哈佛获选言论最不自由大学。。。

s
shengsiwuwei
楼主 (北美华人网)
Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression发表年度报告,将哈佛大学评为今年言论自由最糟糕的大学,甚至在100分满分中只有0分。报告批评哈佛多名教授因言论受到处分,情况令人失望。获选言论最自由的大学是密歇根理工大学,在100分之中取得78.01。 https://nypost.com/2023/09/06/harvard-is-named-worst-school-for-free-speech-scoring-zero-out-of-possible-100/
a
artdong



本来理工学院就是最 liberal 的那群人,没有开放思想又谈何科技创新。
I
ILuvSunshine
终于真相了一回
需要给每个人充分的自由而没有任何的约束,就等于每个人都没有任何自由。这个在美国表现的淋漓尽致,甚至连上厕所都是。
比如大卫·凯恩 (David Kane) ,原是哈佛大学政治学的教授,他在一篇专栏中说,“该校90%以上的黑人学生如果不会黑人身份,根本不会被录取。”哈佛大学并没有拿出数据来证明凯恩教授说的是假的,而是直接将凯恩开除了。
哈佛是为了言论不能伤害任何人的感情,即使是对的也不能说,最后大家连说话的自由都没有了。见面只能谈天气。
l
lhuar
最安全的就是谈论天气
d
dpdpdp
需要给每个人充分的自由而没有任何的约束,就等于每个人都没有任何自由。这个在美国表现的淋漓尽致,甚至连上厕所都是。
比如大卫·凯恩 (David Kane) ,原是哈佛大学政治学的教授,他在一篇专栏中说,“该校90%以上的黑人学生如果不会黑人身份,根本不会被录取。”哈佛大学并没有拿出数据来证明凯恩教授说的是假的,而是直接将凯恩开除了。
哈佛是为了言论不能伤害任何人的感情,即使是对的也不能说,最后大家连说话的自由都没有了。见面只能谈天气。
睿 发表于 2023-09-07 21:16

快别谈天气,一会那个大神就得把你放进川粉行列。
m
mingrimingyue
Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression发表年度报告,将哈佛大学评为今年言论自由最糟糕的大学,甚至在100分满分中只有0分。报告批评哈佛多名教授因言论受到处分,情况令人失望。获选言论最自由的大学是密歇根理工大学,在100分之中取得78.01。 https://nypost.com/2023/09/06/harvard-is-named-worst-school-for-free-speech-scoring-zero-out-of-possible-100/

shengsiwuwei 发表于 2023-09-07 21:07

其实这些藤校都差不多
浮云淡淡
论言论自由,德州的学校得垫底
e
ecko
需要给每个人充分的自由而没有任何的约束,就等于每个人都没有任何自由。这个在美国表现的淋漓尽致,甚至连上厕所都是。
比如大卫·凯恩 (David Kane) ,原是哈佛大学政治学的教授,他在一篇专栏中说,“该校90%以上的黑人学生如果不会黑人身份,根本不会被录取。”哈佛大学并没有拿出数据来证明凯恩教授说的是假的,而是直接将凯恩开除了。
哈佛是为了言论不能伤害任何人的感情,即使是对的也不能说,最后大家连说话的自由都没有了。见面只能谈天气。
睿 发表于 2023-09-07 21:16

睿大码又来瞎编胡扯了,你的受众也就是那些不懂英文的。Kane racist and sexist,在他眼里你也是个不折不扣的垃圾
Jaffe noted that, for Williams students, Kane is synonymous with EphBlog. Because of the numerous posts by David Dudley Field ’25 on EphBlog that are signed “David Kane ’88,” posts that promote Kane’s classes, and include pictures of him,” Jaffe says there is no doubt among Williams students that Kane is running not only EphBlog, but also the David Dudley Field ’25 account. “A lot of people would be like, ‘This is fucking crazy, look at this,’” Jaffe says. “You would be hard-pressed to find anybody who wouldn’t call the blog insane.” Many of the posts on EphBlog are unambiguously racist, sexist, and homophobic. On the blog, ‘Field’ claimed that there is no need for Williams to have a Women’s Center, noted that, during the author’s time at Williams, he was “widely known as the campus homophobe,” wrote that “‘Sexism in the elite workplace’ is 95% fantasy” and about his distaste for what he calls “crackpot feminist quackery,” made a defense for Williams students who used homophobic slurs, proposed Willams professors should come together to discuss racial differences in IQ, claimed that the reason Williams has had fewer female students as commencement day speakers was because of the biological differences between men and women, challenges the notion that Japanese internment was immoral while linking articles in defense of racial profiling, and says that xenophobia isn’t nessesarily a bad thing.
睿大码又来瞎编胡扯了,你的受众也就是那些不懂英文的。Kane racist and sexist,在他眼里你也是个不折不扣的垃圾
Jaffe noted that, for Williams students, Kane is synonymous with EphBlog. Because of the numerous posts by David Dudley Field ’25 on EphBlog that are signed “David Kane ’88,” posts that promote Kane’s classes, and include pictures of him,” Jaffe says there is no doubt among Williams students that Kane is running not only EphBlog, but also the David Dudley Field ’25 account. “A lot of people would be like, ‘This is fucking crazy, look at this,’” Jaffe says. “You would be hard-pressed to find anybody who wouldn’t call the blog insane.” Many of the posts on EphBlog are unambiguously racist, sexist, and homophobic. On the blog, ‘Field’ claimed that there is no need for Williams to have a Women’s Center, noted that, during the author’s time at Williams, he was “widely known as the campus homophobe,” wrote that “‘Sexism in the elite workplace’ is 95% fantasy” and about his distaste for what he calls “crackpot feminist quackery,” made a defense for Williams students who used homophobic slurs, proposed Willams professors should come together to discuss racial differences in IQ, claimed that the reason Williams has had fewer female students as commencement day speakers was because of the biological differences between men and women, challenges the notion that Japanese internment was immoral while linking articles in defense of racial profiling, and says that xenophobia isn’t nessesarily a bad thing.
ecko 发表于 2023-09-07 22:37

这个教授从来上课教书没有任何歧视的问题。做文章的人觉得有个网站上的作者是他,可是也没办法证明就是他,只是怀疑。那个作者说了一些关于女性,同性恋,和黑人方面的统计和他个人的意见。然后哈佛2022年不延续合同,现在这个教授在另一个大学教书。