难道stop sign前不是只要come to a complete stop就可以了吗，根本不需要停3秒。我记得几年前在哪里看到，警察专门为此向公众解释过，加州。刚刚google下，有这么一段解释： “136(1). This means that if there is no hazard to proceed, as long as you came to a complete stop, you can legally continue on your way without stopping for a full three seconds! Many people receive unfair and unjust stop sign tickets when they have obeyed the law completely.” 楼主也许可以此理由上庭抗辩。
难道stop sign前不是只要come to a complete stop就可以了吗，根本不需要停3秒。我记得几年前在哪里看到，警察专门为此向公众解释过，加州。刚刚google下，有这么一段解释： “136(1). This means that if there is no hazard to proceed, as long as you came to a complete stop, you can legally continue on your way without stopping for a full three seconds! Many people receive unfair and unjust stop sign tickets when they have obeyed the law completely.” 楼主也许可以此理由上庭抗辩。
另一种说法是去上庭求情，可能能减半。
有没有有经验的mm说说呢？坐标加州
不要去court 了
去上课
我当时先去交罚单
人家说要先上课
不上课还不让交钱
我上完又去交罚单
结果因为上了课就discount 了
罚了几十块而已（具体多少忘了）
不懂为啥
我就高高兴兴的交了回家了
我是超速罚的
交了还要上学课的~
要不你证明自己停够三秒 ---发自Huaren 官方 iOS APP
你们州真便宜
上课也要花钱的呀
然后再去交罚单就discount 了
是啊，加州罚单巨贵无比
那就看楼主想花上课的时间，还是上庭的时间了。最后交的钱应该差不多。
“136(1). This means that if there is no hazard to proceed, as long as you came to a complete stop, you can legally continue on your way without stopping for a full three seconds! Many people receive unfair and unjust stop sign tickets when they have obeyed the law completely.”
楼主也许可以此理由上庭抗辩。
我那时没有选择
必须上课
不上课罚单都不让交钱
我经常拿着手机做gps 用
一边开车一边看啊
http://m.trafficticketsolutions.ca/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftrafficticketsolutions.ca%2Fstop-sign.php&utm_referrer=#2819
在加州就请交通法律师吧，$200就搞定了，自己上庭赔时间
Stop sign的罚单跟红灯罚单性质一样
据说moving violation会影响保费，找了个律师，自己没出庭。最后判了referral，罚单的钱还得交，只是不进记录，一年多没再犯就既往不咎了。
然后我就去written contest了 照了路口的照片 最后免了
其实三秒并不是一个hard rule 起码在我们州不是（加州）
警察去了吗？