They were suppose to, but there is nothing others can do if the Federal judges decide to go against the law. Congress can impeach, but it takes 67 senators. Will have to wait till 2021.
Unlikely, it is no more than just a judicial joke. There is no merits in this ruling. It surely will be overturned in SCOTUS, or even in 9th Circuit Court. There is nothing controversial under established law.
For the Trump camp, it is probably more gain than loss to have a setback like this, just like the primary loss in Colorado last year.
【 在 brihand (brihand) 的大作中提到: 】 The Justice Department on Saturday evening filed a notice that it will formally appeal a federal judge's ruling halting President Trump's immigration order. Justice Department Attorney Michelle Bennett's filing was made in response to a temporary nationwide restraining order issued Friday that halted Trump' s executive order banning citizens of seven countries from entering the United States. The case now goes to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
The court is given the responsibility of directly reviewing the decisions and rulemaking of many federal independent agencies of the United States government based in the national capital, often without prior hearing by a district court. Aside from the agencies whose statutes explicitly direct review by the D.C. Circuit, the court typically hears cases from other agencies under the more general jurisdiction granted to the Courts of Appeals under the Administrative Procedure Act.
judges decide to go against the law.
Congress can impeach, but it takes 67 senators. Will have to wait till 2021.
看起來有過好幾次彈劾奧巴馬的念頭, 但都未成. 所以不是共和黨建制派無能, 反正就是做不到就對了.
有意思的是, 在這些企圖裡, 沒有一項是像你們講的：奧巴馬拒絕執行某法律，蔑視法庭．我猜多半又是一堆美新版法律專家自己擼出來的法律意見．
发信人: evereve (笑看眾生), 信区: USANews
标02 题: 造勢大會的人數不能代表民意風向
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Oct 25 15:10:36 2016, 美东)
先教你們一個詞：造勢大會。什麼拉勵拉勵的，賽車也叫拉勵啊！中文強大的造詞功能 不用，不經大腦、不顧翻譯品質地亂翻譯，這是在戕害語言表意能力與豐富性。
川普粉的 “革命熱情” 比較高，因為基本上他們就是在革命。所以美新版版主以降的 網民們，個個熱火朝天，連下室瑣男都在捐款！這種情形下，川普的造勢大會能不火 ？ 希粉相對淡然，當然參加人數少。被革命熱情動員的人數雖多，但實際民意如何？ 這中 間不能劃上等號。
其二，候選人個個風格不一，對於群眾的魅力程度也不同。希特勒就是個很會演講、帶 動群眾的人，他的崛起就在於煽動戰敗國民的激情。川希相比，希拉里是個傳統政客 ， 出言四平八穩，力求不出錯，而川普大嘴直言，專揀好聽的說，當然更吸引草根群 眾。 希拉里在川普旋風下，故而選擇不搞大型造勢大會，轉而走零售政治的小型聚會 ，這是 候選人的選戰策略，與民意風向關係不大。
民進黨的造勢大會一向火熱，就是以上兩個原因的綜合：革命性、草根性。但成功的造 勢大會，實在與民意沒有很大關係。
（呵呵，中國人碰到三個字以上的名詞，就不會說了。所以共和黨變成和黨，民主黨變 成主黨，要你們說造勢大會，真為難你們了。算了，你們就說 "造大" 就行了 ）
打悲情牌让自己的盘感同身受效果比一味强硬好。
this ruling. It surely will be overturned in SCOTUS, or even in 9th Circuit Court. There is nothing controversial under established law.
For the Trump camp, it is probably more gain than loss to have a setback
like this, just like the primary loss in Colorado last year.
This ruling is nothing but a joke. Wont need a lot of resources.
The court is given the responsibility of directly reviewing the decisions
and rulemaking of many federal independent agencies of the United States
government based in the national capital, often without prior hearing by a
district court. Aside from the agencies whose statutes explicitly direct
review by the D.C. Circuit, the court typically hears cases from other
agencies under the more general jurisdiction granted to the Courts of
Appeals under the Administrative Procedure Act.
判决.如果两个法庭判决一致,高院可以不接这个案子,让低级法院的判决生效.
聯邦法官又不是只管總統一個人！聯邦那麼多法官是因為聯邦法院管的東西很多，除了聯邦政府是原告或被告的案子之外，還有甚麼州與州之間的案子也是聯邦法院管，還有其他滴哩搭拉的一堆案件．
＂联邦那么多法官，谁都能推翻总统令？那概率也太大了。＂
不是這麼看．法官再多，管一個案子的也就是那幾個法官，又不是所有法官一起審一個案子．比如說你去法院告你房東，法院法官有三十個，但管你這個案子的就一個．
＂如果两个平级的联邦法官作出相反判决听谁的？＂
應該不會發生這種情形，因為相同被告相同罪名的案子，一案不能兩告．所以這次明尼蘇達州加入華盛頓州，成為共同原告，我猜就是因為它不能在自己的州內再告一次．
你去看看class action 诉讼，理解一下啥叫同一个案子，再给我滚回来讨论。