说Musk用钱买票，本来就是谣言。他发起这个没有要求选民支持Trump，而是sign petition support for 1st & 2nd amendments，支持Harris的也可以去sign。Biden和Harris本人也公开说了支持2nd amendment。1st amendment就更不用说了，难道民主党会反对宪法？
是真的 Lawyers for America PAC and its director, Chris Young, said the group doled out the funds based on who would be the best spokespeople for its pro-Trump agenda, despite the billionaire's assertion that winners would be chosen randomly. Young, America PAC's director, testified that he selected winners out of a pool of candidates who appeared in videos for the group and allowed it to use their images after reviewing their social media and meeting them outside event venues. https://www.reuters.com/legal/judge-weighs-challenge-elon-musks-1-million-voter-giveaway-2024-11-04/ 可以看路透社全文
才看到的。感觉今年trump党很疯狂
是个大骗局：
隔壁帖子copy来的：
“刚发完贴，就看到了MAGA这个大骗子musk，真的是继承了MAGA肯盟拐骗的传统
之前不是musk公开号称给一天100万美元贿选，让MAGA选民注册投票吗？现在musk的律师在法庭上作证说，musk根本没有贿选，因为那个1M的奖金是假的，欺骗MAGA川粉的！winners是内定的musk的雇员”
意料之中，马马怎么可能无缘无故给一般选民100万，还每天，要不就是骗，要不这100万是真的就是内定的，川川支持者还真相信这100万每天抽奖这个游戏，不然也不会这么卖力宣传
这人是谁？有可信度吗？
不是说X现在都是右派在上面造谣吗？怎么现在可以拿来做证据了？
你GOOGLE下吧
是真的 Lawyers for America PAC and its director, Chris Young, said the group doled out the funds based on who would be the best spokespeople for its pro-Trump agenda, despite the billionaire's assertion that winners would be chosen randomly. Young, America PAC's director, testified that he selected winners out of a pool of candidates who appeared in videos for the group and allowed it to use their images after reviewing their social media and meeting them outside event venues. https://www.reuters.com/legal/judge-weighs-challenge-elon-musks-1-million-voter-giveaway-2024-11-04/ 可以看路透社全文
它们说： 但凡有正常人类思维都不会认为他们是认真的. Aka, 骗傻逼不算骗….
是啊所以我给你找到了路透原文，well你也可以不信路透社报道。。。
still，trump will lose and go to prison
任何人，包括你都知道他这种不入流的伎俩，再嘴硬也是下三滥
他的意思是x上也不都是造谣，这点能达成共识吗？
这是你理解的民主？ 要不然总统要不然阶下囚？ 无法认同。
你GOOGLE就可以看到正规媒体的报道
是啊，只是需要double check 而已，或者不用X作为source
well，你贴的原文，标题写的清清楚楚，judge allows Elon Musk…… well，我不是法律专家，你觉得judge不对你去找judge argue去
我就想知道你引用的x上这人说的是真的假的？如果是真的，是否等于x上不全部是造谣？
谢谢！也就是说x上不全部是造谣。 至少澄清了之前有人说的自musk接管后全是造谣的谣言了。
估计是，“除了符合我的narrative的不是谣言，其它全是谣言”？
你读完文章了么，Judge是allow啊，因为Elon的律师说他不是抽奖是给指定的人，所以不违反贿选，所以算“欺诈”？
因为那算给他员工的conpensation