回复 109楼 湄南河畔的小熊猫 的帖子 因为那个是2018年时候，你们加州卫生部门起草的一份稿子，稿子是在教育内部人士阅读，“Since few people will read the nearly 1,000-page draft, which unfortunately is only available in English, I am sharing below some examples that parents and educators may be especially interested in. Because the California Department of Education is inviting public comment on the draft, I urge all California residents to review the framework and provide input. The draft includes controversial teaching about sexual relations, sexual orientation and gender. In Chapter Five, Line 925, it states, “Some students may be non-monogamous and the term ‘partner(s)’ may be used to be more inclusive.” According to one resource for LGBTQ terms and definitions, recommended by GLSEN (Gay, Lesbian, Straight Education Network), the polyamorous sexual orientation is defined as “the practice of, desire to, or orientation toward having consensual non-monogamous relationships (i.e. relationships that may include multiple partners). This may include open relationships, polyfidelity (which involves more than two people being in romantic and/or sexual relationships which is not open to additional partners), amongst many other set-ups.” In Chapter 3, Line 1847, the draft recommends the book Who Are You? for pre-K–3rd graders as a “guide” to develop their gender identity. This book introduces young children to the idea that gender is a spectrum. This means genders are unlimited and ever-expanding, rather than confined to two biological genders. In the book, gender is described as, “boy, girl, both, neither, trans, genderqueer, non-binary, gender fluid, transgender, gender neutral, agender, neutrois, bigender, third gender, two spirit…” In Chapter 5, Line 643, the draft introduces sexual orientations as a spectrum as well. LGBTQ+ is defined as an ever-changing spectrum with expanding concepts to include “queer, questioning, intersex, asexual, allies and alternative identities (LGBTQQIAA).” Other sexual orientations introduced in Chapter 6, Line 938 include “pansexual and polysexual.”” 来自一位加州20年从事教育工作的老师，这个网上具体的资料，你可以查到。 因为这些变动是需要征得内部人士同意或者说非常多的人反对，现在加州卫生部还是用的2016年版本的，The California Healthy Young Act 2016 ，你今天能够大谈特谈，是后面多少人斗争的结果。但是你就加州教育部门直接指出“Clarification of the law is summarized below: The law prohibits active consent for any part of comprehensive sexual health education or HIV prevention education. Passive (not active) parent/guardian notification is required for comprehensive sexual health education and HIV prevention education, either at the beginning of the school year or at least 14 days prior to instruction. Comprehensive sexual health and HIV prevention education are both mandated instruction and shall occur once in middle school and once in high school. The EC defines comprehensive sexual health education as “education regarding human development and sexuality, including education on pregnancy, contraception, and STIs” and HIV prevention education as “instruction on the nature of HIV and acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), methods of transmission, strategies to reduce the risk of HIV infection, and social and public health issues related to HIV and AIDS.” Abstinence may not be discussed in isolation. The EC requires that instruction and materials include information that abstinence is the only certain way to prevent HIV, other STIs, and unintended pregnancy. However, it also states: “Instruction shall provide information about the value of delaying sexual activity while also providing medically accurate information on other methods of preventing HIV and other STIs and pregnancy.” “Abstinence-only” or “Sexual Risk Avoidance Education” sex education, which offers abstinence as the only option for preventing STIs and unintended pregnancy, is not permitted in California public schools or charter schools. Instruction shall affirmatively recognize that people have different sexual orientations and, when discussing or providing examples of relationships and couples, must be inclusive of same-sex relationships. It must also teach students about gender, gender expression, and gender identity and explore the harm of negative gender stereotypes. This means that schools must teach about all sexual orientations and what being lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and questioning (LGBTQ) means. All instruction and materials must support and align with the purposes of the California Healthy Youth Act and with each other. Instruction and materials may not be in conflict with or undermine each other or any purposes of the law. For example, schools may not use materials that, in promoting abstinence, focus exclusively on the failure rates or perceived disadvantages of condoms or contraception. ” 来源：Superintendent Letter Clarifying The CHYA (CA Dept of Education) Last Reviewed: Monday, August 14, 2023 最后一个段落， may not be in conflict with undermine each other or any purposes of the law，说明斗争很激烈。
catgoose 发表于 2024-06-06 15:03 回复 109楼 湄南河畔的小熊猫 的帖子 因为那个是2018年时候，你们加州卫生部门起草的一份稿子，稿子是在教育内部人士阅读，“Since few people will read the nearly 1,000-page draft, which unfortunately is only available in English, I am sharing below some examples that parents and educators may be especially interested in. Because the California Department of Education is inviting public comment on the draft, I urge all California residents to review the framework and provide input. The draft includes controversial teaching about sexual relations, sexual orientation and gender. In Chapter Five, Line 925, it states, “Some students may be non-monogamous and the term ‘partner(s)’ may be used to be more inclusive.” According to one resource for LGBTQ terms and definitions, recommended by GLSEN (Gay, Lesbian, Straight Education Network), the polyamorous sexual orientation is defined as “the practice of, desire to, or orientation toward having consensual non-monogamous relationships (i.e. relationships that may include multiple partners). This may include open relationships, polyfidelity (which involves more than two people being in romantic and/or sexual relationships which is not open to additional partners), amongst many other set-ups.” In Chapter 3, Line 1847, the draft recommends the book Who Are You? for pre-K–3rd graders as a “guide” to develop their gender identity. This book introduces young children to the idea that gender is a spectrum. This means genders are unlimited and ever-expanding, rather than confined to two biological genders. In the book, gender is described as, “boy, girl, both, neither, trans, genderqueer, non-binary, gender fluid, transgender, gender neutral, agender, neutrois, bigender, third gender, two spirit…” In Chapter 5, Line 643, the draft introduces sexual orientations as a spectrum as well. LGBTQ+ is defined as an ever-changing spectrum with expanding concepts to include “queer, questioning, intersex, asexual, allies and alternative identities (LGBTQQIAA).” Other sexual orientations introduced in Chapter 6, Line 938 include “pansexual and polysexual.”” 来自一位加州20年从事教育工作的老师，这个网上具体的资料，你可以查到。 因为这些变动是需要征得内部人士同意或者说非常多的人反对，现在加州卫生部还是用的2016年版本的，The California Healthy Young Act 2016 ，你今天能够大谈特谈，是后面多少人斗争的结果。但是你就加州教育部门直接指出“Clarification of the law is summarized below: The law prohibits active consent for any part of comprehensive sexual health education or HIV prevention education. Passive (not active) parent/guardian notification is required for comprehensive sexual health education and HIV prevention education, either at the beginning of the school year or at least 14 days prior to instruction. Comprehensive sexual health and HIV prevention education are both mandated instruction and shall occur once in middle school and once in high school. The EC defines comprehensive sexual health education as “education regarding human development and sexuality, including education on pregnancy, contraception, and STIs” and HIV prevention education as “instruction on the nature of HIV and acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), methods of transmission, strategies to reduce the risk of HIV infection, and social and public health issues related to HIV and AIDS.” Abstinence may not be discussed in isolation. The EC requires that instruction and materials include information that abstinence is the only certain way to prevent HIV, other STIs, and unintended pregnancy. However, it also states: “Instruction shall provide information about the value of delaying sexual activity while also providing medically accurate information on other methods of preventing HIV and other STIs and pregnancy.” “Abstinence-only” or “Sexual Risk Avoidance Education” sex education, which offers abstinence as the only option for preventing STIs and unintended pregnancy, is not permitted in California public schools or charter schools. Instruction shall affirmatively recognize that people have different sexual orientations and, when discussing or providing examples of relationships and couples, must be inclusive of same-sex relationships. It must also teach students about gender, gender expression, and gender identity and explore the harm of negative gender stereotypes. This means that schools must teach about all sexual orientations and what being lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and questioning (LGBTQ) means. All instruction and materials must support and align with the purposes of the California Healthy Youth Act and with each other. Instruction and materials may not be in conflict with or undermine each other or any purposes of the law. For example, schools may not use materials that, in promoting abstinence, focus exclusively on the failure rates or perceived disadvantages of condoms or contraception. ” 来源：Superintendent Letter Clarifying The CHYA (CA Dept of Education) Last Reviewed: Monday, August 14, 2023
catgoose 发表于 2024-06-06 15:03 回复 109楼 湄南河畔的小熊猫 的帖子 因为那个是2018年时候，你们加州卫生部门起草的一份稿子，稿子是在教育内部人士阅读，“Since few people will read the nearly 1,000-page draft, which unfortunately is only available in English, I am sharing below some examples that parents and educators may be especially interested in. Because the California Department of Education is inviting public comment on the draft, I urge all California residents to review the framework and provide input. The draft includes controversial teaching about sexual relations, sexual orientation and gender. In Chapter Five, Line 925, it states, “Some students may be non-monogamous and the term ‘partner(s)’ may be used to be more inclusive.” According to one resource for LGBTQ terms and definitions, recommended by GLSEN (Gay, Lesbian, Straight Education Network), the polyamorous sexual orientation is defined as “the practice of, desire to, or orientation toward having consensual non-monogamous relationships (i.e. relationships that may include multiple partners). This may include open relationships, polyfidelity (which involves more than two people being in romantic and/or sexual relationships which is not open to additional partners), amongst many other set-ups.” In Chapter 3, Line 1847, the draft recommends the book Who Are You? for pre-K–3rd graders as a “guide” to develop their gender identity. This book introduces young children to the idea that gender is a spectrum. This means genders are unlimited and ever-expanding, rather than confined to two biological genders. In the book, gender is described as, “boy, girl, both, neither, trans, genderqueer, non-binary, gender fluid, transgender, gender neutral, agender, neutrois, bigender, third gender, two spirit…” In Chapter 5, Line 643, the draft introduces sexual orientations as a spectrum as well. LGBTQ+ is defined as an ever-changing spectrum with expanding concepts to include “queer, questioning, intersex, asexual, allies and alternative identities (LGBTQQIAA).” Other sexual orientations introduced in Chapter 6, Line 938 include “pansexual and polysexual.”” 来自一位加州20年从事教育工作的老师，这个网上具体的资料，你可以查到。 因为这些变动是需要征得内部人士同意或者说非常多的人反对，现在加州卫生部还是用的2016年版本的，The California Healthy Young Act 2016 ，你今天能够大谈特谈，是后面多少人斗争的结果。但是你就加州教育部门直接指出“Clarification of the law is summarized below: The law prohibits active consent for any part of comprehensive sexual health education or HIV prevention education. Passive (not active) parent/guardian notification is required for comprehensive sexual health education and HIV prevention education, either at the beginning of the school year or at least 14 days prior to instruction. Comprehensive sexual health and HIV prevention education are both mandated instruction and shall occur once in middle school and once in high school. The EC defines comprehensive sexual health education as “education regarding human development and sexuality, including education on pregnancy, contraception, and STIs” and HIV prevention education as “instruction on the nature of HIV and acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), methods of transmission, strategies to reduce the risk of HIV infection, and social and public health issues related to HIV and AIDS.” Abstinence may not be discussed in isolation. The EC requires that instruction and materials include information that abstinence is the only certain way to prevent HIV, other STIs, and unintended pregnancy. However, it also states: “Instruction shall provide information about the value of delaying sexual activity while also providing medically accurate information on other methods of preventing HIV and other STIs and pregnancy.” “Abstinence-only” or “Sexual Risk Avoidance Education” sex education, which offers abstinence as the only option for preventing STIs and unintended pregnancy, is not permitted in California public schools or charter schools. Instruction shall affirmatively recognize that people have different sexual orientations and, when discussing or providing examples of relationships and couples, must be inclusive of same-sex relationships. It must also teach students about gender, gender expression, and gender identity and explore the harm of negative gender stereotypes. This means that schools must teach about all sexual orientations and what being lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and questioning (LGBTQ) means. All instruction and materials must support and align with the purposes of the California Healthy Youth Act and with each other. Instruction and materials may not be in conflict with or undermine each other or any purposes of the law. For example, schools may not use materials that, in promoting abstinence, focus exclusively on the failure rates or perceived disadvantages of condoms or contraception. ” 来源：Superintendent Letter Clarifying The CHYA (CA Dept of Education) Last Reviewed: Monday, August 14, 2023 最后一个段落， may not be in conflict with undermine each other or any purposes of the law，说明斗争很激烈。
笑死。那就让你孩子去享受这种教育。恭喜
你又理解偏了，没问错，当然可以问，等孩子问时再解释就行了，用不着低年级就早早灌输
别的不说，有common sense的地方，至少不可能有零元购
真的了，还TM不够乱么
幼儿园、小学一年级学这些完全没问题 有专门针对这个年纪的sex education 我觉得合适。
我说的是接受不同，尊敬不同的教育，跟性教育有关系吗？
楼主只是说了lgbtq的书籍，跟性教育有啥关系？讲有些家里是有俩爸，俩妈的事实不可以吗？
你脑子就剩下性了吗？ 其他答案完全不会那是你一个人的问题
所以你得意思是小学低年级娃就一定不会问吗？
人家就是问你遇到低年级娃提问，你咋回答， 很明显你根本不知道该怎么回答，所以一直在回避答案
但是件事儿是回避，躲藏就能解决的事儿吗？
长期性压抑导致性变态，从而引发性犯罪。世外桃源的Amish妇女被自己人性侵的比例可不低。
太赞这第一手资料了，不知道楼里面父母是否觉得这尺度太大？
你去真正看过学区的教学内容吗？还是全靠自己在脑补？我看过我们学区的教学内容，完全正常合理的科普，根本不是你想象的灌输洗脑
因为那个是2018年时候，你们加州卫生部门起草的一份稿子，稿子是在教育内部人士阅读，“Since few people will read the nearly 1,000-page draft, which unfortunately is only available in English, I am sharing below some examples that parents and educators may be especially interested in. Because the California Department of Education is inviting public comment on the draft, I urge all California residents to review the framework and provide input. The draft includes controversial teaching about sexual relations, sexual orientation and gender. In Chapter Five, Line 925, it states, “Some students may be non-monogamous and the term ‘partner(s)’ may be used to be more inclusive.” According to one resource for LGBTQ terms and definitions, recommended by GLSEN (Gay, Lesbian, Straight Education Network), the polyamorous sexual orientation is defined as “the practice of, desire to, or orientation toward having consensual non-monogamous relationships (i.e. relationships that may include multiple partners). This may include open relationships, polyfidelity (which involves more than two people being in romantic and/or sexual relationships which is not open to additional partners), amongst many other set-ups.” In Chapter 3, Line 1847, the draft recommends the book Who Are You? for pre-K–3rd graders as a “guide” to develop their gender identity. This book introduces young children to the idea that gender is a spectrum. This means genders are unlimited and ever-expanding, rather than confined to two biological genders. In the book, gender is described as, “boy, girl, both, neither, trans, genderqueer, non-binary, gender fluid, transgender, gender neutral, agender, neutrois, bigender, third gender, two spirit…” In Chapter 5, Line 643, the draft introduces sexual orientations as a spectrum as well. LGBTQ+ is defined as an ever-changing spectrum with expanding concepts to include “queer, questioning, intersex, asexual, allies and alternative identities (LGBTQQIAA).” Other sexual orientations introduced in Chapter 6, Line 938 include “pansexual and polysexual.”” 来自一位加州20年从事教育工作的老师，这个网上具体的资料，你可以查到。 因为这些变动是需要征得内部人士同意或者说非常多的人反对，现在加州卫生部还是用的2016年版本的，The California Healthy Young Act 2016 ，你今天能够大谈特谈，是后面多少人斗争的结果。但是你就加州教育部门直接指出“Clarification of the law is summarized below: The law prohibits active consent for any part of comprehensive sexual health education or HIV prevention education. Passive (not active) parent/guardian notification is required for comprehensive sexual health education and HIV prevention education, either at the beginning of the school year or at least 14 days prior to instruction. Comprehensive sexual health and HIV prevention education are both mandated instruction and shall occur once in middle school and once in high school. The EC defines comprehensive sexual health education as “education regarding human development and sexuality, including education on pregnancy, contraception, and STIs” and HIV prevention education as “instruction on the nature of HIV and acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), methods of transmission, strategies to reduce the risk of HIV infection, and social and public health issues related to HIV and AIDS.” Abstinence may not be discussed in isolation. The EC requires that instruction and materials include information that abstinence is the only certain way to prevent HIV, other STIs, and unintended pregnancy. However, it also states: “Instruction shall provide information about the value of delaying sexual activity while also providing medically accurate information on other methods of preventing HIV and other STIs and pregnancy.” “Abstinence-only” or “Sexual Risk Avoidance Education” sex education, which offers abstinence as the only option for preventing STIs and unintended pregnancy, is not permitted in California public schools or charter schools. Instruction shall affirmatively recognize that people have different sexual orientations and, when discussing or providing examples of relationships and couples, must be inclusive of same-sex relationships. It must also teach students about gender, gender expression, and gender identity and explore the harm of negative gender stereotypes. This means that schools must teach about all sexual orientations and what being lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and questioning (LGBTQ) means. All instruction and materials must support and align with the purposes of the California Healthy Youth Act and with each other. Instruction and materials may not be in conflict with or undermine each other or any purposes of the law. For example, schools may not use materials that, in promoting abstinence, focus exclusively on the failure rates or perceived disadvantages of condoms or contraception. ” 来源：Superintendent Letter Clarifying The CHYA (CA Dept of Education) Last Reviewed: Monday, August 14, 2023 最后一个段落， may not be in conflict with undermine each other or any purposes of the law，说明斗争很激烈。
会的。。。现在这年头俩爸爸俩妈妈有啥讲头，身边有这样的家长娃早就习惯了
我们这里是7年级才讲的， 小学里就是啥是家庭，如何识别sex offender，尤其是如何识别inapproriate behavior 这些，还有碰到了怎么应对。
不想着怎么提高基础教育，整天在性别问题和毒品问题上做文章，就是极左的思路
就跟天然独一样自然产生的？
是这样吗？我这里好的私校都极左，老师都很年轻很左。反而公校老师年纪大一些，不怎么教这些。
当然如果你说的是那些印度老师的平民私立，那是肯定不教的，埋头做题还来不及
因为有的同学就有同性的双亲啊，难道要告诉孩子们这是不正常的大家快去歧视他们？本来就不是什么大事，解释清楚了尊重他人的家庭模式就可以，非要被你们引申得那么卑劣。
大多数州还是需要父母同意的。 少部分蓝州不需要。
所谓的“没有问题”也就是给你洗脑而已。
换个说法，不孕不育 你觉得是问题么？同性恋 基本等价于不孕不育。
现在直男直女不结婚不生娃的多了去吧，反而很多同性couple 代孕或者自己生的呢，同性不等同于不孕不育啊。 娃的同学俩妈妈、家里还有妹妹，这个同学今年要上大学了都，也就是18年前就已经发生
且不说我们现在是2024年，你拿8年前还在纸上的东西来反驳我，想说明什么？虽然现在加州的性教育内容可以被接受，但是教育部的本意是邪恶和偏激的？ Lol. 我就问两个问题1. 对偏激和极端性教育内容发出抗议和斗争的人是不是也是加州人？2. 最后加州政府有没有听取人民群众的心声？ 2018年以前我就在版上混了。对于加州性教育不满，抱怨的帖子我看了很多，从来没有一个人，从来没有一个人是分享自己的小孩在学校进行性教育的经历和内容。全部都是网上看别人说，我朋友说，我亲戚说。
“不想生”和“不能生”是一个概念么？
同性恋生孩子需要医学介入，这和医治不孕不育不是一回事么？如果你觉得不孕不育是问题，那同性恋必然也是类似的问题。
我以为你担心同性恋多了影响人口增长呢… 不孕不育只对有生育需求的人才是需要治疗的啊，没需求不管是同性恋还是异性恋都不会去治疗，也不会影响正常生活。所以把同性恋等同于不孕不育逻辑说不通啊。
美国宪法还是200年前的东西呢，法律不管什么时候制定的，说的是有效性，和成法的时间没有太大关系。美国整体法律框架是海洋法系，就是在原来的法律基础上，形成不停的补充版、不停的宣判例子来构成。所以不停的补充和修改的内容也是非常重要的。不管你什么时候在华人，来多久，和加州的性教育法律内容没有一丝逻辑关系。 我引用的，都是现在有效的，修改的、补充的或者存续沿用的就是后面多少人、家长、老师斗争的结果。你才能在这里打打口水战。整个2016的California Healthy Young Act 2016非常长，根据不同年纪来分的，每个篇幅、每个字的起草平常人看似不重要，其实每个字的运用都是涉及不同的教育理念。 真正落实到了实际的最后一层才是孩子，真正到了孩子得到的教育，就是疾到肤里，那个时候就已经很难根治。现在还在斗争阶段就是一个还可以缓冲阶段。 就像一开始先是大麻医用开放，然后就是有娱乐开放。
按你的逻辑：同性恋只对有生育需求的人才是需要医疗介入的啊，没需求的同性恋不管是不是不孕不育都不会去医疗介入。
明白了么？