce all laws, including presidential executive orders.
If an Attorney General disagrees with an executive order, her ethical obligation under the code of Professional Responsibility is to communicate that to the president. If it cannot be resolved to her satisfaction, she has two choices: enforce the order or resign her position. This is plainly set forth in sections 1.13 and 1.16 of the Rules of Professional Conduct for the District of Columbia.
Yates did neither. Instead, she violated legal ethics by actively undermining the President and issuing her own order countermanding the President. She has no such authority. What would happen if other cabinet secretaries or federal officials committed the same acts as Yates? The result would be chaos and anarchy. The rule of law would vanish.
President Trump had ample justification for firing Yates. She committed an egregious violation of ethical standards and a serious breach of her duties.
Yates Is Not Qualified To Make A Constitutional Determination
Yates is not a constitutional law expert. Her career has been in prosecutions. But within the Department of Justice, there are experts on constitutional law. Some of them are in the Office of Legal Counsel at the DOJ. They reviewed the president’s executive order and gave it their approval as to form and legality. Yates deliberately chose to ignore their sound reasoning.
It is clear that Yates’ decision was political, not legal. How do we know? Look at what she wrote in her memorandum ordering attorneys not to defend the president’s executive order in legal challenges. She questioned whether the policy was “wise or just”. That is a political judgment. She fundamentally misunderstands her job and her duties.
The Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that Congress and the executive branch have “plenary power” to regulate immigration. For more than a century the high court has upheld almost every federal immigration regulation against constitutional challenges. Much, if not all, of the Trump executive order is constitutional. Past presidents, including FDR, Truman, Carter and Obama, have excluded people from various countries that pose a threat. Those orders have survived legal challenges.
Why Would Yates Ignore Ethical Rules?
Either Yates does not understand the ethical canons… or she was grandstanding for personal gain. The evidence shows it is the latter.
Consider the address she delivered in November of 2015 to the 10th Annual Prosecution Summit in which she stated the ethical duty owed to clients:“It is your ethical responsibility to represent their interests, regardless of whether you think they’re really right or whether you even like them.”
Obviously, Yates understands the proper role of a lawyer… which means her recent conduct was likely done for political and personal profit.
As a holdover from the Obama Administration, she was already out the door in a few days. Her diplomas were probably off the walls and her boxes packed up. By instigating her own firing, she gets her face on the front page of every newspaper in America and overnight becomes a political darling of democrats and the left. That may pay dividends for her career.
But is a shameless act of self-promotion unworthy of a conscientious lawyer.
I am honored to serve President Trump in this role until Senator Sessions is confirmed. I will defend and enforce the laws of our country to ensure that our people and our nation are protected," said Dana Boente, Acting Attorney General.
这次这个白痴直接被fired，等于宣告她是华盛顿不受欢迎的人，在华盛顿未来的几年
，她只是个负资产。
这下工作难找了，基本泡汤。只能家里蹲了。
已经有可能被吊销律师执照：
Sally Yates deserved to get canned. Now, the bar association should consider yanking her license to practice law.
In defying President Trump’s executive order on immigration, the Acting
Attorney General flouted the law and violated ethics that govern lawyers.
It is not the prerogative of the Attorney General to decide what laws are
constitutional. That is the job of the courts. As the chief law enforcement officer, she does not get to pick and choose which laws to enforce and
which ones to ignore. She is duty-bound to defend and enforce all laws,
including presidential executive orders.
If an Attorney General disagrees with an executive order, her ethical
obligation under the code of Professional Responsibility is to communicate
that to the president. If it cannot be resolved to her satisfaction, she has two choices: enforce the order or resign her position. This is plainly set forth in sections 1.13 and 1.16 of the Rules of Professional Conduct for the District of Columbia.
Yates did neither. Instead, she violated legal ethics by actively
undermining the President and issuing her own order countermanding the
President. She has no such authority. What would happen if other cabinet
secretaries or federal officials committed the same acts as Yates? The
result would be chaos and anarchy. The rule of law would vanish.
President Trump had ample justification for firing Yates. She committed an
egregious violation of ethical standards and a serious breach of her duties.
Yates Is Not Qualified To Make A Constitutional Determination
Yates is not a constitutional law expert. Her career has been in
prosecutions. But within the Department of Justice, there are experts on
constitutional law. Some of them are in the Office of Legal Counsel at the DOJ. They reviewed the president’s executive order and gave it their
approval as to form and legality. Yates deliberately chose to ignore their
sound reasoning.
It is clear that Yates’ decision was political, not legal. How do we know? Look at what she wrote in her memorandum ordering attorneys not to defend
the president’s executive order in legal challenges. She questioned whether the policy was “wise or just”. That is a political judgment. She
fundamentally misunderstands her job and her duties.
The Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that Congress and the executive
branch have “plenary power” to regulate immigration. For more than a
century the high court has upheld almost every federal immigration
regulation against constitutional challenges. Much, if not all, of the
Trump executive order is constitutional. Past presidents, including FDR,
Truman, Carter and Obama, have excluded people from various countries that
pose a threat. Those orders have survived legal challenges.
Why Would Yates Ignore Ethical Rules?
Either Yates does not understand the ethical canons… or she was
grandstanding for personal gain. The evidence shows it is the latter.
Consider the address she delivered in November of 2015 to the 10th Annual
Prosecution Summit in which she stated the ethical duty owed to clients:“It is your ethical responsibility to represent their interests, regardless of whether you think they’re really right or whether you even like them.”
Obviously, Yates understands the proper role of a lawyer… which means her
recent conduct was likely done for political and personal profit.
As a holdover from the Obama Administration, she was already out the door in a few days. Her diplomas were probably off the walls and her boxes packed
up. By instigating her own firing, she gets her face on the front page of
every newspaper in America and overnight becomes a political darling of
democrats and the left. That may pay dividends for her career.
But is a shameless act of self-promotion unworthy of a conscientious lawyer.
右臂们已经钉上了历史的耻辱柱！
访钱途无量。
民主党的全傻了。
本来她以为装个逼，可以名利双收，结果瞎逼逼没有仨小时就滚蛋了，估计当面宣布完连办公室都不会让再进，物品随后寄去那种。
这种被直接开除的政府高官，多少年也没一个。彻底傻逼的节奏。
就算八年后民主党卷土重来，她已经过气
床铺是用管理公司的方法，管理国家
全不同的概念。
大机构里混混你就知道了
当然是前途无量，钱途无量。
呵呵
脸被直接fired，在ceo的控制范围就，没法混了。
那些政府官员除了傻逼，谁也不会这么干。你看那个管border control的，实际根这女的一个路子，但是那人就比较理智，不说话，实际就是被强迫辞职，但是最后上面给发个短文祝福下，以后好相见。
黄皮再聪明也就是在买买提抖抖机灵的命啊。。。
然后deputy AG接任AG，尼克松命令新AG开除水门检察官，新AG也辞职
然后尼克松下台了
最后只能靠出书了
华盛顿下台的官员之所以钱途无量，全靠在华盛顿的关系，换句话说，在华盛顿的人脉就是他们的唯一资本。
跟华盛顿当权派发飙被直接fired的，人脉尽毁，有个屁钱途。
你们这群土鳖，以为有个15分钟名气，就能发财了？
莱温斯基名气大吧，也出书上电视，她发财了吗？
以后被公司雇用。，HR必须破例
民主党的大英雄
你还是看看新上任的代理司法部长都说了些啥吧。
现在这样子，她哪里还有人脉了
新acting ag
发信人: qianjin (前进), 信区: Military
标 题: Re: 被开除的代理司法部长这下傻了
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Jan 30 22:40:57 2017, 美东)
你对美国政治毫无了解。
华盛顿下台的官员之所以钱途无量，全靠在华盛顿的关系，换句话说，在华盛顿的人脉就是他们的唯一资本。
跟华盛顿当权派发飙被直接fired的，人脉尽毁，有个屁钱途。
你们这群土鳖，以为有个15分钟名气，就能发财了？
莱温斯基名气大吧，也出书上电视，她发财了吗？
你知道星巴克老总为啥感跳出来雇难民跟川普装逼吗？因为川普找个各公司ceo开会根
本没他。
在川普眼里，一个卖咖啡的，根本不在商业精英圈里。
你看那些开过会的ceo，现在谁还出来装逼了？一个都没有。还google给她10个米，你
梦里给吗？
对美国政治商业的运作毫无了解你是。
还说人白痴，狗眼看人低。
确表示向Trump效忠。
她怕什么找工作
她对抗自己老板，瞎逼逼三小时直接被fired，这还不是丑闻下台？
你知道她这种档次的被直接fired有多少见吗？
你不懂就别胡咧咧了
凭啥给Trump捧臭脚，
就该跟Trump对着干才是正着，
这百分之九十几的恨川普的还少了，为啥他们不出来跟这个傻逼一样瞎逼逼，你想过原因吗？
搞不好能去哈佛当个教授。 以后天天在全国媒体上露面恶心床破。
她是Obama的司法部长，这时候要是给Trump捧臭脚，才是把自己的后路全断了，
美国两党政治，河东河西，各为其主，你连这点儿事儿都不明白，还瞎比比啥，
地方检察长， 民主党的多着呢
美国有过15分钟名气的人还少了，出书的也多了，几个发财了？
你们啊，谁要是在公共部门干，奉劝你一句，在这网站上瞎逼逼两句也就完了，千万不要在工作场所这么诋毁现任总统，不然以后吃苦头，死都不知道怎么死的。勿谓言之不预。
索南就别替人操心了
你连这点儿事儿都看不明白，就别假装大尾巴狼给别人提建议了，
竟然有傻逼以为人家会没有工作要饿死了，真可笑，
Deputy AG，最次也有充足的联邦法院庭审经验，以及和区内联邦法官脸熟，保底去大
律所做个partner，一年50万以上不成问题的，要你为她操心？
她是美国人民的英雄
好莱坞要给她拍电影了
告诉你们，美国社会的政治圈商业圈之黑暗比天朝一点都不差。什么她是民主党照样混，都是想象。
这种圈子里混，第一条就是不要公开得罪当权派（尤其是任期刚开始的当权派）。
你们处于某种目的，这里瞎逼逼一下，骂骂新总统也就完了，出去不要瞎逼逼，不然真是死都不知道怎么死的。
按你们那逻辑，尼玛现在在华盛顿的民主党政府雇员太容易出名发财了：只要公开骂川普抗命就行了！
可是你们想过没有，为啥别的民主党政府雇员谁也不吭声！他们都是傻子？
Obama的司法部长，要是这时候给Trump冲锋陷阵，那岂不是疯了？
就该大骂Trump，然后英雄一样离开，
她可以不同意川普的政策，也可以自己不出面为床铺辩护，但让手下的人都不为床铺辩护时非常下作的。
雇员。
法部长，在这么大是大非面前，她怎么能去defense Trump? 人家发声明，把Trump大骂，然后潇洒离开，这都不需要多聪明就做得出的事情，只有傻逼才看不懂，
难不成要说：虽然我不defense，但是你们可以去。这不是傻逼话吗，
你去读读人家司法部长的声明吧，你们一众猥琐学八年也学不到人家一根毫毛，
真心劝你门，不要出去在自己的工作场合瞎逼逼，比如在公司/政府部门公开诋毁现任
总统。工作场合，这种事是很敏感的。你们那些同事，你很难真正知道他们对这些事的想法。不说话的，甚至口不应心的，很难预料。如果出去也这么瞎逼逼，什么sally 是英雄之类的，我反复说，很可能以后死都不知道怎么死的。
当然，如果你是家里蹲，那无所谓了。
人品二没职业道德，不收拾你收拾谁呢。
她在政府法律界已经几乎做到顶了，现在又成了全国新闻人物，跟你玩的根本不是同一个游戏，你用一个底层打工的思路去套她，可笑不可笑？
就别装大尾巴狼了，
你们这些人，从过去十八个月反复进山打猎的行为就应该反思一下自己的心理状态思维方式和智力水平。
不知道抬头做人
他这司法部长实际上相当于中国的最高检检察长
这时候Travel Ban，你让她作为Obama的司法部长给Trump defense，那是傻逼做的事情，做到司法部长那是人精，人家才不干那傻事，
你觉得她被收拾了？咋收拾的？Fire了就叫收拾？人家根本也不想继续做了，
我看倒是Trump被收拾了，四面楚歌，
任何政治话题都不谈，这叫professional，