JUST NOW: President Trump suggests that President Biden’s pardons could be invalid because it was signed with an autopen. pic.twitter.com/itjVFYm2kb — Ian Jaeger (@IanJaeger29) March 14, 2025
JUST NOW: President Trump suggests that President Biden’s pardons could be invalid because it was signed with an autopen. pic.twitter.com/itjVFYm2kb — Ian Jaeger (@IanJaeger29) March 14, 2025
JUST NOW: President Trump suggests that President Biden’s pardons could be invalid because it was signed with an autopen. pic.twitter.com/itjVFYm2kb — Ian Jaeger (@IanJaeger29) March 14, 2025
回复2楼Teabucket. 川黑真是难以理喻，川普动用敌国侨民法遣返委内瑞拉犯罪分子，这难道不是做的一件好事？ 被左派法官阻拦，这难到不是带政治倾向阻扰一件正确的事？ 川黑是支持留着gang members 过年呐。。。真不敢苟同。 以下是CNN 标题： Trump administration deports hundreds of. Alleged gang members of EI Salvador despite court ruling
JUST NOW: President Trump suggests that President Biden’s pardons could be invalid because it was signed with an autopen. pic.twitter.com/itjVFYm2kb — Ian Jaeger (@IanJaeger29) March 14, 2025
他们现在找这个理由，其实随便他找不找auto pen，都可以随便抓shei了，一个个他恨对人都会被他关到集中营的，很多好莱坞outspoken的明星，比如Rosie o Donnell, Richard gere， George Clooney, 还有很多人都搬家离开美国了。逃避political prosecution，没想到一百年吼还得再逃回去
转： LIBs多么愚蠢： 国会试图通过 1973 年的《战争权力法》压制总统的权力，但总统却可以宣布国家紧急状态以使用武装部队。 国家紧急状态开启了 150 项法定权力。 奥巴马宣布了这一国家紧急状态。 它一直持续到今天。为什么“乔”没有撤销它？🤡 军事与联邦法律只有 4 种搭配方式：行政命令、国家紧急状态、公告和条约。 行政命令：不需要立法。 总统可以撤销 EO。 每个国家紧急状态都有一个自动 2 年终止条款，如果它没有超过 2 年。 “乔”继续执行特朗普总统在 2017 年至 2020 年期间签署和宣布的 8 项行政命令，其中包括 8 项国家紧急状态，这些命令将在宣布后的两年内自动终止。 仅这 8 项行政命令和 8 项国家紧急状态，就足以驱逐非法移民，揭露所有联邦机构、部门、公司、组织中的欺诈、浪费和洗钱行为，夺回巴拿马运河，消除股票和交易员操纵和欺诈，消除所有形式的侵犯人权行为，所有法律战和选举干预，打击阿片类药物、毒品和所有形式的贩运等。 这 8 项行政命令和 8 项国家紧急状态持续了 4 年，正在排干沼泽。 为什么“乔”继续执行这些行政命令并揭露所有腐败行为？ 如果特朗普总统是“对民主的威胁”并违反法律和秩序？ 为什么“乔”和民主党人没有撤销和/或终止特朗普总统签署的每一项行政令和宣布的国家紧急状态？ 他们难道不应该废除所有能废除的东西，让他的任期变得痛苦、更具挑战性，并花时间重新签署从 2017 年到 2020 年的那些行政令吗？在新的行政令之前？ 而不是撤销或终止任何一项，让他直接回来执行这些行政令？ 但看……有趣的是……继续执行国家紧急状态的行政令就是在执行它…… 继续执行需要总统签署才能继续…… 2024 年 2 月，14 个州部署到德克萨斯州。唯一可以将国民警卫队联邦化为现役的人是总统，第 10 条。 特朗普总统是唯一一位在 2024 年 2 月与德克萨斯州州长和副官长一起在边境的总统。特朗普总统在德尔里奥的同一天，媒体称“拜登”在德克萨斯州布朗斯维尔，布朗斯维尔政府网站至今仍称第 47 任总统到访过。 除非国民警卫队根据第 10 条联邦化，否则副官长向州长汇报。 适用于此权力的唯一第 10 条命令是 2020 年 3 月 27 日签署的 EO 13912，该命令将 100 万预备役部队联邦化。预备役只服务于联邦使命，而不是像国民警卫队那样服务于州。 如果他是“前”总统……那将是违反国家安全的行为，违反了他自己的 EO 13848 和国家紧急状态……其中一个“乔”继续说…… “乔”从未撤销 EO 13912……这是唯一一项伴随宪法第二条的军事命令，即总统对边境的权力…… “乔”继续执行与也门有关的 EO。🤣 所以，你有两个选择。 由于“乔”继续执行这些 PLUS，因此没有撤销所援引的任何其他法律和命令。 要么“他”和“他的政府”与特朗普总统并列最伟大，因为这些都是特朗普总统的行政命令，加上所有其他援引的法律和命令都概述了正在进行的特别行动…… 或者 特朗普总统对拜登犯罪家族以及过去 70 年来与深层政府的所有其他联系的判断是 100% 准确的。 因为目前援引的法律和命令不仅明确概述了将军和世界领导人为您带来的特别行动和非常规战争，所有这些都在援引的法律和命令中概述，两党共同努力。 自由主义者的笑话。💯 How dumb LIBS are: Congress tried to suppress the President’s power with the War Powers Act of 1973, but made it where a President can declare a National Emergency to use Armed Forces. A National Emergency opens 150 statutory powers. Obama declared this National Emergency. It’s been continued to present day. Why didn’t “Joe” revoke it? 🤡 There's only 4 ways Military pairs with Federal Law: Executive Orders, National Emergencies, Proclamations, and Treaties. Executive Orders: Do NOT require Legislation. An EO can be revoked by a president. Every National Emergency has an automatic 2 year termination clause, if it’s not continued beyond that 2 years. “Joe” continued 8 Executive Orders with 8 National Emergencies invoked and declared by President Trump signed and declared from 2017 to 2020, that would have automatically terminated in 2 years after their declaration. Those 8 EOs with 8 National Emergencies, alone, are what’s deporting illegal migrants, exposing fraud, waste, and money laundering in all Federal agencies, departments, companies, organizations, taking back the Panama Canal, eliminating stock and trader manipulation and fraud, all forms of human rights abuse, all Lawfare and election interference, combating opioids, drugs, and all forms of trafficking, etc. Those 8 EOs with 8 National Emergencies continued for 4 years in a row are what's DRAINING the SWAMP. Why did "Joe" continue the very EOs being enforced and exposing all corruption? If President Trump is a “threat to democracy” and violating Laws and Orders? Why didn't "Joe" and Democrats revoke and/or terminate every single EO signed and National Emergency declared by President Trump? Shouldn't they have abolished all they could to make his term miserable, more challenging, and spend time having to re-sign those same EOs from 2017 to 2020, again? Before new EOs? VERSUS not revoking or terminating ANY of them, allowing him to walk right back in and go straight back to enforcing those? But see... the humorous part is... Continuing an EO with National Emergency is ENFORCING it... Continuing required the participation of the president signing to continue those... In Feb. 2024, 14 states deployed to Texas. The only person who can Federalize the National Guard to active-duty is the president, Title 10. President Trump was the ONLY President at the border in Feb 2024 with the Governor and Adjutant General of Texas. The same day President Trump was in Del Rio, media said "Biden" was in Brownsville, TX, and Brownsville dot Gov site to this day says the 47th President visited. The Adjutant General reports to the Governor UNLESS the National Guard are FEDERALIZED by Title 10. The ONLY Title 10 Order that applied to this authority was EO 13912 signed March 27, 2020, that Federalized 1 Million Reserve Components. Reserves only serve a Federal Mission, not State like the National Guard. If He was a 'Former' President... that would have been a Breach of National Security, a violation of his own EO 13848 with National Emergency... one of those "Joe" continued... "Joe" never revoked the EO 13912... and that's the only Military Order to accompany Article II of the Constitution, a President's authority for the Border... “Joe” continued this EO with Yemen. 🤣 So, you have 2 options. Since "Joe" continued these PLUS did NOT revoke ANY of the OTHER Laws and Orders invoked. Either "he" and "his admin" are the greatest ALONGSIDE President Trump, because those are all President Trump EOs, plus all the other Laws and Orders invoked outline a Special Operation taking place... OR President Trump is 100% accurate on the Biden Crime Family plus all the other links throughout the past 70 years with the Deep State. Because the Laws and Orders CURRENTLY invoked more than clearly outline Special Operations and Unconventional Warfare brought to you by Generals and World Leaders, all outlined in Laws and Orders invoked, bipartisan. Joke's on the Liberals. 💯
BKS 发表于 2025-03-16 23:19 回复2楼Teabucket. 川黑真是难以理喻，川普动用敌国侨民法遣返委内瑞拉犯罪分子，这难道不是做的一件好事？ 被左派法官阻拦，这难到不是带政治倾向阻扰一件正确的事？ 川黑是支持留着gang members 过年呐。。。真不敢苟同。 以下是CNN 标题： Trump administration deports hundreds of. Alleged gang members of EI Salvador despite court ruling
系统提示：若遇到视频无法播放请点击下方链接
https://x.com/ianjaeger29/status/1900645076956541414?s=46&t=AXhygwvvhQ_cq9rgWRMuvw
gotcha！😄
lock him up
Go ahead
话说电子签名有什么问题吗？docusign怎么拿到生意的？
丢的会是佩洛西的脸。。。西婆瑟瑟发抖
你这是说到点子上了
要是电子签名无效，这个国家得有多少合同实效，要乱成什么样子呢
川其实也不是不知道，他就扔这个东西出来，然后等着他的minion出来帮他造势，事情按他想的方向走最好，如果没有，自然有minion来顶缸
黄鼩赢麻了
那川宝自己这个felon呢？
川黑真是难以理喻，川普动用敌国侨民法遣返委内瑞拉犯罪分子，这难道不是做的一件好事？
被左派法官阻拦，这难到不是带政治倾向阻扰一件正确的事？
川黑是支持留着gang members 过年呐。。。真不敢苟同。
以下是CNN 标题： Trump administration deports hundreds of. Alleged gang members of EI Salvador despite court ruling
Re，trump在变成希特勒
他们现在找这个理由，其实随便他找不找auto pen，都可以随便抓shei了，一个个他恨对人都会被他关到集中营的，很多好莱坞outspoken的明星，比如Rosie o Donnell, Richard gere， George Clooney, 还有很多人都搬家离开美国了。逃避political prosecution，没想到一百年吼还得再逃回去
docu sign 的文件不具有总统的constitutional 的权利
因为总统签字的特殊性 我记得总统的autopen是打过官司的 属于历史悠久的官司了 必须有总统在场 be present 才允许工作人员用auto pen 总统不在场 代签的不具有constitutional的效力 就看下面trump能不能找出总统不在场的证据了
卖鸡蛋的老黄婆，恭喜你输麻了
国会试图通过 1973 年的《战争权力法》压制总统的权力，但总统却可以宣布国家紧急状态以使用武装部队。
国家紧急状态开启了 150 项法定权力。
奥巴马宣布了这一国家紧急状态。
它一直持续到今天。为什么“乔”没有撤销它？🤡
军事与联邦法律只有 4 种搭配方式：行政命令、国家紧急状态、公告和条约。
行政命令：不需要立法。
总统可以撤销 EO。
每个国家紧急状态都有一个自动 2 年终止条款，如果它没有超过 2 年。
“乔”继续执行特朗普总统在 2017 年至 2020 年期间签署和宣布的 8 项行政命令，其中包括 8 项国家紧急状态，这些命令将在宣布后的两年内自动终止。
仅这 8 项行政命令和 8 项国家紧急状态，就足以驱逐非法移民，揭露所有联邦机构、部门、公司、组织中的欺诈、浪费和洗钱行为，夺回巴拿马运河，消除股票和交易员操纵和欺诈，消除所有形式的侵犯人权行为，所有法律战和选举干预，打击阿片类药物、毒品和所有形式的贩运等。
这 8 项行政命令和 8 项国家紧急状态持续了 4 年，正在排干沼泽。
为什么“乔”继续执行这些行政命令并揭露所有腐败行为？
如果特朗普总统是“对民主的威胁”并违反法律和秩序？
为什么“乔”和民主党人没有撤销和/或终止特朗普总统签署的每一项行政令和宣布的国家紧急状态？
他们难道不应该废除所有能废除的东西，让他的任期变得痛苦、更具挑战性，并花时间重新签署从 2017 年到 2020 年的那些行政令吗？在新的行政令之前？
而不是撤销或终止任何一项，让他直接回来执行这些行政令？
但看……有趣的是……继续执行国家紧急状态的行政令就是在执行它……
继续执行需要总统签署才能继续……
2024 年 2 月，14 个州部署到德克萨斯州。唯一可以将国民警卫队联邦化为现役的人是总统，第 10 条。
特朗普总统是唯一一位在 2024 年 2 月与德克萨斯州州长和副官长一起在边境的总统。特朗普总统在德尔里奥的同一天，媒体称“拜登”在德克萨斯州布朗斯维尔，布朗斯维尔政府网站至今仍称第 47 任总统到访过。
除非国民警卫队根据第 10 条联邦化，否则副官长向州长汇报。
适用于此权力的唯一第 10 条命令是 2020 年 3 月 27 日签署的 EO 13912，该命令将 100 万预备役部队联邦化。预备役只服务于联邦使命，而不是像国民警卫队那样服务于州。
如果他是“前”总统……那将是违反国家安全的行为，违反了他自己的 EO 13848 和国家紧急状态……其中一个“乔”继续说……
“乔”从未撤销 EO 13912……这是唯一一项伴随宪法第二条的军事命令，即总统对边境的权力……
“乔”继续执行与也门有关的 EO。🤣
所以，你有两个选择。
由于“乔”继续执行这些 PLUS，因此没有撤销所援引的任何其他法律和命令。
要么“他”和“他的政府”与特朗普总统并列最伟大，因为这些都是特朗普总统的行政命令，加上所有其他援引的法律和命令都概述了正在进行的特别行动……
或者
特朗普总统对拜登犯罪家族以及过去 70 年来与深层政府的所有其他联系的判断是 100% 准确的。
因为目前援引的法律和命令不仅明确概述了将军和世界领导人为您带来的特别行动和非常规战争，所有这些都在援引的法律和命令中概述，两党共同努力。
自由主义者的笑话。💯
How dumb LIBS are:
Congress tried to suppress the President’s power with the War Powers Act of 1973, but made it where a President can declare a National Emergency to use Armed Forces.
A National Emergency opens 150 statutory powers.
Obama declared this National Emergency.
It’s been continued to present day. Why didn’t “Joe” revoke it? 🤡
There's only 4 ways Military pairs with Federal Law: Executive Orders, National Emergencies, Proclamations, and Treaties.
Executive Orders: Do NOT require Legislation.
An EO can be revoked by a president.
Every National Emergency has an automatic 2 year termination clause, if it’s not continued beyond that 2 years.
“Joe” continued 8 Executive Orders with 8 National Emergencies invoked and declared by President Trump signed and declared from 2017 to 2020, that would have automatically terminated in 2 years after their declaration.
Those 8 EOs with 8 National Emergencies, alone, are what’s deporting illegal migrants, exposing fraud, waste, and money laundering in all Federal agencies, departments, companies, organizations, taking back the Panama Canal, eliminating stock and trader manipulation and fraud, all forms of human rights abuse, all Lawfare and election interference, combating opioids, drugs, and all forms of trafficking, etc.
Those 8 EOs with 8 National Emergencies continued for 4 years in a row are what's DRAINING the SWAMP.
Why did "Joe" continue the very EOs being enforced and exposing all corruption?
If President Trump is a “threat to democracy” and violating Laws and Orders?
Why didn't "Joe" and Democrats revoke and/or terminate every single EO signed and National Emergency declared by President Trump?
Shouldn't they have abolished all they could to make his term miserable, more challenging, and spend time having to re-sign those same EOs from 2017 to 2020, again? Before new EOs?
VERSUS not revoking or terminating ANY of them, allowing him to walk right back in and go straight back to enforcing those?
But see... the humorous part is... Continuing an EO with National Emergency is ENFORCING it...
Continuing required the participation of the president signing to continue those...
In Feb. 2024, 14 states deployed to Texas. The only person who can Federalize the National Guard to active-duty is the president, Title 10.
President Trump was the ONLY President at the border in Feb 2024 with the Governor and Adjutant General of Texas. The same day President Trump was in Del Rio, media said "Biden" was in Brownsville, TX, and Brownsville dot Gov site to this day says the 47th President visited.
The Adjutant General reports to the Governor UNLESS the National Guard are FEDERALIZED by Title 10.
The ONLY Title 10 Order that applied to this authority was EO 13912 signed March 27, 2020, that Federalized 1 Million Reserve Components. Reserves only serve a Federal Mission, not State like the National Guard.
If He was a 'Former' President... that would have been a Breach of National Security, a violation of his own EO 13848 with National Emergency... one of those "Joe" continued...
"Joe" never revoked the EO 13912... and that's the only Military Order to accompany Article II of the Constitution, a President's authority for the Border...
“Joe” continued this EO with Yemen. 🤣
So, you have 2 options.
Since "Joe" continued these PLUS did NOT revoke ANY of the OTHER Laws and Orders invoked.
Either "he" and "his admin" are the greatest ALONGSIDE President Trump, because those are all President Trump EOs, plus all the other Laws and Orders invoked outline a Special Operation taking place...
OR
President Trump is 100% accurate on the Biden Crime Family plus all the other links throughout the past 70 years with the Deep State.
Because the Laws and Orders CURRENTLY invoked more than clearly outline Special Operations and Unconventional Warfare brought to you by Generals and World Leaders, all outlined in Laws and Orders invoked, bipartisan.
Joke's on the Liberals. 💯
讲话应该要有基本逻辑 做过一件好事的杀人犯并不影响是个杀人犯的事实