对疫苗安全性这么忧虑的人，应该避免乘车，因为交通事故死亡风险1 in 8500远远高于疫苗注射死亡风险1 in 1,000,000 The risk of death from vaccination (e.g., COVID-19 vaccines) is significantly lower than the annual risk of dying in a car accident for an adult. Here's a concise comparison: 1. Vaccination Risk (COVID-19 Example):Reported Deaths: Rare and rigorously investigated. For example: J&J Vaccine: ~3 confirmed deaths linked to blood clots (TTS) out of 12.5 million doses administered (≈ 0.24 per million, or 1 in 4.17 million). mRNA Vaccines: Even lower risk, with no confirmed causal deaths directly attributed in most studies. Overall Estimate: ≈ 0.1–1 death per million doses (varies by vaccine type and population). 2. Car Accident Risk (U.S. Annual):Annual Deaths: ~38,824 traffic fatalities (2020 data). Annual Risk: ≈ 12 deaths per 100,000 people (0.012%), or 1 in 8,500 annually. Comparison:Vaccine (Per Dose): ~1 in 1,000,000 risk. Car Accident (Annual): ~1 in 8,500 risk. Relative Risk: An adult is ~100–120 times more likely to die in a car accident in one year than from a single COVID-19 vaccine dose. Key Notes:Vaccine Benefits: Far outweigh risks, preventing severe illness/death from diseases like COVID-19. Car Accident Factors: Risk varies by driving habits, location, and age. Other Vaccines: Flu shots and routine vaccines have even lower mortality risks (e.g., ≈1 in 10 million). Conclusion: While both risks are low, annual car accident fatalities are orders of magnitude more likely than vaccine-related deaths. Vaccination remains one of the safest public health interventions.
科学不完美 但是是人类最可靠的方法 新冠刺突蛋白对ACE受体的结合非常高效，上呼吸道上皮细胞又是在呼吸道阻止最浅表层，没有足够抗体浓度来阻止新馆病毒侵入上皮细胞，繁殖并传播。因为这是一个新病毒，而且是一个raging pandemic, 感染源超高，所以最初乐观的对群体免疫能阻断传染的估计落空。 疫苗虽然不能阻止感染，但是依然提供了非常显著的保护，在各年龄段减少了95%的死亡风险。仅仅2021年一年，就减少了全球22 million death. The risk of death from COVID-19 varies dramatically by age and vaccination status. Vaccination significantly reduces mortality across all age groups, but older adults (even when vaccinated) remain at higher absolute risk than younger groups. Below is a summary of key data from studies (e.g., CDC, UKHSA, and peer-reviewed research): COVID-19 Death Rates by Age and Vaccination Status (Approximate rates per 100,000 people, based on 2021–2023 data) Age GroupUnvaccinatedVaccinated (No Booster)Vaccinated + BoostedRelative Risk Reduction (Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated) 18–49 years ~5–10 ~0.5–1 ~0.1–0.3 90–95%50–64 years ~50–100 ~5–10 ~1–3 90–95%65–79 years ~200–400 ~20–40 ~5–10 90–95%80+ years ~1,000–2,000 ~100–200 ~30–60 90–95% Notes: Rates are approximate and vary by country, variant (e.g., Delta vs. Omicron), and health infrastructure. "Vaccinated" = Primary series (e.g., 2 mRNA doses); "Boosted" = Received ≥1 additional dose. Death rates are per 100,000 population over a 6–12 month period during the pandemic. Key ObservationsAge is the strongest risk factor: Unvaccinated adults ≥80 have a ~1,000x higher risk of COVID-19 death than unvaccinated adults 18–29. Vaccination reduces this gap, but absolute risk remains higher for older adults. Vaccine effectiveness: Vaccines reduce death risk by ~90–95% compared to being unvaccinated. Booster doses further lower risk, especially in older adults (e.g., 65+). Omicron vs. Delta: Omicron caused milder disease but higher transmissibility. Death rates dropped post-2021 due to vaccines, prior immunity, and improved treatments. Breakthrough deaths: Most deaths in vaccinated groups occur in older adults or those with severe comorbidities (e.g., immunosuppression, chronic illnesses). Example Data SourcesCDC (2022): Unvaccinated adults had a 10–20x higher death rate than vaccinated adults during Omicron. UKHSA (2023): Boosted individuals aged 80+ had a 97% lower risk of death vs. unvaccinated. Nature (2022): Vaccination prevented ~20 million deaths globally in 2021. Why Vaccination Matters While no vaccine is 100% effective, COVID-19 vaccination: Reduces death risk to near-flu levels for younger adults. Slows transmission and protects vulnerable populations. Lowers the odds of severe outcomes even if infected. Takeaway: For adults over 50 (especially 65+), vaccination and boosting remain critical to reducing mortality risk.
你这明摆的颠倒黑白 我去这数据库看了，这里面说的清清楚楚： The VAERS database contains information on unverified reports of adverse events (illnesses, health problems and/or symptoms) following immunization with US-licensed vaccines. 这都是“未经证实的”，“自我举报的”，在接受疫苗“之后”的自认为的副作用。根本不代表有因果关系好吗？具体有没有任何因果关系是需要研究人员具体研究的 CDC信息公开透明，到你这种人嘴里就扭曲成了铁板钉钉的疫苗有极大的副作用。不是蠢就是坏
redpotato1 发表于 2025-02-08 16:21 你这明摆的颠倒黑白 我去这数据库看了，这里面说的清清楚楚： The VAERS database contains information on unverified reports of adverse events (illnesses, health problems and/or symptoms) following immunization with US-licensed vaccines. 这都是“未经证实的”，“自我举报的”，在接受疫苗“之后”的自认为的副作用。根本不代表有因果关系好吗？具体有没有任何因果关系是需要研究人员具体研究的 CDC信息公开透明，到你这种人嘴里就扭曲成了铁板钉钉的疫苗有极大的副作用。不是蠢就是坏
你才是又蠢又坏，这么多案例，光麻疹就有100,000，都是吃饱了撑的人上去编造的？很多都是医生报的，有的还有实验室报告和治疗的方案，每一例都可以查可以自己判断，要是大部分假的CDC还会放在网上？就是躲不开，还把这个网站搞得很难用，每一例都不能直接链接，刚才闲着没事，看了几例，太可怕了 Details for VAERS ID: 0566115-1 Patient Age1.05 SexMale MEASLES + MUMPS + RUBELLA (MMR II) Screaming that could not be stopped. Shaking. Seizure without fever, and hitting his own head for more than three weeks after shot on 3/2011. He also has had years of diagnosed but unresolved swelling and pain. However night time is often the worst. He will cry out and wake sobbing in pain. This has been almost three years of night time pain in which we have sought help at several of the specialists at hospital. Loss of muscle tone and now physical delays. Details for VAERS ID: 0026484-1 Patient Age1.50 SexFemale DTP (NO BRAND NAME)，HIB (PROHIBIT)，MEASLES + MUMPS + RUBELLA (MMR II) Pt vaccinated with DTP/OPV/HIB/MMR found apneic in crib on 06OCT90. Details for VAERS ID: 0027526-1 Patient Age0.50 SexFemale MEASLES (ATTENUVAX) Developed T,convuls&pneumonia.Hospitalized w/ septic shock, renal failure & disseminated intravascular coagulation.Develop rash&tracheitis.Culture-Staph aureus.Exp multiple system failure-renal/respiratory/metabolic/cardivascul.Died 11Jan91
科学不完美 但是是人类最可靠的方法 新冠刺突蛋白对ACE受体的结合非常高效，上呼吸道上皮细胞又是在呼吸道阻止最浅表层，没有足够抗体浓度来阻止新馆病毒侵入上皮细胞，繁殖并传播。因为这是一个新病毒，而且是一个raging pandemic, 感染源超高，所以最初乐观的对群体免疫能阻断传染的估计落空。 疫苗虽然不能阻止感染，但是依然提供了非常显著的保护，在各年龄段减少了95%的死亡风险。仅仅2021年一年，就减少了全球22 million death. The risk of death from COVID-19 varies dramatically by age and vaccination status. Vaccination significantly reduces mortality across all age groups, but older adults (even when vaccinated) remain at higher absolute risk than younger groups. Below is a summary of key data from studies (e.g., CDC, UKHSA, and peer-reviewed research): COVID-19 Death Rates by Age and Vaccination Status (Approximate rates per 100,000 people, based on 2021–2023 data) Age GroupUnvaccinatedVaccinated (No Booster)Vaccinated + BoostedRelative Risk Reduction (Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated) 18–49 years ~5–10 ~0.5–1 ~0.1–0.3 90–95%50–64 years ~50–100 ~5–10 ~1–3 90–95%65–79 years ~200–400 ~20–40 ~5–10 90–95%80+ years ~1,000–2,000 ~100–200 ~30–60 90–95% Notes: Rates are approximate and vary by country, variant (e.g., Delta vs. Omicron), and health infrastructure. "Vaccinated" = Primary series (e.g., 2 mRNA doses); "Boosted" = Received ≥1 additional dose. Death rates are per 100,000 population over a 6–12 month period during the pandemic. Key ObservationsAge is the strongest risk factor: Unvaccinated adults ≥80 have a ~1,000x higher risk of COVID-19 death than unvaccinated adults 18–29. Vaccination reduces this gap, but absolute risk remains higher for older adults. Vaccine effectiveness: Vaccines reduce death risk by ~90–95% compared to being unvaccinated. Booster doses further lower risk, especially in older adults (e.g., 65+). Omicron vs. Delta: Omicron caused milder disease but higher transmissibility. Death rates dropped post-2021 due to vaccines, prior immunity, and improved treatments. Breakthrough deaths: Most deaths in vaccinated groups occur in older adults or those with severe comorbidities (e.g., immunosuppression, chronic illnesses). Example Data SourcesCDC (2022): Unvaccinated adults had a 10–20x higher death rate than vaccinated adults during Omicron. UKHSA (2023): Boosted individuals aged 80+ had a 97% lower risk of death vs. unvaccinated. Nature (2022): Vaccination prevented ~20 million deaths globally in 2021. Why Vaccination Matters While no vaccine is 100% effective, COVID-19 vaccination: Reduces death risk to near-flu levels for younger adults. Slows transmission and protects vulnerable populations. Lowers the odds of severe outcomes even if infected. Takeaway: For adults over 50 (especially 65+), vaccination and boosting remain critical to reducing mortality risk. 平明寻白羽 发表于 2025-02-08 16:14
redpotato1 发表于 2025-02-08 16:21 你这明摆的颠倒黑白 我去这数据库看了，这里面说的清清楚楚： The VAERS database contains information on unverified reports of adverse events (illnesses, health problems and/or symptoms) following immunization with US-licensed vaccines. 这都是“未经证实的”，“自我举报的”，在接受疫苗“之后”的自认为的副作用。根本不代表有因果关系好吗？具体有没有任何因果关系是需要研究人员具体研究的 CDC信息公开透明，到你这种人嘴里就扭曲成了铁板钉钉的疫苗有极大的副作用。不是蠢就是坏
肯定缺很多，看这么多案例太可怕，每一个案例都是血泪啊，难以想象孩子就这么莫名其妙死了，亲人的悲伤，还有一些疫苗教拼命攻击掩盖，没人性 Details for VAERS ID: 0026358-1 Patient Age 1.30 Sex Male MEASLES + MUMPS + RUBELLA (MMR II) Pt vaccinated MMR experienced nervous system damage which included encephalopathy, which resulted in internal, neurological, orthopeidc, psychological, & psychiatric injuries. Details for VAERS ID: 0039041-1 Patient Age 1.30 Sex Female HIB (HIBTITER)，MEASLES + MUMPS + RUBELLA (MMR II) Pt recvd MMR/HIBTITTER on 4JAN92 & had fever of 101 R x 24 hrs later; died 5JAN92; Details for VAERS ID: 0068431-1 Patient Age1.40 SexFemale DTP (NO BRAND NAME)，HIB (ACTHIB)，MEASLES + MUMPS + RUBELLA (MMR II) pt recvd vax on 31oct94 am; at 11:30am on 1nov94 laughing, playfull & took nap; at 1:15pm found in crib by pub hlth nurse cold & pulseness; to er, t 88.9 rectally; resucitation unsuccessful; pronounced dead at 2pm;
落地无声 发表于 2025-02-08 08:38 The Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine for tuberculosis (TB) is not generally used in the United States. Reasons for Non-Use: Low risk of TB in the US: TB rates in the US are significantly lower than in other parts of the world, making vaccination less necessary. Potential side effects: BCG can cause a small scar at the injection site and may cause a false-positive TB skin test reaction. Limited effectiveness: BCG is not always effective in preventing TB, especially in adults. 我们以前在国内打的好像只有20年的有效期（前几个星期查的）
redpotato1 发表于 2025-02-08 16:21 你这明摆的颠倒黑白 我去这数据库看了，这里面说的清清楚楚： The VAERS database contains information on unverified reports of adverse events (illnesses, health problems and/or symptoms) following immunization with US-licensed vaccines. 这都是“未经证实的”，“自我举报的”，在接受疫苗“之后”的自认为的副作用。根本不代表有因果关系好吗？具体有没有任何因果关系是需要研究人员具体研究的 CDC信息公开透明，到你这种人嘴里就扭曲成了铁板钉钉的疫苗有极大的副作用。不是蠢就是坏
疫苗教：吃x会防止得病 路人甲：那你吃啊 疫苗教：不，你吃 路人甲：？？？
政府说什么你都相信，脑子呢？
我们在看不打病人的笑话。到时候死了都带着没打过疫苗的圣体进棺材。
到下面网页，点request form，在1中选group results by “VAERS ID”，然后在3中选感兴趣的疫苗，比如几个麻疹疫苗，点send，然后出来案例100,000之多，不能处理，那就到5，只选严重的，比如death+life threatening+permanent disability，回来一堆，你们慢慢一个个点开看，每一个都是打了麻疹疫苗出事的孩子或大人，都是悲剧，还可以看HPV，看covid疫苗，觉得没事的尽管打
https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html
拿政治屁股来证明科学问题
政府说疫苗安全有效， 拜登说不打疫苗会死，你就信， 脑子呢？
信trump不信biden。嗯，很好。
好像信拜登的就高级了一样
反疫苗的连基本的科学准则都不知道，只知道质疑
这个网站连打疫苗之后出车祸都会被记录进去
你又没孩子，自己早就打了麻疹疫苗了，在这反对给谁看呢
知道真相的人越来越多了
群体免疫啊，booster就是因为这东西每年变种，所以不得不打。
疫苗这东西有效果的时候人感受不到，每次流感毒株猜错了，都会死一大堆的人。
你知道MMR一岁以下的小孩不能打，而且社区里面还有有免疫疾病的孩子么？
福奇老贼说trust science，无脑相信的不是你们吗？ 楼上还那么多坚信covid疫苗的，哎
阴谋论者怎么会无脑相信政府，哈哈
每个案例都有具体描述，有没有车祸大家自己不会看？这么害怕真相想害谁呢
The risk of death from vaccination (e.g., COVID-19 vaccines) is significantly lower than the annual risk of dying in a car accident for an adult. Here's a concise comparison: 1. Vaccination Risk (COVID-19 Example): Reported Deaths: Rare and rigorously investigated. For example: J&J Vaccine: ~3 confirmed deaths linked to blood clots (TTS) out of 12.5 million doses administered (≈ 0.24 per million, or 1 in 4.17 million). mRNA Vaccines: Even lower risk, with no confirmed causal deaths directly attributed in most studies. Overall Estimate: ≈ 0.1–1 death per million doses (varies by vaccine type and population). 2. Car Accident Risk (U.S. Annual): Annual Deaths: ~38,824 traffic fatalities (2020 data). Annual Risk: ≈ 12 deaths per 100,000 people (0.012%), or 1 in 8,500 annually. Comparison: Vaccine (Per Dose): ~1 in 1,000,000 risk. Car Accident (Annual): ~1 in 8,500 risk. Relative Risk: An adult is ~100–120 times more likely to die in a car accident in one year than from a single COVID-19 vaccine dose. Key Notes: Vaccine Benefits: Far outweigh risks, preventing severe illness/death from diseases like COVID-19. Car Accident Factors: Risk varies by driving habits, location, and age. Other Vaccines: Flu shots and routine vaccines have even lower mortality risks (e.g., ≈1 in 10 million). Conclusion: While both risks are low, annual car accident fatalities are orders of magnitude more likely than vaccine-related deaths. Vaccination remains one of the safest public health interventions.
灭活疫苗的有效性远达不到群免，而且灭活疫苗会造成无症状感染，反而会更加威胁到没打疫苗的。
活疫苗是可以群免，但副作用也大。一岁一下不打不是不能，而是默认婴儿已经从母体获得了抗体，疫苗打了也没用。假如认为母亲没抗体，6个月就可以打那些活疫苗，但因为万一母亲是有抗体的疫苗会没用，所以一岁要再打一次。疫苗教的完全可以随便打，按最大计量最大频率来打，在你们心中疫苗是十全大补汤，疫苗副作用是阴谋论。
科学界是尽力以最快速度提供了疫苗，但提供了就能证明疫苗的安全性吗？似乎疫苗出来的时候说的是打一针还是两针就可以完全预防，然后慢慢变得口风，要打booster之类的，更别提安全性的讨论了。 这些不负责任的说法是科学家应该说的？
现代反疫苗运动的兴起 1998年，安德鲁·维克菲尔德（Andrew Wakefield）论文：这位英国医生发表论文，错误地声称麻疹-腮腺炎-风疹（MMR）疫苗与自闭症有关，尽管研究后来被证实是造假，但该谣言持续传播，影响深远。 2000年代，社交媒体助推反疫苗观点——反疫苗组织开始利用互联网和社交媒体传播疫苗风险的夸张言论，影响了一些家长的接种决策。 2010年，维克菲尔德被吊销行医执照，但反疫苗运动并未消退，许多家长仍然相信疫苗与自闭症的关联。 2015年，加州迪士尼麻疹疫情：由于疫苗接种率下降，迪士尼乐园爆发麻疹疫情，加州随后收紧疫苗豁免政策。
疫苗教的圣经，我已经懒得一条条反驳了。
当年可以证明安全性，大范围双盲实验就是做这个的。
谁TM说完全预防的，预防的是某一个变种，RNA病毒变异这么快本来就不可能完全预防。
连一篇文献都没看过，张口就来
来源请求，不会是反疫苗的神论吧
你是不能反驳装作懒得反驳
你可以考古，版上这些年讨论好几轮了。这些都是十年前用来安抚人的话。其实照马斯克这个速度，曝光疫苗问题也很快了。
对，贪小便宜心理
然而反疫苗的都聚集在一起，结果麻疹就爆发了
科学不完美
但是是人类最可靠的方法
新冠刺突蛋白对ACE受体的结合非常高效，上呼吸道上皮细胞又是在呼吸道阻止最浅表层，没有足够抗体浓度来阻止新馆病毒侵入上皮细胞，繁殖并传播。因为这是一个新病毒，而且是一个raging pandemic, 感染源超高，所以最初乐观的对群体免疫能阻断传染的估计落空。
疫苗虽然不能阻止感染，但是依然提供了非常显著的保护，在各年龄段减少了95%的死亡风险。仅仅2021年一年，就减少了全球22 million death.
The risk of death from COVID-19 varies dramatically by age and vaccination status. Vaccination significantly reduces mortality across all age groups, but older adults (even when vaccinated) remain at higher absolute risk than younger groups. Below is a summary of key data from studies (e.g., CDC, UKHSA, and peer-reviewed research): COVID-19 Death Rates by Age and Vaccination Status (Approximate rates per 100,000 people, based on 2021–2023 data) Age GroupUnvaccinated Vaccinated (No Booster) Vaccinated + BoostedRelative Risk Reduction (Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated)
18–49 years ~5–10 ~0.5–1 ~0.1–0.3 90–95% 50–64 years ~50–100 ~5–10 ~1–3 90–95% 65–79 years ~200–400 ~20–40 ~5–10 90–95% 80+ years ~1,000–2,000 ~100–200 ~30–60 90–95% Notes: Rates are approximate and vary by country, variant (e.g., Delta vs. Omicron), and health infrastructure. "Vaccinated" = Primary series (e.g., 2 mRNA doses); "Boosted" = Received ≥1 additional dose. Death rates are per 100,000 population over a 6–12 month period during the pandemic. Key Observations Age is the strongest risk factor: Unvaccinated adults ≥80 have a ~1,000x higher risk of COVID-19 death than unvaccinated adults 18–29. Vaccination reduces this gap, but absolute risk remains higher for older adults. Vaccine effectiveness: Vaccines reduce death risk by ~90–95% compared to being unvaccinated. Booster doses further lower risk, especially in older adults (e.g., 65+). Omicron vs. Delta: Omicron caused milder disease but higher transmissibility. Death rates dropped post-2021 due to vaccines, prior immunity, and improved treatments. Breakthrough deaths: Most deaths in vaccinated groups occur in older adults or those with severe comorbidities (e.g., immunosuppression, chronic illnesses). Example Data Sources CDC (2022): Unvaccinated adults had a 10–20x higher death rate than vaccinated adults during Omicron. UKHSA (2023): Boosted individuals aged 80+ had a 97% lower risk of death vs. unvaccinated. Nature (2022): Vaccination prevented ~20 million deaths globally in 2021. Why Vaccination Matters While no vaccine is 100% effective, COVID-19 vaccination: Reduces death risk to near-flu levels for younger adults. Slows transmission and protects vulnerable populations. Lowers the odds of severe outcomes even if infected. Takeaway: For adults over 50 (especially 65+), vaccination and boosting remain critical to reducing mortality risk.
大部分真不是，不排除有少数人这么觉得，大部分人都知道大部分疫苗没群免。
就是不会反驳呗，我可没那心情查陈年旧账
行吧，只要疫苗不强制，我乐见你们疫苗教继续你们的信仰，子孙后代少些竞争者挺好的。
你这明摆的颠倒黑白
我去这数据库看了，这里面说的清清楚楚： The VAERS database contains information on unverified reports of adverse events (illnesses, health problems and/or symptoms) following immunization with US-licensed vaccines.
这都是“未经证实的”，“自我举报的”，在接受疫苗“之后”的自认为的副作用。根本不代表有因果关系好吗？具体有没有任何因果关系是需要研究人员具体研究的
CDC信息公开透明，到你这种人嘴里就扭曲成了铁板钉钉的疫苗有极大的副作用。不是蠢就是坏
可惜的是不信疫苗的，川普上台还没一个月就被现世报了
麻疹会清除身体的免疫记忆，辛辛苦苦让孩子自然免疫得来的免疫力，得一场麻疹全被wipe out，孩子还得再受一次苦
时间先后不等于因果，做科研的都知道这个道理，这些反疫苗的天天喊着质疑，连最基本的理性都没有
可怜，但是都怪他们爹妈。
你才是又蠢又坏，这么多案例，光麻疹就有100,000，都是吃饱了撑的人上去编造的？很多都是医生报的，有的还有实验室报告和治疗的方案，每一例都可以查可以自己判断，要是大部分假的CDC还会放在网上？就是躲不开，还把这个网站搞得很难用，每一例都不能直接链接，刚才闲着没事，看了几例，太可怕了
Details for VAERS ID: 0566115-1 Patient Age1.05 SexMale MEASLES + MUMPS + RUBELLA (MMR II) Screaming that could not be stopped. Shaking. Seizure without fever, and hitting his own head for more than three weeks after shot on 3/2011. He also has had years of diagnosed but unresolved swelling and pain. However night time is often the worst. He will cry out and wake sobbing in pain. This has been almost three years of night time pain in which we have sought help at several of the specialists at hospital. Loss of muscle tone and now physical delays.
Details for VAERS ID: 0026484-1 Patient Age1.50 SexFemale DTP (NO BRAND NAME)，HIB (PROHIBIT)，MEASLES + MUMPS + RUBELLA (MMR II) Pt vaccinated with DTP/OPV/HIB/MMR found apneic in crib on 06OCT90.
Details for VAERS ID: 0027526-1 Patient Age0.50 SexFemale MEASLES (ATTENUVAX) Developed T,convuls&pneumonia.Hospitalized w/ septic shock, renal failure & disseminated intravascular coagulation.Develop rash&tracheitis.Culture-Staph aureus.Exp multiple system failure-renal/respiratory/metabolic/cardivascul.Died 11Jan91
管不了别人死活，但会给家里人都打上
RNA病毒变异快，疫苗不可能防传染 这个基本常识，一开始没有科学家敢讲
当时主媒宣传的都是为了grandpa年轻人也要打疫苗
科学不完美不要紧，要公开透明安全性数据，监管机构要独立
是的，那个数据库需要医生填的，而且非常难填，导致好多副作用案例没录进去
这还不算医生不承认的，比如SIDS，婴儿在注射疫苗后一两天内的猝死
这些反智的，如果不是科技发达可能早就被淘汰了。
如果是self report和unverified, 可信度大打折扣，尤其如果人群是相信地球是平的，相信喝漂白水，相信口罩里有5G发射器的，就更不可信了
俩麻疹就现世报啦。很快就要50%男孩都在自闭谱系里也是现世报吧，目前一半以上小孩都有慢性健康问题也是现世报吧，不孕不育，暴风癌症，自体免疫，哎呀，太多了，但是不是传染病啊，所以没事儿对吧。
肯定缺很多，看这么多案例太可怕，每一个案例都是血泪啊，难以想象孩子就这么莫名其妙死了，亲人的悲伤，还有一些疫苗教拼命攻击掩盖，没人性
Details for VAERS ID: 0026358-1 Patient Age 1.30 Sex Male MEASLES + MUMPS + RUBELLA (MMR II) Pt vaccinated MMR experienced nervous system damage which included encephalopathy, which resulted in internal, neurological, orthopeidc, psychological, & psychiatric injuries.
Details for VAERS ID: 0039041-1 Patient Age 1.30 Sex Female HIB (HIBTITER)，MEASLES + MUMPS + RUBELLA (MMR II) Pt recvd MMR/HIBTITTER on 4JAN92 & had fever of 101 R x 24 hrs later; died 5JAN92;
Details for VAERS ID: 0068431-1 Patient Age1.40 SexFemale DTP (NO BRAND NAME)，HIB (ACTHIB)，MEASLES + MUMPS + RUBELLA (MMR II) pt recvd vax on 31oct94 am; at 11:30am on 1nov94 laughing, playfull & took nap; at 1:15pm found in crib by pub hlth nurse cold & pulseness; to er, t 88.9 rectally; resucitation unsuccessful; pronounced dead at 2pm;
相关性不代表因果
对的，我体检好像也是结合要再boost 一针
在你臆想中才有那么多自闭症吧
大步迈向第三世界！
你高估一些人了
九十年代的事情，我自己经历的事情骗你干嘛。省会城市条件还可以了把。当时就是麻疹在我们小学爆发，基本班上一半孩子都得了。有疫苗，但是我记得麻疹疫苗需要小学的时候再接种一次，不是强制的，很多孩子包括我都没打或者还没有及时打就爆发了。麻疹病的过程很痛苦，能不得最好别得，打疫苗绝对值得。
好像我们那次之后就没有再流行了。
就美国现在这基础教育的拉跨，民众的民智明显偏低啊。
一剂麻疹疫苗可以管93%人一辈子，两剂可以管97%的人一辈子。假如你们班一半都得了，应该是打了假疫苗了。
不打疫苗只是自己会得，为啥就影响别人了？
对，再去打一针吧，我前两年就打了
因为首先有人打不了疫苗。可能是过敏，可能是体弱或者免疫受损，可能是婴幼儿，可能是bla bla各种原因。
如果能打疫苗的人，都接种了疫苗。那病毒就很难流行（假设疫苗确实有用）。那些不能打疫苗的人，也算被保护了。（那这些弱者是不是应该交点保护费来补偿那些打疫苗的人，可以商榷）
但现在，不打疫苗的多了，以至于可能发生传染，那些无法打疫苗的人，就会跟着倒霉。政府会倾向于保护弱者，尽力减少他们倒霉的概率。同时，不打疫苗但又得病的人，也有一定的概率会消耗政府资源或者社会资源，比如进ICU，或者用Medicare Medicaid ，需要纳税人买单的。
我觉得这个和政府禁毒差不多，属于一个溢出效应。本来按理说，吸毒其实也是自己的选择，吸毒死了也是自作自受。但是它溢出成本太大，吸毒的人容易给社会带来危害，会使得无辜者遭殃。同时政府还要承担那些吸毒人医疗的费用，所以政府禁毒。
同一个逻辑，不打疫苗得人也可能会影响到无辜者，给社会带来危害。所以大政府倾向于强迫疫苗。
真是故意偷梁换柱，铝佐剂如果跟生理盐水一样安全，为啥不敢直接上生理盐水做对照？实际人群中未接种疫苗的也打了铝佐剂？
控制变量
光咱们华人网都有多少例爆出打完新冠疫苗事故的？你活在真空？还是只看CNN?
这个数据库都爆出来多少年了， 带任务舔疫苗的肯定不会去看
麻疹的传染力比新冠大多了
推疫苗的让大家相信政府，但政府说疫苗不安全的时候又不相信政府了，自相矛盾，逻辑不通
不打疫苗等于房子里不装消防喷头。着火了你对邻居家被烧负责么？
你觉得CDC有能力或者想去一个一个证明吗？这不是给自己挖坟墓？你觉得大批普通老百姓有必要为了发假消息凑数据诅咒自己家人的吗？动动脑子吧
可惜这几年被淘汰的都是坚信疫苗打了一次又一次的
得了吧，那应该做三组，不然跟实际人群的数据脱钩
这和传染病的传播率、疫苗的有效率有关。比如说某种病毒传播率高，没有疫苗时要90%的人感染免疫后才能停止传播，这对疫苗要求相当高，要疫苗有效率90%所有人都接种才行。
部分人不接种，要相当一部分人感染才能达到群体免疫。其中包括，接种疫苗后没有产生免疫反应的人也会感染。还有身体原因不能接种的。
那么多没打疫苗重症死的在你眼中都不是人是吧
我家就有一个这样的亲戚
其实他根本不是没有基本的科学常识，就是纯粹的精致利己者。他都明白，别人打了疫苗，所以人群中这种传染病很少，传播的也慢。他会觉得，既然这样，那么就不会传播到我，那我就不需要打“不知道有什么东西在里面”的疫苗，以免伤了自己的身体。是很有学识很有知识的人，各种信息都了解的门儿清，根本不是我们想象中那种，榆木脑袋，头脑简单的人
无知
清朝皇帝够有钱吧，孩子的存活率只有50%。你打的所有疫苗，每个病毒手上都有至少千万的性命。事实上就是，没有疫苗，新生儿得死一半，活下来的还有有后遗症。MAGA心心念念的pro life，合着是打算让这些小生命先死一半，然后再让其他小生命在病毒的后遗症的煎熬中度过余生么？
就算是现在，不打疫苗的孩子死亡率比打疫苗的高2.5%，为了那十几万分之一的自闭症和莫须乌有的后遗症，让自己的孩子有2.5%的死亡概率，这就是反疫苗的混帐逻辑。
另外，得了一次麻疹之后，你的天然免疫记忆会完全失效，以前得的病得再得一次
人当然早知道了，得了大病之后身子虚，容易得其他的病不是常识？
这跟麻疹清除免疫记忆没有任何历史上的记载有毛关系吗？
你这是恼羞成怒按头让chatgpt回答你想要的答案
哎哟是吗，那新冠甲流可比麻疹强力多了，得完了还得去把几百针疫苗重新过一遍，赶紧去啊。
鉴于你这种泼妇吵架的作风，我弃楼而去了。
你看反疫苗的只会口嗨了，还几百针疫苗，你出生到现在打过的所有针加一起都不会超过一百针。
新冠也会削弱免疫力，现在感冒季这么厉害和全球大规模感染新冠也有关系。没有麻疹那么严重，麻疹会清掉你70%的免疫力，刚开完痊愈party的病毒可以再开一次了，恭喜恭喜。
辩不过就跑啊，难道你对反疫苗的热情只有这么点么