Apple_tree 发表于 2024-08-11 17:05 真是造谣一张嘴，我特意查了一下谁写的前言，哪个是JD Vance？Wiki只敢说说“ many contributors are associated with Trump and his campaign”，到你这就直接“是Trump的团队”了。呵呵。
人家没造谣，Vance是写了前言的 JD Vance endorses the ideas of Kevin Roberts, leader of Project 2025, as a “fundamentally Christian view of culture and economics” and a “surprising – even jarring” path forward for conservatives, the Republican vice-presidential nominee writes in the foreword of Roberts’ upcoming book. The foreword was obtained and published in full by the New Republic on Tuesday. Roberts’ bookis out in September. Its title was watered down recently to remove references to “burning down” Washington. https://amp.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/30/jd-vance-project-2025-book-foreword
Media Matters has obtained a galley copy of Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts’ forthcoming book, Dawn’s Early Light: Taking Back Washington To Save America. The book recently garnered headlines due to Republican vice presidential nominee JD Vance’s foreword, in which he lauds the stature and influence of Heritage and suggests that his agenda can act as an “essential weapon” in the “fights that lay ahead.” In the copy reviewed by Media Matters, Roberts, who is the architect of Heritage-led initiative Project 2025, rails against birth control, in vitro fertilization, and abortion. He says that having children should not be considered an “optional individual choice” but “a social expectation or a transcendent gift.” He describes “contraceptive technologies” as “revolutionary inventions that shape American culture away from abundance, marriage, and family.” He labels reproductive choice methods as a “snake strangling the American family.” From page 63:
We need to understand what could be called contraceptive technologies—revolutionary inventions that shape American culture away from abundance, marriage, and family—in the same vein. They shift norms, incentives, and choices, often invisibly and involuntarily. Conservatives inveigh against no-fault divorce, the Sexual Revolution, and the destruction of a culture of hope without recognizing that these cultural changes are all downstream of technological ones.
“If you change a culture on a profound level, you can break the most basic functioning elements of civilization,” Roberts continues. “In the case of contraceptives, we are a society remade according to a research agenda set by the Party of Destruction.” Roberts also attacks in vitro fertilization. From page 64:
Once you understand this pattern (individual choice masking cultural upheaval), you will see it everywhere. In vitro fertilization (IVF) seems to assist fertility but has the added effect of incentivizing women to delay trying to start a family, often leading to added problems when the time comes.
Roberts blames contraception for a rise in abortion rates. Also from page 64:
As other kinds of contraceptive technologies spread, abortion rates went up, not down. Why? Because technological change made having a child seem like an optional and not naturalresult of having sex and destroyed a whole series of institutions and cultural norms that had protected women and forced men to take responsibility for their actions.
Roberts rails against childlessness as well, which has increasingly become a political problem for Republicans amid outrage over Vance’s history of misogynist comments about “childless cat ladies.” From page 47:
That’s a problem because a childless society becomes decadent and nostalgic. Aging, barren societies literally become consumptive, taking on higher levels of debt and depleting savings as they pay foreign workers to keep things going. They become less and less capable of innovation (a young person’s game) and more and more stuck and decrepit every year. Their traditions, culture, and way of life die out, with nothing to hand on and no one to hand it on to. A culture of childlessness is, in the final analysis, a culture of despair.
Getting married and having kids, on the other hand, gives you skin in the game for the future of your country. It forces you to grow up, give up childish things, and live in the real world. It grounds you, gives you a sense of purpose in life, and helps generate community, gratitude, and joy. A culture of children is a culture of hope.
On page 69, Roberts rails against the Swampoodle dog park in Washington, D.C., for having too much room for dogs to play and not enough for children, blaming this on “the antifamily culture shaping legislation, regulation, and enforcement throughout our sprawling government.”
In now-delayed book, Heritage president details MAGA plans to remake education: “America's teachers have gone insane” Kevin Roberts' Dawn's Early Light: “We don’t merely seek an exit from the system; we are coming for the curriculums and classrooms of the remaining public schools, too" WRITTEN BY MADELINE PELTZ RESEARCH CONTRIBUTIONS FROM JUSTIN HOROWITZ PUBLISHED 08/08/24 1:32 PM EDT Media Matters has obtained a galley copy of Heritage Foundation president and Project 2025 architect Kevin Roberts’ now-delayed book, Dawn’s Early Light: Taking Back Washington to Save America. In a review of the chapter on American education titled “Schools Should Teach Piety,” Roberts attacks teachers and advocates for gutting the public school system through so-called “school choice” policies. “A revolution in American education has begun,” Roberts threatens, before later specifying the scope of his vision: “We don’t merely seek an exit from the system; we are coming for the curriculums and classrooms of the remaining public schools, too.” Media Matters previously reported on the content of Dawn’s Early Light in which Roberts attacks birth control, in vitro fertilization, abortion, and dog parks. In the chapter on family policy, he says that having children should not be considered an “optional individual choice" but “a social expectation or a transcendent gift,” and he labels reproductive choice methods as a “snake strangling the American family.” Republican vice presidential nominee and Ohio Sen. JD Vance wrote the foreword, calling Roberts’ ideas an “essential weapon” in the “fights that lay ahead.” Roberts begins the book’s education chapter with a warning: “I’ll state it extra clearly for the FBI: I am a parental rights extremist.” Presumably he is referring to the false right-wing media narrative that the FBI is targeting conservative parents who show up to and complain about policies at school board meetings. (This is not an accurate understanding of the way that the FBI tracks threats across the country — in this case, those made against school employees — and the bureau explicitly stated that it “has never been in the business of investigating parents who speak out or policing speech at school board meetings, and we are not going to start now.”) The Heritage president then goes on to attack teachers (emphasis added):
The current educational crisis does not really arise from a fundamental disagreement about rights, about whether a parent or a teacher should educate a child. In a healthy society, it would be both. The problem is that our schools have been transformed from institutions designed to cultivate children’s souls into godless assembly lines meant to shape obedient little comrades who think morality is a construct and nature is an illusion.
Right now, parents’ rights must be jealously guarded because America’s teachers have gone insane. The reason many parents are having to reassert their rights is that teachers are trying to enforce a truly radical agenda, one that assumes that reality is a social construct.
Roberts repeatedly describes this “radical agenda” of America’s teachers in paranoid, conspiratorial terms. “It might seem to average American parents as though our current educational environment is a passing fad,” he writes. “In fact, it’s the result of a hundred years of plotting by progressives who want to create generations of obedient drones.” Teachers are shaping their students into “ideal cogs in a globalist, Uniparty economic system,” the Heritage Foundation president warns, later adding that “the various educational factions of the Party of Destruction” are seeking “to replace parents, to replace the tradition parents are trying to hand on with a very different one, like a cuckoo kicking another bird’s babies out of the nest to replace them with its own.” Roberts also passionately advocates for so-called “school choice” policies. “The most powerful tool we have in realizing the ideal of American education is universal school choice,” he claims. “Universal school choice lifts all boats by ensuring that parents are supported to make the decisions that are best for their kids and creating meaningful competition and market signals to all schools, including public schools.” “School choice” is a favorite cause of the right and is associated with the conservative push to upend and destroy the American public school system. The term refers to policies providing private school vouchers or promoting school privatization, which conservatives and right-wing media argue is an answer to “woke” public school curriculums. These private school vouchers take funding away from public schools and ultimately do not benefit school kids — as the American Federation of Teachers notes, “research shows that voucher programs either fail to increase student performance or actually hurt student achievement.” Throughout the chapter, Roberts recounts his experience founding and runningJohn Paul the Great Academy, a private Catholic school in Louisiana. He suggests the “classical education movement” rather than progressive teaching practices “may help save Western civilization.” Philosophical debates aside, he clearly seeks to take the practices that served a small, private, Catholic community and apply them broadly to the entire public education system.
We don’t merely seek an exit from the system; we are coming for the curriculums and classrooms of the remaining public schools, too. We seek to return American education to a tradition that encourages the love of beauty, awakens wonder, teaches gratitude for our republic, and instills piety toward our nation, even as it teaches a prudent and circumspect history of its flaws. We fight for this regardless of whether your kids are in a public school, a charter school, or a private school or homeschooled.
The publication delay of Dawn’s Early Light comes amid backlash against the Heritage-led initiative Project 2025, which aims to provide policy and personnel to the next Republican presidential administration and has deep ties to former President Donald Trump and his running mate, JD Vance. Project 2025 seeks to overhaul America’s education system and the support it gets from the federal government by eliminating the Department of Education, gutting federal loan programs, lifting regulations on federal education spending, and redirecting public school funding “to fund families directly” to allow “education choice.” In the introduction to Project 2025, Roberts wrote that “bureaucrats at the Department of Education inject racist, anti-American, ahistorical propaganda into America’s classrooms.” This language echoes years of right-wing mediaattacks against schools and teachers as “woke” “groomers” who push radical racial and gender propaganda. Project 2025 is also partnered with the extreme far-right group Moms for Liberty, an extreme far-right group that rose to prominence in the backlash to COVID-19 school policies and has opposed various LGBTQ- and diversity-related efforts in schools and school libraries.
你以为你骗谁呢，这个版上讨论八百回了，加州950是公投的结果，这个数，德州2500也没见你抱怨
人家没造谣，Vance是写了前言的
JD Vance endorses the ideas of Kevin Roberts, leader of Project 2025, as a “fundamentally Christian view of culture and economics” and a “surprising – even jarring” path forward for conservatives, the Republican vice-presidential nominee writes in the foreword of Roberts’ upcoming book. The foreword was obtained and published in full by the New Republic on Tuesday. Roberts’ bookis out in September. Its title was watered down recently to remove references to “burning down” Washington.
https://amp.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/30/jd-vance-project-2025-book-foreword
Roberts rails against childlessness as well, which has increasingly become a political problem for Republicans amid outrage over Vance’s history of misogynist comments about “childless cat ladies.” From page 47:
On page 69, Roberts rails against the Swampoodle dog park in Washington, D.C., for having too much room for dogs to play and not enough for children, blaming this on “the antifamily culture shaping legislation, regulation, and enforcement throughout our sprawling government.”
说得好！尤其最后一段！
噢， BBC啊。名声跟CCN一样啊？你画出来的两段，没有“80个"Trump竞选团队的啊. 你在帮我论证吗？
必须投票给Trump 呀，你们看看欧洲的左派把国家搞成什么样子就知道了。 这次如果保守派上台，还能稍微调整一下方向。 要不然美国会跟欧洲一样乱
还是有清醒的人在 看看英国现状，就知道为啥必须投票给右派了
上来回复一下。
免得别人以为是我没列举。
列举骂人原帖两次，都被删帖了。
第二次，还把我给禁言了。
所以今天才能回复。
我是中立派，这次大概率不会去投票。
就这么个网站，还搞一言堂，压制不让人说话，真是让我无语。