The data for NMSP 2014 is for class 2015, people may draw wrong conclusion; e.g. for MSJ they had 50 admitted to UCB with 70 NMSP for the year 2014. But for the class of 2015, they had a record 107 NMS, and 80+ UCB admission.
【 在 hnl2011 (calmocean) 的大作中提到: 】 The data is slightly misleading. The data for NMSP 2014 is for class 2015, people may draw wrong conclusion; e.g. for MSJ they had 50 admitted to UCB with 70 NMSP for the year 2014. But for the class of 2015, they had a record 107 NMS, and 80+ UCB admission.
【 在 hnl2011 (calmocean) 的大作中提到: 】 What is so good about Ives? In a 2010, half of H*, could not have a job. Please take a look at Berkeley grads here. https://career.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/pdf/Survey/2014EECS.pdf
【 在 wodoo (福) 的大作中提到: 】 san francis high 2014 (工薪阶层可以考虑招学生较多的私立之一) 据说S的录取不少是legacy http://drive.google.com/open?id=0B1Ztv_hwzJP8bGM3SEpVUVBpd2d5Uzg3WHFQNG1tR3YwcnlN http://drive.google.com/open?id=0B1Ztv_hwzJP8UmcycV8xWWM3YVUzZEt4bjhCRU5EZlBNek40
【 在 hnl2011 (calmocean) 的大作中提到: 】 It is interesting to notice the following facts: For NMSF kids, in MSJ, you only have 70% chance to UCB, or to say it differently 2300 on : SAT is a low in MSJ. other schools are 100-120% chance to UCB, meaning you kid can use its 2200 SAT to apply UCB since their peers are in the same league; the 3-4 stars schools are 150-200 % to UCB, meaning NMSF is a super star in your school, UCB thinks highly about you; Of course, it does not mean guarantee, it only means the kid scores on PSAT can go lower, in the respected schools. ...................
List a few, let's add... Conclusion seems like good school is not good enough, top schools are better. Probably more ivy/MS alum among the MD/ partner in major VC/PE/bank/consulting firms
FB, Philip Ex..., Harvard
L,Reid Hoffman, Stanford, high school at The Putney School (Ranking 1st in VT from niche)
G,Stanford
Youtube, Steve Chen, UIUC, Chad Hurley, Indiana University of Pennsylvania
Yahoo, Stanford
Amazon, Jeff Bezos, Princeton, 好像是个好学生,National Merit Scholar
Tesla, Musk, Upenn
Snapchat, Evan Spiegel, Stanford
Uber,Travis Kalanick, University of California, Los Angeles
airbnb,Brian Chesky, Rhode Island School of Design
参见链接http://docs.google.com/document/d/1shydk1JXDcg6wcYwq9ADAJbTQQUYVdTtNx5UeAxtCqc/pub
来源: http://universityofcalifornia.edu/infocenter/admissions-source-school
http://www.mercurynews.com/education/ci_26510353/list-national-
湾区高中龙虎榜(含部分非湾区高中)
还是进三线好, 不必拿NMSF也能进UCB。
公校私校一起比较很好,menlo school, Castilleja, college prep, SF university high,都大名鼎鼎,没想到数据还没几大公立牛。不知道UCB和大藤的数据是不是线性
相关,大藤有没有学校提供像UC这样的数据?
加入南加名校也很棒,加州榜单上经常看到,经常很好奇是不是湾区的小朋友学的太辛苦不值得。能不能标上地区(湾区,LA,SD)?university high好像各地都有
各类榜单上经常有个Santa Cruz的牛高中,能不能加入比较?WFH的可以考虑去那里不?
根本没什么进了NMSF就半只脚进了腾笑这种事,要不然也不会那么多人进了NMSF却连
UCB都上不到。
唉,不过不管是UCB还是UCLA,教出来的都是自由派民主党
不管什么考试只要是统一考试还是能看出学校平均水平的。其实API也就是低水平选择
题。不也很好反映学校水平了吗?只是大家都是800-900区分度不高罢了。但排名和这
个还是很一致的。就算藤校录取,你会发现也和这个一致。
The data for NMSP 2014 is for class 2015, people may draw wrong conclusion;
e.g. for MSJ they had 50 admitted to UCB with 70 NMSP for the year 2014.
But for the class of 2015, they had a record 107 NMS, and 80+ UCB admission.
我们去东部跑了一圈,有些以为会喜欢的被CROSS掉,有些本来不会申请的反倒变得最
喜欢。
普遍一些。
In a 2010, half of H*, could not have a job.
Please take a look at Berkeley grads here.https://career.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/pdf/Survey/2014EECS.pdf
校只是镀金而已。
如果仅从就业角度看,San Jose State University还很厉害呢。
以下这篇文章说
The 20 universities that are most likely to land you a job in Silicon Valley第一名是San Jose State University, 第二名才是UCB。
http://www.businessinsider.com/silicon-valley-hiring-most-popular-universities-2015-7
2007 年的数据,湾区其他几家名牌私立高中的藤校成功率,超过HARKER。
最好double check其他私立。
据说S的录取不少是legacy
http://drive.google.com/open?id=0B1Ztv_hwzJP8bGM3SEpVUVBpd2d5Uzg3WHFQNG1tR3YwcnlNhttp://drive.google.com/open?id=0B1Ztv_hwzJP8UmcycV8xWWM3YVUzZEt4bjhCRU5EZlBNek40
For NMSF kids,
in MSJ, you only have 70% chance to UCB, or to say it differently 2300 on
SAT is a low in MSJ.
other schools are 100-120% chance to UCB, meaning you kid can use its 2200
SAT to apply UCB since their peers are in the same league;
the 3-4 stars schools are 150-200 % to UCB, meaning NMSF is a super star in your school, UCB thinks highly about you;
Of course, it does not mean guarantee, it only means the kid scores on PSAT can go lower, in the respected schools.
This only says that UCB believes MSJ has good SAT prep programs.
不少
你大概没有看过太多数据,太高估这些中学了。即便是top的中学,能去top学校尤其是藤校的比例也是很低的。远远不会牛到大部分学生连UCB都懒得看的程度。而且top中学UCB的enrollment/admission比例也不算低, 跟非top学校的差别并不大。UCB即使本科
远没有研究生院好,那也是20名左右的学校,想想美国有多少大学,这个档次的绝对算top的。
一年的样板太少。
另外,首贴的JPEG能否UPDATE。和你的DOC不符,有误导。
还有,家里没有孩子的很难知道API背后学校的真正差别。API相差不大的学校产出比其实差别很大。 6-10分学校每一分产出都会X2。希望认为把孩子放到差学校更有利的也
多想想。
enough, top schools are better. Probably more ivy/MS alum among the MD/
partner in major VC/PE/bank/consulting firms
FB, Philip Ex..., Harvard
L,Reid Hoffman, Stanford, high school at The Putney School (Ranking 1st in
VT from niche)
G,Stanford
Youtube, Steve Chen, UIUC, Chad Hurley, Indiana University of Pennsylvania
Yahoo, Stanford
Amazon, Jeff Bezos, Princeton, 好像是个好学生,National Merit Scholar
Tesla, Musk, Upenn
Snapchat, Evan Spiegel, Stanford
Uber,Travis Kalanick, University of California, Los Angeles
airbnb,Brian Chesky, Rhode Island School of Design
最想不到的是几大公校和著名私立(university high, menlo school, Castilleja, college prep)数据不相上下,远超普通私立(St Francis, Bellarmine)。是berkeley/NMSF数据和大藤不match,还是是加州的私校不给力,还是湾区几大公立高中的家长推
的牛?
看了一眼menlo school,和几大公立比,的确没有更牛,3年的***admission***,H5,
P7,Y5,S29,M6. S可能legacy多。。。
Castilleja只有college名字,没有数字
但是私校有很多软benefit,这个是很难量化的,
你这个数据,就好比是比较中美人民生活,只看每天吃什么穿什么,
结果是中美人民生活水平差不多,没准中国人民还更好些。。。
misleading啊。。。
如直接进公立10分高中。
如果相信寒门出人才的,也大可不必送私立。公立学校就像社会杂草多,孩子在这个环境中出来更接近社会。可以避免出现温室花朵。
知道这些有助于家长根据自己需要合理判断
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/hainingl/test1/
bd3de0a29412ff8f1555019459eee52519cc2ad7/Berkeley-2015-admits-rank.png
?连3星的都没有。要知道UCB的教工们有很大一部分是居住在这片区域的。他们的小孩有很大的比例是选择上UCB的