Well 我就没搞懂这个问题为啥这么难回答。 Joe is perfectly capable, he thinks and works better than what you perceive through camera. He made a decision in the best interest of the country. I support Joe, I think his judgement is correct and I want to do the best for the country. So I'm here. Next question.
拜登和川普都太老了，明显比4年前更老了。
Joe is perfectly capable, he thinks and works better than what you perceive through camera. He made a decision in the best interest of the country. I support Joe, I think his judgement is correct and I want to do the best for the country. So I'm here. Next question.
这个回答不行，打民主的脸
这屁话还自以为得意，如果嫌弃拜登年纪大，可以走民主程序初选挑战，跟共和党一样。拜登走完程序，几个党内大佬和一帮金主合计一下就这么把人整下去。就是没走民主选举程序而是指定，哈哈姐脸皮没尼玛这帮闲B厚，经常卡壳。
你既然自以为是的扯到底是不是符合候选人提名程序，是否合理，麻烦你好好研究研究美国的选举制度再扯。
民主党的总统候选人选出方法有超级代表一说，Superdelegate就可以决定谁代表民主党参选总统。而共和党里面自己选择的是没这种超级代表制，你的喷点显示了你的无知。
debatable吧，民主选出来的人也可以自己退。当然有人会说是逼退的，但只要拜登面上说是自愿的，那程序上就不能说有问题。就跟强奸案里哪怕所有外人都觉得应该是强奸，但只要受害人一口咬定自愿那也很难定罪。
easy, know from poor debate performance, kamala is stupid