你这个老师很不专业，有的大学不建议用ai detection tool。 哈佛的官方决定： There are a variety of tools that claim various degrees of success in finding instances when GAI was used, but this is something of an arms race. It would be inadvisable to count on automated methods for GAI detection. FAS does not plan to provide/license such a tool for use in courses. https://oue.fas.harvard.edu/ai-guidance Is it appropriate to enter student work into ChatGPT to generate feedback, or for students to enter their work into ChatGPT? No confidential information can be loaded into GAI systems, since there is no expectation of privacy or confidentiality. Faculty must get documented permission from students before putting original student content into any generative AI tool, and students should be made aware of the risks of entering their original work into such tools.
Arizona State U policy AI Detection software ASU administration has not recommended any specific tools or apps to detect the use of AI in coursework. The accuracy of AI detection tools is not reliable; any results from these tools should be used for nothing more than a starting point for a conversation between faculty and the student whose work is in question. Suspected use of Generative AI in coursework is not sufficient evidence to begin a formal Academic Integrity investigation. Instead, we recommend faculty document their expectations early and often, and have open dialogs with students about the implications and responsible use of Generative AI in coursework and academia. https://instruction.thecollege.asu.edu/academicintegrityAIChatGPT 有的大学明确禁止老师这么做，因为学生的作业一旦被输入到这些网站，就有可能成为网站的property。 建议你找学区的superintendent谈这件事，不是要找老师的麻烦，就是大家都来学习下别的专业人士怎么看待这个问题。
邻居孩子也是同一门课，说她自己从来没这个问题，那个孩子没事写网文，风格迥异，虽然分数不高但是也不会被怀疑是机器写的。
真的是让人火大。娃说她自己会跟老师发信解释，问题是上回解释了老师也只是把上回的作业作废不算进成绩。娃不让我插手我自己也只是干瞪眼。
Is it appropriate to enter student work into ChatGPT to generate feedback, or for students to enter their work into ChatGPT? No confidential information can be loaded into GAI systems, since there is no expectation of privacy or confidentiality. Faculty must get documented permission from students before putting original student content into any generative AI tool, and students should be made aware of the risks of entering their original work into such tools.
Arizona State U policy AI Detection software ASU administration has not recommended any specific tools or apps to detect the use of AI in coursework. The accuracy of AI detection tools is not reliable; any results from these tools should be used for nothing more than a starting point for a conversation between faculty and the student whose work is in question. Suspected use of Generative AI in coursework is not sufficient evidence to begin a formal Academic Integrity investigation. Instead, we recommend faculty document their expectations early and often, and have open dialogs with students about the implications and responsible use of Generative AI in coursework and academia. https://instruction.thecollege.asu.edu/academicintegrityAIChatGPT
有的大学明确禁止老师这么做，因为学生的作业一旦被输入到这些网站，就有可能成为网站的property。 建议你找学区的superintendent谈这件事，不是要找老师的麻烦，就是大家都来学习下别的专业人士怎么看待这个问题。