No, in many cases, the non-biological parents are still required to pay child support to their non-biological children even after the divorces. Here is one of those cases:
No, in many cases, the non-biological parents are still required to pay child support to their non-biological children even after the divorces. Here is one of those cases:
This is the case in the article in my previous reply.
In the case I mentioned the non-biological child wasn't from the previous marriage. He was born during the marriage due to his ex-wife's extrahuaren.usl affair, unbeknown to the husband.
In most cases, if the non-biological parents have been the parents to their non-biological children for a period of time, they will be required to pay child support by the court, it doesn't matter if they have been lied to about the parentage of their non-biological children.
" If the child is not your biological child, must you pay child support? Courts have answered, Yes, and governments have tried to collect with a fervor. See Child Support Enforcement Amendments of 1984, P.L. 98-378, Section 18 as codified at 42 U.S.C. sec. 667. The state cognate is Chapter 460 of the Acts of 1993."
But different courts might have have different rulings. Note the following 3 interesting cases in Michigan:
In Michigan In Nyard v. Nyard, 156 Mich. App. 94 (1986), estoppel was upheld against a husband who knowingly committed to raising a child whom he knew to be fathered by another man and who had convinced his wife, therefore, not to place the child up for adoption.
Another court held that the time factor could be an instant: it estopped a man from denying a child-support obligation by the mere act of marrying the mother. In Johnson v. Johnson, 93 Mich. App. 415 (1970), the court ruled that since the husband-in-waiting knew the woman to be pregnant, he assumed responsibility for triggering the state's statutory presumption of paternity, theoretically cutting off recourse against the father.
But, a third court, in Tilley v. Tilley, 195 Mich. Ct. App. 309 (1992) held that the natural parents were still available for enforcement of support.
(http://www.falseallegations.com/child-support-by-nonbiological-fathers.htm.) In short, if a husband finds out the child he has been raising is from an extrahuaren.usl affair between his wife and another man, it doesn't automatically excuse him from paying child support if he files for divorce.
In the case I mentioned the non-biological child wasn't from the previous marriage. He was born during the marriage due to his ex-wife's extrahuaren.usl affair, unbeknown to the husband.
Martin filed a counterclaim in which he alleged one of his ex-wife's children was not his biological child, although during the marriage Pierce led him to believe the child was his.
In the case I mentioned the non-biological child wasn't from the previous marriage. He was born during the marriage due to his ex-wife's extrahuaren.usl affair, unbeknown to the husband.
In most cases, if the non-biological parents have been the parents to their non-biological children for a period of time, they will be required to pay child support by the court, it doesn't matter if they have been lied to about the parentage of their non-biological children.
"
If the child is not your biological child, must you pay child support? Courts have answered, Yes, and governments have tried to collect with a fervor. See Child Support Enforcement Amendments of 1984, P.L. 98-378, Section 18 as codified at 42 U.S.C. sec. 667. The state cognate is Chapter 460 of the Acts of 1993.
Martin filed a counterclaim in which he alleged one of his ex-wife's children was not his biological child, although during the marriage Pierce led him to believe the child was his.
就是说他毕竟曾经承担过抚养责任，不是孩子一出生就要求离婚的，所以我说和本贴的不一样。
Umm, it really depends on how the court will rule. For example one of the courts in Michigan ruled the following:
Another court held that the time factor could be an instant: it estopped a man from denying a child-support obligation by the mere act of marrying the mother. In Johnson v. Johnson, 93 Mich. App. 415 (1970), the court ruled that since the husband-in-waiting knew the woman to be pregnant, he assumed responsibility for triggering the state's statutory presumption of paternity, theoretically cutting off recourse against the father.
Martin filed a counterclaim in which he alleged one of his ex-wife's children was not his biological child, although during the marriage Pierce led him to believe the child was his.
Umm, it really depends on how the court will rule. For example one of the courts in Michigan ruled the following:
Another court held that the time factor could be an instant: it estopped a man from denying a child-support obligation by the mere act of marrying the mother. In Johnson v. Johnson, 93 Mich. App. 415 (1970), the court ruled that since the husband-in-waiting knew the woman to be pregnant, he assumed responsibility for triggering the state's statutory presumption of paternity, theoretically cutting off recourse against the father.
Search for "non-biological parents paying child support" on the web, you will find quite a few cases like that. Recently a man was jailed for more than a year for failing to pay child support to his non-biological child even though the court knew the fact he wasn't the biological father.
That court ruled "time factor could be instant" and "mere act of marrying the woman" could stop a man from denying child support obligation. Laws are very complex on this issue. It really depends on the laws in the state and how a particular court will rule. The ruling could be completely different between courts. It isn't very clear-cut on this issue.
Disclaimer: above are just simple facts I gathered from the web, they don't represent any of my personal feelings and opinions regarding this issue.
"non-biological parents paying child support"要CASE BY CASE. 象我们现在争论的是生下后当场就发现的.这个EX和这个小孩是没任何责任的. 这个和养了几年后又不想负责有区别的.
Hard to say in this case too, really depends on how the court will rule and how capable the lawyers are. I agree this case is more complicated than finding out the true paternity years later.
I'm simply want to say that finding out the child isn't one's biological child doesn't necessarily excuse one from paying child support.
Disclaimer: above are just simple facts I gathered from the web, they don't represent any of my personal feelings and opinions regarding this issue.
她妈给孩子选了一条过于艰难的路。 就算不选秀，上戏的，今后也要吃演艺这口饭。娱乐圈里鱼龙混杂人言可畏，远比孩子上普通中小学时更难度过。 这个妈妈如果有心让孩子今后生活的平稳些，就应该教育孩子努力念书，等孩子大了出国念书，不管是美洲还是欧洲，对非裔的包容度都比中国好很多，而且黑皮肤可能比黄皮肤能更快获得认同。孩子今后就不用生活在非议之中了。在中国费了好大劲考进上戏，还不如费力好好读书有用。 THis is so true!
legal presumed是对的，一旦DNA验证不是，丈夫可以起诉离婚，就可以不用付钱了，除非丈夫愿意不离婚，要不然离婚一定会成功的。你这个太有误导性了。
No, in many cases, the non-biological parents are still required to pay child support to their non-biological children even after the divorces. Here is one of those cases:
http://www.nwaonline.net/articles/2007/05/18/news/051807lrchild.txt
[此贴子已经被作者于2009-8-30 0:50:53编辑过]
人证，主题曲《草帽歌》
哦，原来这个电影讲的是这个故事啊？
No, in many cases, the non-biological parents are still required to pay child support to their non-biological children even after the divorces. Here is one of those cases:
http://www.nwaonline.net/articles/2007/05/18/news/051807lrchild.txt
[此贴子已经被作者于2009-8-30 0:50:53编辑过]
这个和你说的不是一样的case, 如果一个男人娶了一个离婚带孩子的女人，那是他自愿的，他也愿意负担这个责任，哪怕后来离婚了，他也曾经自愿过，愿意承担的责任不是想退掉就推掉了，离了还得再负担。文章中这种case, 丈夫是受害方，在完全不知情的情况妻子unfaithful, 从未主动承担过责任，你别搞混了。
[此贴子已经被作者于2009-8-30 2:04:00编辑过]
白人大概也可以对亚裔说同样的话。
至少没有哪个亚裔打得白人满地找牙的.也没亚裔老是抢劫白人的吧.好象也很少有亚裔播种了却不认不养的吧. 当然亚裔也有败类但是百分比要少很多吧. 白人吃亚裔的亏大部分是智力上的较量.可是亚裔没惹老黑,老黑欺负亚裔比比皆是.MM大概没去黑人区住过吧.
这个和你说的不是一样的case, 如果一个男人娶了一个离婚带孩子的女人，那是他自愿的，他也愿意负担这个责任，文章中这种case, 丈夫是受害方，在完全不知情的情况妻子unfaithful,你别搞混了。
This is the case in the article in my previous reply.
In the case I mentioned the non-biological child wasn't from the previous marriage. He was born during the marriage due to his ex-wife's extrahuaren.usl affair, unbeknown to the husband.
In most cases, if the non-biological parents have been the parents to their non-biological children for a period of time, they will be required to pay child support by the court, it doesn't matter if they have been lied to about the parentage of their non-biological children.
"
If the child is not your
biological
child,
must you pay child support? Courts
have
answered, Yes, and governments have tried to collect with a fervor. See
Child
Support Enforcement Amendments of 1984, P.L. 98-378, Section 18 as
codified
at 42 U.S.C. sec. 667. The state cognate is Chapter 460 of the Acts of
1993."
But different courts might have have different rulings. Note the following 3 interesting cases in Michigan:
In
Michigan
In Nyard v. Nyard,
156
Mich. App.
94 (1986), estoppel was upheld against a husband who knowingly
committed
to raising a child whom he knew to be fathered by another man and who
had
convinced his wife, therefore, not to place the child up for adoption.
Another court held that the time
factor
could
be an instant: it estopped a man from denying a child-support
obligation
by the mere act of marrying the mother. In Johnson v. Johnson,
93 Mich. App. 415 (1970), the court ruled that since the
husband-in-waiting
knew the woman to be pregnant, he assumed responsibility for triggering
the state's statutory presumption of
paternity,
theoretically cutting off recourse against the father.
But, a third court, in Tilley v.
Tilley,
195 Mich. Ct. App. 309 (1992) held that the natural parents were still
available for enforcement of support.
(http://www.falseallegations.com/child-support-by-nonbiological-fathers.htm.)
In short, if a husband finds out the child he has been raising is from an extrahuaren.usl affair between his wife and another man, it doesn't automatically excuse him from paying child support if he files for divorce.
[此贴子已经被作者于2009-8-30 2:42:06编辑过]
突然想到一个问题
如果这事出在美国
即使她妈是婚内出轨生了她
离婚了她妈当时的老公也是要出抚养费的。。。
只要有证明这小孩不是你的不用付.国家帮你养.美国政府已经不知道养了多少黑小孩了.
In the case I mentioned the non-biological child wasn't from the previous marriage. He was born during the marriage due to his ex-wife's extrahuaren.usl affair, unbeknown to the husband.
Martin filed a counterclaim in which he alleged one of his ex-wife's children was not his biological child, although during the marriage Pierce led him to believe the child was his.
就是说他毕竟曾经承担过抚养责任，不是孩子一出生就要求离婚的，所以我说和本贴的不一样。
In the case I mentioned the non-biological child wasn't from the previous marriage. He was born during the marriage due to his ex-wife's extrahuaren.usl affair, unbeknown to the husband.
In most cases, if the non-biological parents have been the parents to their non-biological children for a period of time, they will be required to pay child support by the court, it doesn't matter if they have been lied to about the parentage of their non-biological children.
"
If the child is not your biological child, must you pay child support? Courts have answered, Yes, and governments have tried to collect with a fervor. See Child Support Enforcement Amendments of 1984, P.L. 98-378, Section 18 as codified at 42 U.S.C. sec. 667. The state cognate is Chapter 460 of the Acts of 1993.
.........
[此贴子已经被作者于2009-8-30 2:25:54编辑过]
这个就和要求领养的小孩不能抚养到一半就不抚养一样，不是说不是自己的，而且自己从未自愿抚养过，法律还会要求他抚养的。
Martin filed a counterclaim in which he alleged one of his ex-wife's children was not his biological child, although during the marriage Pierce led him to believe the child was his.
就是说他毕竟曾经承担过抚养责任，不是孩子一出生就要求离婚的，所以我说和本贴的不一样。
Umm, it really depends on how the court will rule. For example one of the courts in Michigan ruled the following:
Another court held that the time
factor
could
be an instant: it estopped a man from denying a child-support
obligation
by the mere act of marrying the mother. In Johnson v. Johnson,
93 Mich. App. 415 (1970), the court ruled that since the
husband-in-waiting
knew the woman to be pregnant, he assumed responsibility for triggering
the state's statutory presumption of
paternity,
theoretically cutting off recourse against the father.
Martin filed a counterclaim in which he alleged one of his ex-wife's children was not his biological child, although during the marriage Pierce led him to believe the child was his.
就是说他毕竟曾经承担过抚养责任，不是孩子一出生就要求离婚的，所以我说和本贴的不一样。
就是就是.这个CASE是CHEATING. 就是美国也没给带了绿帽还要付扶养费的.要是哪个法官这么判了可是要下六月雪啦. 男窦娥啊!哪个男人还敢结婚啊.
[此贴子已经被作者于2009-8-30 3:02:48编辑过]
Umm, it really depends on how the court will rule. For example one of the courts in Michigan ruled the following:
Another court held that the time factor could be an instant: it estopped a man from denying a child-support obligation by the mere act of marrying the mother. In Johnson v. Johnson, 93 Mich. App. 415 (1970), the court ruled that since the husband-in-waiting knew the woman to be pregnant, he assumed responsibility for triggering the state's statutory presumption of paternity, theoretically cutting off recourse against the father.
注意用词，assumed, presumption, theoretically，这些都在孩子出生后验明DNA后就立即推翻的，有没有白人夫妇生出来黑孩子法官还判男人付抚养费的例子，如果那个女的主上没黑的血统。
这个CASE是CHEATING. 就是美国也没给带了绿帽还要付扶养费的.要是哪个法官这么判了可是要下六月雪啦. 男窦娥啊!哪个男人还敢结婚啊.
不但不付抚养费，男人甚至可以要求精神赔偿，要不然，世界真是乱套了。
这个CASE是CHEATING. 就是美国也没给带了绿帽还要付扶养费的.要是哪个法官这么判了可是要下六月雪啦. 男窦娥啊!哪个男人还敢结婚啊.
Search for "non-biological parents paying child support" on the web, you will find quite a few cases like that. Recently a man was jailed for more than a year for failing to pay child support to his non-biological child even though the court knew the fact he wasn't the biological father.
[此贴子已经被作者于2009-8-30 3:33:16编辑过]
注意用词，assumed, presumption, theoretically，这些都在孩子出生后验明DNA后就立即推翻的，有没有白人夫妇生出来黑孩子法官还判男人付抚养费的例子，如果那个女的主上没黑的血统。
That court ruled "time factor could be instant" and "mere act of marrying the woman" could stop a man from denying child support obligation. Laws are very complex on this issue. It really depends on the laws in the state and how a particular court will rule. The ruling could be completely different between courts. It isn't very clear-cut on this issue.
Disclaimer: above are just
simple facts I gathered from the web, they don't represent any of my
personal feelings and opinions regarding this issue.
[此贴子已经被作者于2009-8-30 4:11:10编辑过]
"non-biological parents paying child support"要CASE BY CASE. 象我们现在争论的是生下后当场就发现的.这个EX和这个小孩是没任何责任的. 这个和养了几年后又不想负责有区别的.
Hard to say in this case too, really depends on how the court will rule and how capable the lawyers are. I agree this case is more complicated than finding out the true paternity years later.
I'm simply want to say that finding out the child isn't one's biological child doesn't necessarily excuse one from paying child support.
Disclaimer: above are just simple facts I gathered from the web, they don't represent any of my personal feelings and opinions regarding this issue.
[此贴子已经被作者于2009-8-30 3:59:30编辑过]
一直想看看亚洲人和黑人混血生的孩子长啥样，原来长这样啊。。。
TIGER WOODS 就是这样的混血啊。还有我有个朋友也是，挺好看的。
这不跟当年美军在日本越南留下的混血儿一样吗
为啥美国人非洲人的还要声明一下涅？
那我觉得这个小女孩挺可怜的，肯定受了不少白眼
re 这个，我也觉得这孩子真可怜。
黑人管生不管养的是多数，她即使找到亲爹，可能更加失望。
白人也是啊，你以为他们背后不歧视黑人啊？只不过当面不会表现出来而已。没办法，文化带来的就是虚伪，只不过有些人把自己都骗过了。
中国人的审美，向来是以白为美，觉得黑人的长相不好看，很多中国父母不希望自己的闺女找黑人，不管是非洲黑人，还是美国黑人，怕生出来的小孩不好看，这个算不上势力眼吧。最多只算不够包容。
我就是看不惯动不动就拿中国人怎么怎么来做文章的，真没劲。
re....support.....
黑人被人讨厌是因为普遍的好吃懒做还老惹事生非，这些事实不能因为一两个优秀的黑人而改变，就算现在奥巴马当了总统也不会改变。你举的这个事例没普遍性。你要讨厌中国人就讨厌好了，最好不要来华人，因为这里遍地是你讨厌的中国人...
支持。。。。。
并不是我harsh
这种事情对于那个母亲的前夫是多大的伤害，一般人老婆辟腿，只要没有被人撞见或是自己不声张，不会有太多的人知道
像这种情况，凡是认识他的人，都会知道他老婆给他带了顶绿油油的帽子，这该是多大的伤害
现在这个女人为了让女儿出名又当着全国人羞辱了前夫，毁了他的生活。前夫的家人，同事，朋友，邻居，20年前不知道的人现在也全知道了。
没关系，网络上不是经常有已婚妇女声讨自己出轨的LG嘛。全国网民大多数都知道了，比起这个不算来，真不算啥。
已婚配偶出轨的多了，自己老婆生了一个黑人孩子的不多吧，更何况还是20年前的中国。
突然想到一个问题
如果这事出在美国
即使她妈是婚内出轨生了她
离婚了她妈当时的老公也是要出抚养费的。。。
应该不是。如果孩子出生后，当时的老公没有从法律上adopt她，就不用出抚养费。
黑人认为自己是当地人，印度人认为英语比中国人流利，中国人认为皮肤比印度人白。
做好自己就行了。
re
mm说得真好。
攻击他们母女的人真是有点不够厚道。 她母亲年轻时犯下的并不代表她就一无是处 吧。 我相信他们的心酸不是常人能体会的。
可怜之人必有可恨之处，虽然人言可畏，众口铄金，但是她犯错在先，只能一并承担这样的局面了。这种事情，实在管不了所有人的嘴啊。
为啥美国人非洲人的还要声明一下涅？
呵呵，如果真是她自己发的申明，就说明在她心中，美国黑人和非洲黑人分量还是不同的，不知道这样反种族歧视是不是有贼喊捉贼的嫌疑。
就算不选秀，上戏的，今后也要吃演艺这口饭。娱乐圈里鱼龙混杂人言可畏，远比孩子上普通中小学时更难度过。
这个妈妈如果有心让孩子今后生活的平稳些，就应该教育孩子努力念书，等孩子大了出国念书，不管是美洲还是欧洲，对非裔的包容度都比中国好很多，而且黑皮肤可能比黄皮肤能更快获得认同。孩子今后就不用生活在非议之中了。在中国费了好大劲考进上戏，还不如费力好好读书有用。
攻击他们母女的人真是有点不够厚道。 她母亲年轻时犯下的并不代表她就一无是处 吧。 我相信他们的心酸不是常人能体会的。
同意.
攻击她这个出身的人真是没品，NND。（俺本来想说去吃屎，想一想还是改成比较温油的一句）
都黑成这样了还说自己不是非州人是米国银，上海女真是太可怕了。
从这个话，看出几样事情：
你抬眼眼美国银，觉得他们高人一等
你低眼看非洲人，觉得他们低人一等
你对上海女有成见
对皮肤颜色有歧视
女孩子没有错，自己的出身没办法选择，自己也是经过很多努力考到了上戏，妈妈劈腿劈给了黑人罢了，那些劈腿劈给了中国人的男人或者女人们就有权利对人家母女俩大声叫嚷了？行为都是劈腿，都是不应该的，与劈给谁没一点关系。
她妈给孩子选了一条过于艰难的路。
就算不选秀，上戏的，今后也要吃演艺这口饭。娱乐圈里鱼龙混杂人言可畏，远比孩子上普通中小学时更难度过。
这个妈妈如果有心让孩子今后生活的平稳些，就应该教育孩子努力念书，等孩子大了出国念书，不管是美洲还是欧洲，对非裔的包容度都比中国好很多，而且黑皮肤可能比黄皮肤能更快获得认同。孩子今后就不用生活在非议之中了。在中国费了好大劲考进上戏，还不如费力好好读书有用。
THis is so true!
如果是白人混血，我觉得她的命运会截然不同......................
女孩的命运也许会不同，但是她妈还是一样不知廉耻，她妈的老公还是会跟她妈离婚
“全场都为这对命运坎坷却坚 强的母女鼓起了长久的掌声。舞台上的娄婧面对全球直播的电视镜头，也说出了自己寻父的愿望：“如果有机会的话，我希望他(父亲)能看到……”从小就失去父亲的戴军感同身受，他安慰小娄婧，“说不定你的爸爸也一直在找寻你们母女俩，现在你的表现那么好，他可能会看得到，他有这么棒的女儿，他离开你们母女俩是他自己的损失。”
真是不知道说怎么好，只希望这个小姑娘可以真的幸福，她是最无辜的。
[此贴子已经被作者于2009-8-28 14:16:59编辑过]
她妈那是自作自受，孩子命运是够坎坷的
这个妈应该是没有廉耻吧？这种事还好意思拿出来说，她自己不要脸也不考虑儿女，再说了，这种节目根本不可能让孩子他黑爸看见，看见了还不一定认不认的
贞洁烈女驾到，你家门口有贞节牌坊吗？让华人出钱给你修一个。
贞洁烈女驾到，你家门口有贞节牌坊吗？让华人出钱给你修一个。
exactly.
贞洁烈女驾到，你家门口有贞节牌坊吗？让华人出钱给你修一个。
你就把华人代表了？
我觉得她上这个节目, 找到兄弟姐妹的机会比找到老爸大很多.
她妈给孩子选了一条过于艰难的路。
就算不选秀，上戏的，今后也要吃演艺这口饭。娱乐圈里鱼龙混杂人言可畏，远比孩子上普通中小学时更难度过。
这个妈妈如果有心让孩子今后生活的平稳些，就应该教育孩子努力念书，等孩子大了出国念书，不管是美洲还是欧洲，对非裔的包容度都比中国好很多，而且黑皮肤可能比黄皮肤能更快获得认同。孩子今后就不用生活在非议之中了。在中国费了好大劲考进上戏，还不如费力好好读书有用。
同感. 我也想为啥她不努力读书出国呢?
中国是个自由的国度，可以肆无忌惮的对肤色 对地域 对户口放声歧视，而不担心自己有任何被制裁。
女孩子没有错，自己的出身没办法选择，自己也是经过很多努力考到了上戏，妈妈劈腿劈给了黑人罢了，那些劈腿劈给了中国人的男人或者女人们就有权利对人家母女俩大声叫嚷了？行为都是劈腿，都是不应该的，与劈给谁没一点关系。
对这个母女本身我没啥观点，
但是从从逻辑上说，对这对母女大声叫嚷的，不一定本身都是劈腿的，你这个偷换概念了。。。。。
我也不评价母女俩到底贱不贱，高尚不高尚，
我就是觉得，她们想通过这个方式找到生父的可能性不是很大啊。。。。。。
当然了，试试也没坏处了，反正都已经到谷底了。
我觉得这样说她妈妈太harsh了，人都有年少轻狂的时候，谁不犯错。只不过一般人即使犯了同样错误可能别人根本没有机会发觉，又或者时过境迁只要犯错的人真心悔改过去了也就过去了。可她的妈妈这样带着她就等于时刻在像所有人昭示她的错误，时刻提醒人她所犯的错误。她要承受多少常人所不能承受的压力才能将女儿养大，我觉得她已经为自己的错误付出了代价。我觉得她妈妈没有放弃她是很坚强的，很少有人能做到这样。从这个角度而言，我敬佩她！
无语，这样人也有粉丝!
中国人是看不起黑人的多，这个没说错。但是中国人看不起黑人，也不会说要像以前白人那样来奴役你，从法律上来压制你，从行为上欺负你，只不过是一般老百姓就有点敬而远之的意思。这有什么丢人的，个人喜好问题。这个世界不是白人统治的，非要自己的老百姓压抑自己的个人喜好，跟随现在美国输出的那一套价值观（比如就是假惺惺的种族平等），这个才叫丢人。
她妈婚内出轨，生下别人的小孩，这不叫丢人？
RE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
攻击他们母女的人真是有点不够厚道。 她母亲年轻时犯下的并不代表她就一无是处 吧。 我相信他们的心酸不是常人能体会的。
这对母女走到公众视线中，每个人都可以发表看法。倒是你这样说话特别不厚道!!!
突然想到一个问题
如果这事出在美国
即使她妈是婚内出轨生了她
离婚了她妈当时的老公也是要出抚养费的。。。
真有这种事？
她妈妈还是在与丈夫蜜月时出轨的.
这都能知道？嗬嗬
顶着锅盖说一句：怎么这个楼里的评论都比较刻薄，有买买提的倾向。
千错万错，这个小姑娘没错，她有没有权利选择出生。她娘当年错了，但是比起大多数WSN和WSNV，起码人家有勇气承担后果啊。
这个倒是
国内好多弃婴呢，不少非婚生的，好可怜，孩子有什么错，生下来就受到惩罚，唉
这个倒是
国内好多弃婴呢，不少非婚生的，好可怜，孩子有什么错，生下来就受到惩罚，唉
没准她压根就不知道孩子是怀的谁的，生出来发现是黑的才知道的，如果她确实知道不是自己丈夫的，还有勇气生下来，我佩服她的勇气。
妈妈的确是犯过错，这个不容质疑的。婚内，不管劈腿和白人，黑人，黄人的都是错误的，这个与肤色无关。但是这个妈妈独子一个人抚养了这个孩子，培养孩子成长，真的不容易。如果这个妈妈不堪压力，带着女儿一起自杀，那这不是大家希望看到的结局吧。
父辈犯下的错误，不应该让下一辈来承担，比如父亲进牛棚，孩子就要被隔离，剥夺一切权利吗？
20年的惩罚够了。
这个妈妈这20年来，所承受的压力不是我们能够想象的，从社会上，家庭上，还有同事那得到的歧视和白眼，真的已经够苦了，用了20年偿还一个错误够了。
妈妈的确是犯过错，这个不容质疑的。婚内，不管劈腿和白人，黑人，黄人的都是错误的，这个与肤色无关。但是这个妈妈独子一个人抚养了这个孩子，培养孩子成长，真的不容易。如果这个妈妈不堪压力，带着女儿一起自杀，那这不是大家希望看到的结局吧。
父辈犯下的错误，不应该让下一辈来承担，比如父亲进牛棚，孩子就要被隔离，剥夺一切权利吗？
20年的惩罚够了。
RE................ 不管怎么样.父母的错,不应该强加到孩子身上!!