In early January, molecular biologist Sholto David published a blog post describing what he said were signs of image manipulation in papers by the Dana-Farber researchers. David contacted Dana-Farber and Harvard Medical School with his concerns, submitting a list of papers he said contained problems. The most serious, he said, had to do with images of experimental results that had signs of copy-and-pasting by software such as Adobe Photoshop. “Those are pixel-perfect matches for the same area, but it’s supposed to be a different sample,” he said. Scientific studies are assessed by experts in the field for quality before they are published in peer-reviewed journals, but the process doesn’t reliably catch fabrications or errors. As a stopgap, some scientists have taken up policing the scientific record on their own, often posting their findings on social media or the scientific discussion forum PubPeer. David has been looking for faulty papers and posting about them for nearly three years.
天呐，这种人命关天的都作假
软件一扫，怎么假图就能现原形呢？ 能给解释下吗？
校长没有作弊，人家学术委员会的定论都有了。
请不要带节奏。
所以只是忘记引用而已，对吧。
所以不所以，撒谎造谣的不得好报应。说这句就行了。
难得有底线。。。知道很多人都是自己骗自己。
就是劣币驱逐良币 我觉得这些背后推DEI的另有目的基本是确定的
很符合哈佛，风气就这样
康涅狄克大学心血管研究中心主任伪造145篇文章。 也就是提前退休
这些作弊的都是DEI？ 还是你塞了私货瞎扯。
哎呦，人命关天个啥呀，都是灌水paper, 基本不会影响到人，最多弄死几只老鼠
以前genentech 重复牛逼实验室的顶尖paper, 好像90% 重复不出来
这个引用问题很多人其实不注意写的论文是经不起仔细审查的。 我博士的导师特别严格，他说多少个字以上就必须引用其实没有定论，音乐的国际惯例是如果8个连续音符一样就属于剽窃，因此导师要求我们如果八个单词原封不动抄别人的就得给出处了。
扯，灌水paper 白皮灌得最多
说到灌水，任何一个国家都比不上中国的papers
确实。哈弗每年各个学校招的人也都是些包装比较好，没啥硬核奖项的。 今年哈弗确实申请人骤减。
你的阅读能力堪忧。
不意外，癌症研究向来位列三大造假重灾区之列，不是浪得虚名的
另外两大造假重灾区是啥？
原理上应该很容易，图片像素和原图有差别。
p图的是水平低，水平高的图上看不出来
这不仅仅是名校的问题，是学术圈体制的问题，那地方一般人呆不了
学术高和学术低的区别，有时候是骗术水平高低的区别。骗术高的不仅骗别人，还把自己都骗了