各位有没认适的??? https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/8987-24 CFTC Charges Fake Commodity Trading Platform with Fraud and Misappropriation in an Online Scam Targeting Asian Americans
September 27, 2024 Washington, D.C. — The Commodity Futures Trading Commission today filed a civil enforcement action in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington against Aipu Limited, Qian Bai, and Lan Bai, together with Fidefx Investments Limited and Chao Li. The complaint alleges from approximately Feb. 6, 2023 to the present, Bai and Lan Bai, individually and as controlling persons of Aipu, with Fidefx and Li, acting as a common enterprise, fraudulently solicited and misappropriated at least $3.6 million from at least 32 customers as part of a fraudulent investment scheme. The defendants have and continue to solicit and accept assets – fiat currency and digital assets – from customers for the sale of agreements; contracts or transactions in commodities on a leveraged or margined basis or financed by the offeror counterparty or a person acting in concert with the offeror or counterparty on a similar basis; off-exchange retail foreign currency contracts and commodity futures contracts. The CFTC seeks restitution to defrauded customers, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, civil monetary penalties, trading bans, and a permanent injunction against further violations of the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and CFTC regulations. Case Background As alleged in the complaint, the fraudulent common enterprise follows a similar pattern with customers either directly funding a purported “trading account” with Aipu or Fidefx via their respective websites, or agreeing to trade commodity interests via Aipu and/or Fidefx after being contacted by individuals (solicitors) acting on behalf of the defendants. The websites are identical but operating under different names. Aipu and Fidefx operated similar schemes where solicitors contact the customers via computer and cell phone applications such as WeChat, WhatsApp, and Line, or other social media platforms. The solicitors claim to have knowledge or inside information that earns them 10% to 30% profits per trade trading in commodity interests such as leveraged or margined retail commodity transactions, retail forex, and/or commodity futures contracts. The solicitors offer to share their knowledge or inside information with customers and to help them trade by providing particularized trading advice. After an account is funded, customers are provided access to online account statements that show purported deposits into their trading accounts and profitable trading at Aipu or Fidefx. These account statements are false. Neither Aipu nor Fidefx have any trading accounts in the United States to which customer funds are sent. No trading takes place on behalf of customers at either Aipu or Fidefx. The defendants do not have any commodity interest trading accounts; fail to use customer assets to margin, guarantee or secure trades on behalf of defrauded customers; and misappropriate all assets they accepted and continue to accept from customers. They immediately transfer assets to offshore entities with no connection to commodity trading. Throughout the relevant period, to fund customers' purported commodity trading accounts, the defendants worked with solicitors as a common enterprise. They directed customers to transfer their fiat and digital assets through a series of bank accounts and private digital wallets affiliated with the defendants. None of these accounts are held or controlled by a CFTC-registered futures commission merchant or retail foreign currency dealer. Rather than using these assets to trade commodity interests on behalf of customers, the defendants immediately misappropriate customers' assets by transferring them offshore to non-trading accounts controlled by persons located outside of the U.S.
回复 6楼 sleepy1 的帖子 Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Aipu Limited et al Washington Western District Court Case #: 3:24-cv-05815 Nature of Suit850 Other Statutes - Securities/Commodities/Exchange Cause07:0006(b) Federal Commodity Exchange Regulation Case Filed:Sep 27, 2024 Docket Parties (6) Docket last updated: 09/27/2024 11:59 PM PDT Friday, September 27, 2024 2 misc Praecipe for a Summons Fri 09/27 9:01 AM PRAECIPE TO ISSUE SUMMONS by Plaintiff Commodity Futures Trading Commission (Mulreany, Timothy) 1 37 pgs cmp Complaint Fri 09/27 8:35 AM COMPLAINT against All Defendants with JURY DEMAND Attorney Timothy J. Mulreany, I added to party Commodity Futures Trading Commission(pty:pla) filed by Commodity Futures Trading Commission.(Mulreany, Timothy) (No Fee Required) Att: 1 Civil Cover Sheet
回复 3楼 Oregon_Farmer 的帖子 Case 3:24-cv-05815 Document 1 Filed 09/27/24 Page 9 of 37: Defendant Lan Bai resides in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Lan Bai has never been registered with the Commission in any capacity.
https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/8987-24
CFTC Charges Fake Commodity Trading Platform with Fraud and Misappropriation in an Online Scam Targeting Asian Americans
September 27, 2024
Washington, D.C. — The Commodity Futures Trading Commission today filed a civil enforcement action in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington against Aipu Limited, Qian Bai, and Lan Bai, together with Fidefx Investments Limited and Chao Li. The complaint alleges from approximately Feb. 6, 2023 to the present, Bai and Lan Bai, individually and as controlling persons of Aipu, with Fidefx and Li, acting as a common enterprise, fraudulently solicited and misappropriated at least $3.6 million from at least 32 customers as part of a fraudulent investment scheme. The defendants have and continue to solicit and accept assets – fiat currency and digital assets – from customers for the sale of agreements; contracts or transactions in commodities on a leveraged or margined basis or financed by the offeror counterparty or a person acting in concert with the offeror or counterparty on a similar basis; off-exchange retail foreign currency contracts and commodity futures contracts. The CFTC seeks restitution to defrauded customers, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, civil monetary penalties, trading bans, and a permanent injunction against further violations of the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and CFTC regulations. Case Background As alleged in the complaint, the fraudulent common enterprise follows a similar pattern with customers either directly funding a purported “trading account” with Aipu or Fidefx via their respective websites, or agreeing to trade commodity interests via Aipu and/or Fidefx after being contacted by individuals (solicitors) acting on behalf of the defendants. The websites are identical but operating under different names. Aipu and Fidefx operated similar schemes where solicitors contact the customers via computer and cell phone applications such as WeChat, WhatsApp, and Line, or other social media platforms. The solicitors claim to have knowledge or inside information that earns them 10% to 30% profits per trade trading in commodity interests such as leveraged or margined retail commodity transactions, retail forex, and/or commodity futures contracts. The solicitors offer to share their knowledge or inside information with customers and to help them trade by providing particularized trading advice. After an account is funded, customers are provided access to online account statements that show purported deposits into their trading accounts and profitable trading at Aipu or Fidefx. These account statements are false. Neither Aipu nor Fidefx have any trading accounts in the United States to which customer funds are sent. No trading takes place on behalf of customers at either Aipu or Fidefx. The defendants do not have any commodity interest trading accounts; fail to use customer assets to margin, guarantee or secure trades on behalf of defrauded customers; and misappropriate all assets they accepted and continue to accept from customers. They immediately transfer assets to offshore entities with no connection to commodity trading. Throughout the relevant period, to fund customers' purported commodity trading accounts, the defendants worked with solicitors as a common enterprise. They directed customers to transfer their fiat and digital assets through a series of bank accounts and private digital wallets affiliated with the defendants. None of these accounts are held or controlled by a CFTC-registered futures commission merchant or retail foreign currency dealer. Rather than using these assets to trade commodity interests on behalf of customers, the defendants immediately misappropriate customers' assets by transferring them offshore to non-trading accounts controlled by persons located outside of the U.S.
不知这三是谁？有认识的吗？
哥儿几个（也可能是姐妹儿）用社交软件找到30多个想投机挣钱的，说有内部消息做外汇和商品期货交易，轻松拿下10%-30%盈利，这30多人觉得天上的馅饼终于砸自己嘴里了就献出360多万美刀。实际上这些钱根本没做任何投资交易，都转到他人名下的海外账号了
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Aipu Limited et al Washington Western District Court Case #: 3:24-cv-05815 Nature of Suit850 Other Statutes - Securities/Commodities/Exchange Cause07:0006(b) Federal Commodity Exchange Regulation Case Filed:Sep 27, 2024 Docket Parties (6) Docket last updated: 09/27/2024 11:59 PM PDT Friday, September 27, 2024 2
Att: 1
Case 3:24-cv-05815 Document 1 Filed 09/27/24 Page 9 of 37:
Defendant Lan Bai resides in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Lan Bai has never been registered with the Commission in any capacity.