文章地址： https://www.economist.com/leaders/2024/10/31/a-second-trump-term-comes-with-unacceptable-risks 摘录几段： “By making Mr Trump leader of the free world, Americans would be gambling with the economy, the rule of law and international peace. We cannot quantify the chance that something will go badly wrong: nobody can. But we believe voters who minimise it are deluding themselves. The case against Mr Trump begins with his policies. In 2016 the Republican platform was still caught between the Mitt Romney party and the Trump party. Today’s version is more extreme. Mr Trump favours a 20% tariff on all imports and has talked of charging over 200% or even 500% on cars from Mexico. He proposes to deport millions of irregular immigrants, many with jobs and American children. He would extend tax cuts even though the budget deficit is at a level usually seen only during war or recession, suggesting a blithe indifference to sound fiscal management. The risks for domestic and foreign policy are amplified by the last big difference between Mr Trump’s first term and a possible second one: he would be less constrained. The president who mused about firing missiles at drug labs in Mexico was held back by the people and institutions around him. Since then the Republican Party has organised itself around fealty to Mr Trump. Friendly think-tanks have vetted lists of loyal people to serve in the next administration. The Supreme Court has weakened the checks on presidents by ruling that they cannot be prosecuted for official acts. If external constraints are looser, much more will depend on Mr Trump’s character. Given his unrepentant contempt for the constitution after losing the election in 2020, it is hard to be optimistic. Half his former cabinet members have refused to endorse him. The most senior Republican senator describes him as a “despicable human being”. Both his former chief-of-staff and former head of the joint chiefs call him a fascist. If you were interviewing a job applicant, you would not brush off such character references. ”
文章地址： https://www.economist.com/leaders/2024/10/31/a-second-trump-term-comes-with-unacceptable-risks
摘录几段： “By making Mr Trump leader of the free world, Americans would be gambling with the economy, the rule of law and international peace. We cannot quantify the chance that something will go badly wrong: nobody can. But we believe voters who minimise it are deluding themselves.
The case against Mr Trump begins with his policies. In 2016 the Republican platform was still caught between the Mitt Romney party and the Trump party. Today’s version is more extreme. Mr Trump favours a 20% tariff on all imports and has talked of charging over 200% or even 500% on cars from Mexico. He proposes to deport millions of irregular immigrants, many with jobs and American children. He would extend tax cuts even though the budget deficit is at a level usually seen only during war or recession, suggesting a blithe indifference to sound fiscal management.
The risks for domestic and foreign policy are amplified by the last big difference between Mr Trump’s first term and a possible second one: he would be less constrained. The president who mused about firing missiles at drug labs in Mexico was held back by the people and institutions around him. Since then the Republican Party has organised itself around fealty to Mr Trump. Friendly think-tanks have vetted lists of loyal people to serve in the next administration. The Supreme Court has weakened the checks on presidents by ruling that they cannot be prosecuted for official acts.
If external constraints are looser, much more will depend on Mr Trump’s character. Given his unrepentant contempt for the constitution after losing the election in 2020, it is hard to be optimistic. Half his former cabinet members have refused to endorse him. The most senior Republican senator describes him as a “despicable human being”. Both his former chief-of-staff and former head of the joint chiefs call him a fascist. If you were interviewing a job applicant, you would not brush off such character references. ”
然后这些人一边参与到分裂民众，一边骂别人分裂民众。历史永远在重演，不破不立。
张嘴就胡说，经济学人从来都是中间偏右。
完了，这次哈哈姐赢了。
经济学人是偏左的 我至今记得他们在2006年的杂志上说中国的制造业 那句话 “中国企业啥都能造，啥都能模仿，除了造不出他们的妈” 当年默大妈大量引进移民 经济学人那个捧，以” exodus" 的标题和背景 极尽赞美之词
但是 以惯例 经济学人杂志是比较权威的风向标 等待大选结果吧
这帮臭老九，竟然用川普的高关税来说是。既然关税那么不好，拜登4年为什么不撤除，反而是变本加厉的打贸易战，不断加税？
这帮所谓经济学家，撒谎没底线。
这种杂志整体偏右 dear
川粉连川粉都做得来，还怕几个小小的标签么？笑话！
应该是经济方面偏右，社会议题上偏左。 他们自称classic liberals
The economist不知道多少次讲维族再教育营了。右派好像不太在乎这个。
总体来说还是蛮中肯的。是我觉得少数值得推荐的刊物