"Texas's effort to get this Court to pick the next President has no basis in law or fact. The Court should not abide this seditious abuse of the judicial process, and should send a clear and unmistakable signal that such abuse must never be replicated," wrote Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro.
Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel addressed the lawsuit with equally strong language, writing that "the election in Michigan is over. Texas comes as a stranger to this matter and should not be heard here." "The challenge here is an unprecedented one, without factual foundation or a valid legal basis," Michigan's brief said.
Chris Carr, the attorney general of Georgia, put more emphasis on the federalism implications of Texas' lawsuit in his filing. "Texas presses a generalized grievance that does not involve the sort of direct state-against-state controversy required for original jurisdiction," he wrote. "And in any case, there is another forum in which parties who (unlike Texas) have standing can challenge Georgia's compliance with its own election laws: Georgia's own courts."
威斯康星：此举严重侵犯宪法赋予威斯康星和其他各州的选举权。
Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul similarly cast the lawsuit as an " extraordinary intrusion into Wisconsin's and the other defendant States' elections, a task that the Constitution leaves to each State."
宾西法尼亚：德克萨斯企图借高法选择总统在事实和法律上没有任何依据。 "Texas's effort to get this Court to pick the next President has no basis inlaw or fact."
宾西法尼亚这是状子都没看就回复了？德州是要让法庭选择总统吗？
密西根：密西根选举已经结束。德克萨斯在这里无权说三道四。没有事实依据没有法律依据。 "the election in Michigan is over. Texas comes as a stranger to this matter and should not be heard here." "The challenge here is an unprecedented one, without factual foundation or avalid legal basis"
密西根这是光有指责没有论证啊。
佐治亚：德州提出了一个不涉及直接州与州争端的泛化的申诉。 "Texas presses a generalized grievance that does not involve the sort of direct state-against-state controversy required for original jurisdiction,"
佐治亚这一样是光有指责没有论证。
威斯康星：此举严重侵犯宪法赋予威斯康星和其他各州的选举权。 "extraordinary intrusion into Wisconsin's and the other defendant States' elections, a task that the Constitution leaves to each State."
威斯康星这是忘了选举规则是宪法给各州议会的。
【 在 nile (nile) 的大作中提到: 】 : 宾西法尼亚：德克萨斯企图借高法选择总统在事实和法律上没有任何依据。高法不可纵 : 容如此叛逆的滥法行径，应该明确而且没有歧义地告诉他们，这样的滥法绝不允许有下 : 一次。 : "Texas's effort to get this Court to pick the next President has no basis in : law or fact. The Court should not abide this seditious abuse of the : judicial process, and should send a clear and unmistakable signal that such : abuse must never be replicated," wrote Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh : Shapiro. : 密西根：密西根选举已经结束。德克萨斯在这里无权说三道四。没有事实依据没有法律 : 依据。德州的法律挑战千无古人。 : ...................
【 在 jollyl 的大作中提到: 】 : :四州都没说出什么道理。如果庭审还是这些，四州要完。 : :宾西法尼亚：德克萨斯企图借高法选择总统在事实和法律上没有任何依据。 :"Texas's effort to get this Court to pick the next President has no basis inlaw or fact." : :宾西法尼亚这是状子都没看就回复了？德州是要让法庭选择总统吗？ : :密西根：密西根选举已经结束。德克萨斯在这里无权说三道四。没有事实依据没有法 律依据。 :"the election in Michigan is over. Texas comes as a stranger to this matter and should not be heard here." :"The challenge here is an unprecedented one, without factual foundation or avalid legal basis" :
【 在 jollyl (砖石老五) 的大作中提到: 】 : 四州都没说出什么道理。如果庭审还是这些，四州要完。 : 宾西法尼亚：德克萨斯企图借高法选择总统在事实和法律上没有任何依据。 : "Texas's effort to get this Court to pick the next President has no basis in : law or fact." : 宾西法尼亚这是状子都没看就回复了？德州是要让法庭选择总统吗？ : 密西根：密西根选举已经结束。德克萨斯在这里无权说三道四。没有事实依据没有法律 : 依据。 : "the election in Michigan is over. Texas comes as a stranger to this matter : and should not be heard here." : "The challenge here is an unprecedented one, without factual foundation or a : ...................
别的不提了，就看宾州吧，它说的只字未提什么伤害德州利益，什么德州无权起诉。你的总结不对。 【 在 insect9 (insect9) 的大作中提到: 】 : 四州的论点是他们瞎胡搞没有伤害德州利益，德州无权起诉，所以高院不应该接案。因 : 为他们很清楚，一旦确定开审，他们就输定了。 : : : :四州都没说出什么道理。如果庭审还是这些，四州要完。 : : : :宾西法尼亚：德克萨斯企图借高法选择总统在事实和法律上没有任何依据。 : :"Texas's effort to get this Court to pick the next President has no : basis inlaw or fact." : : : :宾西法尼亚这是状子都没看就回复了？德州是要让法庭选择总统吗？ : ...................
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has dismissed the lawsuit from Congressman Mike Kelly and congressional candidate Sean Parnell to declare universal mail-in voting unconstitutional in the state and deny the votes of the majority of Pennsylvanians who voted by mail in the Nov. 3 election.
The state Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision, threw out the three-day- old order, saying the underlying lawsuit was filed months after the law allowed for challenges to Pennsylvania’s expansive year-old mail-in voting law.
The court filings also appear to have been prepared in haste. For example, the lawsuit says the four states that Texas wants to sue have a total of 72 electoral votes. The total is actually 62.
不要听那几个法盲胡扯。每年在高院file petition for writ of certiorari 的有好 几千，justice只会grant cert 给1%的case。流程说的很清楚，先要拿到双方的brief ，法官们才会讨论是否接受这个case。4个法官投票接受，就会grant certiorari。周 二的时候，被告方连response还没提供，法官们根本不会投票的。傻逼才会信那个谣言。
When a petition for writ of certiorari is filed with the Supreme Court, the party that won the case in the appeal below (called the respondent) files an opposition. Together, these two documents are considered by the justices during one of their weekly conferences to decide whether or not the case should be granted. As previously discussed, cases that fall into one of three categories are generally granted, while others are dismissed. The conference works on the rule of four—only four justices (a minority) need to agree to hear a case for the petition to be granted. The vast majority of cases are dismissed, which means the decision of the lower court stands.
宾州并没有为 universal mail-in 立法，因为是和宪法抵触的。他们只是在投票上增 加了一个选项 called “mail-in". 看看下面原文
"Absentee ballots are listed in the state constitution as having an excuse. The legislature and governor wanted to have no excuse absentee balloting so anybody can apply without an excuse, but because it would require a constitutional amendment, they created a new category called mail-in voting," Custodio said. "But it's functionally the same, it's just a way to get around the way the law is right now."
Governor Wolf made voting more convenient and secure by signing Act 77 of 2019, the most significant improvement to Pennsylvania’s elections in more than 80 years. The bipartisan compromise legislation takes effect for the April 2020 primary election and makes Pennsylvania a national leader with voter-friendly election reforms.
The law creates a new option to vote by mail up to 50 days before an election and be placed on a list to permanently receive a ballot application by mail. It also provides more time to register to vote and authorizes a $ 90 million bond to help counties fund the purchase of new voting systems with a paper trail that strengthens the security of our elections.
【 在 Ignius (Hyperion) 的大作中提到: 】 : 不要听那几个法盲胡扯。每年在高院file petition for writ of certiorari 的有好 : 几千，justice只会grant cert 给1%的case。流程说的很清楚，先要拿到双方的 brief : ，法官们才会讨论是否接受这个case。4个法官投票接受，就会grant certiorari。周 : 二的时候，被告方连response还没提供，法官们根本不会投票的。傻逼才会信那个谣言。 : When a petition for writ of certiorari is filed with the Supreme Court, the : party that won the case in the appeal below (called the respondent) files an : opposition. Together, these two documents are considered by the justices : during one of their weekly conferences to decide whether or not the case : should be granted. As previously discussed, cases that fall into one of : three categories are generally granted, while others are dismissed. The : ...................
宾西法尼亚：德克萨斯企图借高法选择总统在事实和法律上没有任何依据。高法不可纵容如此叛逆的滥法行径，应该明确而且没有歧义地告诉他们，这样的滥法绝不允许有下一次。
"Texas's effort to get this Court to pick the next President has no basis in law or fact. The Court should not abide this seditious abuse of the
judicial process, and should send a clear and unmistakable signal that such abuse must never be replicated," wrote Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh
Shapiro.
密西根：密西根选举已经结束。德克萨斯在这里无权说三道四。没有事实依据没有法律依据。德州的法律挑战千无古人。
Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel addressed the lawsuit with equally
strong language, writing that "the election in Michigan is over. Texas comes as a stranger to this matter and should not be heard here."
"The challenge here is an unprecedented one, without factual foundation or a valid legal basis," Michigan's brief said.
佐治亚：德州提出了一个不涉及直接州与州争端的泛化的申诉。毕竟佐治亚州是有法庭的，如果谁要告佐治亚没有遵守自己的选举法，应该去那里告。
Chris Carr, the attorney general of Georgia, put more emphasis on the
federalism implications of Texas' lawsuit in his filing. "Texas presses a
generalized grievance that does not involve the sort of direct state-against-state controversy required for original jurisdiction," he wrote.
"And in any case, there is another forum in which parties who (unlike Texas) have standing can challenge Georgia's compliance with its own election laws: Georgia's own courts."
威斯康星：此举严重侵犯宪法赋予威斯康星和其他各州的选举权。
Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul similarly cast the lawsuit as an "
extraordinary intrusion into Wisconsin's and the other defendant States'
elections, a task that the Constitution leaves to each State."
明天（周五）最高法有例会。下周一各州选举人投票。联邦法规定，所有州选举人投票必须同时进行。德州的要求是作废四州选举。最高法应该表态。川fen们，明天就会有
好消息。先恭喜了。
四州都没说出什么道理。如果庭审还是这些，四州要完。
宾西法尼亚：德克萨斯企图借高法选择总统在事实和法律上没有任何依据。
"Texas's effort to get this Court to pick the next President has no basis inlaw or fact."
宾西法尼亚这是状子都没看就回复了？德州是要让法庭选择总统吗？
密西根：密西根选举已经结束。德克萨斯在这里无权说三道四。没有事实依据没有法律依据。
"the election in Michigan is over. Texas comes as a stranger to this matter and should not be heard here."
"The challenge here is an unprecedented one, without factual foundation or avalid legal basis"
密西根这是光有指责没有论证啊。
佐治亚：德州提出了一个不涉及直接州与州争端的泛化的申诉。
"Texas presses a generalized grievance that does not involve the sort of
direct state-against-state controversy required for original jurisdiction,"
佐治亚这一样是光有指责没有论证。
威斯康星：此举严重侵犯宪法赋予威斯康星和其他各州的选举权。
"extraordinary intrusion into Wisconsin's and the other defendant States'
elections, a task that the Constitution leaves to each State."
威斯康星这是忘了选举规则是宪法给各州议会的。
【 在 nile (nile) 的大作中提到: 】
: 宾西法尼亚：德克萨斯企图借高法选择总统在事实和法律上没有任何依据。高法不可纵
: 容如此叛逆的滥法行径，应该明确而且没有歧义地告诉他们，这样的滥法绝不允许有下
: 一次。
: "Texas's effort to get this Court to pick the next President has no basis in
: law or fact. The Court should not abide this seditious abuse of the
: judicial process, and should send a clear and unmistakable signal that
such
: abuse must never be replicated," wrote Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh : Shapiro.
: 密西根：密西根选举已经结束。德克萨斯在这里无权说三道四。没有事实依据没有法律
: 依据。德州的法律挑战千无古人。
: ...................
四州的论点是他们瞎胡搞没有伤害德州利益，德州无权起诉，所以高院不应该接案。因为他们很清楚，一旦确定开审，他们就输定了。
【 在 jollyl 的大作中提到: 】
:
:四州都没说出什么道理。如果庭审还是这些，四州要完。
:
:宾西法尼亚：德克萨斯企图借高法选择总统在事实和法律上没有任何依据。
:"Texas's effort to get this Court to pick the next President has no basis inlaw or fact."
:
:宾西法尼亚这是状子都没看就回复了？德州是要让法庭选择总统吗？
:
:密西根：密西根选举已经结束。德克萨斯在这里无权说三道四。没有事实依据没有法
律依据。
:"the election in Michigan is over. Texas comes as a stranger to this
matter and should not be heard here."
:"The challenge here is an unprecedented one, without factual foundation or avalid legal basis"
:
因为德州告的就是这四个州的mail in违宪。这四个州回复的很正常，选举是各州的事
物，外州管不着，根本没有standing。高院才不管舞弊呢，只管是否违宪。
【 在 insect9(insect9) 的大作中提到: 】
: 四州的论点是他们瞎胡搞没有伤害德州利益，德州无权起诉，所以高院不应该接案。因
: 为他们很清楚，一旦确定开审，他们就输定了。
: :
: :四州都没说出什么道理。如果庭审还是这些，四州要完。
: :
: :宾西法尼亚：德克萨斯企图借高法选择总统在事实和法律上没有任何依据。
: :"Texas's effort to get this Court to pick the next President has no
: basis inlaw or fact."
: :
: :宾西法尼亚这是状子都没看就回复了？德州是要让法庭选择总统吗？
: ...................
是的，所以你也同意核心在于高院是不是接案，只要接案四州就输了，对吧。
【 在 Ignius 的大作中提到: 】
:
:因为德州告的就是这四个州的mail in违宪。这四个州回复的很正常，选举是各州的事:物，外州管不着，根本没有standing。高院才不管舞弊呢，只管是否违宪。
:
:
:【 在 insect9(insect9) 的大作中提到: 】
:
:: 四州的论点是他们瞎胡搞没有伤害德州利益，德州无权起诉，所以高院不应该接案
。因
:
:: 为他们很清楚，一旦确定开审，他们就输定了。
:
:: :
接案也是判德州输的可能性大。因为timing。如果在竞选前告还有可能赢，竞选结束了才来告太晚了。pa的高院就是这么dismiss了kelly的case，kelly的appeal也被最高法
院驳回了。很能说明SCOTUS的态度了。
【 在 insect9(insect9) 的大作中提到: 】
: 是的，所以你也同意核心在于高院是不是接案，只要接案四州就输了，对吧。
: :
: :因为德州告的就是这四个州的mail in违宪。这四个州回复的很正常，选举是各州的事
: :物，外州管不着，根本没有standing。高院才不管舞弊呢，只管是否违宪。
: :
: :
: :【 在 insect9(insect9) 的大作中提到: 】
: :
: :: 四州的论点是他们瞎胡搞没有伤害德州利益，德州无权起诉，所以高院不应
该接案
: 。因
: ...................
Kelly 的上诉案没有被驳回，高院只是denied emergency injunctive relief
Kelly的appeal就一个，被驳回了。
如果他要继续sue，得从lower court开始。
【 在 kwok008(kwok) 的大作中提到: 】
<br>: Kelly 的上诉案没有被驳回，高院只是denied emergency injunctive
relief
<br>
【 在 Ignius (Hyperion) 的大作中提到: 】
: 接案也是判德州输的可能性大。因为timing。如果在竞选前告还有可能赢，竞选结束了
: 才来告太晚了。pa的高院就是这么dismiss了kelly的case，kelly的appeal也被最高法
: 院驳回了。很能说明SCOTUS的态度了。
:
: 是的，所以你也同意核心在于高院是不是接案，只要接案四州就输了，对吧。:
: :
:
: :因为德州告的就是这四个州的mail in违宪。这四个州回复的很正常，选举是各
: 州的事
:
: :物，外州管不着，根本没有standing。高院才不管舞弊呢，只管是否违宪。
:
: :
:
: :
: ...................
那是当时没有人提告。本质上这四个州是为宪了，没人提告高院也没办法。违宪了就没有timing的问题，
你去看看Kelly在pa的case，就是告mail in违宪。
【 在 Dbyatou(我爱鱿鱼) 的大作中提到: 】
: 那是当时没有人提告。本质上这四个州是为宪了，没人提告高院也没办法。违宪了就没
: 有timing的问题，
今天英文论坛里也有人嘲笑他们的答复文书写法非常业余。
【 在 jollyl (砖石老五) 的大作中提到: 】
: 四州都没说出什么道理。如果庭审还是这些，四州要完。
: 宾西法尼亚：德克萨斯企图借高法选择总统在事实和法律上没有任何依据。
: "Texas's effort to get this Court to pick the next President has no basis in
: law or fact."
: 宾西法尼亚这是状子都没看就回复了？德州是要让法庭选择总统吗？
: 密西根：密西根选举已经结束。德克萨斯在这里无权说三道四。没有事实依据没有法律
: 依据。
: "the election in Michigan is over. Texas comes as a stranger to this
matter
: and should not be heard here."
: "The challenge here is an unprecedented one, without factual foundation or a
: ...................
别的不提了，就看宾州吧，它说的只字未提什么伤害德州利益，什么德州无权起诉。你的总结不对。
【 在 insect9 (insect9) 的大作中提到: 】
: 四州的论点是他们瞎胡搞没有伤害德州利益，德州无权起诉，所以高院不应该接案。因
: 为他们很清楚，一旦确定开审，他们就输定了。
: :
: :四州都没说出什么道理。如果庭审还是这些，四州要完。
: :
: :宾西法尼亚：德克萨斯企图借高法选择总统在事实和法律上没有任何依据。
: :"Texas's effort to get this Court to pick the next President has no
: basis inlaw or fact."
: :
: :宾西法尼亚这是状子都没看就回复了？德州是要让法庭选择总统吗？
: ...................
庭审千万不要换人，就让写回复的上！
【 在 fishingarden (Edward Blum门下老王) 的大作中提到: 】
: 今天英文论坛里也有人嘲笑他们的答复文书写法非常业余。
: in
: matter
: a
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has dismissed the lawsuit from Congressman
Mike Kelly and congressional candidate Sean Parnell to declare universal
mail-in voting unconstitutional in the state and deny the votes of the
majority of Pennsylvanians who voted by mail in the Nov. 3 election.
The state Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision, threw out the three-day-
old order, saying the underlying lawsuit was filed months after the law
allowed for challenges to Pennsylvania’s expansive year-old mail-in voting law.
【 在 Ignius(Hyperion) 的大作中提到: 】
: 你去看看Kelly在pa的case，就是告mail in违宪。
: 了就没
德州的诉讼更加业余，连票都算不对。看来红脖儿的数学都是体育老师教的
The court filings also appear to have been prepared in haste. For example,
the lawsuit says the four states that Texas wants to sue have a total of 72 electoral votes. The total is actually 62.
【 在 fishingarden(Edward Blum门下老王) 的大作中提到: 】
: 今天英文论坛里也有人嘲笑他们的答复文书写法非常业余。
: in
: matter
: a
川粉为啥智商这么低？
【 在 Ignius (Hyperion) 的大作中提到: 】
: 你去看看Kelly在pa的case，就是告mail in违宪。
:
: 那是当时没有人提告。本质上这四个州是为宪了，没人提告高院也没办法。违宪
: 了就没
:
: 有timing的问题，
:
mail-in 不违宪 军人一直都是mail-in 投票。违宪指的是你新决定的mail-in 是程序
违宪，不因该政府来做，这个权利只属于立法机关
你看看我后来贴的那个英文报道
【 在 Dbyatou(我爱鱿鱼) 的大作中提到: 】
: mail-in 不违宪 军人一直都是mail-in 投票。违宪指的是你新决定的mail-in
是程序
: 违宪，不因该政府来做，这个权利只属于立法机关
不是说最高院已经6：3投票， 接这个官司了吗？http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/USANews/34374781.html
【 在 insect9 (insect9) 的大作中提到: 】
: 是的，所以你也同意核心在于高院是不是接案，只要接案四州就输了，对吧。
: :
: :因为德州告的就是这四个州的mail in违宪。这四个州回复的很正常，选举是各州的事
: :物，外州管不着，根本没有standing。高院才不管舞弊呢，只管是否违宪。
: :
: :
: :【 在 insect9(insect9) 的大作中提到: 】
: :
: :: 四州的论点是他们瞎胡搞没有伤害德州利益，德州无权起诉，所以高院不应该接案
: 。因
: ...................
不要听那几个法盲胡扯。每年在高院file petition for writ of certiorari 的有好
几千，justice只会grant cert 给1%的case。流程说的很清楚，先要拿到双方的brief
，法官们才会讨论是否接受这个case。4个法官投票接受，就会grant certiorari。周
二的时候，被告方连response还没提供，法官们根本不会投票的。傻逼才会信那个谣言。
When a petition for writ of certiorari is filed with the Supreme Court, the party that won the case in the appeal below (called the respondent) files an opposition. Together, these two documents are considered by the justices
during one of their weekly conferences to decide whether or not the case
should be granted. As previously discussed, cases that fall into one of
three categories are generally granted, while others are dismissed. The
conference works on the rule of four—only four justices (a minority) need
to agree to hear a case for the petition to be granted. The vast majority of cases are dismissed, which means the decision of the lower court stands.
【 在 chace(Time is money, friend!) 的大作中提到: 】
: 不是说最高院已经6：3投票， 接这个官司了吗？
: http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/USANews/34374781.html
Pennsylvania%20Opp%20to%20Bill%20of%20Complaint%20v.FINAL.pdf
14页第一段
First, Texas cannot establish it suffered an injury in fact.
搜个“injury”就能搜到的，你真的读了吗....
【 在 jollyl (砖石老五) 的大作中提到: 】
: 别的不提了，就看宾州吧，它说的只字未提什么伤害德州利益，什么德州无权起诉。你
: 的总结不对。
来看看Jonathan Turley（GOP最强的高院律师之一，曾在高院代表GOP告过O8，曾为
trump弹劾案辩护）怎么说的
只要看前两分钟就行
【 在 Dbyatou (我爱鱿鱼) 的大作中提到: 】
: 那是当时没有人提告。本质上这四个州是为宪了，没人提告高院也没办法。违宪了就没
: 有timing的问题，
收藏，学习。这无疑是捍卫美国民主制度和美国宪法的历史性文件。
【 在 wishee (温顺的野猪) 的大作中提到: 】
: https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163367/20201210142206254_: Pennsylvania%20Opp%20to%20Bill%20of%20Complaint%20v.FINAL.pdf
: 14页第一段
: First, Texas cannot establish it suffered an injury in fact.
: 搜个“injury”就能搜到的，你真的读了吗....
选举连VOTER ID都捍卫不了，还捍卫宪法个毛啊？LOL
【 在 nile (nile) 的大作中提到: 】
: 收藏，学习。这无疑是捍卫美国民主制度和美国宪法的历史性文件。
ID 的事情，你应该去相关state的立法机构去辩论。
【 在 cnus (会飞的猪) 的大作中提到: 】
: 选举连VOTER ID都捍卫不了，还捍卫宪法个毛啊？LOL
联邦有权确定公民是唯一能投票的身份
【 在 nile (nile) 的大作中提到: 】
: ID 的事情，你应该去相关state的立法机构去辩论。
首先，选举投票不是联邦行为而是各州的主权行为。懂吗？第二，各州有权立法规定用什么凭证确定一个人的身份。
【 在 cnus (会飞的猪) 的大作中提到: 】
: 联邦有权确定公民是唯一能投票的身份
州有权规定不用确认身份就能投票？！LOL
【 在 nile (nile) 的大作中提到: 】
: 首先，选举投票不是联邦行为而是各州的主权行为。懂吗？第二，各州有权立法规定用
: 什么凭证确定一个人的身份。
你把“不用确认身份就能投票”的规定拿出来看看。
【 在 cnus (会飞的猪) 的大作中提到: 】
: 州有权规定不用确认身份就能投票？！LOL
【 在 wishee (温顺的野猪) 的大作中提到: 】
: 来看看Jonathan Turley（GOP最强的高院律师之一，曾在高院代表GOP告过O8，曾为
: trump弹劾案辩护）怎么说的
: https://youtu.be/bpMHgCSYwKk
: 只要看前两分钟就行
目前只要确定行政机钩没有经过立法机构擅自修改投票方式 这是不是一个违宪行为 （从而伤害到原告州的利益） 就行了。违宪了，川胜，不违宪 白胜。
真是法盲
【 在 cnus (会飞的猪) 的大作中提到: 】
: 联邦有权确定公民是唯一能投票的身份
universal mail in是各州的州议会立法通过的。比如宾州的universal 买了in， 就是宾州议会（共和党主导的）一年前立法通过的。
【 在 Dbyatou(我爱鱿鱼) 的大作中提到: 】
: 目前只要确定行政机钩没有经过立法机构擅自修改投票方式 这是不是一个违宪
行为 （
: 从而伤害到原告州的利益） 就行了。违宪了，川胜，不违宪 白胜。
【 在 Ignius (Hyperion) 的大作中提到: 】
: universal mail in是各州的州议会立法通过的。比如宾州的universal 买了in， 就是
: 宾州议会（共和党主导的）一年前立法通过的。
:
: 目前只要确定行政机钩没有经过立法机构擅自修改投票方式 这是不是一个违宪
: 行为 （
:
: 从而伤害到原告州的利益） 就行了。违宪了，川胜，不违宪 白胜。
:
宾州并没有为 universal mail-in 立法，因为是和宪法抵触的。他们只是在投票上增
加了一个选项 called “mail-in".
看看下面原文
"Absentee ballots are listed in the state constitution as having an excuse. The legislature and governor wanted to have no excuse absentee balloting so anybody can apply without an excuse, but because it would require a
constitutional amendment, they created a new category called mail-in voting," Custodio said. "But it's functionally the same, it's just a way to get
around the way the law is right now."
Governor Wolf made voting more convenient and secure by signing Act 77 of
2019, the most significant improvement to Pennsylvania’s elections in more than 80 years. The bipartisan compromise legislation takes effect for the
April 2020 primary election and makes Pennsylvania a national leader with
voter-friendly election reforms.
The law creates a new option to vote by mail up to 50 days before an
election and be placed on a list to permanently receive a ballot application by mail. It also provides more time to register to vote and authorizes a $
90 million bond to help counties fund the purchase of new voting systems
with a paper trail that strengthens the security of our elections.
【 在 Dbyatou(我爱鱿鱼) 的大作中提到: 】
: 宾州并没有为 universal mail-in 立法，因为是和宪法抵触的。他们只是在投
票上增
: 加了一个选项 called “mail-in".
: 看看下面原文
: "Absentee ballots are listed in the state constitution as having an
excuse.
: The legislature and governor wanted to have no excuse absentee
balloting so
: anybody can apply without an excuse, but because it would require a
: constitutional amendment, they created a new category called mail-in
voting,
: " Custodio said. "But it's functionally the same, it's just a way to
get
: around the way the law is right now."
我说的是总结
【 在 wishee (温顺的野猪) 的大作中提到: 】
: https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163367/20201210142206254_: Pennsylvania%20Opp%20to%20Bill%20of%20Complaint%20v.FINAL.pdf
: 14页第一段
: First, Texas cannot establish it suffered an injury in fact.
: 搜个“injury”就能搜到的，你真的读了吗....
还是你看的准
【 在 Ignius (Hyperion) 的大作中提到: 】
: 不要听那几个法盲胡扯。每年在高院file petition for writ of certiorari 的有好
: 几千，justice只会grant cert 给1%的case。流程说的很清楚，先要拿到双方的
brief
: ，法官们才会讨论是否接受这个case。4个法官投票接受，就会grant certiorari。周
: 二的时候，被告方连response还没提供，法官们根本不会投票的。傻逼才会信那个谣言。
: When a petition for writ of certiorari is filed with the Supreme Court,
the
: party that won the case in the appeal below (called the respondent) files an
: opposition. Together, these two documents are considered by the justices : during one of their weekly conferences to decide whether or not the case
: should be granted. As previously discussed, cases that fall into one of
: three categories are generally granted, while others are dismissed. The
: ...................