这是1月30号的EO 针对DEI的： In making the changes, VA officials cite the president’s 30 January executive order titled “Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government”. The primary purpose of the executive order was to strip most government protections from transgender people. The VA has since ceased providing most gender-affirming care and forbidden a long list of words, including “gender affirming” and “transgender”, from clinical settings.
The primary purpose of the executive order was to strip most government protections from transgender people. 就一条军医不提供变性医疗，要把整个民主党绑上战车，还要把未婚者也拉上垫背。 民主党就是挖空心思搅混水，唯恐大家知道一点真相。
大青椒 发表于 2025-06-17 09:22 The primary purpose of the executive order was to strip most government protections from transgender people. 就一条军医不提供变性医疗，要把整个民主党绑上战车，还要把未婚者也拉上垫背。 民主党就是挖空心思搅混水，唯恐大家知道一点真相。
大青椒 发表于 2025-06-17 09:22 The primary purpose of the executive order was to strip most government protections from transgender people. 就一条军医不提供变性医疗，要把整个民主党绑上战车，还要把未婚者也拉上垫背。 民主党就是挖空心思搅混水，唯恐大家知道一点真相。
读了一下全文，其中这两段比较关键： （1）Medical staff are still required to treat veterans regardless of race, color, religion and sex, and all veterans remain entitled to treatment. But individual workers are now free to decline to care for patients based on personal characteristics not explicitly prohibited by federal law. Language requiring healthcare professionals to care for veterans regardless of their politics and marital status has been explicitly eliminated. （2）They “seem to open the door to discrimination on the basis of anything that is not legally protected”, said Dr Kenneth Kizer, the VA’s top healthcare official during the Clinton administration. He said the changes open up the possibility that doctors could refuse to treat veterans based on their “reason for seeking care – including allegations of rape and sexual assault – current or past political party affiliation or political activity, and personal behavior such as alcohol or marijuana use”. 第一段是指出目前vet hospitals的工作人员依然必须向老兵提供服务，无论其种族，肤色，宗教信仰和性别（这些是受联邦反歧视法律保护的categories，也同时写在VA guidelines里），但是最新的guidelines把之前包括的politics政治倾向和marital status婚姻状况给删除了，我的解读就是如果工作人员以这两点为由拒绝提供医疗服务并不违规。 第二段是VA前前前朝高官的解读，对于不受保护的categories又有所扩大（目前我不清楚这些是否被包括在以前的guidelines里，听上去应该是有，否则他不会这么说）。 我个人的想法：是否会引发大规模拒绝提供服务--应该不会。但是，如果一旦发生因为这些被拒绝提供服务，就是申诉无门，因为新的guidelines删除了对这些categories的protection。
来源：
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jun/16/va-doctors-refuse-treat-patients
对Trump 来说也不算过分， MAGA 是Make America Great Again， 不是 Make Veterans Great again
不敢相信
这是为美国战斗的退伍老兵，因为政见不同连看病都没资格了吗？trump还是个逃兵，居然连退伍老兵看病都管，以后要求政府企业不准请民主党人，Medicaid不接受民主党人，收民主党人的学校拿不到funding，彻底打击政见不同的人清除异己达到独裁的目标吗
民主党的退伍军人难道不是American？为什么要因为政治倾向区别对待？
有很多老兵不结婚不是因为不想结婚，而是没人想和他们结婚。上过战场的有很多有后遗症
党派不同代表政见不同，政见不同代表利益不同，既然利益都不同了，趁早分家过得了
可不是嘛，对于没有底线的东西来说，NOTHING“算过分”，ANTHING“也不算过分”。不就是没皮没脸嘛。就不信没皮没脸能Make America Great Again。
个人和个别的行为，能和成文的命令相提并论吗？这就跟说哎现在还不是有人骂人种族歧视，跟一百年前奴隶制也没啥区别嘛。
你不搅浑水 不怕大家知道全部真相 你说个全面的呗 顺便给洗洗地
那个工作人员已经被FEMA开除了，那是不是把川总也给开除了呀
我就说肯定民主党在搞浑水，已经习惯了。
既然他们不支持MAGA，就是不支持让 America Great Again。如果Make America Great Again这个方针足够高大上，自然可以压倒一切喽！
MAGA！
（1）Medical staff are still required to treat veterans regardless of race, color, religion and sex, and all veterans remain entitled to treatment. But individual workers are now free to decline to care for patients based on personal characteristics not explicitly prohibited by federal law. Language requiring healthcare professionals to care for veterans regardless of their politics and marital status has been explicitly eliminated.
（2）They “seem to open the door to discrimination on the basis of anything that is not legally protected”, said Dr Kenneth Kizer, the VA’s top healthcare official during the Clinton administration. He said the changes open up the possibility that doctors could refuse to treat veterans based on their “reason for seeking care – including allegations of rape and sexual assault – current or past political party affiliation or political activity, and personal behavior such as alcohol or marijuana use”.
第一段是指出目前vet hospitals的工作人员依然必须向老兵提供服务，无论其种族，肤色，宗教信仰和性别（这些是受联邦反歧视法律保护的categories，也同时写在VA guidelines里），但是最新的guidelines把之前包括的politics政治倾向和marital status婚姻状况给删除了，我的解读就是如果工作人员以这两点为由拒绝提供医疗服务并不违规。
第二段是VA前前前朝高官的解读，对于不受保护的categories又有所扩大（目前我不清楚这些是否被包括在以前的guidelines里，听上去应该是有，否则他不会这么说）。
我个人的想法：是否会引发大规模拒绝提供服务--应该不会。但是，如果一旦发生因为这些被拒绝提供服务，就是申诉无门，因为新的guidelines删除了对这些categories的protection。