对疫苗安全性这么忧虑的人，应该避免乘车，因为交通事故死亡风险1 in 8500远远高于疫苗注射死亡风险1 in 1,000,000 The risk of death from vaccination (e.g., COVID-19 vaccines) is significantly lower than the annual risk of dying in a car accident for an adult. Here's a concise comparison: 1. Vaccination Risk (COVID-19 Example):Reported Deaths: Rare and rigorously investigated. For example: J&J Vaccine: ~3 confirmed deaths linked to blood clots (TTS) out of 12.5 million doses administered (≈ 0.24 per million, or 1 in 4.17 million). mRNA Vaccines: Even lower risk, with no confirmed causal deaths directly attributed in most studies. Overall Estimate: ≈ 0.1–1 death per million doses (varies by vaccine type and population). 2. Car Accident Risk (U.S. Annual):Annual Deaths: ~38,824 traffic fatalities (2020 data). Annual Risk: ≈ 12 deaths per 100,000 people (0.012%), or 1 in 8,500 annually. Comparison:Vaccine (Per Dose): ~1 in 1,000,000 risk. Car Accident (Annual): ~1 in 8,500 risk. Relative Risk: An adult is ~100–120 times more likely to die in a car accident in one year than from a single COVID-19 vaccine dose. Key Notes:Vaccine Benefits: Far outweigh risks, preventing severe illness/death from diseases like COVID-19. Car Accident Factors: Risk varies by driving habits, location, and age. Other Vaccines: Flu shots and routine vaccines have even lower mortality risks (e.g., ≈1 in 10 million). Conclusion: While both risks are low, annual car accident fatalities are orders of magnitude more likely than vaccine-related deaths. Vaccination remains one of the safest public health interventions.
科学不完美 但是是人类最可靠的方法 新冠刺突蛋白对ACE受体的结合非常高效，上呼吸道上皮细胞又是在呼吸道阻止最浅表层，没有足够抗体浓度来阻止新馆病毒侵入上皮细胞，繁殖并传播。因为这是一个新病毒，而且是一个raging pandemic, 感染源超高，所以最初乐观的对群体免疫能阻断传染的估计落空。 疫苗虽然不能阻止感染，但是依然提供了非常显著的保护，在各年龄段减少了95%的死亡风险。仅仅2021年一年，就减少了全球22 million death. The risk of death from COVID-19 varies dramatically by age and vaccination status. Vaccination significantly reduces mortality across all age groups, but older adults (even when vaccinated) remain at higher absolute risk than younger groups. Below is a summary of key data from studies (e.g., CDC, UKHSA, and peer-reviewed research): COVID-19 Death Rates by Age and Vaccination Status (Approximate rates per 100,000 people, based on 2021–2023 data) Age GroupUnvaccinatedVaccinated (No Booster)Vaccinated + BoostedRelative Risk Reduction (Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated) 18–49 years ~5–10 ~0.5–1 ~0.1–0.3 90–95%50–64 years ~50–100 ~5–10 ~1–3 90–95%65–79 years ~200–400 ~20–40 ~5–10 90–95%80+ years ~1,000–2,000 ~100–200 ~30–60 90–95% Notes: Rates are approximate and vary by country, variant (e.g., Delta vs. Omicron), and health infrastructure. "Vaccinated" = Primary series (e.g., 2 mRNA doses); "Boosted" = Received ≥1 additional dose. Death rates are per 100,000 population over a 6–12 month period during the pandemic. Key ObservationsAge is the strongest risk factor: Unvaccinated adults ≥80 have a ~1,000x higher risk of COVID-19 death than unvaccinated adults 18–29. Vaccination reduces this gap, but absolute risk remains higher for older adults. Vaccine effectiveness: Vaccines reduce death risk by ~90–95% compared to being unvaccinated. Booster doses further lower risk, especially in older adults (e.g., 65+). Omicron vs. Delta: Omicron caused milder disease but higher transmissibility. Death rates dropped post-2021 due to vaccines, prior immunity, and improved treatments. Breakthrough deaths: Most deaths in vaccinated groups occur in older adults or those with severe comorbidities (e.g., immunosuppression, chronic illnesses). Example Data SourcesCDC (2022): Unvaccinated adults had a 10–20x higher death rate than vaccinated adults during Omicron. UKHSA (2023): Boosted individuals aged 80+ had a 97% lower risk of death vs. unvaccinated. Nature (2022): Vaccination prevented ~20 million deaths globally in 2021. Why Vaccination Matters While no vaccine is 100% effective, COVID-19 vaccination: Reduces death risk to near-flu levels for younger adults. Slows transmission and protects vulnerable populations. Lowers the odds of severe outcomes even if infected. Takeaway: For adults over 50 (especially 65+), vaccination and boosting remain critical to reducing mortality risk.
你这明摆的颠倒黑白 我去这数据库看了，这里面说的清清楚楚： The VAERS database contains information on unverified reports of adverse events (illnesses, health problems and/or symptoms) following immunization with US-licensed vaccines. 这都是“未经证实的”，“自我举报的”，在接受疫苗“之后”的自认为的副作用。根本不代表有因果关系好吗？具体有没有任何因果关系是需要研究人员具体研究的 CDC信息公开透明，到你这种人嘴里就扭曲成了铁板钉钉的疫苗有极大的副作用。不是蠢就是坏
redpotato1 发表于 2025-02-08 16:21 你这明摆的颠倒黑白 我去这数据库看了，这里面说的清清楚楚： The VAERS database contains information on unverified reports of adverse events (illnesses, health problems and/or symptoms) following immunization with US-licensed vaccines. 这都是“未经证实的”，“自我举报的”，在接受疫苗“之后”的自认为的副作用。根本不代表有因果关系好吗？具体有没有任何因果关系是需要研究人员具体研究的 CDC信息公开透明，到你这种人嘴里就扭曲成了铁板钉钉的疫苗有极大的副作用。不是蠢就是坏
你才是又蠢又坏，这么多案例，光麻疹就有100,000，都是吃饱了撑的人上去编造的？很多都是医生报的，有的还有实验室报告和治疗的方案，每一例都可以查可以自己判断，要是大部分假的CDC还会放在网上？就是躲不开，还把这个网站搞得很难用，每一例都不能直接链接，刚才闲着没事，看了几例，太可怕了 Details for VAERS ID: 0566115-1 Patient Age1.05 SexMale MEASLES + MUMPS + RUBELLA (MMR II) Screaming that could not be stopped. Shaking. Seizure without fever, and hitting his own head for more than three weeks after shot on 3/2011. He also has had years of diagnosed but unresolved swelling and pain. However night time is often the worst. He will cry out and wake sobbing in pain. This has been almost three years of night time pain in which we have sought help at several of the specialists at hospital. Loss of muscle tone and now physical delays. Details for VAERS ID: 0026484-1 Patient Age1.50 SexFemale DTP (NO BRAND NAME)，HIB (PROHIBIT)，MEASLES + MUMPS + RUBELLA (MMR II) Pt vaccinated with DTP/OPV/HIB/MMR found apneic in crib on 06OCT90. Details for VAERS ID: 0027526-1 Patient Age0.50 SexFemale MEASLES (ATTENUVAX) Developed T,convuls&pneumonia.Hospitalized w/ septic shock, renal failure & disseminated intravascular coagulation.Develop rash&tracheitis.Culture-Staph aureus.Exp multiple system failure-renal/respiratory/metabolic/cardivascul.Died 11Jan91
科学不完美 但是是人类最可靠的方法 新冠刺突蛋白对ACE受体的结合非常高效，上呼吸道上皮细胞又是在呼吸道阻止最浅表层，没有足够抗体浓度来阻止新馆病毒侵入上皮细胞，繁殖并传播。因为这是一个新病毒，而且是一个raging pandemic, 感染源超高，所以最初乐观的对群体免疫能阻断传染的估计落空。 疫苗虽然不能阻止感染，但是依然提供了非常显著的保护，在各年龄段减少了95%的死亡风险。仅仅2021年一年，就减少了全球22 million death. The risk of death from COVID-19 varies dramatically by age and vaccination status. Vaccination significantly reduces mortality across all age groups, but older adults (even when vaccinated) remain at higher absolute risk than younger groups. Below is a summary of key data from studies (e.g., CDC, UKHSA, and peer-reviewed research): COVID-19 Death Rates by Age and Vaccination Status (Approximate rates per 100,000 people, based on 2021–2023 data) Age GroupUnvaccinatedVaccinated (No Booster)Vaccinated + BoostedRelative Risk Reduction (Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated) 18–49 years ~5–10 ~0.5–1 ~0.1–0.3 90–95%50–64 years ~50–100 ~5–10 ~1–3 90–95%65–79 years ~200–400 ~20–40 ~5–10 90–95%80+ years ~1,000–2,000 ~100–200 ~30–60 90–95% Notes: Rates are approximate and vary by country, variant (e.g., Delta vs. Omicron), and health infrastructure. "Vaccinated" = Primary series (e.g., 2 mRNA doses); "Boosted" = Received ≥1 additional dose. Death rates are per 100,000 population over a 6–12 month period during the pandemic. Key ObservationsAge is the strongest risk factor: Unvaccinated adults ≥80 have a ~1,000x higher risk of COVID-19 death than unvaccinated adults 18–29. Vaccination reduces this gap, but absolute risk remains higher for older adults. Vaccine effectiveness: Vaccines reduce death risk by ~90–95% compared to being unvaccinated. Booster doses further lower risk, especially in older adults (e.g., 65+). Omicron vs. Delta: Omicron caused milder disease but higher transmissibility. Death rates dropped post-2021 due to vaccines, prior immunity, and improved treatments. Breakthrough deaths: Most deaths in vaccinated groups occur in older adults or those with severe comorbidities (e.g., immunosuppression, chronic illnesses). Example Data SourcesCDC (2022): Unvaccinated adults had a 10–20x higher death rate than vaccinated adults during Omicron. UKHSA (2023): Boosted individuals aged 80+ had a 97% lower risk of death vs. unvaccinated. Nature (2022): Vaccination prevented ~20 million deaths globally in 2021. Why Vaccination Matters While no vaccine is 100% effective, COVID-19 vaccination: Reduces death risk to near-flu levels for younger adults. Slows transmission and protects vulnerable populations. Lowers the odds of severe outcomes even if infected. Takeaway: For adults over 50 (especially 65+), vaccination and boosting remain critical to reducing mortality risk. 平明寻白羽 发表于 2025-02-08 16:14
redpotato1 发表于 2025-02-08 16:21 你这明摆的颠倒黑白 我去这数据库看了，这里面说的清清楚楚： The VAERS database contains information on unverified reports of adverse events (illnesses, health problems and/or symptoms) following immunization with US-licensed vaccines. 这都是“未经证实的”，“自我举报的”，在接受疫苗“之后”的自认为的副作用。根本不代表有因果关系好吗？具体有没有任何因果关系是需要研究人员具体研究的 CDC信息公开透明，到你这种人嘴里就扭曲成了铁板钉钉的疫苗有极大的副作用。不是蠢就是坏
肯定缺很多，看这么多案例太可怕，每一个案例都是血泪啊，难以想象孩子就这么莫名其妙死了，亲人的悲伤，还有一些疫苗教拼命攻击掩盖，没人性 Details for VAERS ID: 0026358-1 Patient Age 1.30 Sex Male MEASLES + MUMPS + RUBELLA (MMR II) Pt vaccinated MMR experienced nervous system damage which included encephalopathy, which resulted in internal, neurological, orthopeidc, psychological, & psychiatric injuries. Details for VAERS ID: 0039041-1 Patient Age 1.30 Sex Female HIB (HIBTITER)，MEASLES + MUMPS + RUBELLA (MMR II) Pt recvd MMR/HIBTITTER on 4JAN92 & had fever of 101 R x 24 hrs later; died 5JAN92; Details for VAERS ID: 0068431-1 Patient Age1.40 SexFemale DTP (NO BRAND NAME)，HIB (ACTHIB)，MEASLES + MUMPS + RUBELLA (MMR II) pt recvd vax on 31oct94 am; at 11:30am on 1nov94 laughing, playfull & took nap; at 1:15pm found in crib by pub hlth nurse cold & pulseness; to er, t 88.9 rectally; resucitation unsuccessful; pronounced dead at 2pm;
落地无声 发表于 2025-02-08 08:38 The Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine for tuberculosis (TB) is not generally used in the United States. Reasons for Non-Use: Low risk of TB in the US: TB rates in the US are significantly lower than in other parts of the world, making vaccination less necessary. Potential side effects: BCG can cause a small scar at the injection site and may cause a false-positive TB skin test reaction. Limited effectiveness: BCG is not always effective in preventing TB, especially in adults. 我们以前在国内打的好像只有20年的有效期（前几个星期查的）
疫苗教：吃x会防止得病 路人甲：那你吃啊 疫苗教：不，你吃 路人甲：？？？
政府说什么你都相信，脑子呢？
我们在看不打病人的笑话。到时候死了都带着没打过疫苗的圣体进棺材。
到下面网页，点request form，在1中选group results by “VAERS ID”，然后在3中选感兴趣的疫苗，比如几个麻疹疫苗，点send，然后出来案例100,000之多，不能处理，那就到5，只选严重的，比如death+life threatening+permanent disability，回来一堆，你们慢慢一个个点开看，每一个都是打了麻疹疫苗出事的孩子或大人，都是悲剧，还可以看HPV，看covid疫苗，觉得没事的尽管打
https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html
拿政治屁股来证明科学问题
政府说疫苗安全有效， 拜登说不打疫苗会死，你就信， 脑子呢？
信trump不信biden。嗯，很好。
好像信拜登的就高级了一样
反疫苗的连基本的科学准则都不知道，只知道质疑
这个网站连打疫苗之后出车祸都会被记录进去
你又没孩子，自己早就打了麻疹疫苗了，在这反对给谁看呢
知道真相的人越来越多了
群体免疫啊，booster就是因为这东西每年变种，所以不得不打。
疫苗这东西有效果的时候人感受不到，每次流感毒株猜错了，都会死一大堆的人。
你知道MMR一岁以下的小孩不能打，而且社区里面还有有免疫疾病的孩子么？
福奇老贼说trust science，无脑相信的不是你们吗？ 楼上还那么多坚信covid疫苗的，哎
阴谋论者怎么会无脑相信政府，哈哈
每个案例都有具体描述，有没有车祸大家自己不会看？这么害怕真相想害谁呢
The risk of death from vaccination (e.g., COVID-19 vaccines) is significantly lower than the annual risk of dying in a car accident for an adult. Here's a concise comparison: 1. Vaccination Risk (COVID-19 Example): Reported Deaths: Rare and rigorously investigated. For example: J&J Vaccine: ~3 confirmed deaths linked to blood clots (TTS) out of 12.5 million doses administered (≈ 0.24 per million, or 1 in 4.17 million). mRNA Vaccines: Even lower risk, with no confirmed causal deaths directly attributed in most studies. Overall Estimate: ≈ 0.1–1 death per million doses (varies by vaccine type and population). 2. Car Accident Risk (U.S. Annual): Annual Deaths: ~38,824 traffic fatalities (2020 data). Annual Risk: ≈ 12 deaths per 100,000 people (0.012%), or 1 in 8,500 annually. Comparison: Vaccine (Per Dose): ~1 in 1,000,000 risk. Car Accident (Annual): ~1 in 8,500 risk. Relative Risk: An adult is ~100–120 times more likely to die in a car accident in one year than from a single COVID-19 vaccine dose. Key Notes: Vaccine Benefits: Far outweigh risks, preventing severe illness/death from diseases like COVID-19. Car Accident Factors: Risk varies by driving habits, location, and age. Other Vaccines: Flu shots and routine vaccines have even lower mortality risks (e.g., ≈1 in 10 million). Conclusion: While both risks are low, annual car accident fatalities are orders of magnitude more likely than vaccine-related deaths. Vaccination remains one of the safest public health interventions.
灭活疫苗的有效性远达不到群免，而且灭活疫苗会造成无症状感染，反而会更加威胁到没打疫苗的。
活疫苗是可以群免，但副作用也大。一岁一下不打不是不能，而是默认婴儿已经从母体获得了抗体，疫苗打了也没用。假如认为母亲没抗体，6个月就可以打那些活疫苗，但因为万一母亲是有抗体的疫苗会没用，所以一岁要再打一次。疫苗教的完全可以随便打，按最大计量最大频率来打，在你们心中疫苗是十全大补汤，疫苗副作用是阴谋论。
科学界是尽力以最快速度提供了疫苗，但提供了就能证明疫苗的安全性吗？似乎疫苗出来的时候说的是打一针还是两针就可以完全预防，然后慢慢变得口风，要打booster之类的，更别提安全性的讨论了。 这些不负责任的说法是科学家应该说的？
现代反疫苗运动的兴起 1998年，安德鲁·维克菲尔德（Andrew Wakefield）论文：这位英国医生发表论文，错误地声称麻疹-腮腺炎-风疹（MMR）疫苗与自闭症有关，尽管研究后来被证实是造假，但该谣言持续传播，影响深远。 2000年代，社交媒体助推反疫苗观点——反疫苗组织开始利用互联网和社交媒体传播疫苗风险的夸张言论，影响了一些家长的接种决策。 2010年，维克菲尔德被吊销行医执照，但反疫苗运动并未消退，许多家长仍然相信疫苗与自闭症的关联。 2015年，加州迪士尼麻疹疫情：由于疫苗接种率下降，迪士尼乐园爆发麻疹疫情，加州随后收紧疫苗豁免政策。
疫苗教的圣经，我已经懒得一条条反驳了。
当年可以证明安全性，大范围双盲实验就是做这个的。
谁TM说完全预防的，预防的是某一个变种，RNA病毒变异这么快本来就不可能完全预防。
连一篇文献都没看过，张口就来
来源请求，不会是反疫苗的神论吧
你是不能反驳装作懒得反驳
你可以考古，版上这些年讨论好几轮了。这些都是十年前用来安抚人的话。其实照马斯克这个速度，曝光疫苗问题也很快了。
对，贪小便宜心理
然而反疫苗的都聚集在一起，结果麻疹就爆发了
科学不完美
但是是人类最可靠的方法
新冠刺突蛋白对ACE受体的结合非常高效，上呼吸道上皮细胞又是在呼吸道阻止最浅表层，没有足够抗体浓度来阻止新馆病毒侵入上皮细胞，繁殖并传播。因为这是一个新病毒，而且是一个raging pandemic, 感染源超高，所以最初乐观的对群体免疫能阻断传染的估计落空。
疫苗虽然不能阻止感染，但是依然提供了非常显著的保护，在各年龄段减少了95%的死亡风险。仅仅2021年一年，就减少了全球22 million death.
The risk of death from COVID-19 varies dramatically by age and vaccination status. Vaccination significantly reduces mortality across all age groups, but older adults (even when vaccinated) remain at higher absolute risk than younger groups. Below is a summary of key data from studies (e.g., CDC, UKHSA, and peer-reviewed research): COVID-19 Death Rates by Age and Vaccination Status (Approximate rates per 100,000 people, based on 2021–2023 data) Age GroupUnvaccinated Vaccinated (No Booster) Vaccinated + BoostedRelative Risk Reduction (Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated)
18–49 years ~5–10 ~0.5–1 ~0.1–0.3 90–95% 50–64 years ~50–100 ~5–10 ~1–3 90–95% 65–79 years ~200–400 ~20–40 ~5–10 90–95% 80+ years ~1,000–2,000 ~100–200 ~30–60 90–95% Notes: Rates are approximate and vary by country, variant (e.g., Delta vs. Omicron), and health infrastructure. "Vaccinated" = Primary series (e.g., 2 mRNA doses); "Boosted" = Received ≥1 additional dose. Death rates are per 100,000 population over a 6–12 month period during the pandemic. Key Observations Age is the strongest risk factor: Unvaccinated adults ≥80 have a ~1,000x higher risk of COVID-19 death than unvaccinated adults 18–29. Vaccination reduces this gap, but absolute risk remains higher for older adults. Vaccine effectiveness: Vaccines reduce death risk by ~90–95% compared to being unvaccinated. Booster doses further lower risk, especially in older adults (e.g., 65+). Omicron vs. Delta: Omicron caused milder disease but higher transmissibility. Death rates dropped post-2021 due to vaccines, prior immunity, and improved treatments. Breakthrough deaths: Most deaths in vaccinated groups occur in older adults or those with severe comorbidities (e.g., immunosuppression, chronic illnesses). Example Data Sources CDC (2022): Unvaccinated adults had a 10–20x higher death rate than vaccinated adults during Omicron. UKHSA (2023): Boosted individuals aged 80+ had a 97% lower risk of death vs. unvaccinated. Nature (2022): Vaccination prevented ~20 million deaths globally in 2021. Why Vaccination Matters While no vaccine is 100% effective, COVID-19 vaccination: Reduces death risk to near-flu levels for younger adults. Slows transmission and protects vulnerable populations. Lowers the odds of severe outcomes even if infected. Takeaway: For adults over 50 (especially 65+), vaccination and boosting remain critical to reducing mortality risk.
大部分真不是，不排除有少数人这么觉得，大部分人都知道大部分疫苗没群免。
就是不会反驳呗，我可没那心情查陈年旧账
行吧，只要疫苗不强制，我乐见你们疫苗教继续你们的信仰，子孙后代少些竞争者挺好的。
你这明摆的颠倒黑白
我去这数据库看了，这里面说的清清楚楚： The VAERS database contains information on unverified reports of adverse events (illnesses, health problems and/or symptoms) following immunization with US-licensed vaccines.
这都是“未经证实的”，“自我举报的”，在接受疫苗“之后”的自认为的副作用。根本不代表有因果关系好吗？具体有没有任何因果关系是需要研究人员具体研究的
CDC信息公开透明，到你这种人嘴里就扭曲成了铁板钉钉的疫苗有极大的副作用。不是蠢就是坏
可惜的是不信疫苗的，川普上台还没一个月就被现世报了
麻疹会清除身体的免疫记忆，辛辛苦苦让孩子自然免疫得来的免疫力，得一场麻疹全被wipe out，孩子还得再受一次苦
时间先后不等于因果，做科研的都知道这个道理，这些反疫苗的天天喊着质疑，连最基本的理性都没有
可怜，但是都怪他们爹妈。
你才是又蠢又坏，这么多案例，光麻疹就有100,000，都是吃饱了撑的人上去编造的？很多都是医生报的，有的还有实验室报告和治疗的方案，每一例都可以查可以自己判断，要是大部分假的CDC还会放在网上？就是躲不开，还把这个网站搞得很难用，每一例都不能直接链接，刚才闲着没事，看了几例，太可怕了
Details for VAERS ID: 0566115-1 Patient Age1.05 SexMale MEASLES + MUMPS + RUBELLA (MMR II) Screaming that could not be stopped. Shaking. Seizure without fever, and hitting his own head for more than three weeks after shot on 3/2011. He also has had years of diagnosed but unresolved swelling and pain. However night time is often the worst. He will cry out and wake sobbing in pain. This has been almost three years of night time pain in which we have sought help at several of the specialists at hospital. Loss of muscle tone and now physical delays.
Details for VAERS ID: 0026484-1 Patient Age1.50 SexFemale DTP (NO BRAND NAME)，HIB (PROHIBIT)，MEASLES + MUMPS + RUBELLA (MMR II) Pt vaccinated with DTP/OPV/HIB/MMR found apneic in crib on 06OCT90.
Details for VAERS ID: 0027526-1 Patient Age0.50 SexFemale MEASLES (ATTENUVAX) Developed T,convuls&pneumonia.Hospitalized w/ septic shock, renal failure & disseminated intravascular coagulation.Develop rash&tracheitis.Culture-Staph aureus.Exp multiple system failure-renal/respiratory/metabolic/cardivascul.Died 11Jan91
管不了别人死活，但会给家里人都打上
RNA病毒变异快，疫苗不可能防传染 这个基本常识，一开始没有科学家敢讲
当时主媒宣传的都是为了grandpa年轻人也要打疫苗
科学不完美不要紧，要公开透明安全性数据，监管机构要独立
是的，那个数据库需要医生填的，而且非常难填，导致好多副作用案例没录进去
这还不算医生不承认的，比如SIDS，婴儿在注射疫苗后一两天内的猝死
这些反智的，如果不是科技发达可能早就被淘汰了。
如果是self report和unverified, 可信度大打折扣，尤其如果人群是相信地球是平的，相信喝漂白水，相信口罩里有5G发射器的，就更不可信了
俩麻疹就现世报啦。很快就要50%男孩都在自闭谱系里也是现世报吧，目前一半以上小孩都有慢性健康问题也是现世报吧，不孕不育，暴风癌症，自体免疫，哎呀，太多了，但是不是传染病啊，所以没事儿对吧。
肯定缺很多，看这么多案例太可怕，每一个案例都是血泪啊，难以想象孩子就这么莫名其妙死了，亲人的悲伤，还有一些疫苗教拼命攻击掩盖，没人性
Details for VAERS ID: 0026358-1 Patient Age 1.30 Sex Male MEASLES + MUMPS + RUBELLA (MMR II) Pt vaccinated MMR experienced nervous system damage which included encephalopathy, which resulted in internal, neurological, orthopeidc, psychological, & psychiatric injuries.
Details for VAERS ID: 0039041-1 Patient Age 1.30 Sex Female HIB (HIBTITER)，MEASLES + MUMPS + RUBELLA (MMR II) Pt recvd MMR/HIBTITTER on 4JAN92 & had fever of 101 R x 24 hrs later; died 5JAN92;
Details for VAERS ID: 0068431-1 Patient Age1.40 SexFemale DTP (NO BRAND NAME)，HIB (ACTHIB)，MEASLES + MUMPS + RUBELLA (MMR II) pt recvd vax on 31oct94 am; at 11:30am on 1nov94 laughing, playfull & took nap; at 1:15pm found in crib by pub hlth nurse cold & pulseness; to er, t 88.9 rectally; resucitation unsuccessful; pronounced dead at 2pm;
相关性不代表因果
对的，我体检好像也是结合要再boost 一针
在你臆想中才有那么多自闭症吧
大步迈向第三世界！