Can you handle four more years with Harris and the left

F
Frcssa
楼主 (北美华人网)
https://www.wsj.com/opinion/can-you-handle-four-more-years-kamala-harris-regulation-higher-taxes-price-controls-b482e8fd?st=pHw16b&reflink=article_copyURL_share
 My question: Can the economy handle four more years of progressive power? 

• Price controls. Candidate Harris wants to end grocery “price gouging,” a classic misdirection to shift blame for the Biden-Harris spending-induced 9% inflation. The first sign of economic illiteracy is price controls, then tariffs, money multipliers and all things Keynes. Stripped of price signals, markets lose their compass. Soviet supermarkets had price controls and bare shelves. Wage and price controls don’t work. 
• Never-ending spending. The progressive plank has pushed housing subsidies, child tax credits and startup loans that will never be paid back (90% of startups fail). How will this be paid for? It doesn’t matter, to spend is to tax. Ms. Harris proposes to extend Medicare’s $2,000 cap on drug spending to everyone—a gateway drug, pardon the pun, to Medicare for all and socialized medicine. Don’t fall for it.

• Taxes up. Progressives are gunning for your hard-earned money. Their proposed highest tax rate is 39.6% from 37%. Add roughly 13.3% in California and if you do well, you’re working for the man. Corporate tax rates are to rise to 28% from 21%. They should be 15%. Taxes on realized long-term capital-gains could rise to 28% plus another 5% tax on net investment income for ObamaCare, from 20% plus 3.8%. Remember, Silicon Valley blossomed with a 20% rate—more money for entrepreneurs than government. Progressives even want to tax unrealized gains for those making over $100 million. Doesn’t affect you? Just wait. In 1913 the top income-tax rate was 7% on incomes over $500,000 (about $11 million today). 
• Federal housing control. Ms. Harris wants to add three million new homes. Does this mean blocky Soviet-style housing for everyone? There’s already a glut of homes, especially in the South. This is a progressive power grab to take away local zoning control. Ask Californians about mandatory Accessory Dwelling Units to expand housing—especially low-income housing—in neighborhoods and near train stations. The state decides, not local zoning laws.
• Heavier regulation. The U.S. has 440 federal agencies that mangle favored industries like autos. More agencies may be coming as progressives are gung-ho on regulating AI. Red tape is classic progressive project poison. Tim Walz, whom former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty called “Bernie Sanders in hunting gear,” declared that Minnesota’s Line 3 oil pipeline needed a “social permit.” Surgeon General Vivek H. Murthy called for warning labels on social media. This is the kind of progressive pointlessness that kills innovation. Want warning labels? Slap one on K-12 education.
Innovation down. High capital-gains rates hurt capital formation. Innovation might still happen but much slower with less capital for growth. Artificial intelligence isn’t cheap. Stock markets don’t like inflation or the heavy hand of government. The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 3.6% for the entire decade of the 1970s.







h
happyTruth
凭良心说,经历一个百年不遇的大疫以后,房市股市都没有塌,大家都还有工作,除了通货膨胀的一点儿痛感(其实对于华人有资产的人是利好)之外,我觉得老拜的团队干的不错。通货膨胀是疫情中间发放海量救济款的必然结果,这个没法子。再也不想去那个川大嘴领军鸡飞狗跳、Chinese Virus, China Initiatives 让华人战战兢兢的时候了。
h
holidaycactus
没觉得这四年有啥不好的呢。
b
buzhidao2000
比天天被叫china virus强
F
Frcssa
h
happyTruth

Frcssa 发表于 2024-10-28 13:16

说别人贪婪冷血,老川的稅表从来没胆子公开,开历届美国总统先河。破产了一堆公司,让员工喝西北风,自家还是金碧辉煌。说人家伤风败俗,自己离婚又结婚三次,多次婚内出轨,被告骚扰还是强奸。这都是贼喊捉贼吗?
p
poopooh
乱印钞票从川普开始。不顾一切地乱搞。以前要印都非常慬慎。