佩服这种富豪 Bill Gates says his children will inherit ‘less than 1%’ of his wealth https://fortune.com/2025/03/31/bill-gates-children-inheritence-microsoft-fortune-philanthropy/
dcbby 发表于 2025-04-01 15:34 XAI 's take: Critics argue that Bill Gates’ donations to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation are primarily a strategy for tax avoidance, with the added claim that his children control the foundation and, by extension, the money. While these criticisms raise valid points worth exploring, a closer look suggests that the reality is more nuanced, and the evidence leans toward genuine philanthropy rather than a scheme for tax evasion or family enrichment. ### Addressing the Tax Avoidance Claim It’s true that donating to charity offers tax benefits in the U.S. When Gates donates large sums—say, $1 billion—he can deduct that amount from his taxable income. At a top federal tax rate of 37%, this might save him around $370 million in taxes. However, this still means he’s giving away $630 million more than he saves. Over the years, Gates has donated tens of billions, far exceeding any tax savings. If his main goal were to avoid taxes, he could use other methods—like offshore accounts or private trusts—that don’t involve parting with most of his wealth. The tax code incentivizes philanthropy for everyone, not just Gates, and while he benefits from this system, the scale of his giving suggests it’s not just about keeping money in his pocket. ### Do His Children Control the Foundation? The idea that Gates’ children—Jennifer, Rory, and Phoebe—control the foundation doesn’t hold up under scrutiny. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is a public charitable trust, not a private family entity. It’s governed by a board of trustees, which currently includes Gates, his ex-wife Melinda French Gates, and other independent members. His children are not on the board, nor is there evidence they have direct control over the funds. Gates has publicly stated that his kids will inherit only a small fraction of his wealth—reportedly $10 million each—with the vast majority going to charity. The foundation’s assets are legally bound to be used for charitable purposes, not personal gain, and its operations are subject to strict oversight and public disclosure. If Gates wanted his children to control his wealth, setting up a private family trust would be a simpler and more discreet option, yet he hasn’t done that. ### The Foundation’s Real Impact The foundation’s work provides a strong counterpoint to the critics. It has poured billions into global health, education, and poverty reduction—think vaccine programs that have saved millions of lives, efforts to eradicate diseases like polio and malaria, and initiatives to improve sanitation in developing countries. These projects are independently audited and have measurable, large-scale impacts. If this were just a tax dodge or a way to funnel money to his kids, why commit to such public, heavily regulated efforts? There are less scrutinized ways to hide or preserve wealth, but Gates has chosen a path that invites transparency and accountability. ### Transparency and Rules U.S. charitable foundations must follow strict regulations: they have to distribute at least 5% of their assets annually for charitable causes, and their finances are publicly reported. The Gates Foundation meets these requirements and goes further, regularly sharing detailed updates on its grants and projects. This level of openness makes it tough to argue that it’s a front for personal or family benefit. ### What Drives Gates? Gates has long said he feels a moral duty to use his wealth to tackle global problems, a belief reflected in his co-founding of the Giving Pledge, where billionaires commit to giving away most of their fortunes. His actions—donating billions and pledging even more—line up with this stance. Sure, tax benefits are part of the equation, but they don’t erase the broader intent. Critics might see cynicism in every move, but the foundation’s structure, its impact, and Gates’ consistent behavior suggest philanthropy is the bigger driver. ### My Take The tax avoidance critique oversimplifies things. Yes, Gates gets tax breaks, but he’s still giving away far more than he saves, and the money funds real, world-changing work. As for his kids controlling the foundation, that’s not supported by how it’s set up or run—they don’t have the reins, and the funds are locked into charitable use. While skepticism about billionaires is fair, the evidence here points more to a sincere effort to give back than a clever ruse to dodge taxes or hoard wealth for his family. The foundation’s transparency and results make it hard to dismiss as just a tax gimmick.
dayou 发表于 2025-03-31 21:45 佩服这种富豪 Bill Gates says his children will inherit ‘less than 1%’ of his wealth https://fortune.com/2025/03/31/bill-gates-children-inheritence-microsoft-fortune-philanthropy/
佩服这种富豪 Bill Gates says his children will inherit ‘less than 1%’ of his wealth https://fortune.com/2025/03/31/bill-gates-children-inheritence-microsoft-fortune-philanthropy/ dayou 发表于 2025-03-31 21:45
dayou 发表于 2025-03-31 21:45 佩服这种富豪 Bill Gates says his children will inherit ‘less than 1%’ of his wealth https://fortune.com/2025/03/31/bill-gates-children-inheritence-microsoft-fortune-philanthropy/
dayou 发表于 2025-03-31 21:45 佩服这种富豪 Bill Gates says his children will inherit ‘less than 1%’ of his wealth https://fortune.com/2025/03/31/bill-gates-children-inheritence-microsoft-fortune-philanthropy/
RFK 对比尔盖茨的评论： RFK Jr on Bill Gates: “The same week…Bill Gates…who oversaw the Event 201 Simulation…bought 1.1M shares of the ‘vaccines’. He then sold that stock two years later at a $242M profit…and a week after that…he announced the vaccine didn't work…”
XAI 's take: Critics argue that Bill Gates’ donations to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation are primarily a strategy for tax avoidance, with the added claim that his children control the foundation and, by extension, the money. While these criticisms raise valid points worth exploring, a closer look suggests that the reality is more nuanced, and the evidence leans toward genuine philanthropy rather than a scheme for tax evasion or family enrichment. ### Addressing the Tax Avoidance Claim It’s true that donating to charity offers tax benefits in the U.S. When Gates donates large sums—say, $1 billion—he can deduct that amount from his taxable income. At a top federal tax rate of 37%, this might save him around $370 million in taxes. However, this still means he’s giving away $630 million more than he saves. Over the years, Gates has donated tens of billions, far exceeding any tax savings. If his main goal were to avoid taxes, he could use other methods—like offshore accounts or private trusts—that don’t involve parting with most of his wealth. The tax code incentivizes philanthropy for everyone, not just Gates, and while he benefits from this system, the scale of his giving suggests it’s not just about keeping money in his pocket. ### Do His Children Control the Foundation? The idea that Gates’ children—Jennifer, Rory, and Phoebe—control the foundation doesn’t hold up under scrutiny. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is a public charitable trust, not a private family entity. It’s governed by a board of trustees, which currently includes Gates, his ex-wife Melinda French Gates, and other independent members. His children are not on the board, nor is there evidence they have direct control over the funds. Gates has publicly stated that his kids will inherit only a small fraction of his wealth—reportedly $10 million each—with the vast majority going to charity. The foundation’s assets are legally bound to be used for charitable purposes, not personal gain, and its operations are subject to strict oversight and public disclosure. If Gates wanted his children to control his wealth, setting up a private family trust would be a simpler and more discreet option, yet he hasn’t done that. ### The Foundation’s Real Impact The foundation’s work provides a strong counterpoint to the critics. It has poured billions into global health, education, and poverty reduction—think vaccine programs that have saved millions of lives, efforts to eradicate diseases like polio and malaria, and initiatives to improve sanitation in developing countries. These projects are independently audited and have measurable, large-scale impacts. If this were just a tax dodge or a way to funnel money to his kids, why commit to such public, heavily regulated efforts? There are less scrutinized ways to hide or preserve wealth, but Gates has chosen a path that invites transparency and accountability. ### Transparency and Rules U.S. charitable foundations must follow strict regulations: they have to distribute at least 5% of their assets annually for charitable causes, and their finances are publicly reported. The Gates Foundation meets these requirements and goes further, regularly sharing detailed updates on its grants and projects. This level of openness makes it tough to argue that it’s a front for personal or family benefit. ### What Drives Gates? Gates has long said he feels a moral duty to use his wealth to tackle global problems, a belief reflected in his co-founding of the Giving Pledge, where billionaires commit to giving away most of their fortunes. His actions—donating billions and pledging even more—line up with this stance. Sure, tax benefits are part of the equation, but they don’t erase the broader intent. Critics might see cynicism in every move, but the foundation’s structure, its impact, and Gates’ consistent behavior suggest philanthropy is the bigger driver. ### My Take The tax avoidance critique oversimplifies things. Yes, Gates gets tax breaks, but he’s still giving away far more than he saves, and the money funds real, world-changing work. As for his kids controlling the foundation, that’s not supported by how it’s set up or run—they don’t have the reins, and the funds are locked into charitable use. While skepticism about billionaires is fair, the evidence here points more to a sincere effort to give back than a clever ruse to dodge taxes or hoard wealth for his family. The foundation’s transparency and results make it hard to dismiss as just a tax gimmick.
dayou 发表于 2025-03-31 21:45 佩服这种富豪 Bill Gates says his children will inherit ‘less than 1%’ of his wealth https://fortune.com/2025/03/31/bill-gates-children-inheritence-microsoft-fortune-philanthropy/
Bill Gates says his children will inherit ‘less than 1%’ of his wealth
https://fortune.com/2025/03/31/bill-gates-children-inheritence-microsoft-fortune-philanthropy/
🔥 最新回帖
基金会在中国 扶贫减贫 与国家卫生健康委员会等部门合作，在基层卫生服务体系和儿童营养改善等领域设立创新模式试点，支持中国消除绝对贫困，同时探索解决“相对贫困”的长效机制。[7] 与国务院扶贫办以及相关智库合作，进行扶贫政策研究总结经验，推动中国国内以及中国和其他国家之间的经验分享，并动员更多人积极参与并支持中国的扶贫减贫工作。[8] 卫生改善 与中国合作伙伴携手推出一系列项目[9] ，通过药物研发、诊疗技术创新、新防控模式的试点推广和相关政策的倡导，更有效地遏制结核病和艾滋病的传播，并降低吸烟所带来的经济负担与健康风险。[10] 扩大国家免疫规划 与中国疾控中心、国家免疫规划专家咨询委员会等伙伴开展合作[11] ，在政策、定价、供应、预算和异常反应管理等多方面做好充分准备，推动包括肺炎球菌（PCV）、人乳头瘤病毒（HPV）、轮状病毒（Rota Virus）和b型流感嗜血杆菌（Hib）疫苗等在内的疫苗纳入国家免疫规划。 慈善发展与合作 与政府、学术机构和社会组织，以及众多慈善家合作，共同鼓励慈善捐助并倡导有利于公益慈善发展的政策环境，资助创建了深圳国际公益学院，为中国公益事业培养人才。[12] 消除疟疾 与中国商务部和国家卫健委等伙伴开展合作，加快中国制造的高质量、低成本抗疟产品进入全球市场，利用中国的双边和多边合作机制填补资金和技术缺口，并协助中国与疟疾高发地区分享疟疾防控经验。[13] 农业发展 与中国政府、私营部门和金融机构合作，开发并转让技术、方案和模式，帮助农民提高作物产量，还支持中国通过参与国际和区域多边合作机制，分享在农业领域的技术、经验和资源，推动撒哈拉以南非洲地区的农业转型。[13] 药物研发 和北京市政府以及清华大学三方联合成立了全球健康药物研发中心。针对结核病、疟疾等重大传染病进行新药研发，建立具有开创性的药物研发和应用转化平台，为促进中国和全球贫困人群的健康做贡献。[14] 盖茨基金会正在与GHDDI在内的中国伙伴们合作解决全球健康与发展领域的许多难题，例如根除脊髓灰质炎，诊断、预防和治疗艾滋病、结核病，以及开发更加经济实惠、可持续的新一代环境卫生技术，在全球范围内改善人们的生活。[30] 低成本疫苗和基本卫生产品 与中国政府、私营部门和全球卫生合作伙伴一起发现、研发并交付高质量、可负担的卫生产品，这些卫生产品包括乙脑疫苗、灭活脊髓灰质炎疫苗、防治宫颈癌的人乳头瘤病毒（HPV）疫苗以及治疗疟疾的青蒿素综合疗法，等等。[13] 改善医药产品监管体系 通过世界卫生组织（WHO）和其他合作伙伴向中国监管机构提供技术支持及帮助，促使中国的监管标准和流程与国际接轨，提升整体监管能力，实现中国医药产品监管的改革目标。[13] 公共卫生设施技术革新 与合作伙伴一道进行突破性环境卫生和厕所技术的创新和商业化推广，培育市场并倡导公共政策，以支持改善全球最贫困人群的卫生条件。[15]
你说你自己吗
所以第一巴菲特几年前就已经辞职了 第二你也没有找到source哪个说了是三大管理者之一 你不是在造谣么 你不知道trustee的board有很多人吗 你这人除了造谣也没别的能耐了
trustee有一个board一堆人呢，你不知道吗？ 并不是他造谣说的巴菲特是盖茨基金三大控股人之一
说的挺好的。 大门巴菲特这种nerd儿女心不重，而且觉得一个亿完全够花了。是真心想不到给儿女留钱。Charlie munger 就早早都把钱给子女了。老巴怎么劝他，他都不肯捐钱。 这跟避税没啥关系。主要还是想不想给儿女留钱。
🛋️ 沙发板凳
这改革开放都四十多年了，还拿这种知音体来忽悠中国人，陈年老棒槌吧？
这货的钱都在基金会里，儿女以后在基金会里任职就行了。把名义上的所有权转给基金会，把支配权交给孩子，谁还玩直接继承这种初级游戏？
你是说，微软的所有权转给基金，基金的所有权交给孩子？
如果孩子只有基金的支配权，没有所有权，那可能就无法传下去了
明白人
谁能在法律角度说明白，我佩服你
好像99%回馈大众似的？ 2025，这种公殖体
盖茨舍得死后100%给孩子吗？ lol
除非孩子拥有基金的所有权，微软的所有权如何巧妙的转给自己的孩子？
你要能在法律角度说明白，我佩服你
你这是被弱肉强食洗脑了。 基金会每年必须支持总金额的5%做慈善，所有支持项目都公布在公司网站上。即使他家女儿能够用基金会的钱花在自己身上，那点金额数目也极小。基金会的支出至少还是有一部分用在了公益事业上。比那些自己一毛不拔还到处造谣的强多了。
不需要你佩服 😂
富不过三代，美国例外，就是这些慈善基金诸如此类 定制 loophole
法律责任都是这些富豪找律师定制的，专门律师才懂。你去佩服他们吧！
直接地100%给子女、那么难吗？
原来你跟本不懂
才要求5%用于慈善？那比交税划算多了。美国到底是富人给自己制定规则。
说得你好像精通似得。😂
我不说自己不懂的东西
你说的东西，连你自己都不懂
这就是区别
美国国家遗产税是40％，还要缴纳州遗产税，这每个州不同。1000亿交一半税出去，你傻么？富人避税你不懂么？川普每年交几百块的税，你没听说么？
你不傻？那你说，除非孩子拥有基金的所有权，微软的所有权如何巧妙的转给自己的孩子？
树风车作战？我说我懂了吗？我不是律师 😂
这股票以后在family trust里。family trust可以做决定是否卖股票。 卖的钱继续在trust里投资别的。可以给子孙后代。 你这点东西，人家早研究过了。
你是说盖茨的孩子拥有基金的全部股票，那不就是拥有基金的所有权吗？
股票=所有权
你说盖茨的孩子拥有基金的全部股票，有依据吗？
你既然不懂，就自娱自乐吧
人生攻击挺牛逼。 给你做个这么浅显的比喻，你理解不了，你智障吗？
你非要因为别人不懂世事如何臭的，而要说你懂如何如何，鉴定这坨屎香的？
有些富豪，不仅一毛不拔，而且还随时割韭菜，捞腰包。
这个要承认。
啤酒盖子，至少表面上还是decenct的。
现在兴起的，赤果果了。艺龙为杰出先锋。
比尔盖子给他的基金会总共捐了590亿美元，基金会至今为止已经花出去了770亿美元。这770亿美元中能进比尔盖子女儿口袋的恐怕微乎其微吧。反之加入盖子不把钱捐给基金会而是留给自己的女儿，即使50%的遗产税他女儿也能拿到300亿。
我理解很多现代人极其自私，觉得自己没有任何义务或者必要帮助别人，但是不要把其他人想的和自己一样，这世界上还是有很多人愿意帮助其他人的。
不是针对比尔盖茨，而是有一部人的内心里从来不相信这世界上竟然还有人愿意帮助其他人，所以把其他人的善行按照自己的人生观总要往肮脏里猜测。
需要的不是所有权，需要的是控制权。 所有权在基金，你只要控制基金就行了。 做坏事需要带个手套。
这是极复杂的。 你就参看2008房地产是怎么暴雷的，里面的浆糊有多复杂。 或者你就问川总吧，他是怎么做到每年交几百块的税的。
在所有富豪里边，他还是很不错的。
要所有权干嘛？
把你家的所有权归你，支配权归我好吗！
哪些富豪一毛不拔？你倒说说看？ 存在你想想里吧！
这是标准玩法，富豪都懂。 或者说不懂的， 是还豪不到那个级别。
我觉得没必要那么阴暗。他对自己的子女的执念好像还没版上这么大。
现在看看大陆媒体是怎么说的：
新浪：比尔·盖茨决定仅留不到1%财富给子女，剩余全捐。盖茨说道，“我认为，过多的财富对他们来说并非一种帮助。”盖茨多次强调，他计划将全部财富捐赠给基金会，他认为有责任以最大程度减少痛苦、改善生活的方式回馈社会。他还呼吁其他拥有巨额财富的人也能积极行动起来，共同为社会做出贡献。https://finance.sina.com.cn/tech/roll/2025-04-01/doc-inerrxpq2977693.shtml
再看看大陆的deepseek怎么说的，以下全部是deepseek原话：
基金会所有权 无传统“股东”： 作为非营利组织，基金会没有股权或私人所有者，其资产属于基金会本身，必须用于慈善目的。
5%支出规则： 美国法律要求私人基金会每年至少支出资产的5%用于慈善（基金会通常超额支出）
禁止利益输送： 基金会资产不得用于盖茨家族个人利益，所有开支需公开审计（IRS Form 990-PF）。
常见误解澄清 误区：“盖茨家族拥有基金会资产。” 事实：基金会资产独立于个人财产，两人仅作为理事参与治理，无权随意提取资金。
你太容易被忽悠了，5%做慈善的都是利益互换。你的5%慈善什么地方都可以投，大学也可以，社区也可以，你小孩读哪个大学就搞定了，社区里什么重要事情你都出席搞定知名度，各种社区关系你从里面也可以捞到不少好处。反正你的钱投到哪里，哪里就给你方便之门。包括给外国各种慈善，投了后在外国开公司啥的都方便批准一路开。慈善就是合法的贿赂。别说个人搞了，连国家都给其他国家搞慈善啊。
看看巴菲特怎么做的吧，全捐给自己基金会了，现在还信超级富豪的大忽悠啊
这货老邪恶了。
让民众不要吃肉减少碳排放。他一处房子一个月的维护费用就要几十万，自己和家人，甚至她女儿的牲口都坐着大型私人飞机到处乱串。
大把的富豪一毛不拔。最多拔一两根毛给political funding。捐了政客，而且还是要回报的。
微软是上市公司，最大股东又不是盖子，你什么文化水平？
这种富豪就只有老婆离婚能治他
巴菲特是巴菲特 盖茨是盖茨啊 选举的时候盖茨反对川普，巴菲特反对了吗 不能说富人都是一样的毕竟也不是人人都像马斯克那么极品
我记得盖茨疫情给中国捐了一亿美元 别的富豪这么做了吗 不过不知道为什么大妈们很恨盖茨
那也比直接真金白银的继承少了很多了。基金受很多监控的。人家give up的已经很可观了。
就是没有啊。大众就是不肯相信所以yy各种诠释。许晋亨跟李嘉欣不就是现成的例子，有基金的假富豪。但是那个例子大妈们就不会说还是变相转给李嘉欣了，因为她们更讨厌李嘉欣😂
那是，版上大部分人还停留在为了给自己孩子争取一套房子啥都能忍啥都能干的阶段🤦♀️
盖茨是世界上最邪恶的人之一！ 很多装的高大上的人实际上邪恶无比，盖茨就是其中之一。
做慈善可以避税也是不争的事实。富豪要是那么好，那可以先交税，然后把剩下的钱放到基金会里面。
问题在哪儿？美国政府允许这样啊。谁是美国政府？就是你我这样的普通人选出来的。
那不是，这个理论基础是你交的税也是为社会，那么如果你愿意不让政府而是自己决定怎么benefit社会，那么这笔钱是可以用税前的钱的。我觉得很合理啊
我觉得benefit社会最好的办法就是养好自己的娃。能和政府说别让我交税了，别替我benefit社会，让我多留点钱养娃？
他们这些大富豪最狡猾了。一边说他们这种富豪交的税比普通人低，一边又找各种避税方式不交税，说得自己多高尚似的。真嫌税低就多交点或者真的捐了，不要进自己人腰包啊
如果你可以prove这一点，我觉得你可以按照规定的程序去申请。就像所有的非营利组织一样，你得申请和满足一定要求才能得到资质。这个你得咨询律师。
“The same week…Bill Gates…who oversaw the Event 201 Simulation…bought 1.1M shares of the ‘vaccines’. He then sold that stock two years later at a $242M profit…and a week after that…he announced the vaccine didn't work…”
盖茨基金的三大控制人 一个是盖茨 一个是他老婆 另外一个是沃伦巴菲特，不过好像已经退休了 他们之间的联系还是挺紧密的
法律就是有钱人定的，咱不是没钱去游说国会给政客捐款么？
bill gates也不拥有微软啊，他加上他的基金现在拥有的微软股权都不如鲍尔默多
可惜他离婚，老婆也没分到多少
你找律师谈过了？这是律师说的？
我记得那个基金是有期限的, 现在是每个月拿月钱, 150年以后才能取本金, 所以说李嘉欣跟那400亿无缘
都2025了，还装纯就没意思了。法律面前人人平等，但有些人比另一些人更平等，这已经是众人皆知的秘密了。
是的啊，捐给基金会的就是变相给子孙后代一个长久工作，不然这些二代三代们很快就会把这些钱败光，还遭人惦记。富豪们又不傻
有钱人要的是社会影响力。
假如盖茨赚了100亿，如果不捐只能拿到手60亿，白白交了40亿税。捐给自己控制的基金会，就是100亿还归自己控制。而且每年基金会只需要捐出去五亿，每年基金会还能赚10%，十亿还不用上税，也就是基金会的钱还会越来越多。而且捐出去的钱也可以用来收买政客，利益交换，扩大自己的影响力，帮自己赚到更多的钱。
其实只要规定捐款抵税有上限或者基金会每年至少捐出20%就能堵住这种漏洞。但法律都是为有钱人服务的。
要影响力和省税是肯定的。另一方面就是他们的孩子本身的影响力不能和第一代相比，也需要这个基金傍身才能维持一定的影响力和财富。说他们完全为了做慈善就是太天真了
就是这个道理。
XAI 's take:
Critics argue that Bill Gates’ donations to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation are primarily a strategy for tax avoidance, with the added claim that his children control the foundation and, by extension, the money. While these criticisms raise valid points worth exploring, a closer look suggests that the reality is more nuanced, and the evidence leans toward genuine philanthropy rather than a scheme for tax evasion or family enrichment.
### Addressing the Tax Avoidance Claim It’s true that donating to charity offers tax benefits in the U.S. When Gates donates large sums—say, $1 billion—he can deduct that amount from his taxable income. At a top federal tax rate of 37%, this might save him around $370 million in taxes. However, this still means he’s giving away $630 million more than he saves. Over the years, Gates has donated tens of billions, far exceeding any tax savings. If his main goal were to avoid taxes, he could use other methods—like offshore accounts or private trusts—that don’t involve parting with most of his wealth. The tax code incentivizes philanthropy for everyone, not just Gates, and while he benefits from this system, the scale of his giving suggests it’s not just about keeping money in his pocket.
### Do His Children Control the Foundation? The idea that Gates’ children—Jennifer, Rory, and Phoebe—control the foundation doesn’t hold up under scrutiny. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is a public charitable trust, not a private family entity. It’s governed by a board of trustees, which currently includes Gates, his ex-wife Melinda French Gates, and other independent members. His children are not on the board, nor is there evidence they have direct control over the funds. Gates has publicly stated that his kids will inherit only a small fraction of his wealth—reportedly $10 million each—with the vast majority going to charity. The foundation’s assets are legally bound to be used for charitable purposes, not personal gain, and its operations are subject to strict oversight and public disclosure. If Gates wanted his children to control his wealth, setting up a private family trust would be a simpler and more discreet option, yet he hasn’t done that.
### The Foundation’s Real Impact The foundation’s work provides a strong counterpoint to the critics. It has poured billions into global health, education, and poverty reduction—think vaccine programs that have saved millions of lives, efforts to eradicate diseases like polio and malaria, and initiatives to improve sanitation in developing countries. These projects are independently audited and have measurable, large-scale impacts. If this were just a tax dodge or a way to funnel money to his kids, why commit to such public, heavily regulated efforts? There are less scrutinized ways to hide or preserve wealth, but Gates has chosen a path that invites transparency and accountability.
### Transparency and Rules U.S. charitable foundations must follow strict regulations: they have to distribute at least 5% of their assets annually for charitable causes, and their finances are publicly reported. The Gates Foundation meets these requirements and goes further, regularly sharing detailed updates on its grants and projects. This level of openness makes it tough to argue that it’s a front for personal or family benefit.
### What Drives Gates? Gates has long said he feels a moral duty to use his wealth to tackle global problems, a belief reflected in his co-founding of the Giving Pledge, where billionaires commit to giving away most of their fortunes. His actions—donating billions and pledging even more—line up with this stance. Sure, tax benefits are part of the equation, but they don’t erase the broader intent. Critics might see cynicism in every move, but the foundation’s structure, its impact, and Gates’ consistent behavior suggest philanthropy is the bigger driver.
### My Take The tax avoidance critique oversimplifies things. Yes, Gates gets tax breaks, but he’s still giving away far more than he saves, and the money funds real, world-changing work. As for his kids controlling the foundation, that’s not supported by how it’s set up or run—they don’t have the reins, and the funds are locked into charitable use. While skepticism about billionaires is fair, the evidence here points more to a sincere effort to give back than a clever ruse to dodge taxes or hoard wealth for his family. The foundation’s transparency and results make it hard to dismiss as just a tax gimmick.
批评者认为，比尔·盖茨向比尔和梅琳达·盖茨基金会捐款主要是为了避税，并声称他的孩子们控制着基金会，从而控制着这些资金。虽然这些批评提出了一些值得探讨的观点，但仔细观察表明，实际情况更为复杂，证据更倾向于真正的慈善事业，而不是避税或家族致富的阴谋。 回应避税指控 确实，向慈善机构捐款在美国可以享受税收优惠。当盖茨捐出大笔款项，比如10亿美元时，他可以从应税收入中扣除这笔金额。以37%的最高联邦税率计算，这可能为他节省约3.7亿美元的税款。然而，这仍然意味着他捐赠的金额比他节省的税款多出6.3亿美元。多年来，盖茨已经捐赠了数百亿美元，远远超过了他可能节省的任何税款。如果他的主要目的是避税，他可以使用其他方法，比如离岸账户或私人信托，这些方法不需要他放弃大部分财富。税法鼓励所有人进行慈善捐赠，而不仅仅是盖茨，虽然他从这个系统中受益，但他捐赠的规模表明这不仅仅是为了保住自己的钱。 他的孩子们是否控制基金会？ 盖茨的孩子们——詹妮弗、罗里和菲比——控制基金会的说法经不起推敲。比尔和梅琳达·盖茨基金会是一个公共慈善信托，而不是一个私人家族实体。它由一个董事会管理，目前的董事会成员包括盖茨、他的前妻梅琳达·弗兰奇·盖茨以及其他独立成员。他的孩子们不在董事会中，也没有证据表明他们对资金有直接控制权。盖茨公开表示，他的孩子们将只继承他财富的一小部分——据报道每人1000万美元——而绝大多数将捐给慈善事业。基金会的资产在法律上必须用于慈善目的，而不是个人利益，其运营受到严格的监督和公开披露。如果盖茨想让他的孩子们控制他的财富，建立一个私人家族信托会是一个更简单、更隐秘的选择，但他并没有这样做。 基金会的实际影响 基金会的工作为批评者提供了一个有力的反驳。它已经投入了数十亿美元用于全球健康、教育和减贫——比如拯救了数百万人生命的疫苗项目、根除小儿麻痹症和疟疾等疾病的努力，以及改善发展中国家卫生条件的倡议。这些项目都经过独立审计，并具有可衡量的大规模影响。如果这只是一个避税手段或向他的孩子们输送资金的方式，为什么要致力于这样公开、受到严格监管的努力呢？有其他不那么受审查的方式来隐藏或保全财富，但盖茨选择了一条邀请透明度和问责制的道路。 透明度和规定 美国的慈善基金会必须遵守严格的规定：它们每年必须将至少5%的资产用于慈善事业，并且它们的财务状况是公开报告的。盖茨基金会不仅满足了这些要求，还更进一步，定期分享关于其拨款和项目的详细更新。这种程度的开放性使得很难辩称它是为了个人或家族利益的幌子。 盖茨的动机是什么？ 盖茨长期以来一直表示，他感到有道德责任用自己的财富来解决全球问题，这一信念体现在他与他人共同创立的“捐赠誓言”中，亿万富翁们承诺将大部分财富捐献出去。他的行动——捐赠数十亿美元并承诺更多——与这一立场相符。当然，税收优惠是其中的一部分，但它们并没有抹去更广泛的意图。批评者可能在每一个举动中看到犬儒主义，但基金会的结构、其影响以及盖茨一贯的行为表明，慈善事业是更大的驱动力。 我的看法 对避税的批评过于简单化了。是的，盖茨获得了税收减免，但他捐赠的金额远远超过了他节省的税款，而且这些钱资助了真正改变世界的工作。至于他的孩子们控制基金会，这并没有得到基金会设置或运营方式的支持——他们没有控制权，资金被锁定用于慈善用途。虽然对亿万富翁的怀疑是合理的，但这里的证据更多地指向一种真诚的回馈努力，而不是为了避税或为家族囤积财富的巧妙伎俩。基金会的透明度和成果使得很难将其仅仅视为一个税收花招。
2000年，微软创始人比尔·盖茨及妻子梅琳达·盖茨创建了比尔及梅琳达盖茨基金会。2006年以前，基金会在开展慈善事业的同时也进行了投资。2006年，“股神”沃伦·巴菲特向比尔及梅琳达盖茨基金会捐了巨款。同年，基金会的组织构架发生较大的调整，转变成双实体结构，包括盖茨基金会（Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation）和比尔及梅琳达盖茨信托基金（Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Trust） 这是典型的“基金会+公益信托”的模式，在美国富豪圈中被普遍运用。那么，公益信托到底是什么？为什么越来越多的富豪会选择这种形式？公益信托分为两种类型：公益先行信托（Charitable Lead Trusts）和公益剩余信托（Charitable Remainder Trusts）。公益先行信托是在一定年限内将固定年金或固定比例的信托资产交付给慈善机构。支付终止后，剩余资产转移给非慈善受益人。公益剩余信托则相反，先在一段时期内将特定金额支付给非慈善受益人，再把剩余资产永久性地交给慈善机构。目前较多富豪选择公益先行信托。 公益信托的一个显著优势是税收优惠，主要体现在以下几点： 公益信托资产增值的部分免收资本利得税。 可获得部分所得税抵扣。 减免遗产税。富豪们在进行财富传承规划时，首先需要考虑的是如何规避高额的遗产税。在美国，美国税务居民享有549万美元的遗产税终身免税额度（2017年），超出549万美元的资产在传承的时候需要缴纳高达40%的联邦遗产税。通过设立公益先行信托，在支付给慈善机构的指定年限结束后，信托内剩余的资产分配给指定非慈善受益人，受益人无需支付遗产税。
佩服个屁 比起我们能力之外资本为零差远了 虽然是一个意思
基金会的钱就是基金会的，无论是盖茨本人还是他的孩子都不能把钱给自己花，比如买飞机、海岛啥的都不行。
有source吗？他俩不熟吧
不会Google么？
都是文字游戏。
黄右喜欢恶龙这样的 所以每次提起盖茨都恨之入骨
看看群里发言无知又可笑
你拿不出source就在这儿瞎说巴菲特是盖茨基金会的三大控制人？还反问别人不会Google？其实是你自己编造的？
你觉得是就是吧 你这种无用又没文化，还觉得全世界都在骗朕的东西 和你有什么好争辩的呢？
没人捧
巴菲特和盖茨的关系你不知道么？ 真的是什么都不懂还喜欢瞎逼逼。
当然难，没看遗产税么？
人会死，trust 不会死
所以你是承认瞎说巴菲特是盖茨基金会的三大控制人了？
盖子大女儿在曼哈顿的豪宅是买在trust 名下的，当然这个trust 可能是另一个，但是说trust 不能买豪宅就搞笑了