Q & A | Zhang Ziyi CD (China Daily): You donated 1 million yuan ($146,500) out of your own pocket (for Sichuan earthquake relief), right? ZZY (Zhang Ziyi): Yes. CD: You gave it to the China Red Cross? ZZY: Yes. CD: But only 840,000 yuan ($123,000) was transferred. ZZY: That's correct. CD: You made up for the shortfall only recently (Feb 8, 2010). Why was that? ZZY: I was not in China (May 2008). I just gave the instruction to donate and did not follow up. I traveled from the United States to Cannes, France. I take the main responsibility for the lapse and causing my staff to mix it up. CD: When did you first realize your donation was short of what you had announced? ZZY: Later, when news came out and we did an investigation. CD: What exactly went wrong? ZZY: Some kind of communication problem. CD: Have you ever said things like: "Please give money to the Red Cross?" ZZY: Yes. CD: At Cannes? ZZY: Yes. CD: Were you encouraging people to donate to the Red Cross? Or, were you asking them to give you the money and you would pass it to the Red Cross? ZZY: I was encouraging them to give directly to the Red Cross. Not a penny of other people's money passed through me to the Red Cross. CD: Have you ever raised money in the name of the Red Cross, but for your own foundation? ZZY: Never. CD: Have you ever thought of putting the 1 million yuan you gave to the Red Cross into your own foundation? ZZY: No. Fundraising in Cannes CD: Your fundraising in Cannes (May 21, 2008) got a lot of media coverage in China. But there have been different reports about the sum raised. The oft-quoted amount for cash is $50,000, which includes some Hong Kong dollars and euros converted into US dollars. Is that correct? ZZY: That's not correct. CD: Then, what was the amount of cash raised? ZZY: About $1,300. CD: How come it was so little? ZZY: The fundraising event was hastily arranged. We did not have a place. It was lent to us. I did not have many people with me, and I'm grateful to the volunteers from Sohu. Not many people showed up. At Cannes, everyone was busy watching movies and attending parties. And people do not carry much cash around, especially non-Chinese. CD: How much did you raise in pledges? ZZY: We got a little more than $400,000. CD: How much of that has been honored? Zhang Ziyi tears up at her fundraising event in Cannes, France. CFP / For China Daily
Zhang Ziyi tears up at her fundraising event in Cannes, France. CFP / For China Daily ZZY: Around $39,000. CD: Did the "almost $500,000" include the $100,000 pledged by Wendi Deng (Rupert Murdoch's wife)? ZZY: Yes. CD: In the past two years did you try to get the pledged money? ZZY: I made calls and corresponded with the pledged donors. CD: What was the result? ZZY: I hope to have a concrete project to show them and see whether that will interest them. CD: What if you fail to collect the whole? ZZY: (Long pause) If they do not honor their pledges that will give me another chance to give. I'll make up for the shortfall of $400,000 (the amount earmarked for a Sichuan Children's Center). CD: Have you ever mentioned that you raised more than $500,000, say, $1 million, which is often mentioned in media reports? What about $2 million, $5 million, and the highest I've read, $7 million? Do you know where those figures came from? ZZY: None of these is right. In the interviews after that fund-raising party, I said we raised "almost $500,000" and my goal is to raise $1 million. I have seen the $2 million report, which seemed to have something to do with Vivi (Nevo, Zhang's fianc). But he did not have a clue when I asked him about it. As for the other numbers, I have no idea. Zhang Ziyi Foundation CD: Some say you have two foundations, one in California and one in New York. The one in New York is actually an ESL school. How is that?
Zhang visits a Kunming orphanage in 2007, in support of Care for Children. REN / For China Daily ZZY: We have only one foundation, which is registered in California. But we added a New York mailing address for convenience of correspondence. CD: Some say your foundation is registered as a business. Zhang visits a Kunming orphanage in 2007, in support of Care for Children. REN / For China Daily ZZY: That's not true. It is a not-for-profit organization, a charity. CD: Some say (the registration) has expired. ZZY: It is always in good standing. CD: Some say you have only $45,471 in the account, others say the foundation's assets are zero. Which is correct? ZZY: There have never been zero assets in the account. The $40,000-plus should be $39,000 in donations plus $5,000 in expenses, which came from my own pocket. CD: Did all donations go to this account? ZZY: Yes. CD: Did anyone send money to your own account and you had to transfer it to the foundation? ZZY: This never happened. CD: Is this money managed by a professional, say, an accountant? ZZY: Yes. CD: Has there been any withdrawal - for any reason? ZZY: Never. It has always been there. I want to say that all information about the foundation is open and we have never done anything not transparent or illegal. Everyone can go and check on it. CD: There was a full-page ad in Hollywood Reporter, in which the editor-in-chief and you appeal for funds for the relief of the Sichuan earthquake. Is that true? ZZY: Yes. CD: Did you pay for the ad? ZZY: No. They wanted to help me when they found out what I was doing and they were moved. CD: Did anyone donate because of the ad? ZZY: It was a pity we did not receive any donations (induced by the ad). Care for Children CD: You said this money will be given to Care for Children and be used for building a Children's Center in Deyang, Sichuan province. Can you give us a brief description of the organization? ZZY: Care for Children is an international charity headquartered in the United Kingdom and with an office in Beijing. It has handled 38 projects in 27 provinces and autonomous regions across China. CD: Why did you pick Care for Children? ZZY: I had worked with them before the 2008 earthquake. What they do is to help those children who are deserted by sending them to foster homes. I wanted to cooperate with them and help the children left homeless from the earthquake. CD: But your money has not reached Care for Children yet. Why? ZZY: We had to get government approval for the project. It took a long time. CD: Now it has been approved, right? ZZY: The approval came in November 2009. CD: When will the money enter the account of Care for Children? ZZY: Within three weeks of breaking ground on the center. CD: How much will the center cost? And how much do the monies from your foundation and Care for Children account for? ZZY: The total cost will be 9 million yuan ($1.3 million), and our donations will be 4.5 million yuan, which is about $658,000. Of this amount, $400,000 is from my foundation. CD: Will you shut down the foundation once this project is over, or keep running it? ZZY: This project has just been approved. We'll put our energy into it. I'll think about other things later. Learning about charity CD: What qualities do you think are required for doing charity work, besides passion? ZZY: Besides passion, I think one needs a lot of energy, a professional team and enough knowledge. CD: Do you think you possessed them? ZZY: I had passion and energy, but not a professional team, or the right approach. CD: When entertainment celebrities engage in charity work, it usually gives people the impression that they want to spruce up their public image. Have you considered a low-profile or anonymous approach to charity? ZZY: I wish I could do that. But ... I still hope to use my name and influence to raise awareness for the issues involved. CD: What position does charity work occupy in your life and career? ZZY: A very important position. The achievements I have made today are the result of the many years that my country invested in me If the country suffers, we have to do our part. You cannot make up the feeling that you have with the country and the people. It is real. CD: What's your philosophy for charity? ZZY: My interest is in kids, especially disabled children. When I see them - whatever country they come from, I hope I can work for them, to improve their welfare. CD: Since the controversy about your donation, you have hired a Los Angeles law firm to investigate. Now it has issued its report, which is quite detailed. There are four donors who each pledged $100,000, and one for $50,000, but they have not yet honored their pledges. Why are their identities not revealed? ZZY: Donors have the right to reveal or conceal their names. It's about privacy. CD: If they end up not honoring those pledges, basically you'll take the responsibility for them. Right? ZZY: Yes, it can be interpreted this way. CD: You kept silent for two months. Why didn't you come out earlier and explain? ZZY: I wanted to clarify it from the very beginning. But then I found out I should use legal means to clarify everything. That'll be more convincing. We sent all the evidence to the US. The process took a long time. Impact of the controversy CD: Do you think there was someone manipulating the controversy, or it was the netizens who wanted to find out the truth? ZZY: I believe most netizens have a sense of justice and will seek truth from facts. When they know the truth, they can judge for themselves. CD: What impact has the controversy had on you and your family? ZZY: A lot. It's about me and I have to face it. But I don't want to see my family getting worried because of me ... (fighting back tears) CD: Did you get angry and feel it's unfair? ZZY: Of course there were moments I felt bad. I wanted to do something good, but we had our problems, such as my lack of experience, my failure to disclose to the public, my limited knowledge about philanthropy and other reasons. CD: Would you see this as a setback? ZZY: It was certainly a setback. But I learned something new from it. CD: Some say you quit (the Wendi Deng-produced movie)Snow Flower and the Secret Fan because of this, and some brands dropped you as their spokeswoman. Is that true? ZZY: No. I prepared for this movie for two years. But I underwent a surgery after doing an action scene, which prevented me from proceeding with that (Wendi Deng) movie. CD: What about endorsements? ZZY: Nothing unusual has happened. Black paint incident CD: When the current controversy first broke out, it had nothing to do with donations. A certain Zhao (Xinyu) accused you of something. Would you care to respond? ZZY: This incident has already caused trouble for a lot of people, especially my family. I have endured much, and I don't want others to go through the same pain. CD: Do you think the public has a right to know the private lives of celebrities? ZZY: There should be limits. CD: What about your love and marriage? ZZY: If it's nothing unethical, there's a need to let the public know. CD: Do you think a star should be a role model of morality? ZZY: Stars are ordinary people, too. But they should conduct themselves better. CD: You have international fame. Some say what you do represents the whole country and you should receive special protection or be placed under special constraints. What do you think? ZZY: I want to do better, but I don't want to give myself too much pressure or a sense of mission. I want to be an ordinary person, but I'll work to make it as perfect as possible. CD: A professor once said, you, Zhang Ziyi, are more powerful than Confucius in promoting Chinese culture overseas. What's your take on it? ZZY: How can I be compared with Confucius ... CD: What do you want your public image to be? ZZY: I want to be compassionate, responsible, hard working and full of personality.
作者：daimer_Chrysler 回复日期：2010-03-16 07:37:56 Well, I declined many friends' requests in helping to report Zhang to jurisdictions in the US because they heard about the suspected embezzlement of charity fund from me and they never heard of Zhang or watched her movies. My friends told me that they could at least write and speak native English with IRS, FBI and attorney general's offices. Now I am going to enlist their help. This kind of attitude and behavior cannot be tolerated and I am going to request the maximum punishment the law permits!
他写的好肉麻，我摘录一段： Yes, she is China's gift to Hollywood. But we're not living in an age when we give giant pandas as free gifts to foreign nations anymore. Nowadays we loan them out for a nice and nifty donation. If this policy is right for the black-and-white national treasure, why not apply it to the porcelain fragile type, as well? Which means she can date whomever she wants, but she eventually had better settle down with her own kind -- a nice lad, not someone at the bottom of the 30 million heap. And once that is picked up by a certain website that can turn anything into a social trend, all of those more gorgeous stars, such as Gong Li and Maggie Cheung, will have second thoughts on having Caucasian paramours or spouses. But then again, I think Zhang Ziyi shouldn't marry anybody. She should be put on a pedestal and enshrined as the virgin queen of Chinese cinema -- somewhat like the Buddha of Infinite Chastity.
他写的好肉麻，我摘录一段： Yes, she is China's gift to Hollywood. But we're not living in an age when we give giant pandas as free gifts to foreign nations anymore. Nowadays we loan them out for a nice and nifty donation. If this policy is right for the black-and-white national treasure, why not apply it to the porcelain fragile type, as well? Which means she can date whomever she wants, but she eventually had better settle down with her own kind -- a nice lad, not someone at the bottom of the 30 million heap. And once that is picked up by a certain website that can turn anything into a social trend, all of those more gorgeous stars, such as Gong Li and Maggie Cheung, will have second thoughts on having Caucasian paramours or spouses. But then again, I think Zhang Ziyi shouldn't marry anybody. She should be put on a pedestal and enshrined as the virgin queen of Chinese cinema -- somewhat like the Buddha of Infinite Chastity.
But then again, I think Zhang Ziyi shouldn't marry anybody. She should be put on a pedestal and enshrined as the virgin queen of Chinese cinema -- somewhat like the Buddha of Infinite Chastity. 玛雅，这浑身的鸡皮掉了几层了。。
But then again, I think Zhang Ziyi shouldn't marry anybody. She should be put on a pedestal and enshrined as the virgin queen of Chinese cinema -- somewhat like the Buddha of Infinite Chastity. 玛雅，这浑身的鸡皮掉了几层了。。
TX们，千万要淡定哈，关于章子怡的“专访”，大家要记住 ，目前的真实情况就是：章子怡知道，脸皮是怎么也保不住了，但是不能吃官司，所以，无论最后给出1300美金，还是象我前面给出的那种在法庭上的狡辩，并不是为了保住名誉，是为了免受牢狱之灾。如果你想通了这点，就不要再浪费口舌批评她了，她都没脸了，连皮啊肉啊什么都打算豁出去了，还怕我们全民的口水？
所以从她的专访可以知道，我们主攻方向是走法律途径。国内，国外都要。国内的，可以举报包括红会，搜狐，其他新闻媒体，颁奖机构等等，红会上司是国际红会吧？如果不是，总有管理慈善机构的部门吧？搜狐和其他新闻媒体呢？当年报道她募捐的新闻媒体如果真如章子怡所说是把“1300”误传成“几百万”（当然鬼才相信他的话），那我们就举报那些造假的新闻媒体，向中宣部，文化部等等。还有颁奖的那个机构，上慈？我们要向其上层民政局，民政部等举报投诉。
国外的，除了向各国警方举报章子怡基金会外，还要提供vivi，纪灵灵等人的线索，要告诉警方，这些人涉嫌侵吞善款，涉嫌洗钱。能将几百瓦洗到一分钱都木有也是蛮强的。
如果中国日报出来了律师声明和财务明细，要拿到国内外各会计事务所和审计部门检查，我们就不行，难道全球的金融机构她都买的通？
cfc还是要查，按照章子怡昨天的说法，好像是知道我们在堵她cfc这条路，那么也就从反面说明，这个cfc绝对有问题。决不能放过一个打着慈善幌子的营利机构。
Q & A | Zhang Ziyi
CD (China Daily): You donated 1 million yuan ($146,500) out of your own pocket (for Sichuan earthquake relief), right?
ZZY (Zhang Ziyi): Yes.
CD: You gave it to the China Red Cross?
ZZY: Yes.
CD: But only 840,000 yuan ($123,000) was transferred.
ZZY: That's correct.
CD: You made up for the shortfall only recently (Feb 8, 2010). Why was that?
ZZY: I was not in China (May 2008). I just gave the instruction to donate and did not follow up. I traveled from the United States to Cannes, France. I take the main responsibility for the lapse and causing my staff to mix it up.
CD: When did you first realize your donation was short of what you had announced?
ZZY: Later, when news came out and we did an investigation.
CD: What exactly went wrong?
ZZY: Some kind of communication problem.
CD: Have you ever said things like: "Please give money to the Red Cross?"
ZZY: Yes.
CD: At Cannes?
ZZY: Yes.
CD: Were you encouraging people to donate to the Red Cross? Or, were you asking them to give you the money and you would pass it to the Red Cross?
ZZY: I was encouraging them to give directly to the Red Cross. Not a penny of other people's money passed through me to the Red Cross.
CD: Have you ever raised money in the name of the Red Cross, but for your own foundation?
ZZY: Never.
CD: Have you ever thought of putting the 1 million yuan you gave to the Red Cross into your own foundation?
ZZY: No.
Fundraising in Cannes
CD: Your fundraising in Cannes (May 21, 2008) got a lot of media coverage in China. But there have been different reports about the sum raised. The oft-quoted amount for cash is $50,000, which includes some Hong Kong dollars and euros converted into US dollars. Is that correct?
ZZY: That's not correct.
CD: Then, what was the amount of cash raised?
ZZY: About $1,300.
CD: How come it was so little?
ZZY: The fundraising event was hastily arranged. We did not have a place. It was lent to us. I did not have many people with me, and I'm grateful to the volunteers from Sohu. Not many people showed up. At Cannes, everyone was busy watching movies and attending parties. And people do not carry much cash around, especially non-Chinese.
CD: How much did you raise in pledges?
ZZY: We got a little more than $400,000.
CD: How much of that has been honored?
Zhang Ziyi tears up at her fundraising event in Cannes, France. CFP / For China Daily
Zhang Ziyi tears up at her fundraising event in Cannes, France. CFP / For China Daily
ZZY: Around $39,000. CD: Did the "almost $500,000" include the $100,000 pledged by Wendi Deng (Rupert Murdoch's wife)?
ZZY: Yes.
CD: In the past two years did you try to get the pledged money?
ZZY: I made calls and corresponded with the pledged donors.
CD: What was the result?
ZZY: I hope to have a concrete project to show them and see whether that will interest them.
CD: What if you fail to collect the whole?
ZZY: (Long pause) If they do not honor their pledges that will give me another chance to give. I'll make up for the shortfall of $400,000 (the amount earmarked for a Sichuan Children's Center).
CD: Have you ever mentioned that you raised more than $500,000, say, $1 million, which is often mentioned in media reports? What about $2 million, $5 million, and the highest I've read, $7 million? Do you know where those figures came from?
ZZY: None of these is right. In the interviews after that fund-raising party, I said we raised "almost $500,000" and my goal is to raise $1 million. I have seen the $2 million report, which seemed to have something to do with Vivi (Nevo, Zhang's fianc). But he did not have a clue when I asked him about it. As for the other numbers, I have no idea.
Zhang Ziyi Foundation
CD: Some say you have two foundations, one in California and one in New York. The one in New York is actually an ESL school. How is that?
Zhang visits a Kunming orphanage in 2007, in support of Care for Children. REN / For China Daily
ZZY: We have only one foundation, which is registered in California. But we added a New York mailing address for convenience of correspondence. CD: Some say your foundation is registered as a business.
Zhang visits a Kunming orphanage in 2007, in support of Care for Children. REN / For China Daily
ZZY: That's not true. It is a not-for-profit organization, a charity.
CD: Some say (the registration) has expired.
ZZY: It is always in good standing.
CD: Some say you have only $45,471 in the account, others say the foundation's assets are zero. Which is correct?
ZZY: There have never been zero assets in the account. The $40,000-plus should be $39,000 in donations plus $5,000 in expenses, which came from my own pocket.
CD: Did all donations go to this account?
ZZY: Yes.
CD: Did anyone send money to your own account and you had to transfer it to the foundation?
ZZY: This never happened.
CD: Is this money managed by a professional, say, an accountant?
ZZY: Yes.
CD: Has there been any withdrawal - for any reason?
ZZY: Never. It has always been there. I want to say that all information about the foundation is open and we have never done anything not transparent or illegal. Everyone can go and check on it.
CD: There was a full-page ad in Hollywood Reporter, in which the editor-in-chief and you appeal for funds for the relief of the Sichuan earthquake. Is that true?
ZZY: Yes.
CD: Did you pay for the ad?
ZZY: No. They wanted to help me when they found out what I was doing and they were moved.
CD: Did anyone donate because of the ad?
ZZY: It was a pity we did not receive any donations (induced by the ad).
Care for Children
CD: You said this money will be given to Care for Children and be used for building a Children's Center in Deyang, Sichuan province. Can you give us a brief description of the organization?
ZZY: Care for Children is an international charity headquartered in the United Kingdom and with an office in Beijing. It has handled 38 projects in 27 provinces and autonomous regions across China.
CD: Why did you pick Care for Children?
ZZY: I had worked with them before the 2008 earthquake. What they do is to help those children who are deserted by sending them to foster homes. I wanted to cooperate with them and help the children left homeless from the earthquake.
CD: But your money has not reached Care for Children yet. Why?
ZZY: We had to get government approval for the project. It took a long time.
CD: Now it has been approved, right?
ZZY: The approval came in November 2009.
CD: When will the money enter the account of Care for Children?
ZZY: Within three weeks of breaking ground on the center.
CD: How much will the center cost? And how much do the monies from your foundation and Care for Children account for?
ZZY: The total cost will be 9 million yuan ($1.3 million), and our donations will be 4.5 million yuan, which is about $658,000. Of this amount, $400,000 is from my foundation.
CD: Will you shut down the foundation once this project is over, or keep running it?
ZZY: This project has just been approved. We'll put our energy into it. I'll think about other things later.
Learning about charity
CD: What qualities do you think are required for doing charity work, besides passion?
ZZY: Besides passion, I think one needs a lot of energy, a professional team and enough knowledge.
CD: Do you think you possessed them?
ZZY: I had passion and energy, but not a professional team, or the right approach.
CD: When entertainment celebrities engage in charity work, it usually gives people the impression that they want to spruce up their public image. Have you considered a low-profile or anonymous approach to charity?
ZZY: I wish I could do that. But ... I still hope to use my name and influence to raise awareness for the issues involved.
CD: What position does charity work occupy in your life and career?
ZZY: A very important position. The achievements I have made today are the result of the many years that my country invested in me If the country suffers, we have to do our part. You cannot make up the feeling that you have with the country and the people. It is real.
CD: What's your philosophy for charity?
ZZY: My interest is in kids, especially disabled children. When I see them - whatever country they come from, I hope I can work for them, to improve their welfare.
CD: Since the controversy about your donation, you have hired a Los Angeles law firm to investigate. Now it has issued its report, which is quite detailed. There are four donors who each pledged $100,000, and one for $50,000, but they have not yet honored their pledges. Why are their identities not revealed?
ZZY: Donors have the right to reveal or conceal their names. It's about privacy.
CD: If they end up not honoring those pledges, basically you'll take the responsibility for them. Right?
ZZY: Yes, it can be interpreted this way.
CD: You kept silent for two months. Why didn't you come out earlier and explain?
ZZY: I wanted to clarify it from the very beginning. But then I found out I should use legal means to clarify everything. That'll be more convincing. We sent all the evidence to the US. The process took a long time.
Impact of the controversy
CD: Do you think there was someone manipulating the controversy, or it was the netizens who wanted to find out the truth?
ZZY: I believe most netizens have a sense of justice and will seek truth from facts. When they know the truth, they can judge for themselves.
CD: What impact has the controversy had on you and your family?
ZZY: A lot. It's about me and I have to face it. But I don't want to see my family getting worried because of me ... (fighting back tears)
CD: Did you get angry and feel it's unfair?
ZZY: Of course there were moments I felt bad. I wanted to do something good, but we had our problems, such as my lack of experience, my failure to disclose to the public, my limited knowledge about philanthropy and other reasons.
CD: Would you see this as a setback?
ZZY: It was certainly a setback. But I learned something new from it.
CD: Some say you quit (the Wendi Deng-produced movie)Snow Flower and the Secret Fan because of this, and some brands dropped you as their spokeswoman. Is that true?
ZZY: No. I prepared for this movie for two years. But I underwent a surgery after doing an action scene, which prevented me from proceeding with that (Wendi Deng) movie.
CD: What about endorsements?
ZZY: Nothing unusual has happened.
Black paint incident
CD: When the current controversy first broke out, it had nothing to do with donations. A certain Zhao (Xinyu) accused you of something. Would you care to respond?
ZZY: This incident has already caused trouble for a lot of people, especially my family. I have endured much, and I don't want others to go through the same pain.
CD: Do you think the public has a right to know the private lives of celebrities?
ZZY: There should be limits.
CD: What about your love and marriage?
ZZY: If it's nothing unethical, there's a need to let the public know.
CD: Do you think a star should be a role model of morality?
ZZY: Stars are ordinary people, too. But they should conduct themselves better.
CD: You have international fame. Some say what you do represents the whole country and you should receive special protection or be placed under special constraints. What do you think?
ZZY: I want to do better, but I don't want to give myself too much pressure or a sense of mission. I want to be an ordinary person, but I'll work to make it as perfect as possible.
CD: A professor once said, you, Zhang Ziyi, are more powerful than Confucius in promoting Chinese culture overseas. What's your take on it?
ZZY: How can I be compared with Confucius ...
CD: What do you want your public image to be?
ZZY: I want to be compassionate, responsible, hard working and full of personality.
已经有人发现，这个英文版本的采访已经把“没有收到支票”去掉了。之前大家继续八中英版本不一样的地方。这些就是zzy的弱点。
by xiaoqixiaomm
搜狐新闻的原稿
“这些将被用到灾区重建的350万人民币中，是由465050美元，2700 欧元的支票，以及 145英镑、860欧元，60港币的现金组成。
--------------------------
嘿嘿，这些支票都上哪去了？
作者：oasisjz 回复日期：2010-03-16 19:49:08
TX们，千万要淡定哈，关于章子怡的“专访”，大家要记住 ，目前的真实情况就是：章子怡知道，脸皮是怎么也保不住了，但是不能吃官司，所以，无论最后给出1300美金，还是象我前面给出的那种在法庭上的狡辩，并不是为了保住名誉，是为了免受牢狱之灾。如果你想通了这点，就不要再浪费口舌批评她了，她都没脸了，连皮啊肉啊什么都打算豁出去了，还怕我们全民的口水？
所以从她的专访可以知道，我们主攻方向是走法律途径。国内，国外都要。国内的，可以举报包括红会，搜狐，其他新闻媒体，颁奖机构等等，红会上司是国际红会吧？如果不是，总有管理慈善机构的部门吧？搜狐和其他新闻媒体呢？当年报道她募捐的新闻媒体如果真如章子怡所说是把“1300”误传成“几百万”（当然鬼才相信他的话），那我们就举报那些造假的新闻媒体，向中宣部，文化部等等。还有颁奖的那个机构，上慈？我们要向其上层民政局，民政部等举报投诉。
国外的，除了向各国警方举报章子怡基金会外，还要提供vivi，纪灵灵等人的线索，要告诉警方，这些人涉嫌侵吞善款，涉嫌洗钱。能将几百瓦洗到一分钱都木有也是蛮强的。
如果中国日报出来了律师声明和财务明细，要拿到国内外各会计事务所和审计部门检查，我们就不行，难道全球的金融机构她都买的通？
cfc还是要查，按照章子怡昨天的说法，好像是知道我们在堵她cfc这条路，那么也就从反面说明，这个cfc绝对有问题。决不能放过一个打着慈善幌子的营利机构。
赞同啊。撒谎虽然道德不好，但是不会坐牢呢。她爹娘怎么养了这样个女儿？
作者：oasisjz 回复日期：2010-03-16 19:49:08
TX们，千万要淡定哈，关于章子怡的“专访”，大家要记住 ，目前的真实情况就是：章子怡知道，脸皮是怎么也保不住了，但是不能吃官司，所以，无论最后给出1300美金，还是象我前面给出的那种在法庭上的狡辩，并不是为了保住名誉，是为了免受牢狱之灾。如果你想通了这点，就不要再浪费口舌批评她了，她都没脸了，连皮啊肉啊什么都打算豁出去了，还怕我们全民的口水？
所以从她的专访可以知道，我们主攻方向是走法律途径。国内，国外都要。国内的，可以举报包括红会，搜狐，其他新闻媒体，颁奖机构等等，红会上司是国际红会吧？如果不是，总有管理慈善机构的部门吧？搜狐和其他新闻媒体呢？当年报道她募捐的新闻媒体如果真如章子怡所说是把“1300”误传成“几百万”（当然鬼才相信他的话），那我们就举报那些造假的新闻媒体，向中宣部，文化部等等。还有颁奖的那个机构，上慈？我们要向其上层民政局，民政部等举报投诉。
国外的，除了向各国警方举报章子怡基金会外，还要提供vivi，纪灵灵等人的线索，要告诉警方，这些人涉嫌侵吞善款，涉嫌洗钱。能将几百瓦洗到一分钱都木有也是蛮强的。
如果中国日报出来了律师声明和财务明细，要拿到国内外各会计事务所和审计部门检查，我们就不行，难道全球的金融机构她都买的通？
cfc还是要查，按照章子怡昨天的说法，好像是知道我们在堵她cfc这条路，那么也就从反面说明，这个cfc绝对有问题。决不能放过一个打着慈善幌子的营利机构。
re
http://www.sina.com.cn 2010年03月16日16:06 河南报业网-大河报
记者吴战朝撰文
对话双方记=本报记者周=《中国日报》专栏作家周黎明(影评人、文化评论人)
时间地点
2010年3月15日22时本报编辑部
周黎明是谁？为什么章子怡会接受他的采访？昨晚，我们电话采访了《中国日报》专栏作家、影评人、文化评论人周黎明。
第1部分：为什么会是你？
记：看得出来，你为这个采访做了充分的准备。
周：还好吧。准备了一个多月，也争取了一个多月。一开始，对方(章子怡和她的经纪人)没一口回绝，当时我就觉得有希望，于是反复沟通，最终她们答应了。
记：你之前和章子怡有过接触吗？
周：去年8月在新加坡，因为《非常完美》这部电影我采访过她。她为什么选我们《中国日报》、选我，我猜我们是英文报纸还有中文网站，这不仅能在国内传播，还能在国外传播，尤其是在国外，我们的报纸在150个国家发行，这在国内是独一无二的。她在国外有一定知名度，也有一些代言，她也需要消除在国外的影响。选择我，也许是因为第一次给她印象挺好，但我们真的没有任何私交，我也不是她的粉丝。我写过很多影评，包括《英雄》、《夜宴》，但没评论过她。
第2部分：为什么是这个时间？
记：我们留意到你做采访的时间是2010年3月12日凌晨。
周：是的，我们预约过，本以为是晚上。但是她正在拍《一代宗师》，你知道导演是王家卫，什么时候能放她出来完全不一定的。所以最后她走进来接受采访的时候是凌晨1点半，走的时候大约凌晨5点半，天都快亮了。之前，她因为赶工24小时没睡，采访完就又直接赶回片场了。
记：12号做的采访，为什么直到现在才对外公布？
周：主要是为了避开“两会”。另外还有很多数字要核对，对我来讲这很难。这段时间内，所有有关人员都被要求保密。如果再拖几天的话，可能就保密不了了。
记：两会期间，李前宽(中国影协主席、长春电影制片厂总导演、全国政协委员)曾呼吁大家宽容章子怡……
周：这个采访抛出的时间与李前宽没有任何关系，采访时，我还没有点名地问到了这个问题。其实，“两会”之前，有几次我差点有机会采她了，但每次都是临时往后推。如果不推的话，我的采访发布就在李前宽发言之前了。
记：你写的采访地点是“中国辽宁省某市”，为什么要含糊呢？
周：因为他们还在那里拍片，那里地方不大，很容易找到的。我担心把地点一公布，大家都去现场找了，会打扰到他们拍片。
第3部分：你在为谁说话？
记：采访之前，你对章子怡本人及捐款风波怎么看？采访之后呢？
周：这个问题比较难回答。我只想做一个搬运工，把大家对她的看法反馈给她，把她的声音传出来。说太多我担心会被误解，我会被误认为是她的代言人——我不是她的代言人！我希望大家看完我的采访，能做出自己的判断，而不是在我的影响下做出判断。
记：因为社会诚信的缺失，越是官方的说法出来后越是会被网友骂。你担心过这个问题吗？
周：这个东西出来肯定不可能说服每个人。网友提出了很多很好的问题，也指出了不少她涉嫌侵吞的款项。为了梳理这些数字，我一直在看。她涉及的所有款项里面，真正能落实的不多，只有她个人捐款100万元时少捐的那16万元。至于有网友提出的100万美元的问题，她一直解释说这是“目标”、“希望”，而不是“已经筹到了100万美元”——事实上，她募到的钱很少，才1392.36美元。通过采访我发现，她被指贪污的钱如此之少，逻辑上行不通：作为一个有国际影响力的明星，与她的片酬相比，她会贪这些钱吗？而且，通过她的解释，大部分数字其实是对上了的，她也出具了大量律师整理的证据。
记：看你的专访，只看到一堆数字和一些捐款的细节，你是怎么考虑的？
周：这篇专访可能读起来会很乏味，因为都是关于捐款的细节，其他的涉及不深。如果我只是问她“你诈捐了吗？”她一定会说“没有”。只有把问题一点点理清了，才能知道她到底有没有“诈”，所以会列那么多数据出来。我相信这篇专访发出来后，大家还会有疑问，这是不可避免的，肯定会有我想不到的新问题出来，那就再争取下一个采访吧。
记：我也采访过章子怡，感觉她还是很有感染力的。你会受她影响吗？
周：我不是她“粉丝”！我写过不少影评，但我从来没有两次采访同一个人的兴趣，包括一些大导演。我只是把这事当一个社会新闻来采，只想把事实真相讲出来。
记：你能想象这篇专访发出后网民的反应吗？
周：想过，我可能会被人肉搜索，很多人会问我有没有被买通、有没有收红包之类。但我真的是以客观、中立的态度做采访，比如“诈捐门”，我都只说是“捐款门”、“捐款风波”。
就章子怡受访事件答自己问
问：有网友说，不得不佩服谭飞的预见性！当初他就预测章子怡会反击，不反击是时候未到，到了时机章子怡必反击！看来谭飞说的真准！你对你这次预见准确有何看法？
答：没看法，呆逼才无法预见。
作者：oasisjz 回复日期：2010-03-16 19:49:08
TX们，千万要淡定哈，关于章子怡的“专访”，大家要记住 ，目前的真实情况就是：章子怡知道，脸皮是怎么也保不住了，但是不能吃官司，所以，无论最后给出1300美金，还是象我前面给出的那种在法庭上的狡辩，并不是为了保住名誉，是为了免受牢狱之灾。如果你想通了这点，就不要再浪费口舌批评她了，她都没脸了，连皮啊肉啊什么都打算豁出去了，还怕我们全民的口水？
所以从她的专访可以知道，我们主攻方向是走法律途径。国内，国外都要。国内的，可以举报包括红会，搜狐，其他新闻媒体，颁奖机构等等，红会上司是国际红会吧？如果不是，总有管理慈善机构的部门吧？搜狐和其他新闻媒体呢？当年报道她募捐的新闻媒体如果真如章子怡所说是把“1300”误传成“几百万”（当然鬼才相信他的话），那我们就举报那些造假的新闻媒体，向中宣部，文化部等等。还有颁奖的那个机构，上慈？我们要向其上层民政局，民政部等举报投诉。
国外的，除了向各国警方举报章子怡基金会外，还要提供vivi，纪灵灵等人的线索，要告诉警方，这些人涉嫌侵吞善款，涉嫌洗钱。能将几百瓦洗到一分钱都木有也是蛮强的。
如果中国日报出来了律师声明和财务明细，要拿到国内外各会计事务所和审计部门检查，我们就不行，难道全球的金融机构她都买的通？
cfc还是要查，按照章子怡昨天的说法，好像是知道我们在堵她cfc这条路，那么也就从反面说明，这个cfc绝对有问题。决不能放过一个打着慈善幌子的营利机构。
rere
微薄：@谢晓
哈哈，国际章这段时间可真没闲着
作者：daimer_Chrysler 回复日期：2010-03-16 07:37:56
Well, I declined many friends' requests in helping to report Zhang to jurisdictions in the US because they heard about the suspected embezzlement of charity fund from me and they never heard of Zhang or watched her movies. My friends told me that they could at least write and speak native English with IRS, FBI and attorney general's offices. Now I am going to enlist their help. This kind of attitude and behavior cannot be tolerated and I am going to request the maximum punishment the law permits!
ding
http://enhuaren.us.yahoo.com/10-03-/352/2a9x3.html
大家快去投票!!!!!!!!!!1
以下是引用雪舞在3/16/2010 9:31:00 AM的发言：
—事实上，她募到的钱很少，才1392.36美元。通过采访我发现，她被指贪污的钱如此之少，逻辑上行不通：作为一个有国际影响力的明星，与她的片酬相比，她会贪这些钱吗？而且，通过她的解释，大部分数字其实是对上了的，她也出具了大量律师整理的证据。
一方面假扮客观，一方面又把zzy的狡辩当事实
正告章子怡，我们公众只要以下几样东西
1，原始账本，原始认捐卡，原始支票，财务报表，银行转账单等
---------真假我们会拿到各大会计事务所和审计部门以及警方去看的，不用你的律师团
3，你的原始搜狐博客（心里没鬼为何删除？）
3，如果以上两项你拿不出来，对不起，请做到以下几项
1，面向公众的道歉，不是面向你的团队，不是面向你的爸爸妈妈，你的哥哥姐姐
2，退回慈善大奖
3，接受司法机关调查
4，退出娱乐圈
戛纳当地时间5月21日中午12：20至13：20，一个小时的时间内，章子怡用自己的真诚和努力，让全世界的目光关注到了中国的四川汶川大地震。
阿玛尼高层Roberta Armani、Jimmy choo 老板Tamara Mellon、麦当娜经理人Guy、《Hollywood Reporter》的出版人Eric Mika，以及戛纳电影节的发起人Thierry Fremaux 、戛纳电影节的官方代表Christian Jeune 等众多重量级嘉宾，与这个筹款会的另一个发起人Chopard 的总裁Caroline Gruosi-Scheufele一起，认真聆听着来自章子怡用哀伤的语调讲述的两个发生在地震灾区的真实故事，而一段来自灾区现状的VIDIO，则让人们近距离地感受到了灾难来临时人类的无助和伤痛……
接受采访的照片里，没有一张国鸡的眼睛是直视镜头的，她就这么心虚啊？
re
==================
NONONO，我想子怡和小周都是属于那种特正义，特淳朴的人，我觉得你那个截图是PS的，应该是章黑PS出来陷害子怡的，想骗谁啊？！周说了，和子怡没任何私交！！！
[此贴子已经被作者于2010/3/16 10:56:03编辑过]
长江商报访问周黎明，周一听就是给章洗白，仍然暗示阴谋论，嫉妒论，暴民论。
感觉这个周黎明对国鸡爱的不行啊，他还好意思说之前从来没有评论过国鸡。
他写的好肉麻，我摘录一段：
Yes, she is China's gift to Hollywood. But we're not living in an age when we give giant pandas as free gifts to foreign nations anymore. Nowadays we loan them out for a nice and nifty donation. If this policy is right for the black-and-white national treasure, why not apply it to the porcelain fragile type, as well? Which means she can date whomever she wants, but she eventually had better settle down with her own kind -- a nice lad, not someone at the bottom of the 30 million heap. And once that is picked up by a certain website that can turn anything into a social trend, all of those more gorgeous stars, such as Gong Li and Maggie Cheung, will have second thoughts on having Caucasian paramours or spouses. But then again, I think Zhang Ziyi shouldn't marry anybody. She should be put on a pedestal and enshrined as the virgin queen of Chinese cinema -- somewhat like the Buddha of Infinite Chastity.
程青松的微博
//@电影人程青松:不靠谱解密真相 //@不靠谱:周黎明是章子怡的宣传总监，他才不是记者，他也是奔五的人了，脸皮厚了点而已
[此贴子已经被作者于2010/3/16 10:36:29编辑过]
嘿嘿，牛鬼蛇神啊～
http://raymondzhou.ycool.com/post.2662674.html
感觉这个周黎明对国鸡爱的不行啊，他还好意思说之前从来没有评论过国鸡。
他写的好肉麻，我摘录一段：
Yes, she is China's gift to Hollywood. But we're not living in an age when we give giant pandas as free gifts to foreign nations anymore. Nowadays we loan them out for a nice and nifty donation. If this policy is right for the black-and-white national treasure, why not apply it to the porcelain fragile type, as well? Which means she can date whomever she wants, but she eventually had better settle down with her own kind -- a nice lad, not someone at the bottom of the 30 million heap. And once that is picked up by a certain website that can turn anything into a social trend, all of those more gorgeous stars, such as Gong Li and Maggie Cheung, will have second thoughts on having Caucasian paramours or spouses. But then again, I think Zhang Ziyi shouldn't marry anybody. She should be put on a pedestal and enshrined as the virgin queen of Chinese cinema -- somewhat like the Buddha of Infinite Chastity.
呵呵，不知道把章子怡送到国际舞台，国家一年收几个钱，果然是个商品。
But then again, I think Zhang Ziyi shouldn't marry anybody. She should be put on a pedestal and enshrined as the virgin queen of Chinese cinema -- somewhat like the Buddha of Infinite Chastity. 玛雅，这浑身的鸡皮掉了几层了。。
玛雅，直接晕倒，国际章哪是人啊简直就是神啊。。。
玛雅，直接晕倒，国际章哪是人啊简直就是神啊。。。
我老早开始怀疑，她有棒子血统～～
作者：理_论_上 回复日期：2010-03-17 00:24:17 周黎明说和章子怡不熟是吧？看看下面的证据，我看他可以闭嘴了 http://tieba.baidu.com/f?kz=133980882 http://raymondzhou.ycool.com/post.2662674.html http://raymondzhou.ycool.com/post.2662674.html http://cul.sohu.com/20091118/n268312382.shtml http://www.1diaocha.com/Survey/GetVote_189077.html http://blog.mdbchina.cn/post/879625/ http://blog.m1905.com/lihao4623/blog/71395 http://blog1.poco.cn/myBlogDetail.htx&id=457467&userid=23294726 http://ent.qq.com/zt/2009/81oscar/ http://enjoy.eastday.com/2008ljzt/2009020481oscar/ http://www.douban.com/review/2755793/ http://www.hongxiu.com/x/40186/ http://www.tianjinwe.com/rollnews/201002/t20100221_534736.html http://big5.china.com.cn/culture/txt/2008-12/03/content_16894376.htm
“不熟”可以是精神上的，也可以是肉体上的……
http://huaren.us/s/blog_413eb1fa0100heex.html
谭飞
就章子怡受访事件答自己问
问：你看了周黎明采访章子怡的采访记吗，有何感受？
答：周黎明采访章子怡，这件事只适合一个成语形容：大费周章，此“费”也可作“废”解。
问：你从章子怡的回答得出了什么结论吗？
答：周章采访记得出的最重要结论是：搜狐记者是不会数钱的，不会算数的，普遍小学一年级文化水平。帮人数钱都要数错，而且错了上千倍，简直弱智到顶。
问：还有呢？
答：哦，原来那天才1300美元，我要控诉给著名狗仔队员王小鱼配眼镜的眼镜店，你们配的是什么破眼镜，让王小鱼这么近距离还多看了好几个零！
问：有网友说，不得不佩服谭飞的预见性！当初他就预测章子怡会反击，不反击是时候未到，到了时机章子怡必反击！看来谭飞说的真准！你对你这次预见准确有何看法？
答：没看法，呆逼才无法预见。我又不是宋祖德，只不过讲了一些符合逻辑、符合常识的发展过程。更多网友比我有预见性。
问：你在这次章子怡诈捐门事件中为何那么高调，跟章小姐有仇吗？
答：对此事，我就一**路人甲，但我不能容忍“侵吞善款”行径，就算你曾拿出10亿行善，一沾此四字即功德尽丧。这是底线，如果这都能同情原囿谅解，明天开始，我准备偷税漏税，面朝大众，赃款开花。
问：章子怡认为自己在做善事过程中“经验不足”导致出现纰漏，你认为真是这个原因吗？
答：有些东西，也没那么复杂，无非是先代收钱然后捐钱，如果把一件并不复杂的事包装得很有难度，然后以“太复杂”而“没经验”为由推诿，只能说明有人心虚。按此方式，韩峰、陈同海、文强也完全可以说，他们收钱后，因为“经验不足”，一直没向有关部门退钱，是否就不用查他们？善写日记的韩局长，你傻啊，为何想不到这个理由呢？
问：关于戛纳善款的描述，善款一路从美元 700万-500万-200万-100万-50万-40万-5万--0.13万，你怎么看？
答：我没帮着数钱，但我认为0.13万这个数字不符合逻辑，又哭又拉横幅的，才收到张机票钱，性价比为负数。
问：有很多人同情章小姐，认为一个亿万富翁怎么可能贪几百万？你认为呢？
答：我没有任何证据敢说章小姐贪了钱，但我愿意指出这种理论的荒诞。在我四川老家流行打麻将、斗地主，我没听说过亿万富翁在打牌的时候，就不愿意多赢点钱。鸡屁股也是肉呵。有私欲是人类的共性，不分富翁、穷人。有些人，自己有很多钱、房产，还霸着兄弟、侄女的房产、财产，去翻翻新闻就知道了。
问：很多人觉得此次倒章事件有幕后黑手，你觉得呢？那些质疑的人，是受唆使的吗？
答：我觉得这不是问题的关键，我认为：有没有被黑跟有没有侵吞善款是两回事，问题关键在于章有没有侵吞善款。打个不一定对的比方：一个问题富豪举报了另一问题富豪，难道因为该富豪有问题就不去查她举报的对象吗？！在这点上，章子怡看得还是清楚的，她承认大众的质疑权利，也不枉在民主国家呆过些时日。在我看来，网民及媒体的质疑，99%是自发的。有受唆使的，但绝不是主流。
问：现在很多人很同情章子怡，而且两大官方网站登载黑章子怡的帖子后，这种同情声浪更大了，你怎么看？
答：如果因为有官方网站转发不利于章的文章，就全面同情章，只说明，很多人其实并不关心章有没有错，只关心背后谁在黑她；很多人并不在乎章做没做错事，只敏感于她对手的官方背景而“逢官必反，不计其余”。我对章子怡没什么个人偏见，我对来自官方的某些声音也带着天然的排斥，但我明白一点：欺负小女子跟涉嫌侵吞善款，这是完全不同的两桩事。如果有意无意把两件事混为一谈，我倒真是“惊艳不足”了。在伟大祖国，同情的对象太漂亮了，漂亮到国际上，是很容易“惊艳”，且怎么同情都“不足”的。
问：那你觉得这件事要怎么解决才能真相大白呢？
答：祖国不允许私家侦探出现，但现在两会也结束了，能不能有些公家侦探涉及此事？有请司法介入，查个明白，那一切就真相大白了。具体哪款法律条款涉此，我没研究，但相信总有办法。
问：你为什么不保护我们的国际影星呢？中国好不容易才出一个，影协副主席也说了，要杀杀媒体炒作明星绯闻风。
答：查清楚情况，厘清是非，才是保护章子怡的最合理方式，让她吸取教育吃一堑长一智不会再错。我也请副主席注意，不要老把真理部当成杀威棒，我们更需要的是真相部。而且，这是绯闻吗？
问：谭飞
答：谭飞
赞谭飞。难得有说公道话的媒体人。
让那个周黎明还是周迟暮和章子怡一起下地狱吧。
作者：mark_up 回复日期：2010-03-16 21:07:26
http://bolaipinmelvin.blog.sohu.com/77976342.html
浙大英语学士， 中山文艺学硕士， 加州伯克力MBA，
他的博客是名副其实的bilingual blog, 据说每天都有一大打外国记者通过他的博客了解当下中国。
这是他的博客地址：raymondzhou.yculblog.com
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
请美国的同学查一下加州Raymond Zhou的伯克力MBA是真的还是假的？？
请美国的同学查一下加州Raymond Zhou的伯克力MBA是真的还是假的？？
请美国的同学查一下加州Raymond Zhou的伯克力MBA是真的还是假的？？
请美国的同学查一下加州Raymond Zhou的伯克力MBA是真的还是假的？？
作者：oasisjz 回复日期：2010-03-16 21:28:03
正告章子怡，我们公众只要以下几样东西
1，原始账本，原始认捐卡，原始支票，财务报表，银行转账单等
---------真假我们会拿到各大会计事务所和审计部门以及警方去看的，不用你的律师团
3，你的原始搜狐博客（心里没鬼为何删除？）
3，如果以上两项你拿不出来，对不起，请做到以下几项
1，面向公众的道歉，不是面向你的团队，不是面向你的爸爸妈妈，你的哥哥姐姐
2，退回慈善大奖
3，接受司法机关调查
4，退出娱乐圈
re
果然跟她“有狠劲”的性子很像。
可惜用错了方向。
章可能要上内地4月号的VOGUE的封面
那我们就把vogue的电话打到爆。。。。。。
@洪晃
谁是红肿啊?
谁是红肿啊?
好像是湖北的省长，夺记者录音笔的那个
那我们就把vogue的电话打到爆。。。。。。
外行问一下，中国的vogue，听国外vogue的支配么？还是两码事？
那我们就把vogue的电话打到爆。。。。。。
re
好像是湖北的省长，夺记者录音笔的那个
哦，原来是他。这名字，呵呵。
其实吧，我觉得，国际章的事情，道不道歉不是问题的关键，关键是这几个月来，大家查出来的，他们自己暴露的，这么多疑点，为什么解释不清楚？为什么没有人调查，只是在这里一次又一次地组团忽悠？
你看，就补齐16万人民币那事情，人倒是道歉了。为什么呀? 因为跟法律责任比起来，那根本不是最严重的问题。从公关角度来说，人乐得摆个姿态，然后顺便找几个亲信媒体，来混淆视听。
我预测，随着5.12的临近，国际章还会有更大规模更正式的“道歉仪式”，连还慈善大奖都是有可能的---只要，只要能把”海外募款“这一case的水给搅浑，把观众的视线给转移，然后把这次募款丑闻强行画上一个句号。
外行问一下，中国的vogue，听国外vogue的支配么？还是两码事？
中国的是自负盈亏，自己选题自己出版，所以投诉美国vogue没用，得国内投诉
那我们就把vogue的电话打到爆。。。。。。
re
赞成。 发起倡议， 大家都不买VOGUE， 如果让骗子作封面的话。 以下是引用梦的衣裳在3/16/2010 8:02:00 PM的发言：
支持！！
人，正是她自己
http://www.sina.com.cn 2010年03月16日23:23 金羊
网-新快报
很欣赏这样一句话，“与其说是对章子怡的口诛笔伐，其实更是对慈善透明的呼唤”。我很认真地看了章子怡的答记者问，最大的感受是惊讶——这位国
际巨星，为她赢回如此大的荣誉与利益的慈善举动，原来不过尔耳。
网友的眼睛是雪亮的，网友的力量是强大的，在章子怡的访谈中找出的漏洞如此之多如此之明显，实在让人不得不对“国际章”的诚信与人品产生怀疑
——如果连人品都有问题，慈善从何谈起。
章子怡访谈出街之时，恰好是3·15消费者权益保护日。有人认为，对章子怡的宽容，就是对假冒伪劣的放纵，不但不能保护她，反而会毁了她。所
以，对章小姐的每句话每个回应，做地毯式的较真和核实，我举双手赞同。做慈善，容不得丝毫忽悠。
章子怡做慈善没有经验，很多细节确实属于她个人处理不当，这也是事实，我也从来没有用“诈捐”一词形容过她。但事发后，她与她那新加坡经纪人那
些欲盖弥彰的拙劣表演，以及这次避重就轻的“表白”，都看出她的狡黠与机心。一个国际巨星这等作派，令人寒心。
有些话章子怡否认说过，有些事否认做过，可人家有视频有录音，铁证如山。如果这就是些无关痛痒的八卦小事，大家最多骂句无耻就罢，但一旦牵扯到
金钱与慈善，任何的谎言，都涉嫌利用他人的爱心去达到自己的私欲。毕竟，在一段不短的时间里面，章子怡凭借“慈善明星”的光环，为她谋得无数的商业利益。
这一次，章子怡在访谈中的谎话连篇早已超出了八卦、绯闻的范畴，它关乎的是当事人道德底线和诚信的失守。或许，在章子怡通往“国际章”一步一步
往上爬的路途上，道德和诚信早就被她踩在脚下，不屑一顾。
有句老话叫“人在做，天在看”。有人说有专门的“黑章团队”在有计划地黑她，其实，每个人的经历都是自己写就，没有人可以“黑”得了章子怡。
“黑”她的人，正是她自己。
温总理说：公平正义比太阳还要有光辉。光芒四射的章子怡，但愿你还能够从容地走在阳光下。
单中出去了。偶尔有一期李冰冰好像还搞得天怒人怨，品牌公关狂投诉。
而且还要有品牌加持，比如代言的产品买了非常好位置的大幅广告，那么产品可能会要求代言人当封面，如果真上的话，
那么国际的团队和背后产品没少花钱啊
哦，原来是他。这名字，呵呵。
其实吧，我觉得，国际章的事情，道不道歉不是问题的关键，关键是这几个月来，大家查出来的，他们自己暴露的，这么多疑点，为什么解释不清楚？为什么没有人调查，只是在这里一次又一次地组团忽悠？
你看，就补齐16万人民币那事情，人倒是道歉了。为什么呀? 因为跟法律责任比起来，那根本不是最严重的问题。从公关角度来说，人乐得摆个姿态，然后顺便找几个亲信媒体，来混淆视听。
我预测，随着5.12的临近，国际章还会有更大规模更正式的“道歉仪式”，连还慈善大奖都是有可能的---只要，只要能把”海外募款“这一case的水给搅浑，把观众的视线给转移，然后把这次募款丑闻强行画上一个句号。
解释不清楚。
里面真可能有违法的行为，不是违反中国的法律，就是违反美国的法律，怎么可能给你解释的清清楚楚呢？
她的道歉也是强盗试的，错都错在工作人员，她象征性的表态自己的连带责任，而且都是她的下属，会计还能不年终结算?还要等到网友追查才想起来？明显就是用一个谎言去解释另外一个谎言。她的下一次“道歉”肯定又是一个精心编造的谎言。
我就是想知道这个国家的法律制度和当权者的法制观点到底有多大的弹性，可以让她的丑陋行为上演到何种程度。
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
完全不同的两个团队，与其他版vogue一样，都是受总公司控制的子公司，彼此之间有合作，比如交换大片和封面，
集体倡议举行活动，推荐模特等等。杜鹃走红就是靠VOGUE的力捧。
博客原文
“
4月号杂志早已送厂印刷，就算万民请愿也难改铁定事实。安吉里卡背负拯救天朝时尚产业重担也想喘口气，财神送上门任谁都难以抗拒。好消息是，虽然Diva电影杨门女将成为亚洲版《Nine》可能性微乎其微，但五位爆红花旦之中已有一位与安吉里卡签下一纸文书，年内将会登上Vogue封面。同时，她也将成为内地一线男刊7月号Cover Girl。
”
底下贴着巩俐，国际，汤唯，杨紫琼，周迅的大头像
要是敢让国际上封面，我就一定打电话投诉！！！
解释不清楚。
里面真可能有违法的行为，不是违反中国的法律，就是违反美国的法律，怎么可能给你解释的清清楚楚呢？
她的道歉也是强盗试的，错都错在工作人员，她象征性的表态自己的连带责任，而且都是她的下属，会计还能不年终结算?还要等到网友追查才想起来？明显就是用一个谎言去解释另外一个谎言。她的下一次“道歉”肯定又是一个精心编造的谎言。
我就是想知道这个国家的法律制度和当权者的法制观点到底有多大的弹性，可以让她的丑陋行为上演到何种程度。
恩，同意。我可能更想说的是，在公关运作上，公开道歉和退还慈善大奖都可以变成good moves。这两项举动，和她是否真心愿意这样做，可以没有一点关系。
比如，当时她补齐了那16万人民币的捐款，同一时间出了多少洗白的文章和舆论啊。她的那些亲信媒体俨然忘了这也是很大的misconduct，跳出来大眼不惭地说“子怡捐了100万，是自己的钱！”
同理，她要是哪天和CFC搞款项交接仪式的时候，自己垫付了那40万美金，肯定会找媒体大肆报道，说不定又标榜成子怡的又一慈善壮举呢----”我们子怡又捐了40万，自己的钱！“
视听就是这样被混淆的，黑白慢慢就是这样被颠倒的。
PS：你读周黎明的报道，会发现她已经露了口风，会自己垫付那40万。我猜， 她最后可能真的会这样做。不然的话，别人捐的钱该从哪个帐户里，合法地，合理地，捐出来啊？
作者：日月如心 回复日期：2010-03-17 09:04:13
看到了记者对小鸭子的采访，好精彩啊，为小鸭子叫好，说美国已有两个部门受理了章的案子，哇，我的信心回来了，我以前是相信中国的会先出来，现在知道我错了，可惜我外语不好，帮不上忙啊，大家来看看吧，章枪也来看看，我要多发几遍哦
http://ent.ifeng.com/idolnews/mainland/detail_2010_03/17/395006_0.shtml
恩，同意。我可能更想说的是，在公关运作上，公开道歉和退还慈善大奖都可以变成good moves。这两项举动，和她是否真心愿意这样做，可以没有一点关系。
比如，当时她补齐了那16万人民币的捐款，同一时间出了多少洗白的文章和舆论啊。她的那些亲信媒体俨然忘了这也是很大的misconduct，跳出来大眼不惭地说“子怡捐了100万，是自己的钱！”
同理，她要是哪天和CFC搞款项交接仪式的时候，自己垫付了那40万美金，肯定会找媒体大肆报道，说不定又标榜成子怡的又一慈善壮举呢----”我们子怡又捐了40万，自己的钱！“
视听就是这样被混淆的，黑白慢慢就是这样被颠倒的。
PS：你读周黎明的报道，会发现她已经露了口风，会自己垫付那40万。我猜， 她最后可能真的会这样做。不然的话，别人捐的钱该从哪个帐户里，合法地，合理地，捐出来啊？
早这样做，多好！
你诚恳的出来道歉，哪怕是像woods那样很隐晦很隐晦的承认错误，也不会让我如此厌恶！可惜她就是一次又一次的抵赖，一个又一个的谎言，让我看不到一点点悔意，哪怕是镜头前虚假的悔意。而且我个人觉得，她只要在募捐这个事情上坦诚，认错改过，连她以前泼墨们的那些丑闻都能被她的诚意淡化。
所以我决定了，这次就是占据道德制高点，等待粉丝们出来谴责我吧，我倒要看看他们怎么颠倒黑白的。
China's gift to Hollywood？？？？？？玛雅！
人体炸弹？
作者：日月如心 回复日期：2010-03-17 09:04:13
看到了记者对小鸭子的采访，好精彩啊，为小鸭子叫好，说美国已有两个部门受理了章的案子，哇，我的信心回来了，我以前是相信中国的会先出来，现在知道我错了，可惜我外语不好，帮不上忙啊，大家来看看吧，章枪也来看看，我要多发几遍哦
http://ent.ifeng.com/idolnews/mainland/detail_2010_03/17/395006_0.shtml
rere
国际会不会到最后说那1300美金都是假钞？所以没马上拿出来交给灾区。
油菜。。
作者：采悦 回复日期：2010-03-17 09:31:46
当我听到戛纳永远拒绝章子怡这消息我就觉得章子怡没有可能在德国露面的了，果然她没去成！
无论怎样，明天我找出说这事的法国人协助我找消息来源出处！
哦，原来是他。这名字，呵呵。
其实吧，我觉得，国际章的事情，道不道歉不是问题的关键，关键是这几个月来，大家查出来的，他们自己暴露的，这么多疑点，为什么解释不清楚？为什么没有人调查，只是在这里一次又一次地组团忽悠？
你看，就补齐16万人民币那事情，人倒是道歉了。为什么呀? 因为跟法律责任比起来，那根本不是最严重的问题。从公关角度来说，人乐得摆个姿态，然后顺便找几个亲信媒体，来混淆视听。
我预测，随着5.12的临近，国际章还会有更大规模更正式的“道歉仪式”，连还慈善大奖都是有可能的---只要，只要能把”海外募款“这一case的水给搅浑，把观众的视线给转移，然后把这次募款丑闻强行画上一个句号。
support....
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/hqyl/zhangziyi/zhangziyizt.html
中国日报的网站上有视频了
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/hqyl/zhangziyi/zhangziyizt.html
看见那个狗屁调查就来气，谁care对她演艺有啥影响？把自己干的事整清楚了再说！还有啥影响？本来就根本没有演技，还把自己当棵葱！
调查
一系列风波事件对她今后的演艺生涯会产生怎样影响？
在和周黎明的访谈里，说，捐款时，自己当时人在纽约工作，给手下的人下了“指令”，让他们去捐100万人民币。但是他们在操作中出现了疏忽。然后她说，“这个事情我要负主要责任”。我说的“道歉”是这个。
当时我看了，觉得，对这种在目前阶段已经不重要的问题，她倒显得挺能“承担责任”的。
避重就轻这一招（再加上媒体帮着吆喝），对付老百姓，有时候还是挺管用的。看看那些贪官怎么糊弄的，就知道了。
哈哈，梁山好汉啊。
都是我兄弟的错，你别怪他，要怪就怪我吧，真是富有自我牺牲精神的圣母。
童贞女王一统江湖，千秋万代。
那我们就把vogue的电话打到爆。。。。。。
支持这个....
哼哼
搞不好，我们也泼VAGUE海报的墨....
支持这个....
哼哼
搞不好，我们也泼VAGUE海报的墨....
要是有那种自动持续拨号的机器就好了，设置一个，跟踪vogue。
看见那个狗屁调查就来气，谁care对她演艺有啥影响？把自己干的事整清楚了再说！还有啥影响？本来就根本没有演技，还把自己当棵葱！
调查
一系列风波事件对她今后的演艺生涯会产生怎样影响？
以下是引用qzhang8在3/16/2010 9:13:00 PM的发言：
From tianya 作者：采悦 回复日期：2010-03-17 09:31:46 当我听到戛纳永远拒绝章子怡这消息我就觉得章子怡没有可能在德国露面的了，果然她没去成！ 无论怎样，明天我找出说这事的法国人协助我找消息来源出处！
戛纳永远拒绝章子怡???
OH~~~yeah~~~~~
BTW source?
澄清
VOGUE的封面换了李冰冰，很难看的黄瓜绿
只要不是国际脏谁都行！
作者：小猪胖乎乎2009 回复日期：2010-03-17 12:42:01
她简直在挑战她自己的智商
我看最大的章黑就是她自己
是呀，总觉得她将大家都当傻子，其实是因为她自己傻。
但是这种人坏起来很厉害。
说实话我以前就遇到过一个，很用功，读书很差，但是搞人很厉害的
其实她智商很低的，看她演戏就知道，用力过猛，明显那种脑力不够的类型。
但是这种人坏起来很厉害。
说实话我以前就遇到过一个，很用功，读书很差，但是搞人很厉害的
小心眼很多，大道理不懂。
这件事改变了我对一些事情的看法
如果不是四川地震后发生的事让我知道了什么是大爱
我也不会坚持到今天
[此贴子已经被作者于2010/3/17 10:05:10编辑过]
我们最大的疑问是：2008年底Asset Amount（资产额）为39,716美元，现在为 0 美元，钱到哪里去了？
网友：既然章子怡和她的律师都那么坦白了，没有募捐到100万美金，就是50万美金也还有40多万没有兑现，看来原来有太多人陷害她了。我们准备告那些媒体造谣说章子怡在海外募捐了100万、200万甚至500万美元，告上海市慈善基金会、上海市精神文明建设委员会办公室、上海东方传媒集团等三个单位硬栽给章子怡一个“年度慈善贡献奖”，让章子怡好委屈。