Q: Most everyone thinks that you’re doing a remarkable job, but you're standing there as the representative of truth and facts but things are being said that aren't true and aren't factual.
A: The way it happened is that after he made that statement [suggesting China could have revealed the discovery of a new coronavirus three to four months earlier], I told the appropriate people, it doesn't comport, because two or three months earlier would have been September. The next time they sit down with him and talk about what he’s going to say, they will say, by the way, Mr. President, be careful about this and don't say that. But I can't jump in front of the microphone and push him down. OK, he said it. Let's try and get it corrected for the next time.
Q: Most everyone thinks that you’re doing a remarkable job, but you're standing there as the representative of truth and facts but things are being said that aren't true and aren't factual.
A: The way it happened is that after he made that statement [suggesting China could have revealed the discovery of a new coronavirus three to four months earlier], I told the appropriate people, it doesn't comport, because two or three months earlier would have been September. The next time they sit down with him and talk about what he’s going to say, they will say, by the way, Mr. President, be careful about this and don't say that. But I can't jump in front of the microphone and push him down. OK, he said it. Let's try and get it corrected for the next time.
工资都拿了不干事怎么行
也是美国撒贝宁
Q: Most everyone thinks that you’re doing a remarkable job, but you're standing there as the representative of truth and facts but things are being said that aren't true and aren't factual.
A: The way it happened is that after he made that statement [suggesting China could have revealed the discovery of a new coronavirus three to four months earlier], I told the appropriate people, it doesn't comport, because two or three months earlier would have been September. The next time they sit down with him and talk about what he’s going to say, they will say, by the way, Mr. President, be careful about this and don't say that. But I can't jump in front of the microphone and push him down. OK, he said it. Let's try and get it corrected for the next time.
一个健康的社会不能只有一种乐器🐶
英吹的确已经死挺了
一个健康的社会不应该只有一种声音
罗永浩出来挨打🐶
并没有任何误导,只是归纳,你看看你红圈下面的内容。既然你知道画圈,怎么不知道看完呢?!
September
根据火锅大王的整理美国新闻的时间线是,2019年5月生化基地立项。6月第一次出现电子烟肺炎。7月基地关停。9月29日电子烟最后一次高峰,然后莫名其妙病例就消失了。10月美国CDC开始追踪季节流感,然后基地所在地马里兰州流感病例是四年内最多的一年。
你再看看你红圈下面福奇回到的内容,提到了2、3个月前是9月。
马上有人翻出一篇论文告诉你因为添加了维生素e
我特么就不懂了,加维生素e是怎么会得病毒性肺炎
这就是自由的香气吗🐶
看他留言记录就知道了,屁股都上天了。
先宣布感染,再关起来,然后接下来就没人关注了。
他首席科学家也会有点背景。不是那些小记者能比的。
太真实了,这位专家已经在调侃自己在离职的边缘
擦,原来电子烟背了口大锅。。。
我声望曾经很好的 后来一次在股票区和人交流 留了个微信号 一下扣了好像是好几万 这些年靠不停的回复 才慢慢快变正数了 这下又惨了
老爷子千古!
哈哈哈哈哈哈好惨
人家说的对啊 美国空气那么甜 那么清新,美国 怎么可能会是病源地, 人家可是美国,给人整吐了这人
Q: Most everyone thinks that you’re doing a remarkable job, but you're standing there as the representative of truth and facts but things are being said that aren't true and aren't factual.
A: The way it happened is that after he made that statement [suggesting China could have revealed the discovery of a new coronavirus three to four months earlier], I told the appropriate people, it doesn't comport, because two or three months earlier would have been September. The next time they sit down with him and talk about what he’s going to say, they will say, by the way, Mr. President, be careful about this and don't say that. But I can't jump in front of the microphone and push him down. OK, he said it. Let's try and get it corrected for the next time.
为啥要强调九月?🤔🤔🤔
呵呵
他画个那么大的红圈说误导,却看不到下文内容,哈哈,幸好他自己的截图也截到下面的,难道是词汇量不够🐶?
假设电子烟真的会损害人的肺部,那么还有一个问题,为什么其他国家没有出现相关的电子烟肺炎呢?还是说美国人吸的电子烟比较特殊?
一直这么缺德
米国文宣
头疼自由
正直的老人,老科学家,没有被政治污染的纯粹的人。还能怎么夸
阿川开始此地无银了啊
別整天傳軍運會這種謠言了啊,病毒爆發軌跡根本解釋不通。我們一定要和他們一樣通過謠言互相攻擊嗎?
fake news!
他从里根开始一直干到现在,应该是白宫那几个里唯一一个说话可以信的了
一盆脏水迎面泼过来难道就接着?
我固然反感美国故意散布“中国病毒”这样的引导式新闻,但说肺炎是因军运会从国外带来的这种说法,似乎也难以经得起推敲。这件事还是等科学家们最终盖棺定论吧,之前保持吃瓜就好。
对,微博那一阵很好。。。
这个记者是为中国讲话的啊,而且全篇对中国非常友好了。是记者先提出病毒是在12月份才被发现,特朗普要求中国比1月份更早三四个月公布病毒的说法纯属互扯(doesn't comport with facts),然后这点上Fauci也认同但是十分无奈。
全篇大概是这样的:记者问总统一直在胡说八道,这你不管管吗?Fauci回答他我尽我可能的和白宫强调要以事实为准发言,并遵循CDC给出的防控意见。但是说实话吧他们不听我的话的时候我也只能尽力尝试,特朗普胡说八道的时候我也不能当场捂住话筒中断他的讲话,只能发布会开完后告诉他他说的并不正确希望下次改正。
原文链接:https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/03/i-m-going-keep-pushing-anthony-fauci-tries-make-white-house-listen-facts-pandemic
编辑一下:才看到你是回复别人说你有看全文的,那我觉得要不就是你没有仔细看,要不就是你没看懂。不然你不可能会觉得是记者试图引导抹黑中国,结果现场遇到专家反水。Jon Cohen是Science的staff writer,毕竟还是美国人对中国看法不一定非常客观(参考他一些过去的采访稿),但是跟CNN福克斯纽约时报那些无良媒体的撰稿人/记者还是不一样的。 [ 此帖被wmdsyjr在2020-03-23 19:00修改 ]
当时我特别奇怪,电子烟出来多少年了,怎么偏偏那个时候出问题
像悦刻那种预制烟弹应该不会有啥事,但是老美那块儿有人吸的是加了料的自制烟油
繁体字发表这些,不奇怪!
若“质疑”不自 由,则“肯定”无意义!🐶🐶🐶
太真实了
在美国,实话实说没人会把你怎么样。
你以为是自大,其实他们就是坏,非常坏
阿川:抗议!对方辩友这是顺藤摸瓜
这货用的是繁体字,明白了吧!
别理他 他这几天跳得很 哪儿反驳他美爹 他就气得跺脚
你们不会用简体字发帖吗?
谁TM跟你我们?这里是中国
先了解下再出来反驳吧,笑死人
我记得台湾一个节目专门说过,论文好像是日本学者的
他说的是采访崔大使的记者吧
就得干
福西也是传奇人物啊
公知:现在跳槽还来得及不
这两件事都是公开新闻,其他咱也不敢说🐶
relx还不错,绿豆味很赞。抽着抽着就不像抽烟草的了
电子烟分两种,一种是不含烟草成分的,如烟油。一种是含烟草成分(国内禁止销售)的,如iqos加热不燃烧
电子烟都产生15年左右的时间了,中国美国多少人吸,要是真会引起的早都爆出来了,至少美国9月份找这个理由背锅的时候,中美都有人质疑过。
人家说的有问题?
cnn,fake news,next🐶
“我看了啊,不就是美国想嫁祸给我们嘛,然后首席专家反水,我想说的是包括上午采访崔大师的记者各种挖坑,等你跳,众多美国人就像这个记者一样自大,充满傲慢与偏见!”。
我又看了一下他的回复,我不能完全确定,但是我倾向于他两个记者都在骂?反正我是觉得这帖子里面一堆人上来就开始带节奏,掀骂战真的挺没意思的。一篇好好地非常客观的采访,回帖乌七八糟。这跟美国人不管看到中国什么新闻都捂起眼睛耳朵开黑开骂,有什么区别。
虽然大爆发是一月底,但病毒出现的时间相信比这个时间要早,甚至早的多。但是九月仍令人非常吃惊,白宫到底掌握了什么资料?
九月这个白宫要求的时间点非常有意思,可惜我们手头掌握的信息点太少,暂时连不成线
事出反常必有妖,希望阴谋早日浮出水面
加了料会引起其他肺部疾病嘛?比如说肺炎呢?
国内为什么禁售啊?加烟草成分只有美国人会这么干嘛?
绿豆冰沙贼好抽,阿尔法好像出了其他新的口味,不过还没尝试
有往里面加违禁物品的…🍃之类还有别的更烈的,在网上我就不明说了。具体会不会引起肺炎,我不是大夫我不懂,可是既然媒体一直在鼓吹电子烟肺炎,那我想这东西至少和肺炎致病性有关联吧,可是纯烟油怎么可能导致肺炎呢,我和身边的朋友抽了很久了一点事都没有,那只能是他往里放东西把自己抽死了
他们污蔑我们,我们为什么不能反击?大家都没证据,凭什么我们就该受着?
要我说,国内禁售是因为这玩意儿不交烟草税…但是如果把市场给国家队的话那就不一样了
首先,这种说法本来就是为了怼回去,其次
从哪来的根本不重要
老话儿说得好,狗咬你一口,你还能咬狗么~再说了,他爱说就让他说去呗,咱又不掉块肉咋的,犯不上川大总统口嗨过瘾了,咱们无故挨了喷还狠的牙痒痒千方百计琢磨怎么反击,为了他一个老流氓花我半分钟的时间、搅了我一点点好心情都不值
这不是science的作者写的么?为什么和cnn有关?
我没明白为啥点灭你??这确实是science的采访啊
了解啥?论文的结论是咋写的你贴出来看看?
楼上有cnn发的原文,自己看吧
操肛了dxd
根据烟草专卖法,含烟草成分的属于专卖,在没有烟草局的许可下私人不能出售。
美国有记者在调查了。。
还是考高拒稿率换来的,其他的更多强调科学伦理问题,实际上IF拖后腿了
需要站队的都不会是科学家。科学家只相信他们研究的东西。