NYS WCB Case# G2029240: What Actual Information IS Provided to the USA Legal System by Professionals Nov. 25, 2020, Wed by Limin Wang
According to the NYS WCB's eCase Folder of this WCB Case# G2029240, the employer/carrier's COVERT defense law firm Jones | Jones, LLC had electronicly sent a one-page affidavit to NYS WCB presumably claiming JJ had done with the legal service to "Dr. Benjamin S. Uh". Contemporary history witnesses, please, check such low image quality of the so-called legal DOCUMENT in a NYS WCB legal system. Also, WHY NYS WCB did not directly send a hearing notice to the questionable "Dr. Benjamin S. Uh"? Why the SYSTEM fails to demonstrate its POWER to hold THE POWERS ACCOUNTABLE even on matters as simple as mailing "attempts"? (Note: When I convert the file to image, for whatever reason, it's a multimega size, and this website would only allow a 1 MB of attachment file(s) size in a post. So the attached image in this post is further lower in image quality ONLY ON MY COMPUTER SCREEN OR APP than the Jones | Jones' original file of almost illegibility. When this online post is shown in my browser, the image's quality is the SAME low to that of the Jones | Jones original. How weird is my electronic world.)
NYS WCB Case# G2029240: What Actual Information IS Provided to the USA Legal System by Professionals
Nov. 25, 2020, Wed
by Limin Wang
According to the NYS WCB's eCase Folder of this WCB Case# G2029240, the
employer/carrier's COVERT defense law firm Jones | Jones, LLC had
electronicly sent a one-page affidavit to NYS WCB presumably claiming JJ had done with the legal service to "Dr. Benjamin S. Uh". Contemporary history
witnesses, please, check such low image quality of the so-called legal
DOCUMENT in a NYS WCB legal system. Also, WHY NYS WCB did not directly send a hearing notice to the questionable "Dr. Benjamin S. Uh"? Why the SYSTEM
fails to demonstrate its POWER to hold THE POWERS ACCOUNTABLE even on
matters as simple as mailing "attempts"?
(Note: When I convert the file to image, for whatever reason, it's a
multimega size, and this website would only allow a 1 MB of attachment file(s) size in a post. So the attached image in this post is further lower in
image quality ONLY ON MY COMPUTER SCREEN OR APP than the Jones | Jones'
original file of almost illegibility. When this online post is shown in my
browser, the image's quality is the SAME low to that of the Jones | Jones
original. How weird is my electronic world.)