Jeff Bezos walking into the White House after hearing Tim Cook got a tariff exemption first. pic.twitter.com/SXd6PMPaZv — Geiger Capital (@Geiger_Capital) April 12, 2025
Jeff Bezos walking into the White House after hearing Tim Cook got a tariff exemption first. pic.twitter.com/SXd6PMPaZv — Geiger Capital (@Geiger_Capital) April 12, 2025
美将对中国制传统芯片进行贸易调查 Radio Free Asia https://www.rfa.org › 2025/03/08 8 Mar 2025 — 美国商务部去年12月指出，在所有使用芯片的美国产品当中，2/3含有中国制传统芯片，并且半数美国企业不知道他们所用的芯片来源，其中包括国防产业公司。 美国 ...
美将对中国制传统芯片进行贸易调查 Radio Free Asia https://www.rfa.org › 2025/03/08 8 Mar 2025 — 美国商务部去年12月指出，在所有使用芯片的美国产品当中，2/3含有中国制传统芯片，并且半数美国企业不知道他们所用的芯片来源，其中包括国防产业公司。 美国 ...
美对中国制传统芯片进行贸易调查3/11召开公听会 World Journal https://www.worldjournal.com › st... 8 Mar 2025 — 美国商务部去年12月指出，在所有使用到芯片的美国产品当中，2/3含有中国制传统芯片；且半数美国企业不知道他们所用的芯片来源，当中包括国防产业公司。 美国 ... UQ EvenOdd 发表于 2025-04-13 01:33
Q all-press-releases | Bureau of Industry and Security Bureau of Industry and Security (.gov) https://www.bis.gov › news-updates ... U.S. companies'''' use of chips made in PRC-based foundries is pervasive. More than 2/3 of their products contain PRC-origin chips. However, these legacy chips ...
findings of the investigation into china''s acts, policies, and ... United States Trade Representative (.gov) https://ustr.gov › sites › default › files PDF 2018 — Among all major economies, the United States has the highest ... quarter (26 percent) of all integrated circuits made and sold in the United ... UQ Q "U.S. Department of Commerce pointed out that among all U.S. products that use chips, 2/3 contain traditional chips made in China" The statement is accurate. The U.S. Department of Commerce has indeed found that about two-thirds of U.S. products utilizing chips rely on traditional chips manufactured in China. These chips, often built on older manufacturing processes (28nm or larger), are crucial for various products, including cars and medical devices. The U.S. has been concerned about this dependency and has launched investigations and implemented measures to reduce reliance on Chinese-made chips. Elaboration: Focus on "Legacy Chips": The statement specifically refers to "traditional chips," which are also referred to as "legacy chips" or "mature node" chips. These are semiconductors built on older manufacturing technologies, typically 28nm or larger. While advanced chips (AI, GPU, etc.) are also a concern, the focus here is on the widespread use of these older, more readily available chips in various U.S. products. U.S. Reliance on Chinese Chips: The U.S. Commerce Department analysis highlights that a significant portion of U.S. products, not just advanced technology, rely on these legacy chips manufactured in China. This reliance creates a potential vulnerability in the U.S. supply chain, as disruptions in Chinese production could impact various sectors, including manufacturing and healthcare. U.S. Actions to Reduce Reliance: The U.S. government has taken steps to address this dependency, including launching an investigation into Chinese-made chips and implementing export controls to restrict China''''s access to advanced chip manufacturing technology. These measures aim to reduce reliance on Chinese-made chips and encourage domestic chip production. UQ
EvenOdd 发表于 2025-04-13 01:54 Q all-press-releases | Bureau of Industry and Security Bureau of Industry and Security (.gov) https://www.bis.gov › news-updates ... U.S. companies'''' use of chips made in PRC-based foundries is pervasive. More than 2/3 of their products contain PRC-origin chips. However, these legacy chips ...
findings of the investigation into china''s acts, policies, and ... United States Trade Representative (.gov) https://ustr.gov › sites › default › files PDF 2018 — Among all major economies, the United States has the highest ... quarter (26 percent) of all integrated circuits made and sold in the United ... UQ Q "U.S. Department of Commerce pointed out that among all U.S. products that use chips, 2/3 contain traditional chips made in China" The statement is accurate. The U.S. Department of Commerce has indeed found that about two-thirds of U.S. products utilizing chips rely on traditional chips manufactured in China. These chips, often built on older manufacturing processes (28nm or larger), are crucial for various products, including cars and medical devices. The U.S. has been concerned about this dependency and has launched investigations and implemented measures to reduce reliance on Chinese-made chips. Elaboration: Focus on "Legacy Chips": The statement specifically refers to "traditional chips," which are also referred to as "legacy chips" or "mature node" chips. These are semiconductors built on older manufacturing technologies, typically 28nm or larger. While advanced chips (AI, GPU, etc.) are also a concern, the focus here is on the widespread use of these older, more readily available chips in various U.S. products. U.S. Reliance on Chinese Chips: The U.S. Commerce Department analysis highlights that a significant portion of U.S. products, not just advanced technology, rely on these legacy chips manufactured in China. This reliance creates a potential vulnerability in the U.S. supply chain, as disruptions in Chinese production could impact various sectors, including manufacturing and healthcare. U.S. Actions to Reduce Reliance: The U.S. government has taken steps to address this dependency, including launching an investigation into Chinese-made chips and implementing export controls to restrict China''''s access to advanced chip manufacturing technology. These measures aim to reduce reliance on Chinese-made chips and encourage domestic chip production. UQ
Q Last year, 41 per cent of the semiconductors in the US weapons systems and associated infrastructure were sourced from China, according to Govini.18 June 2024 The US wants to decouple its military supplies from China Yahoo Finance https://finance.yahoo.com › news › us-wants-decouple-... UQ
Q China's materials and components were used in producing US military weapons? AI Overview Learn more Yes, reports indicate that Chinese materials and components have been found in U.S. military weapons, including the F-35 fighter jet, B-1B bomber, and some F-16 fighters. This has raised concerns about supply chain vulnerabilities and potential risks to national security. Here's a more detailed explanation: Discovery of Chinese Parts: A Pentagon investigation revealed Chinese-made magnets in the turbomachine pumps of Honeywell, a supplier for the F-35, prompting a hold on deliveries of the aircraft. Broader Issue: The discovery of Chinese parts in the F-35 highlights a broader trend of reliance on foreign inputs, particularly from East Asia, in U.S. defense programs. This is due to the contraction of U.S. defense and civilian industries since the end of the Cold War. Supply Chain Vulnerability: The reliance on foreign suppliers, including China, exposes U.S. defense programs to potential vulnerabilities in supply chains, such as disruptions or politicization. Specific Examples: Beyond the F-35, investigations have also uncovered Chinese materials in other U.S. military weapons, including the B-1B bomber and some F-16 fighters. Strategic Considerations: The dependence on Chinese materials for U.S. weapons highlights the strategic importance of securing domestic and allied supply chains for critical components. According to a Foreign Policy article, China's control over certain minerals like gallium, arsenic, and neon, which are crucial for semiconductors used in missile guidance and other military systems, further underscores this point. UQ
Q Last year, 41 per cent of the semiconductors in the US weapons systems and associated infrastructure were sourced from China, according to Govini.18 June 2024 The US wants to decouple its military supplies from China Yahoo Finance https://finance.yahoo.com › news › us-wants-decouple-... UQ
Q China's materials and components were used in producing US military weapons? AI Overview Learn more Yes, reports indicate that Chinese materials and components have been found in U.S. military weapons, including the F-35 fighter jet, B-1B bomber, and some F-16 fighters. This has raised concerns about supply chain vulnerabilities and potential risks to national security. Here's a more detailed explanation: Discovery of Chinese Parts: A Pentagon investigation revealed Chinese-made magnets in the turbomachine pumps of Honeywell, a supplier for the F-35, prompting a hold on deliveries of the aircraft. Broader Issue: The discovery of Chinese parts in the F-35 highlights a broader trend of reliance on foreign inputs, particularly from East Asia, in U.S. defense programs. This is due to the contraction of U.S. defense and civilian industries since the end of the Cold War. Supply Chain Vulnerability: The reliance on foreign suppliers, including China, exposes U.S. defense programs to potential vulnerabilities in supply chains, such as disruptions or politicization. Specific Examples: Beyond the F-35, investigations have also uncovered Chinese materials in other U.S. military weapons, including the B-1B bomber and some F-16 fighters. Strategic Considerations: The dependence on Chinese materials for U.S. weapons highlights the strategic importance of securing domestic and allied supply chains for critical components. According to a Foreign Policy article, China's control over certain minerals like gallium, arsenic, and neon, which are crucial for semiconductors used in missile guidance and other military systems, further underscores this point. UQ
昨天去Costco买了两桶酱油 觉得也许以后不一定还买不到 还想买耗油来着 没找到
川普全家及其走狗，这两天在股市都赚翻天了，他能疼？
痛的是美国屁民
Q 如果出现所有外资都被中国驱逐的极端情况，那么中国也完全不用怕，因为中国是全球最大单一市场，有着全球最强大完整的产业链，我们还可以带着发展中国家玩，我们从国际失去的市场利润空间，可以从驱逐外资获得的中国市场利润空间补回来。
如此一来，其他国家三十多年来在华投资将成为废品，从中国市场再得不到一丝好处，还需要艰难重组国际产业链。此前以中国为中心的全球产业链，是中国人民30多年拼命奋斗出来的，不仅美国无法单独重建，美国+其他国家也无法轻易重建并替代。即便没有中国超级产业集群的竞争干扰，他们没有10-20年、不付出巨大代价根本没可能替代。更可能的结果是，美国被排除在以中国为核心的全球产业链之外，成为“产业链+贸易孤岛”，要四处求人拼凑供应链，在初见成效前，国家早陷入了政治、经济和金融的多重崩溃，美元也将因丧失中国产业链的支撑而崩溃，社会冲突加剧导致势必导致美国四分五裂。 UQ
?
呵呵美国韭菜都快吵翻天了，他老人家坐着空军一号雷打不动地去弗罗里达打高尔夫过周末去了
<美元也将因丧失中国产业链的支撑而崩溃>
Q 美债危机要来了，6月到期6.5万亿美元，得找买家
1. 这是拜登挖的坑，疫情期间很轻松就发债搞了好几万亿美元发钱，利息也低。等发完了大的，通胀上来了，就加息，没有了低息环境，发债成本大升。但是拜登没有事，混完了任期。发债爽，还债就是特朗普的锅了。没有任何办法，就是发新债还老债，利息都得靠发债还，还有过日子的政府赤字。这都得找买家，给买家高息。
2. 黄金昨新高破3200了。黄金长期大涨是最确定的逻辑，美元变垃圾，黄金是真金，美金是假金。这是没利息的黄金，都那么涨，那发美债，得给多少利息？绝对低不了。 ...
8. 美债完蛋的标志，就是美联储被迫下场买债救市。这当然没问题，最后总会印钱还债，美债不会违约。很多人就是这个没想明白，以为美债崩盘就是违约。真崩盘，是美联储大买美债救市。市场之前高息买没美债都不愿意，美联储来大买，美元更不值钱了。我说的黄金7000-8000会加速实现，美元也完了。
9. 之前美联储救市，是金融危机、疫情，流动性崩溃，可以理解。如果是因为美债高息也没人买，那就是总崩溃了，美债所谓全球投资基础收益的地位，就完蛋了，也就是全球金融秩序彻底颠覆。日债，就崩了，外国人不玩了，日本央行自己玩，零利率。美债如果这样，美国就可以说崩溃了。现在可以预期这个了。
UQ
?
401K也是股票呀，不过我心态好，从来不卖，到需要时候再说
这是为Apple定制的吧？
美国的医疗真的好先进噢，连TM的SOUL都能检查。
还好啦，只不过是把去年涨的都跌掉了。这么上上下下的，瞅准了抽空卖点儿covered call 也能赚个买车的钱。不贪心的也能买几个新的电脑和手机，以备关税的冲击。
hahaha
哈哈哈，mark！
exempted from Trump’s reciprocal tariffs， 说的是回到 reciprocal tariffs 之前，也就是 20% ； 而且是单方面的，同类产品比如美国芯片进到中方还是 125% ， 所以说川普今天这举动是滑跪不为过
目前没有，还在精准打击美产芯片
电视算哪一类？
今天在costco 看见96寸的TCL 才1300.
真便宜呀。
我觉得应当对应减少相应品目的退税， 苹果等美资公司在国内的组装虽然贸易额大， 但中国只能挣点微薄手工费，还被西方天天指责制裁， 正好趁机会拿回应有的利润。
electronics
系统提示：若遇到视频无法播放请点击下方链接
https://x.com/Geiger_Capital/status/1911079319411052746
杰夫·贝佐斯在听说蒂姆·库克首先获得关税豁免后大踏步走进白宫。
真到这地步，3站开打了。
这。。。。。
Q 美专家：解放军已装备地球最强炸药，美军可能被中国打得头破血流
然而如何让炸药尽量小型化，数量少且威力大，这是提高爆炸效率的关键所在。在该领域，美俄一直保持领先地位，但这种局面现在已经被中国打破。2023年3月，为美国政府工作的ETC研究组织发布了一则消息，该组织的专家 Bob Kavetsky表示中国的CL-20炸药已经让中国在该领域领先于美国。
台海地区发生冲突，那么这种炸药会让美军承受巨大损失，换言之就是美军可能会被解放军打得“头破血流”。专家提到了CL-20是一种第四代炸药，它的学名叫六硝基六氮杂异伍兹烷，因为这个名字太长太复杂，外界一般简称它为HNIW。如果单纯从能量的高低来看，它其实并不是已知的能量最高的炸药，但它却是目前为止人类能够实际使用的能量最高且威力最大的非核单质炸药，从实用的角度出发，它就是当今的“炸药领域的扛把子”。
...
其实说起CL-20炸药，美国方面一直声称他们是最早成功研制该炸药的国家，但美国在该领域却一直处于止步不前的状态，直到2005 年，欧洲的 CL-20炸药价格仍达到了1000 欧元每公斤，美国CL-20炸药大约一千美元一克，比欧洲更贵。在如此昂贵的情况下，该炸药很难大量应用。而中国却已经实现了实用化，之所以能做到这一点，离不开我国著名的炸药专家于永忠教授。
于教授在上世纪70年代末就已经解决了CL-20炸药的理论问题，1979年首次在国际上提出了合成笼形结构单质炸药的理念，为中国在该领域的发展奠定了基础。后来中国的一代代专家们不断努力，找到了新的制备方法，把CL-20炸药的成本降到了1元人民币每克，远比欧美便宜。因此可以说，时隔1000多年，中国再次在火药炸药领域领先世界。再加上美国制造炸药需要的锑矿物长期依赖从中国进口，一旦中国在该领域反制美国的关税大棒，美国不仅CL-20成本更高，连普通炸药的成本都会激增，还怎么和中国打仗呢。 UQ
Q 巨大爆炸划破西北戈壁上空，白宫和五角大楼都安静了：中方不按常理出牌
2025年4月，当特朗普政府挥舞着"无差别对等关税"大棒砸向全球时，中国西北戈壁深处突然传来密集的爆炸声。解放军一次性向同一目标发射16枚弹道导弹，又用新型反导系统将它们全部拦截。这不是好莱坞大片，而是真实发生的战略级军事测试。这场看似与贸易战无关的军事行动，实则是对美国最直接的战略回应。
这次测试的核心是新型双波段相控雷达系统。这种雷达能同时使用S波和X波两种不同频率的雷达波，就像给反导系统装上了一双超级眼睛。它能同时跟踪31个弹道导弹目标，还能在这些目标中挑出7个威胁最大的优先处理。五角大楼官员私下承认，这种能力已经超过了美国现役的"萨德"系统。更让他们紧张的是，解放军这次测试的不是拦截巡航导弹，而是直接针对弹道导弹——也就是核导弹的主要载体。 ...
这场测试的真正意义，在于它揭示了一个残酷的现实：在大国博弈中，没有永远的朋友，只有永恒的利益。当特朗普政府把贸易战当作政治筹码时，中国用16声爆炸给出了最直接的答案。这种"以战止战"的智慧，或许才是维护和平的真正秘诀。 UQ
英雄所见略同啊。唉，可惜Trump没被打击到，咱们买这些电子产品的韭菜先被打击到。
给资本家跪了
你得有实力人家才肯勾兑啊。绿蛙主动跪舔那贱相，自身命运没有勾兑这个选项吧。
Q “责任全在中国”！北美芯片价格暴跌2/3，特朗普彻底玩脱了
日前，国际半导体协会（SEMI）的一份最新行业报告，在西方媒体中炸开了锅。
“中国成熟制程芯片产能占全球28%，且有望2027年突破39%。这也代表着，全球每3块传统芯片中就有1块出自中国。”
如今我国不仅研制出了昇腾等高端芯片，还倒逼北美芯片价格暴跌2/3。更让美方跳脚的是，近期美股刚刚经历了一场暴跌，大型科技股集体蒸发47万亿，英伟达、AMD等芯片巨头股价跌超15%。
而这一切的导火索，竟来自特朗普的一句话：要对中国芯片加征45%关税。在已经十分高昂的关税基础上，还想再提高关税，这对依赖中国供应链的科技企业堪称“灭顶之灾”。
鲜为人知的是，自2024年起，中国已荣登全球芯片产量榜首。美国官方报告表明，在美国含芯片的产品里，多达三分之二都采用中国芯片，甚至不少国防产品也不能例外。
更令西方坐立难安的是，依托完备强大的产业链，我国中低端芯片已经具备显著价格优势。以存储芯片领域为例，中国厂商的低价策略极为大胆，成熟制程的DDR4产品报价相较国际厂商低40 - 50%，这一价格直接突破欧美企业的成本底线。 ...
过去，《华尔街日报》高傲地表示：“中国只配生产低端芯片”。如今又不得不承认：“中国的价格战，让西方制造商面临巨大压力。” UQ
不战而屈人之兵， 还是老祖宗兵法里教的。
其实美国大学 政治学教授推荐书目里也会有孙子兵法 ， 然而， 川巨巨反智啊。
UQ 是什么意思?
Unquote 取消引用
Q
1 Nov 2021 — You told me, quote “this car will last you a lifetime” unquote, but after a few months, it''s already broken down! UQ
少发这种假新闻！还美国国防产品用中国芯片？还美国2/3产品使用中国制造芯片？是人都知道中国现在只能生产低档次芯片，英伟达的最低挡H20芯片在中国都被抢购。
<还美国2/3产品使用中国制造芯片？>
???
Q 美国商务部去年12月指出，在所有使用晶片的美国产品当中，2/3含有中国制造的传统晶片；且半数美国企业不知道他们所用的晶片来源，当中包括国防产业公司。 所谓“传统”（legacy）晶片或半导体是指相对较落后的半导体，採用有10多年历史的制程，通常比人工智能（AI）装置使用的晶片或复杂的微处理器简单得多。9 Mar 2025 半导体令特朗普抓狂爱恨交加- 要闻分析 - RFI https://www.rfi.fr › ... › 要闻分析
美国要开听证会调查中国传统芯片，专家：美国目前处于两难 ... 华尔街见闻 https://wallstreetcn.com › articles 11 Mar 2025 — 美国商务部去年12月表示，含芯片的美国产品中，有2/3使用中国芯片；超过半数美国公司不知道其芯片的来源，其中还包括一些国防工业企业。 中国社科院美国 ...
美将对中国制传统芯片进行贸易调查 Radio Free Asia https://www.rfa.org › 2025/03/08 8 Mar 2025 — 美国商务部去年12月指出，在所有使用芯片的美国产品当中，2/3含有中国制传统芯片，并且半数美国企业不知道他们所用的芯片来源，其中包括国防产业公司。 美国 ...
美国为什么会认为中国传统芯片对国家安全构成威胁？ 美国之音 https://www.voachinese.com › us-... 15 Mar 2025 — 专家们说，鉴于传统芯片涉及层面广，对美国经济影响深远，一旦中国形成对该行业的垄断，将威胁美国的国家安全。但美国如果对所有含有中国芯片的产品征收关税， ...
美对中国制传统芯片进行贸易调查3/11召开公听会 World Journal https://www.worldjournal.com › st... 8 Mar 2025 — 美国商务部去年12月指出，在所有使用到芯片的美国产品当中，2/3含有中国制传统芯片；且半数美国企业不知道他们所用的芯片来源，当中包括国防产业公司。 美国 ... UQ
Q all-press-releases | Bureau of Industry and Security Bureau of Industry and Security (.gov) https://www.bis.gov › news-updates ... U.S. companies'''' use of chips made in PRC-based foundries is pervasive. More than 2/3 of their products contain PRC-origin chips. However, these legacy chips ...
findings of the investigation into china''s acts, policies, and ... United States Trade Representative (.gov) https://ustr.gov › sites › default › files PDF 2018 — Among all major economies, the United States has the highest ... quarter (26 percent) of all integrated circuits made and sold in the United ... UQ
Q "U.S. Department of Commerce pointed out that among all U.S. products that use chips, 2/3 contain traditional chips made in China"
The statement is accurate. The U.S. Department of Commerce has indeed found that about two-thirds of U.S. products utilizing chips rely on traditional chips manufactured in China. These chips, often built on older manufacturing processes (28nm or larger), are crucial for various products, including cars and medical devices. The U.S. has been concerned about this dependency and has launched investigations and implemented measures to reduce reliance on Chinese-made chips.
Elaboration: Focus on "Legacy Chips": The statement specifically refers to "traditional chips," which are also referred to as "legacy chips" or "mature node" chips. These are semiconductors built on older manufacturing technologies, typically 28nm or larger. While advanced chips (AI, GPU, etc.) are also a concern, the focus here is on the widespread use of these older, more readily available chips in various U.S. products. U.S. Reliance on Chinese Chips: The U.S. Commerce Department analysis highlights that a significant portion of U.S. products, not just advanced technology, rely on these legacy chips manufactured in China. This reliance creates a potential vulnerability in the U.S. supply chain, as disruptions in Chinese production could impact various sectors, including manufacturing and healthcare. U.S. Actions to Reduce Reliance: The U.S. government has taken steps to address this dependency, including launching an investigation into Chinese-made chips and implementing export controls to restrict China''''s access to advanced chip manufacturing technology. These measures aim to reduce reliance on Chinese-made chips and encourage domestic chip production.
UQ
Q
Last year, 41 per cent of the semiconductors in the US weapons systems and associated infrastructure were sourced from China, according to Govini.18 June 2024 The US wants to decouple its military supplies from China Yahoo Finance https://finance.yahoo.com › news › us-wants-decouple-...
UQ
Q China's materials and components were used in producing US military weapons?
AI Overview Learn more
Yes, reports indicate that Chinese materials and components have been found in U.S. military weapons, including the F-35 fighter jet, B-1B bomber, and some F-16 fighters. This has raised concerns about supply chain vulnerabilities and potential risks to national security.
Here's a more detailed explanation:
Discovery of Chinese Parts: A Pentagon investigation revealed Chinese-made magnets in the turbomachine pumps of Honeywell, a supplier for the F-35, prompting a hold on deliveries of the aircraft.
Broader Issue: The discovery of Chinese parts in the F-35 highlights a broader trend of reliance on foreign inputs, particularly from East Asia, in U.S. defense programs. This is due to the contraction of U.S. defense and civilian industries since the end of the Cold War.
Supply Chain Vulnerability: The reliance on foreign suppliers, including China, exposes U.S. defense programs to potential vulnerabilities in supply chains, such as disruptions or politicization.
Specific Examples: Beyond the F-35, investigations have also uncovered Chinese materials in other U.S. military weapons, including the B-1B bomber and some F-16 fighters.
Strategic Considerations: The dependence on Chinese materials for U.S. weapons highlights the strategic importance of securing domestic and allied supply chains for critical components. According to a Foreign Policy article, China's control over certain minerals like gallium, arsenic, and neon, which are crucial for semiconductors used in missile guidance and other military systems, further underscores this point.
UQ
好吧，你的2/3产品使用中国产新片的说法是对的，但你第二条说美国国防产品使用中国产芯片是不对的，原文里说的是制造这些国防芯片使用的原材料部分来自中国
你可能误会了。这只是引用了别人（不是我的）的文章，正如Q/UQ所指出的。
当然，没有人会支持美国国防产品使用中国产芯片的想法！
?
Q 美帝国的死穴就是钱
近日，有消息称，美国民众在超市疯狂扫货，那种保质期长的食品，如豆类、罐头、面粉、谷物、食用油等等备受青睐，被一扫而空。
大家简单想想，作为拥有4亿枪支的美帝国，当有钱也买不到必要生活物资时，美帝国内部会爆发什么样的美丽风景线呢？何况没钱要背一身债呢？有网友表示，特朗普可以只关心赢没赢，但是普通美国人必须关心鞋子会从150美元上涨到230美元，iPhone手机会从1000美元上升到3500美元！因为，美国人要面对生活，特朗普只需要面对镜头就行了！显然，对于美帝国的内外交困，我们必须警惕特朗普铤而走险了！
美媒《战区》网站在报道中提到，美国海军部长办公室参谋部主任、海军中将博伊尔表示，美国国防部正在组织美军各军种及海岸警卫队在太平洋举行大规模联合演习，预计为期两周的“部队重返太平洋”今年夏天将在“印太地区”举行，内容是在太平洋与中国爆发大规模战争的情况下如何获胜，赤裸裸地为针对中国战争做准备。不仅仅如此，五角大楼宣布在太平洋举行“利刃2025”超大规模联合军演，美军的6大军种都会参加，并明确指出，“军演是应对亚太地区可能出现的军事冲突”，这几乎是挑明了军演目标就是中国。
日美已经实施了导弹模拟攻击中国。据多家媒体报道，最近，为了检验日本自卫队和美国驻日部队的联合作战能力，针对中国进行了美日联合打击演习。美日这次演习首次明确把“台海有事”当成核心，并在电脑模拟和实兵对抗中，有一个科目就是日美联合“向中国登陆编队发射导弹”，发射导弹的目标就是解放军登陆舰，企图以此阻断解放军登岛。 UQ
Q 最后24小时，中方仍未取消反制，特朗普白等了两天，问题变得复杂
特朗普要切断中美贸易，只给中方留了最后24小时，中方会怎么选？
关税的问题变复杂了，在中方对美国“对等关税”措施进行反制之后，美国总统特朗普在7号抛出一个重磅炸弹，说给中国48小时考虑，如果中方不撤回反制措施，那美国打算9号的时候，升级关税措施，要再次对华加征50%关税。离现在只剩最后24个小时。一旦特朗普真的升级关税，那么美国对华关税将来到惊人的超100%，届时，中国商品恐怕就不只是失去美国市场竞争力那么简单了，而是中美贸易可能会“脱钩断链”。那么，在特朗普的疯狂施压下，中方是否会妥协呢？
可以明确的回答，中方不可能会妥协，特朗普注定只会是白等两天。为什么？因为直到现在，中方仍未取消反制措施，并且在8号上午，我商务部发言人就已经明确回应，表示如果美方真的要升级关税措施，那么中方将坚决采取反制措施。这是什么意思？就是在告诉美国，如果你真要胡来，中国必将奉陪到底。 UQ