在看加州今年公投,家庭收入一百万以上要多交税?

H
HONNINGSVAG
楼主 (北美华人网)
看到帅哥州长极力推荐今年的prop1 想绝对对我们华人中产没好处 结果看到果然是给瘾君子神经病拓展财源 有一条 “changing how revenue from the 1% tax on income above $1 million is spent under the law, including requiring 30% of the Behavioral Health Services Fund be allocated to housing intervention programs”
那问题来了 难道一百万以上的家庭收入税率比五十万到一百万不一样吗?
g
gokgs
A YES vote on this measure means: Counties would need to change some of the mental health care and drug or alcohol treatment services provided currently to focus more on housing and personalized support services. The state could borrow up to $6.4 billion to build (1) more places where people could get mental health care and drug or alcohol treatment and (2) more housing for people with mental health, drug, or alcohol challenges. NO A NO vote on this measure means: Counties would not need to change the mental health care and drug or alcohol treatment services provided currently. The state could not borrow up to $6.4 billion to build more places where people could get mental health care and drug or alcohol treatment and more housing for people with mental health, drug, or alcohol challenges.
g
gokgs
I am not sure. YES vote seems not that bad. will decide and balance other items when I vote.
p
poppyjasper
No
卖一个房子就到100万了
这是给利益集团送钱,有去无回,得陇望蜀
没有穷尽也
书面上的好处一个字也不要相信,无家可归者和心理不健康者只会越来越多的
因为社会财富慢慢通过类似法案被集中到这些王八羔子手里了
老百姓越来越穷,然后心理疾病就越来越普遍,越来越严重
一分钱税都不收,保证大家的毛病都好了


大衣被禁
太惨了。 真是taxation without representation. 我家不但不能在加州投票还要给加州交税。
S
Strawberry99
MA 早就通过了1M 以上extra Tax新政,湾区那么多拿大包的不能落后药工哦
Q
QQ.com
以后加州公投,所有加税加费用需要投资的项目,我统统投NO
A
Anotherfacet
那个1m税一直在收。这个提案只是改一下怎么用那个税而已。
e
ebc
太惨了。 真是taxation without representation. 我家不但不能在加州投票还要给加州交税。
大衣被禁 发表于 2024-02-06 00:22

不在加州为什么要给加州交税?是在这边有商业活动吗?