以下是引用njulily在1/14/2011 3:51:00 AM的发言： I read the rest 2010 Microsoft Research award fellows' resumes/CVs. They became professors from newly graduated PhD student, from post-doc position, or from industry in 2007, 2008, 2009. Everyone except Shen AP is eligible in terms of candidacy. Shen AP is not even qualified to begin with. [此贴子已经被作者于2011/1/14 3:52:58编辑过]
Nominees must be new faculty members in the first, second, or third year of their first faculty appointment as of the application deadline (usually in November of the preceding year). The nominee’s eligibility for this criterion is not determined by the date of the award.
On August 2009 she has passed her third year ... so she is not qualified... [此贴子已经被作者于2011/1/14 4:37:47编辑过]
那个奖序不许要系里的信呀. If so, her department chair should be held responsible too; well, he might be provided with wrong info. At least, someone should inform him (the chair) about this issue.
那个奖序不许要系里的信呀. If so, her department chair should be held responsible too; well, he might be provided with wrong info. At least, someone should inform him (the chair) about this issue.
Don't know who's the 2nd candidate in her area (if MS gives awards based on areas). It may not hurt for Some mm or their LG, who applied for the award that year too, to check with MS.
那个奖序不许要系里的信呀. If so, her department chair should be held responsible too; well, he might be provided with wrong info. At least, someone should inform him (the chair) about this issue.
nomination by department or individual? i would expect microsoft asking for some type of confirmation from the department on the employment status of the applicant before triage... interesting... maybe AP submitted her application the year before but received the award a year after
nomination by department or individual? i would expect microsoft asking for some type of confirmation from the department on the employment status of the applicant before triage... interesting... maybe AP submitted her application the year before but received the award a year after
Haiying (Helen) Shen’s Experience Assistant Professor Clemson University (Educational Institution; Higher Education industry) August 2009 — Present (1 year 6 months)
Assistant Professor University of Arkansas (Educational Institution; Higher Education industry) August 2006 — August 2009 (3 years 1 month)
---------------------- Schedule and Deadlines Q: My institution is considering a nominee who is now finishing up a third (calendar) year as a new faculty member, and would be in the fourth year as a faculty member when the awards are announced in July. Is this faculty member eligible to be nominated? Nominees must be new faculty members in the first, second, or third year of their first faculty appointment as of the application deadline (usually in November of the preceding year). The nominee’s eligibility for this criterion is not determined by the date of the award. Q: What are the funding dates for the Microsoft Research Faculty Fellowship program awards? The Microsoft Research Faculty Fellowship awards will be decided in early May 2011. Funds are distributed shortly after the winners are decided. The awards will be publicly announced at the Microsoft Research Faculty Summit in July 2011.
cool！Nominees must be new faculty members in the first, second, or third year of their first faculty appointment as of the application deadline (usually in November of the preceding year). The nominee’s eligibility for this criterion is not determined by the date of the award.
Haiying (Helen) Shen’s Experience Assistant Professor Clemson University (Educational Institution; Higher Education industry) August 2009 — Present (1 year 6 months)
Assistant Professor University of Arkansas (Educational Institution; Higher Education industry) August 2006 — August 2009 (3 years 1 month)
---------------------- Schedule and Deadlines Q: My institution is considering a nominee who is now finishing up a third (calendar) year as a new faculty member, and would be in the fourth year as a faculty member when the awards are announced in July. Is this faculty member eligible to be nominated? Nominees must be new faculty members in the first, second, or third year of their first faculty appointment as of the application deadline (usually in November of the preceding year). The nominee’s eligibility for this criterion is not determined by the date of the award. Q: What are the funding dates for the Microsoft Research Faculty Fellowship program awards? The Microsoft Research Faculty Fellowship awards will be decided in early May 2011. Funds are distributed shortly after the winners are decided. The awards will be publicly announced at the Microsoft Research Faculty Summit in July 2011.
那个奖序不许要系里的信呀. If so, her department chair should be held responsible too; well, he might be provided with wrong info. At least, someone should inform him (the chair) about this issue.
hmm, either her first faculty appointment was a non-tenure track position, or, she lied.
Later, I found this: http://www.clemson.edu/ces/departments/ece/document_resource/seminars/ShenAbstract_03-12-09.pdf Her title was "assistant professor", not "adjunct ....professor", which shows her position in U of Arkansas was tenure-track.
So the conclusion is SHE IS NOT QUALIFIED TO RECEIVE MS AWARD!!!!
我来顶贴了，早上发了言后就不能回复了，被公司给封了，只好回家力顶。我的精神是可嘉的，我的意志是顽强的。我的威望是不够的，路过的版主请留情。
hmm, either her first faculty appointment was a non-tenure track position, or, she lied.
Later, I found this: http://www.clemson.edu/ces/departments/ece/document_resource/seminars/ShenAbstract_03-12-09.pdf
Her title was "assistant professor", not "adjunct ....professor", which shows her position in U of Arkansas was tenure-track.
So the conclusion is SHE IS NOT QUALIFIED TO RECEIVE MS AWARD!!!!
P.S. The seminar was on Thursday, March 12, 2009.
[此贴子已经被作者于2011/1/14 2:54:47编辑过]
what?!
I read the rest 2010 Microsoft Research award fellows' resumes/CVs. They became professors from newly graduated PhD student, from post-doc position, or from industry in 2007, 2008, 2009. Everyone except Shen AP is eligible in terms of candidacy. Shen AP is not even qualified to begin with.
[此贴子已经被作者于2011/1/14 3:52:58编辑过]
问了一下，这几篇文章是每年成果汇报的时候PI输入NSF database的，不是申请的proposal里的，所以reviewers并看不到。 成果汇报每年就是program officer审批，但他们一般不会花太多时间做crossreference，所以很少会发现有人这么做。NSF这么贴出来在它的网页上，大概也是希望有群众帮着一起监督？
可以从几个方面下手:
1. 师太这些nsf funding proposal本身的merit，在proposal review and award过程中是否有猫腻
2. 师太项目成果的具体成就，是否真正达到了nsf funding的水平，是否有循环重复使用成果现象。审核结果时是否有审核不严格，nsf玩忽职守现象
3. 师太从2008就开始拿nsf，已经完成的项目的成果的具体水平到底如何，她的track record并不强，为什么还能一而三再而三地继续拿nsf，什么起了决定作用？
I think those ID who dig a lot of info are very good at research, they will be good faculties in the future.
刚刚申请的新号码.
不要怀疑我是亲友团啊,我只是个打酱油的. 不是博士,更不是CS。
刚刚申请的新号码.
欢迎MM，大家一起打酱油挖真相。亲友团的也欢迎，等山蛋等半天了。
不要怀疑我是亲友团啊,我只是个打酱油的. 不是博士,更不是CS。
刚刚申请的新号码.
嘿嘿，你的注册日期令人遐想。。。
[此贴子已经被作者于2011/1/14 10:25:15编辑过]
不要怀疑我是亲友团啊,我只是个打酱油的. 不是博士,更不是CS。
刚刚申请的新号码. 谁知道啊，亲友团都不承认自己是亲友团，马甲还不承认自己是师太，最后还不是现了原形，嘿嘿
[此贴子已经被作者于2011/1/14 10:28:38编辑过]
谁知道啊，亲友团都不承认自己是亲友团，马甲还不承认自己是师太，最后还不是现了原形，嘿嘿
这个新ID至今对无聊大妈们还是称赞的，应该可以暂且划为大妈。
。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。
[此贴子已经被作者于2011/1/14 10:28:38编辑过]
啥意思，一串酱油滴？
等那个去旅游的报料了俺再来看。呵呵，我也是无聊大妈一名。这几天看这个帖子，工作都没好好找。
[此贴子已经被作者于2011/1/14 10:38:39编辑过]
不好意思，安家小朋友打的。
小朋友这么聪明啊，酱油滴都会打了。赞一个。
不好意思，安家小朋友打的。
安家开始卖小朋友了？
安家开始卖小朋友了？
哈哈哈，现在在extra 40% off?
Nominees must be new faculty members in the first, second, or third year of their first faculty appointment as of the application deadline (usually in November of the preceding year). The nominee’s eligibility for this criterion is not determined by the date of the award.
On August 2009 she has passed her third year ... so she is not qualified...
[此贴子已经被作者于2011/1/14 4:37:47编辑过]
那个奖序不许要系里的信呀. If so, her department chair should be held responsible too; well, he might be provided with wrong info. At least, someone should inform him (the chair) about this issue.
按在这里蹲了很久了，都快精分了。花了不少时间，决定退了。
等那个去旅游的报料了俺再来看。呵呵，我也是无聊大妈一名。这几天看这个帖子，工作都没好好找。
[此贴子已经被作者于2011/1/14 10:38:39编辑过]
别退啊，才挖出这个Microsoft的问题，这个可能蛮damaging。
那个奖序不许要系里的信呀. If so, her department chair should be held responsible too; well, he might be provided with wrong info. At least, someone should inform him (the chair) about this issue.
一般是需要领域里的推荐信吧。象师太nsf都搞定了，这个应该是小菜一碟
好高的楼啊 ，有精简版不？
看精简版就没那么多fun了。MM慢慢爬，很娱乐的楼。
一般是需要领域里的推荐信吧。象师太nsf都搞定了，这个应该是小菜一碟
Don't know who's the 2nd candidate in her area (if MS gives awards based on areas). It may not hurt for Some mm or their LG, who applied for the award that year too, to check with MS.
看精简版就没那么多fun了。MM慢慢爬，很娱乐的楼。
那个奖序不许要系里的信呀. If so, her department chair should be held responsible too; well, he might be provided with wrong info. At least, someone should inform him (the chair) about this issue.
nomination by department or individual? i would expect microsoft asking for some type of confirmation from the department on the employment status of the applicant before triage... interesting... maybe AP submitted her application the year before but received the award a year after
nomination by department or individual? i would expect microsoft asking for some type of confirmation from the department on the employment status of the applicant before triage... interesting... maybe AP submitted her application the year before but received the award a year after
应该可以查到申请程序。师太明显不符合申请资格要求。
我凹凸了。。。 为什么说ap不qualify？
hmm, either her first faculty appointment was a non-tenure track position, or, she lied.
Later, I found this: http://www.clemson.edu/ces/departments/ece/document_resource/seminars/ShenAbstract_03-12-09.pdf
Her title was "assistant professor", not "adjunct ....professor", which shows her position in U of Arkansas was tenure-track.
So the conclusion is SHE IS NOT QUALIFIED TO RECEIVE MS AWARD!!!!
P.S. The seminar was on Thursday, March 12, 2009.
[此贴子已经被作者于2011/1/14 2:54:47编辑过]
ORZ
hmm, either her first faculty appointment was a non-tenure track
position, or, she lied.
Later, I found this: http://www.clemson.edu/ces/departments/ece/document_resource/seminars/ShenAbstract_03-12-09.pdf
Her title was "assistant professor", not "adjunct ....professor",
which shows her position in U of Arkansas was tenure-track.
So the conclusion is SHE IS NOT QUALIFIED TO RECEIVE MS AWARD!!!!
P.S. The seminar was on Thursday, March 12, 2009.
师太也太大胆了，
老底快翻完了，下一步该干嘛呢？
没翻完呢，看来师太很多dirt，每一步都有问题。
为啥又牵出什么microsoft award？
我凹凸了。。。 为什么说ap不qualify？
必须是第一，第二，或第三年的new faculty，而师太现在不是new faulty，她已经毕业4+，第二个学校了。
没翻完呢，看来师太很多dirt，每一步都有问题。
Wondering who will get the 5,000 dollars by calling the nsf audit line!
必须是第一，第二，或第三年的new faculty，而师太现在不是new faulty，她已经毕业4+，第二个学校了。
Maybe she applied a year or two ago...??
应该可以查到申请程序。师太明显不符合申请资格要求。
Please see floor 3317. You would know clearly. :-)
The cutting-off time for ShenAP's eligibility is November,2009. Which university was she in at that time? The answer is Clemson.
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/haiying-helen-shen/4/336/72a
Haiying (Helen) Shen’s Experience
Assistant Professor
Clemson University
(Educational Institution; Higher Education industry)
August 2009 — Present (1 year 6 months)
Assistant Professor
University of Arkansas
(Educational Institution; Higher Education industry)
August 2006 — August 2009 (3 years 1 month)
----------------------
Schedule and Deadlines
Q: My institution is considering a nominee who is now finishing up a third (calendar) year as a new faculty member, and would be in the fourth year as a faculty member when the awards are announced in July. Is this faculty member eligible to be nominated?
Nominees must be new faculty members in the first, second, or third year of their first faculty appointment as of the application deadline (usually in November of the preceding year). The nominee’s eligibility for this criterion is not determined by the date of the award.
Q: What are the funding dates for the Microsoft Research Faculty Fellowship program awards?
The Microsoft Research Faculty Fellowship awards will be decided in early May 2011. Funds are distributed shortly after the winners are decided. The awards will be publicly announced at the Microsoft Research Faculty Summit in July 2011.
[此贴子已经被作者于2011/1/14 4:08:36编辑过]
post again...
Maybe she applied a year or two ago...??
怎么可能...
别退啊，才挖出这个Microsoft的问题，这个可能蛮damaging。
怎么发现这个奖的呢？从她的页面上吗？太厉害了
Maybe she applied a year or two ago...??
这个不是应该每年申请的吗？以前申请更不make sense了，记得这个楼早期我就说过师太的身份在一堆同获奖的top school faculty里显得非常突兀，她一两年前更什么东西都不是了，现在有些nsf，看着比较好看些也就。感觉她应该是在现在这个学校申请的，拿了现在的成果。
post again...
cool！Nominees must be new faculty members in the first, second, or third year of their first faculty appointment as of the application deadline (usually in November of the preceding year). The nominee’s eligibility for this criterion is not determined by the date of the award.
[此贴子已经被作者于2011/1/14 12:24:13编辑过]
Please see floor 3317. You would know clearly. :-)
Thanks! 早上会太多，没来得及仔细看MM的研究成果。这个很强。师太完全不合格。
Thanks! 早上会太多，没来得及仔细看MM的研究成果。这个很强。师太完全不合格。
What do you think is better? Calling or emailing nsf??
msr那个奖的评定委员会会经常请外面的大牛一起来做评委，所以这个nsf funding and msr reward的评委如果有交集，而且都很牛，酒比较有意思了
[此贴子已经被作者于2011/1/14 12:24:13编辑过]
师太应该是拿到了很强的推荐信，以及评委里有人。大家去看看同届的获奖人，就知道她多寒酸了（当然出nsf 数目外，呵呵）。
[此贴子已经被作者于2011/1/14 12:31:27编辑过]
The cutting-off time for ShenAP's eligibility is November,2009. Which university was she in at that time? The answer is Clemson.
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/haiying-helen-shen/4/336/72a
Haiying (Helen) Shen’s Experience
Assistant Professor
Clemson University
(Educational Institution; Higher Education industry)
August 2009 — Present (1 year 6 months)
Assistant Professor
University of Arkansas
(Educational Institution; Higher Education industry)
August 2006 — August 2009 (3 years 1 month)
----------------------
Schedule and Deadlines
Q: My institution is considering a nominee who is now finishing up a third (calendar) year as a new faculty member, and would be in the fourth year as a faculty member when the awards are announced in July. Is this faculty member eligible to be nominated?
Nominees must be new faculty members in the first, second, or third year of their first faculty appointment as of the application deadline (usually in November of the preceding year). The nominee’s eligibility for this criterion is not determined by the date of the award.
Q: What are the funding dates for the Microsoft Research Faculty Fellowship program awards?
The Microsoft Research Faculty Fellowship awards will be decided in early May 2011. Funds are distributed shortly after the winners are decided. The awards will be publicly announced at the Microsoft Research Faculty Summit in July 2011.
[此贴子已经被作者于2011/1/14 4:08:36编辑过]
这个给力！！！[EM57][EM57][EM57]
[此贴子已经被作者于2011/1/14 12:29:47编辑过]
师太应该是拿到了很强的推荐信，以及评委里有人。大家去看看同届的获奖人，就知道她多寒酸了（当然出nsf 数目外，呵呵）。
师太横扫了一下其他获奖者，对自己说，恩，成绩比我牛的没有俺漂亮，比俺漂亮的成绩没有我大因此也都没来！这么着，师太就自信起来了。
What do you think is better? Calling or emailing nsf??
可以先contact Microsoft了。师太完全不合格拿那个奖。他们是审查不严，自打耳光，对其他申请人不公平，对Microsoft的声誉造成了极大损害，其他申请人完全可以告Microsfot不按章行事。对这件事也许都不需要攻击师太，就咬住Microsoft自己的失误就。如果收集到师太技术不合格，一贯造假打擦边球的behavior pattern，那就更强。nsf还需要继续收集证据，然后吹哨子。
以下是引用njulily在1/14/2011 2:30:00 AM的发言：
hmm, either her first faculty appointment was a non-tenure track position, or, she lied.
Later, I found this: http://www.clemson.edu/ces/departments/ece/document_resource/seminars/ShenAbstract_03-12-09.pdf
Her title was "assistant professor", not "adjunct ....professor", which shows her position in U of Arkansas was tenure-track.
So the conclusion is SHE IS NOT QUALIFIED TO RECEIVE MS AWARD!!!!
P.S. The seminar was on Thursday, March 12, 2009.
师太也太大胆了，
[此贴子已经被作者于2011/1/24 1:13:23编辑过]
师太横扫了一下其他获奖者，对自己说，恩，成绩比我牛的没有俺漂亮，比俺漂亮的成绩没有我大因此也都没来！这么着，师太就自信起来了。
嗯，是自我膨胀的厉害，在那个声明里还说她获得了很大的成就，切，都是什么破成就。教授夫人们，快把这个新情况告诉你们LG。
可以先contact Microsoft了。师太完全不合格拿那个奖。他们是审查不严，自打耳光，对其他申请人不公平，对Microsoft的声誉造成了极大损害，其他申请人完全可以告Microsfot不按章行事。对这件事也许都不需要攻击师太，就咬住Microsoft自己的失误就。如果收集到师太技术不合格，一贯造假打擦边球的behavior pattern，那就更强。nsf还需要继续收集证据，然后吹哨子。
微软有举报电话什么的吗？
她的第一个appointment肯定是tenure-track的，要不然不可以做NSF独立PI的，除非是那种培养未来faculty的training grants。她的不是。
对哦，当时两个nsf钱还不少呢，有个好象300K+.
师太横扫了一下其他获奖者，对自己说，恩，成绩比我牛的没有俺漂亮，比俺漂亮的成绩没有我大因此也都没来！这么着，师太就自信起来了。
[EM82]
师太横扫了一下其他获奖者，对自己说，恩，成绩比我牛的没有俺漂亮，比俺漂亮的成绩没有我大因此也都没来！这么着，师太就自信起来了。
都不占吧，内心独白应该是，你们辛辛苦苦几年也不如我ｈａｒｄ ｗｏｒｋ几个钟？
微软有举报电话什么的吗？
申请这个奖应该有联络方式吧？
都不占吧，内心独白应该是，你们辛辛苦苦几年也不如我ｈａｒｄ ｗｏｒｋ几个钟？
好像某种特殊职业用“几个钟”来衡量的。lol
申请这个奖应该有联络方式吧？
应该有别的联系方式，不一定申请人才有的。
要不要在看看师太其他funding，集中猫腻在行动？
好的。师太真是不经戳哈。
要不要在看看师太其他funding，集中猫腻在行动？
[此贴子已经被作者于2011/1/24 1:13:45编辑过]
这个microsoft的是独立的，和NSF没关系，它也没权利调查NSF奖项的pattern。而且microsoft这个是challenge她的eligibility，是客观硬性规定的，和NSF那个她的proposal的quality如何的主观评估不一样。不过这个microsoft 内部也可以看看当年的审核程序，看看是谁推波助澜的，到时候可以给NSF做参考。
对。先用technicality把师太的microsoft奖去掉。
BTW,捏着鼻子看了师太某个nsf支持的project的paper，真是很烂，弄了半天也就是弄个java写的simulator弄弄就完事了，估计也就雇两个中国学生，码工码工，paper再拼凑几下就算mission accomplished了。不知道为什么会给那么多钱的nsf funding，她那个做法又不需要买多少server和其他设备的。欢迎懂行的做些专家分析。
不要污蔑师太的研究水平！她的那三篇文章里，只有一个有个学生，另两个都是师太独立作者的，码工写文都是师太百忙之中自己干的！
不要污蔑师太的研究水平！她的那三篇文章里，只有一个有个学生，另两个都是师太独立作者的，码工写文都是师太百忙之中自己干的！
哈哈，我真好mean，忍不住笑了。
不要污蔑师太的研究水平！她的那三篇文章里，只有一个有个学生，另两个都是师太独立作者的，码工写文都是师太百忙之中自己干的！
是的是的，我接受批评。师太万岁万岁万万岁。BTW，做CS/EE Systems方面用simulation是个没定论的方法，怎么知道你里面的model和code具体怎么回事。看师太一贯行为，她要做simulation，如果有人告诉我，她的结果是手画出来的我都可能相信。警告师太，别派an lawyer跨省，我是特别问了CS Systems方面的大牛。
师太咋不出来声明一下：她的两大奖项问题？
按师太的日程，现在才午饭完，然后是严肃research时间，没工夫和大妈们解释。
师太咋不出来声明一下：她的两大奖项问题？
师太说了，她的所有成就都是因为她的hard work。要说几遍我等这些资质平凡的人才能理解呀！？
这个帖子简直就是NSF科普贴。大妈们估计以后都可以跟cs faculty讨论nsf funding问题了
Re! 还有cs得科普，文科大妈学到好多阿。
[此贴子已经被作者于2011/1/14 13:02:21编辑过]
Re! 还有cs得科普，文科大妈学到好多阿。
[此贴子已经被作者于2011/1/14 13:02:21编辑过]
从师太的经历看，文科大妈努努力，使使劲，也能说不准连蒙带唬的弄个NSF玩玩。
师太咋不出来声明一下：她的两大奖项问题？
she is hiding in the corner crying
我离师太好近。汗。真想去参观一下
快去吧，回来报告一下，顺便和师太合个影。
从师太的经历看，文科大妈努努力，使使劲，也能说不准连蒙带唬的弄个NSF玩玩。
nsf也有文科项目的。文科大妈加油。
师太咋不出来声明一下：她的两大奖项问题？
她现在还敢？
按师太的日程，现在才午饭完，然后是严肃research时间，没工夫和大妈们解释。
[此贴子已经被作者于2011/1/14 13:18:34编辑过]
从师太的经历看，文科大妈努努力，使使劲，也能说不准连蒙带唬的弄个NSF玩玩。
俺可不想换个按钟点PAID的职业
俺可不想换个按钟点PAID的职业
几个钟换一大笔钱，还顶着教授的帽子，不了解谁知道是怎么来的，我看不错呢。
Re! 还有cs得科普，文科大妈学到好多阿。
[此贴子已经被作者于2011/1/14 13:02:21编辑过]
ｎｓｆ也有很多文科项目，我知道有拿了１００多万的
几个钟换一大笔钱，还顶着教授的帽子，不了解谁知道是怎么来的，我看不错呢。
有人动心了？围观一下。[EM80]
那个奖序不许要系里的信呀. If so, her department chair should be held responsible too; well, he might be provided with wrong info. At least, someone should inform him (the chair) about this issue.
好像要学校提名的，不知道那个学校提名她。如果是现在的学校，那学校也有问题。
ｎｓｆ也有很多文科项目，我知道有拿了１００多万的
文科怎么能拿这么多？social science还有可能。
这个microsoft的是独立的，和NSF没关系，它也没权利调查NSF奖项的pattern。而且microsoft这个是challenge她的eligibility，是客观硬性规定的，和NSF那个她的proposal的quality如何的主观评估不一样。不过这个microsoft 内部也可以看看当年的审核程序，看看是谁推波助澜的，到时候可以给NSF做参考。
the NSF director has microsoft connection...
the NSF director has microsoft connection...
hmmm, he is really nice to shi tai.
以下是引用njulily在1/14/2011 2:30:00 AM的发言：
hmm, either her first faculty appointment was a non-tenure track position, or, she lied.
Later, I found this: http://www.clemson.edu/ces/departments/ece/document_resource/seminars/ShenAbstract_03-12-09.pdf
Her title was "assistant professor", not "adjunct ....professor", which shows her position in U of Arkansas was tenure-track.
So the conclusion is SHE IS NOT QUALIFIED TO RECEIVE MS AWARD!!!!
P.S. The seminar was on Thursday, March 12, 2009.
师太也太大胆了，
她的第一个appointment肯定是tenure-track的，要不然不可以做NSF独立PI的，除非是那种培养未来faculty的training grants。她的不是。
赶紧mark一下 又有新料了 师太怎么这么不禁挖呀
可以改成：宁愿相信世界上有鬼，不要相信AP师太那张嘴。
[此贴子已经被作者于2011/1/14 15:12:15编辑过]
文科怎么能拿这么多？social science还有可能。
打酱油打得糊涂了，就是ｓｏｃｉａｌ ｓｃｉｅｎｃｅｓ
师太发文章速度堪比以前那个很有名的一年发一百多篇SCI的青椒。师太一个月最少有一篇文章，怀疑她还得带学生还得上课，有时间自己做research吗
Time is like cleavage, there is always some if you squeeze hard enough.
以下是引用ijustforyou在1/14/2011 12:10:00 PM的发言：
以下是引用njulily在1/14/2011 2:30:00 AM的发言：
hmm, either her first faculty appointment was a non-tenure track position, or, she lied.
Later, I found this: http://www.clemson.edu/ces/departments/ece/document_resource/seminars/ShenAbstract_03-12-09.pdf
Her title was "assistant professor", not "adjunct ....professor", which shows her position in U of Arkansas was tenure-track.
So the conclusion is SHE IS NOT QUALIFIED TO RECEIVE MS AWARD!!!!
P.S. The seminar was on Thursday, March 12, 2009.
师太也太大胆了，
她的第一个appointment肯定是tenure-track的，要不然不可以做NSF独立PI的，除非是那种培养未来faculty的training grants。她的不是。
赶紧mark一下 又有新料了 师太怎么这么不禁挖呀
如果第一个是tenure-track, microsoft faculty fellowship 她不该合格；如果第一个是non tenure-track, nsf的那两个funding她不该合格。师太左右成问题。看来是有能人鼎力相助。谁见过哪个nsf director这么帮忙过吗？
师太发文章速度堪比以前那个很有名的一年发一百多篇SCI的青椒。师太一个月最少有一篇文章，怀疑她还得带学生还得上课，有时间自己做research吗
都是junk paper，这么点可怜的citation，真是浪费地球资源。
宁愿相信世界上有鬼,不要相信CCTV那张嘴——真有才，拷贝过来大家乐乐。
可以改成：宁愿相信世界上有鬼，不要相信AP师太那张嘴。
[此贴子已经被作者于2011/1/14 15:12:15编辑过]
师太曰：俺不需要你相信。俺照拿funding照拿奖，气死你们losers。