朱令案投毒嫌疑人 孙维 网上发声:笑骂由人

d
dreambig
有人请教过李昌钰博士这个案例吗?公安机关出了个大错,没有把相关物品取走保存好
fridec2 发表于 2023-07-19 00:10

你以为李昌钰就会很公正吗? 看看OJ Simpson案子 在钱和权的诱惑下,哎
d
dltmddyd
回复 101楼一笑而过吗的帖子
有句老话,天下人悠悠众口,岂能堵之。这么多同学愿意出来为孙维澄清贝志诚扑风捉影泼的脏水,足见孙维没啥问题,经得起质疑。
相反,贝志诚跟孙维单线联系,没有进一步佐证,而且有的没的把脏水往孙维身上引,比如“清华不发毕业证”这种情节其实是“北大不发毕业证给他”嫁接到孙维身上,更是可疑
Thbzico777 发表于 2023-07-19 04:37

你说的有点道理
呵呵笑
谁说朱令一定是在宿舍被投毒的?第一次有症状后朱令已经不怎么住宿舍了,而贝经常去清华找朱令吃饭,完全具备作案条件,贝就靠不准确的英文描述就能有人敢断定原因是铊?现在视频诊断都不敢这样说!至于后来啥朱令宿舍物品不见,更是扯谈,几个水杯牙缸,是不是真的不见都难说,不排除贝故意造谣,爆料指向孙维,为自己脱身,就像造谣说孙维没拿到清华毕业证,后来孙维自己出来说拿到了,而贝是真的没拿到北大毕业证,这种情节完全就是凶手把自己的遭遇移花接木嫁接到孙维上,一般人没这个遭遇,拍脑袋也想不出来
Thbzico777 发表于 2023-07-18 23:03

你不是善类,贝就没去清华找过朱令,太会颠倒黑白了。互联网是有记忆的包括头发分析等等
S
Spring123
我很好奇,世界上有很多花季少女都被人杀害,不比她惨得多吗?很多也没抓到凶手啊。所以为什么朱令案引起这么大关注呢,就因为她是清华的吗?为什么那些丧失生命而又没破案的少女没人关注呢?
公用马甲1 发表于 2023-07-18 15:17

你如果发布一些其他惨案,大家也会关注的。
G
God2me
回复 4楼公用马甲1的帖子
怪不得要用马甲, 你这是啥心理阿?完全不是正常人的思维
斗牛犬妹妹
回复 43楼cs5560的帖子
以前天涯有她们寝室的邮件,某个黑客搞到的,就是群体作案,可能孙维是下毒的那个,其他室友也知情
yangff 发表于 2023-07-18 20:05

之前有分析说是群体作案,目的是想让朱令生病,然后休学一年退出这个寝室。没想到第一次投毒后朱令没有病得很严重也不会搬出寝室,然后再是第二次投毒。第二次投毒就加大了剂量,于是一个不小心把人给整废了。 因为群体作案,就算不是投毒的那个,也是知情者,有知情不报和包庇罪,所以最后寝室里没有人为朱令案提供任何线索。
河边垂钓
每次想到朱令就很揪心,无法破案真是太沉重了
九州事尽知
“笑骂由人,生死由命”---孙维
九州事尽知
亚马逊上有《朱令的四十五年》这本书,有兴趣的可以去看。真凶是谁当初北京市公安局和清华肯定都已经知道了,朱令的家人也知道,拿她没办法。第二次投毒之后,警方去清华取证之前,朱令的寝室还出现了匪夷所思的盗窃案,所有证物都不翼而飞了……唉,只能说这个世界有些人就是心真的太黑了,不只是凶手,还有那些帮凶,和包庇他们的权贵们。
小红马甲 发表于 2023-07-19 01:15

朱令父母去世的时候,虽说带不走孙维,但至少希望留下一个绝笔,让真相能大白于天下
九州事尽知
这话说的。女生宿舍被盗,男小偷就自动排除嫌疑了?
uglyduck 发表于 2023-07-19 02:37

其实破案很简单的,你抓住了犯罪动机、犯罪手法、犯罪过程、凶器,基本上凶手就差不多了。贝志诚一个学计算机的,完全接触不到Ta盐(不是耗子药,是高纯度的铊盐),也没有能近距离接触朱的投毒方式,还有啥求而不得的啥狗屁动机,根本不成立,他大学和朱就没有任何交集了。所以当孙维把贝推出来当嫌疑人说事的时候,她就输了。。。
九州事尽知
建议真正感兴趣的吃瓜观众去看看没药花园的分析。时间线,事实总结的非常全面,分析的也合理。看完自己作判断吧。 https://m.huaren.us/showtopic/2648027.amp.html?page=1
awesomeiris 发表于 2023-07-19 03:11

没药的分析我觉得很接近于事实了
w
why2025
什么公安局长,都是网友或者那个神秘爆料人脑补的,还有啥孙维爷爷临终床前求江啥的,都是话本小说看多了,能当证据?
Thbzico777 发表于 2023-07-19 00:23

"孙维爷爷临终床前求江啥的" 这是贝志诚首先在新语丝披露的独家历史新编。
d
destiny2008
你说的有点道理
dltmddyd 发表于 2023-07-19 05:59

这些id大家都应该注意一下
d
destiny2008
别乱扣帽子,这种伤天害理的事情,不可能是一个寝室的人干的,如果有这么多人知情,早就内讧破案了,反而贝志诚这个单线跟朱令联系的高中同学最不容易打开突破口
Thbzico777 发表于 2023-07-19 00:02

铊帮的吧
W
Wugelvshi
"孙维爷爷临终床前求江啥的" 这是贝志诚首先在新语丝披露的独家历史新编。
why2025 发表于 2023-07-19 09:54

这里唯一逻辑不通的是。
如果凶手不是孙维,案件发生在清华,能接触金属的人和朱令的人就那么几个,就凭这孙家,朱家的能量,找不出真凶,只能说真凶就是这其中的一个。贝家和清华能力也不小,可就是生生的拖了几十年了。
北京警方90年代可没现在这么文明,刑讯逼供是常见的,一个惊动国家高层和最高学府的案件,警方就硬是没有给出个结论,连替罪羊也没有找一个,让这个案件这么吊着。
先不说朱家有找到凶犯的需求。假设凶手不是孙维,能量更大的孙家现在更急需找到凶手吧,因为孙维明显已经被严重影响了。按理说,孙家应该出面力压北京警方,动用自己所有的能力,还孙维一个清白。孙家这么有能力的家庭,同学受害,自己家公主,被人栽赃,就这么认怂了,也说不通吧。孙家应该不遗余力的提供嫌疑人的线索吧。不过更搞的是,竟然有一群人认为嫌疑人是贝,至少应该找个能够进女生宿舍的清华的嫌疑人吧。
h
habibi
朱令父母去世的时候,虽说带不走孙维,但至少希望留下一个绝笔,让真相能大白于天下
九州事尽知 发表于 2023-07-19 09:36

不用等他们去世前吧,如果朱令去世他们就可以公布了,反正什么都没有也不怕了,现在也是希望朱令能好好活到最后。
t
tgaa
不是有枪吗,孙维不怕人报复吗
l
littlelittle
逢朱令贴必顶🆙!!!法网恢恢,愿苍天眷顾朱令,等到真相大白的日子
W
Wugelvshi
不用等他们去世前吧,如果朱令去世他们就可以公布了,反正什么都没有也不怕了,现在也是希望朱令能好好活到最后。
habibi 发表于 2023-07-19 10:12

我是做法律的,这个案件现在的一个问题是,追诉时效其实已经过了。
按照刑法第八十七条,法定最高刑为无期徒刑、死刑的,经过二十年。如果二十年以后认为必须追诉的,须报请最高人民检察院核准。
这个案子简直是教科书式的,被害人及时报案了,公安机关也迅速立案了,犯罪嫌疑人没有逃避侦查(很多旧案没有追诉时效全靠犯罪人逃跑),全案没有定案,没有审判,但也没有销案。诉讼时效规定的每一条几乎都是完美切合的,除非现在能冒出一个完全无关的逃避侦查的嫌疑人来。
这个案子,除非天翻地覆,比如某人出面坦白,呈现新证据,否则最高检不可能出面核准。
因为如果警方检方在没有新证据的情况下,破案了,凶手就是同学。警方检方这几十年的不作为,明知道凶手但让人逍遥法外,这个带来的负面影响,会动摇根基的,还不如就当作没破案。
b
betterme
恶魔在人间
T
Thbzico777
其实破案很简单的,你抓住了犯罪动机、犯罪手法、犯罪过程、凶器,基本上凶手就差不多了。贝志诚一个学计算机的,完全接触不到Ta盐(不是耗子药,是高纯度的铊盐),也没有能近距离接触朱的投毒方式,还有啥求而不得的啥狗屁动机,根本不成立,他大学和朱就没有任何交集了。所以当孙维把贝推出来当嫌疑人说事的时候,她就输了。。。
九州事尽知 发表于 2023-07-19 09:44

你连基本的事实都不清楚,贝志诚是北大力学系的,怎么就不可能买不到铊盐了?相反,孙维这么多同学,不可能封住每一个人的嘴,而贝志诚是单线联系,他写的帖子漏洞百出,但凡有一个其他佐证,他早露馅了
f
fallfall
我是做法律的,这个案件现在的一个问题是,追诉时效其实已经过了。
按照刑法第八十七条,法定最高刑为无期徒刑、死刑的,经过二十年。如果二十年以后认为必须追诉的,须报请最高人民检察院核准。
这个案子简直是教科书式的,被害人及时报案了,公安机关也迅速立案了,犯罪嫌疑人没有逃避侦查(很多旧案没有追诉时效全靠犯罪人逃跑),全案没有定案,没有审判,但也没有销案。诉讼时效规定的每一条几乎都是完美切合的,除非现在能冒出一个完全无关的逃避侦查的嫌疑人来。
这个案子,除非天翻地覆,比如某人出面坦白,呈现新证据,否则最高检不可能出面核准。
因为如果警方检方在没有新证据的情况下,破案了,凶手就是同学。警方检方这几十年的不作为,明知道凶手但让人逍遥法外,这个带来的负面影响,会动摇根基的,还不如就当作没破案。

Wugelvshi 发表于 2023-07-19 10:34

同意最后一句话。觉得不太可能破案了,除非有石破天惊的新证据新证人。最后估计就和所有那些冤假错案一起烟消云散了。
a
alittlecat
你连基本的事实都不清楚,贝志诚是北大力学系的,怎么就不可能买不到铊盐了?相反,孙维这么多同学,不可能封住每一个人的嘴,而贝志诚是单线联系,他写的帖子漏洞百出,但凡有一个其他佐证,他早露馅了
Thbzico777 发表于 2023-07-19 11:06

这人就是孙维或者他们一伙的,可以查查IP地址。 如果来美国的话,完全可以起诉的。还有她这种要是在美国拿绿卡或者国籍,一定要在申请材料上撒谎的。
z
zhangxx818
你连基本的事实都不清楚,贝志诚是北大力学系的,怎么就不可能买不到铊盐了?相反,孙维这么多同学,不可能封住每一个人的嘴,而贝志诚是单线联系,他写的帖子漏洞百出,但凡有一个其他佐证,他早露馅了
Thbzico777 发表于 2023-07-19 11:06

楼里暴露了几个搅混水的。。。
z
zhangxx818
孙维和她们一个宿舍的,就算不是投毒,也都知情。。 为什么这么说? 要是我同宿舍的同学中毒了,还是两次,我要是完全不知情,我能不害怕? 害怕同屋的凶手再来下毒,害怕被误伤,我肯定再也不敢在这个宿舍住。。 孙维她们倒好,不但很淡定的继续住到毕业,还淡定的把朱令留下的面包都吃了。。 她们不怕面包里有毒吗?
c
clsying
我很好奇,世界上有很多花季少女都被人杀害,不比她惨得多吗?很多也没抓到凶手啊。所以为什么朱令案引起这么大关注呢,就因为她是清华的吗?为什么那些丧失生命而又没破案的少女没人关注呢?
公用马甲1 发表于 2023-07-18 15:17

世界上因为有别的恶人存在就可以不对这个恶人关注了吗 这是要和最差的恶人比吗 世间因果将来会很可怜的
c
chiffongirlx
网络上被黑客破解的同宿舍pigs之间的email,没办法证明是孙下毒,而其他人帮忙cover。
E
Ethangirl
朱令同寝室的人冒着犯罪被抓的风险下这样的毒手,到底是什么原因?失眠患抑郁症了?
feemy 发表于 2023-07-18 15:50

前几天版上不是一个贴讲清华北大学生因为睡不好觉抑郁的很多吗,搞不好这个孙维也是如此,只不过她不是自己寻求正当帮助,而是对其他人下狠手
V
Venwa75
你连基本的事实都不清楚,贝志诚是北大力学系的,怎么就不可能买不到铊盐了?相反,孙维这么多同学,不可能封住每一个人的嘴,而贝志诚是单线联系,他写的帖子漏洞百出,但凡有一个其他佐证,他早露馅了
Thbzico777 发表于 2023-07-19 11:06

大家说孙维是凶手,你说是没证据阴谋论,也没有必要给贝志诚泼脏水吧。立场这样分明,你的身份太可疑了!朱令这件事在国外人尽皆知,在国内确没人知道,就知道凶手在国内的势力有多大。如果是其它普通华季少女案件,用得着搞得这么铁板一块吗?建议定期就把这件案子拿出来讨论,免得国内刚出来的小同学不知道。
E
Ethangirl
谁说朱令一定是在宿舍被投毒的?第一次有症状后朱令已经不怎么住宿舍了,而贝经常去清华找朱令吃饭,完全具备作案条件,贝就靠不准确的英文描述就能有人敢断定原因是铊?现在视频诊断都不敢这样说!至于后来啥朱令宿舍物品不见,更是扯谈,几个水杯牙缸,是不是真的不见都难说,不排除贝故意造谣,爆料指向孙维,为自己脱身,就像造谣说孙维没拿到清华毕业证,后来孙维自己出来说拿到了,而贝是真的没拿到北大毕业证,这种情节完全就是凶手把自己的遭遇移花接木嫁接到孙维上,一般人没这个遭遇,拍脑袋也想不出来
Thbzico777 发表于 2023-07-18 23:03

言之凿凿。就问你一个问题,贝怎么能搞到 铊盐 这种严格管控剧毒实验室试剂的?
a
autofill
一般合伙犯案很难让所有人在长时间里闭嘴。这个宿舍几人死命维护的共同利益是啥?
一笑而过吗
贝志诚黑客了 孙维 跟同宿舍的同学一起 讨论应对 回应朱令案件的舆论 的邮件 据说是贝志诚黑客了 孙维的邮件发现了 她 跟同宿舍同学的邮件 - 讨论如何应对 朱令案件的舆论------------------------------------



孙释颜(原名:孙维)对高菲替她辩护文件的修改(红字为孙的修改)
先自我介绍一下,我是清华化学系物化二班的一员,朱令和孙维的同班女同学。在此我只想针对网上的一些言论把我了解的情况和想法写下来,我会尽量客观如实地记录。希望大家不要偏听偏信,人云亦云。 另外说明一下:我不说出自己的姓名是因为看到网上确实有一些不负责任的人肆意攻击。如果有人质疑我是马甲,或要求我说出姓名,请你先把自己的真名实姓联系方式公布出来,允许大家核实。到目前为止,指认孙维是凶手的人中除了贝志诚从来没有人说出过自己的姓名。 朱令94年底第一次发病,寒假之后回学校上学,当时身体看起来在康复中,可以去教室上课,离开宿舍去洗澡、煎药等等,并非传说中的卧床不起(Belle 自己斟酌是否可加);95年第二次发病,经互联网求助知道是铊中毒,随后清华派出所也找了一些同学(不止同班同学)了解情况,然后就没有下文了。 关于网上流传的孙维为了争演出机会而下毒的动机,之前已有网友从社团运行方式方面证实是不可能的。我想补充的是我所认识的孙维不可能这么小肚鸡肠,认识她的人都知道,她虽然是个伶牙俐齿的女孩,但心地善良、性格直爽,有什么说什么。而且她当时进民乐队学中阮也只是一个业余爱好,玩玩而已。 我和孙维不在同一个宿舍,但经常去她们屋串门,说实在的我非常羡慕她们的宿舍关系,朱令社团活动较多,少在宿舍,但和大家相处得也很融洽。我觉得这种宿舍不可能发生投毒的事情,所以我总是在想朱令会不会是在别处中的毒,甚至有没有可能是误服。现在网上有很多质疑二次投毒的声音,而且也有专业医生的意见认为有可能不是二次中毒,更加深了我的这种想法。 我对贝志诚网络求助一事一直很佩服,但看了天妒一文,觉得贝的某些言论非常的不负责任,这是人命关天的事情,总是拿一些道听途说和完全站不住脚不值一驳的所谓证据来煽情,无论对孙维还是对朱令都是一种侮辱和伤害。 十年了,孙维最终发了这个声明,我很佩服她的勇气。因为在网络上,任何事最终都可能搅成一堆浆糊,但我还是决定像我其他的同学一样站出来,说出我们知道的事实,谣言止于智者,真心地希望每个人在看帖回帖的时候都仔细地想想。 最后说明一点,网上很多同学说我们不关心朱令,这并不是事实。我们确实做得还不够,但我们在这里不说并不等于我们什么都没做。而且我们在这里说什么也不能给朱令任何实际的帮助。在此也呼吁大家用实际行动帮帮朱令,胜过在网上无谓地吵来吵去。 添加评论 16:12 | 固定链接 | 引用通告 (0) | 记录它
固定链接 关闭 http://spaces.msn.com/sunshiyan/blog/cns!AF1B937AC836F9C1!112.entry 薛钢替孙释颜辩护的征求意见稿 1. 95年4月孙维与诸多同学一同翻译电邮,结果由系领导转交协合。 2。化学系前有多篇论文涉及铊。 3。事后得知储存有铊的实验室就在我毕设的同一楼内。所有化学药品当时并无危险品管理措施,每日工作时间(至每晚10时许) 实验室并不上锁。同时该实验楼担负各系仪器分析实验课程。所谓孙维是唯一可接触铊的指责有失公允。 4。95年6月30日,学校毕业典礼,孙维未领到毕业和学位证书。 5。孙维与舍友关系非常融洽,至今仍是好友。不仅如此,由于其宿舍气氛最为活跃,经常是我班很多女生晚自习后集聚打闹之所。虽然如今遍布各地,她们仍保持着密切的联系,并数次小聚。 6。朱令是社团骨干,相对与同班同学相处时间较少,所以我们班男同学也觉得她平日比较"酷" 。但每当班级活动,朱令能参与的总是非常积极,出谋划策。未见其与班内同学有何矛盾。朱令在协合住院初期,孙维及其他女生们曾帮助看护,直至很快有了特护。 7。孙维性格非常直爽,心直口快,嘴还比较"损",爱开玩笑,但为人大气,属典型的北京女孩。 8。孙维曾在民乐队弹奏中阮,后退出。具体时间我不清楚,但有据可查,声明里提供的时间应为真实。 9。孙维的爷爷于1995年12月9日去世,这我记得很清楚。因为当时孙维非常伤心,班里同学曾一起安慰过她。而且直到当时,我才得知其爷爷是这么一位德高望重的老人。孙维在此之前从未提及。 添加评论 16:07 | 固定链接 | 引用通告 (0) | 记录它
关注朱令庚 Jun 27, 2006, 4:52:00 AM  孙释颜的发帖指南回帖纲要: 总纲: 须每天逐渐发贴. 尽量不要互相呼应(例外:以大学同班同学身份的可以适当呼应)。同时应当尽量回应其他人。建议互相加入一个MSN或其他IM. 1. 大学同班同学:发表对维
关注朱令庚 Jun 27, 2006, 4:53:33 AM  高菲的修改意见娘子, 看了几遍你的声明,觉得你写得挺好的,条理清晰,有凭有据。这么多年来,我们在你面前几乎从来不提这件事,潜意识是想淡忘,更怕伤害到你,看过你写的这些,才知道我们能做得简直就是杯水车薪。
关注朱令庚 Jun 27, 2006, 4:54:08 AM  通信之三 --- Hanlin Li <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry I haven't checked my home emails
关注朱令庚 Jun 27, 2006, 4:54:55 AM    to 精华 孙释颜和同学的通信 From: "wq" <[email protected]> View Contact Details Add Mobile Alert Subject: Re: I am back and need your contact info To: "Hanlin Li" <[email protected]>, [email protected], "Jin Ya" <[email protected]>, "sun wei" <[email protected]> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 13:35:20 +0800 so glad to hear from u from shanghai. my cell: 13600072567 PF: 13570066776 contact u later, see u. On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 18:06:27 -0800 (PST) Hanlin Li <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear piglets, > > I am back in China. It is a lot colder than I > expected, fortunately, indoor temp. is very > comfortable. > > I left from US in a hurry and didn't take your contact > informaiton with me, could all of you please send me > your phone numbers so I can reach you? > > I will start first: > > My home phone # at Anshan is : 0412-673-2565 and I > also have a cell phone @ 136-1080-9319. > > Qizi, > > please send me P4's phone # as well, so Gang can bug > him. :-) > > I am so looking forward to meeting all of you in > Shanghai! > > Talk to you later. > > Hanlin
Subject: Re: I am back and need your contact info To: "Hanlin Li" <[email protected]> CC: "Jin Ya" <[email protected]>, "sun wei" <[email protected]>,
"Qi Wang" <[email protected]> From: [email protected] View Contact Details Add Mobile Alert Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:14:02 +0800 My mobil phone is 13530655861. I am afraid I can not go to shanghai for reunion because these days our business is very busy. Sorry for this bad news. Merry x-mas and happy new year to all of you in advance. Hanlin Li <[email protected]> To 12/11/2005 10:06 [email protected], Jin Ya AM <[email protected]>, sun wei
<[email protected]>, Qi Wang <[email protected]> cc
Subject I am back and need your contact info
Dear piglets, I am back in China. It is a lot colder than I expected, fortunately, indoor temp. is very comfortable. I left from US in a hurry and didn't take your contact informaiton with me, could all of you please send me your phone numbers so I can reach you? I will start first: My home phone # at Anshan is : 0412-673-2565 and I also have a cell phone @ 136-1080-9319. Qizi, please send me P4's phone # as well, so Gang can bug him. :-) I am so looking forward to meeting all of you in Shanghai! Talk to you later. Hanlin
From: "wuhongfei99" <[email protected]> Add to Address Book Add Mobile Alert To: [email protected] Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 16:05:50 +0800 Subject: 来自清华 李含琳: 你好!你好! 无论是清华环境系校友的身份还是《南方周末》记者的名义,我都有足够的情感和理性在今天 继续关注朱令 “铊中毒”事件。这一事件十年前就引起轩然大波,十年后仍未定案,不仅朱 令同学本人深受其害,她的家人也一直处于孤独的痛苦当中,而且也给那些关心过朱令帮助过 朱令的朋友们留下了诸多不解和疑团。 我努力去找过化学系的老师和物化2班的同学。但是我还不敢惊动大部分人。包括一些退休的 老师.我了解的情况是:大家已经很尽力。而当时一些媒体的不当报道,却可能伤害了大家的感 情。大家一方面同情朱令,一方面又想保护同学.作为清华的学生,我不相信我的同学是冷漠 的,相反,我认为这里面,肯定存在着一些相互的误解和微妙的抵触.而这些究竟是什么?什么 造成了这种不信任?是不是怕伤害到了无辜?我也看到了有些同学,为孙维辩护.我完全理解:因 为我们不会傻到先定一个人有罪,再去寻找他的过失.这是无论如何一个有智商的人,都不会这 么做的。因为要公正,我相信你们也是这么想的。 昨天我甚至见到了和朱令一起演出的艺术团的一个校园歌手.也许大家都知道他。他现在已经 几乎很成名了,踌躇满志,要回清华开咖啡馆,在北院.当时我心里很难过,我听到一个98级化 学系的孩子说,年年提这个事情,年年没有结果.我听了更是伤感。 我去拜访过朱令父母。他们还在不停信访.朱母曾经因去年摔倒而开了脑颅.她感到自己老了, 家里也没有其他人了。没有人可以照顾朱令.她想的是,怎么办?如果她去了,她说,就让朱令也 和我一起去吧. 我当时,真是无话可说了。 他们并没有努力申诉自己的冤屈,我感到的不是他们的委屈和仇恨,而是对生命的尊重.是一种 意志力.活下去的意志.那时候,我甚至不敢问:你们恨不恨凶手.我不敢问。 而我做这个事情,只是希望。还能够从媒体角度,促使公安部门追查嫌疑人,让大家都有一个清 白的说法. 我和一个关注这个事情的朋友聊天,她说:“旧事重提,肯定会伤害到一些人的感情。可我认 为,面对承受了人生的残忍和不公的朱令,面对承受了这么大痛苦的朱家父母,作为健康、自 由、相对幸福生活着的人,如果只是因为怕伤害到自己和周围人的感情或者影响自己和周围人 的生活而永远选择沉默,使真相在时光中消逝,那么,未免太不公平。因为真相虽然是痛苦可 能甚至会触目惊心,但真相还是很重要的。因为我一直坚持,社会的正义和良心比个人平静温 暖的内心舒适似乎更为重要。” 我希望通过自己实实在在的努力为她做些什么。作为《南方周末》的一名职业记者,我深知, 虽然媒体是本着维护正义,保护弱者的立场进行追踪和关注,但我们并不能干预办案或是有罪 推论,我们能够做的和最终力图做到的,只是抛开外界纷杂不一的说法,如实记录朱令的同学 、家人,也就是所有了解她关心她愿意帮帮她的朋友们真实的声音。 我承认,我是一个多事者, 虽然我也曾在清华园度过了九年光阴.实际上我根本不必要关心 社会新闻,我的志向不在这里。但是等我见到朱的父母时,我就知道我必须追问下去,即便是没 有结果,即便是…因为没有做好而丢失了一个记者应有的职业口碑.我很希望自己能给朱令的 父母一些实际的帮助,也希望你们不要有太多的顾虑,信任我支持我。谋事在人,成事在天。 我相信苍天在上,我失败一次,以后还会有人追问的。但我依然相信你们,我的同学们,我相信 天下人的心是善良的,我也相信,我能够公正地呈现这个当年的事实. 谢谢你们。 所以,我能做的事情,不是追查,没有公安的证据我是不会定罪的,我只想呈现一个事实,大 家在一种悲愤和沉郁之下,我们能够做的微薄之力,就是,即便是不知情,也要说出不知情,也要 说出:我们需要知情. 我有看到过很多你的发言.此事我一直在关注着.我们没有高调介入是因为我们还在不想惊动太 多人。如果你愿意发言...我很愿意.保护你的一切:姓名,住址联络方法.这是一个基本的职业 道德。请你信任我. 《南方周末》记者 Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:11:15 -0800 (PST)
From: "Yes No" <[email protected]> View Contact Details Add Mobile Alert Yahoo! DomainKeys has confirmed that this message was sent by yahoo.com. Learn more Subject: Will you have time in the next week? To: [email protected], "Hanlin Li" <[email protected]>, "Jin Ya"
<[email protected]>, "Qi Wang" <[email protected]> Dear piglets I'm pretty bad these days. As you probablly have (or have not) heard about it, People are discussing about the rumor (basically cursing me) on hundreds of websites in China and the rumor is now wide spread all over my friends & colleagues... In such a case, it's very difficult for me to keep silence anymore. So I'm considering clarifying about it. I'm now spending all my "leasure" time drafting the "clarification". I'd like to send for you to help review it before publish, hopefully within a week. Will you have time then? Subject: Re: Will you have time in the next week? To: "Yes No" <[email protected]> CC: "Hanlin Li" <[email protected]>, "Jin Ya" <[email protected]>, "Qi
Wang" <[email protected]> From: [email protected] View Contact Details Add Mobile Alert Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 11:44:17 +0800 Dear Wei, I am really shocked by your e-mail because I haven't noticed it in internet at all. Really sorry for you. Of course I will leave time for you. If you would like to leave Beijing for a while, my home is always open for you. And if there is anything I can do for you, just tell me. Wish you are strong enough and every bad thing is smooth as soon as possible. Take care, baby! Gao Yes No <sunweihere@yahoo .com> To [email protected], Hanlin Li 12/19/2005 11:11 <[email protected]>, Jin Ya AM <[email protected]>, Qi Wang <[email protected]> cc
Subject Will you have time in the next week?
Dear piglets I'm pretty bad these days. As you probablly have (or have not) heard about it, People are discussing about the rumor (basically cursing me) on hundreds of websites in China and the rumor is now wide spread all over my friends & colleagues... In such a case, it's very difficult for me to keep silence anymore. So I'm considering clarifying about it. I'm now spending all my "leasure" time drafting the "clarification". I'd like to send for you to help review it before publish, hopefully within a week. Will you have time then? Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 20:52:03 -0800 (PST)
From: "Jin Ya" <[email protected]> View Contact Details Add Mobile Alert Yahoo! DomainKeys has confirmed that this message was sent by yahoo.com. Learn more Subject: Re: Will you have time in the next week?
To: [email protected], "Hanlin Li" <[email protected]>, "Qi Wang" <[email protected]>, "sun wei" <[email protected]> Yeah, I didn't notice either. People can be really mean, disgusting and irresponsible when they can speak anonymously. Niangzi, be strong and take care! Surely I have time. As Belle said, if anything we can help, don't hesitate, we support you at any circumstances. Jin --- [email protected] wrote: > Dear Wei, > > I am really shocked by your e-mail because I haven't > noticed it in internet > at all. Really sorry for you. Of course I will leave > time for you. If you > would like to leave Beijing for a while, my home is > always open for you. > And if there is anything I can do for you, just tell > me. > > Wish you are strong enough and every bad thing is > smooth as soon as > possible. > > Take care, baby!
> Gao > > > > > Yes No > > <sunweihere@yahoo > > .com> > To > > [email protected], Hanlin Li > 12/19/2005 11:11 > <[email protected]>, Jin Ya > AM
> <[email protected]>, Qi Wang > > <[email protected]> > > cc > > > > Subject > Will you have > time in the next > week? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear piglets > I'm pretty bad these days. As you probablly have (or > have not) heard about it, People are discussing > about > the rumor (basically cursing me) on hundreds of > websites in China and the rumor is now wide spread > all > over my friends & colleagues... > > In such a case, it's very difficult for me to keep > silence anymore. So I'm considering clarifying about > it. > I'm now spending all my "leasure" time drafting the > "clarification". > I'd like to send for you to help review it before > publish, hopefully within a week. > > Will you have time then?
> > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 01:23:57 -0800 (PST)
From: "Yes No" <[email protected]> View Contact Details Add Mobile Alert Yahoo! DomainKeys has confirmed that this message was sent by yahoo.com. Learn more Subject: Re: Will you have time in the next week? To: "Jin Ya" <[email protected]>, [email protected], "Hanlin
Li" <[email protected]>, "Qi Wang" <[email protected]> Thank you all piglets!! Your mails makes me stronger and I will never be knocked down! :) Remember our old saying in dorm that we want to get famous in public? -- Now I'm achieving it. It's still not the worst case yet, but I'm prepared... sooner or later... Anyway, let's see... --- Jin Ya <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah, I didn't notice either. People can be really > mean, disgusting and irresponsible when they can > speak > anonymously. Niangzi, be strong and take care! > > Surely I have time. As Belle said, if anything we > can > help, don't hesitate, we support you at any > circumstances. > > Jin > > --- [email protected] wrote: > > > Dear Wei, > > > > I am really shocked by your e-mail because I > haven't > > noticed it in internet > > at all. Really sorry for you. Of course I will > leave > > time for you. If you > > would like to leave Beijing for a while, my home > is > > always open for you. > > And if there is anything I can do for you, just > tell > > me. > > > > Wish you are strong enough and every bad thing is > > smooth as soon as > > possible. > > > > Take care, baby!
> > Gao > > > > > > > > > > > Yes No > > > > > <sunweihere@yahoo > > > > > .com> > > > To > > > > [email protected], Hanlin Li > > 12/19/2005 11:11 > > <[email protected]>, Jin Ya > > AM
> > <[email protected]>, Qi Wang > > > > <[email protected]> > > > > > cc > > > > > > > > > > Subject > > Will you > have > > time in the next > > week? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear piglets > > I'm pretty bad these days. As you probablly have > (or > > have not) heard about it, People are discussing > > about > > the rumor (basically cursing me) on hundreds of > > websites in China and the rumor is now wide spread > > all > > over my friends & colleagues... > > > > In such a case, it's very difficult for me to keep > > silence anymore. So I'm considering clarifying > about > > it. > > I'm now spending all my "leasure" time drafting > the > > "clarification". > > I'd like to send for you to help review it before > > publish, hopefully within a week. > > > > Will you have time then?
> > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > > protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 08:31:45 -0800 (PST)
From: "Yes No" <[email protected]> View Contact Details Add Mobile Alert Yahoo! DomainKeys has confirmed that this message was sent by yahoo.com. Learn more Subject: can you help review the doc? To: [email protected], "Hanlin Li" <[email protected]>, "Jin Ya"
<[email protected]>, "Qi Wang" <[email protected]> Dear all Here is my draft doc. If you have time, pls help to review it from an outsider point of view, to see if there are some parts that is not proper or could cause some misunderstanding etc. Any comments welcome! It would be great if you can give the feedback by Friday night so that I can do the modification before publish. Many thanks! attach1_by_sw_20051222.doc
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 02:25:43 -0800 (PST)
From: "Yes No" <[email protected]> View Contact Details Add Mobile Alert Yahoo! DomainKeys has confirmed that this message was sent by yahoo.com. Learn more Subject: So Moved! To: "Hanlin Li" <[email protected]>, [email protected], "Jin Ya"
<[email protected]>, "Qi Wang" <[email protected]> Dear everyone! I'm soooooo moved by all of you! Of cause you all are my BEST friends, lifetime friends (although I removed the "best" friends statement in the doc that I'm currently modifying, changed to "good" -- it might bring negative effect if people want to make story out of it)! I can't express with words but I have to admit that when I read the mail from all of you, I can't control my tears, even now. What a strange creature human being is -- when people are beating, hurting, humiliating you, you are strong and never show sorrow, but when you friends are comming with warm heart and words, you, on the contrary, start to cry. Anyway, no matter what happens, I always repeat to myself, that I am not the poorest person in world and I will never be knocked down. There are too many examples that people sufferied much much more that I do. So what I'm now experiencing is nothing. For example, Zhu Ling's family is more poorer, and they sufferred much much more. Of cause I don't like their way of doing things but it's also understandable to some extent. I'm still making modifications based on some early comment. If I can finish it by tonight, I will send you to review again. Anyway, let's see... Hope it doesn't cause you too much trouble :(
--- Hanlin Li <[email protected]> wrote: > Niangzi, > > I just saw your email this morning and gave a first > read of the document. It is a well written document, > very objective, with lots of facts, which made the > document credible. I believe anyone who is not > biased > would get the right message. I am going to read it > again, being a devil's advocate this time, and get > back to you tonight. > > As a close friend of yours (I assumed), I feel so > ashamed when I read your clarification, I had no > idea > what you have been through. If I were in your shoes, > I > may be collapsed already. I am really proud of you, > after going through all this, you are still a > strong, > optimistic, cheerful girl, still the old Sun Xiaozhu > we know of. I hope you will only grow stronger and > happier from now on, as we (your best friends, I am > speaking for all of the piglets here) will always be > on your side, support you and fight back with you. > > Last but not least, wish you best of luck. I do > believe after the issuance of your document, the > public should get a clearer and more truthful > picture > of the whole thing, and give you back the oridinary > life you've been wishing for. > > If anything I could be help with, don't hesitate to > ask.
> > Hanlin > > > --- Yes No <[email protected]> wrote: > > > passward is "thetruth"
> > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > > protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 23:14:53 +0800 (CST) From: "belle gao" <[email protected]> View Contact Details Add
Mobile Alert Yahoo! DomainKeys has confirmed that this message was sent by yahoo.com.cn. Learn more Subject: reply from gaofei To: [email protected][email protected][email protected], [email protected] Dear niangzi, refer to the attachment. take care. Gao attach2_by_gaofei_reply.doc Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 23:14:53 +0800 (CST) From: "belle gao" <[email protected]> View Contact Details Add Mobile Alert Subject: reply from gaofei To: [email protected][email protected][email protected], [email protected] Dear niangzi, refer to the attachment. take care. Gao attach3_by_gaofei_reply.doc Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 08:35:22 -0800 (PST)
From: "Yes No" <[email protected]> View Contact Details Add Mobile Alert Yahoo! DomainKeys has confirmed that this message was sent by yahoo.com. Learn more Subject: new version for review To: "belle gao" <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected][email protected] Dear all As said, I'm speechless, so have nothing to say. Here is the new version after consolidating all your precious comment, not 100% yet cos I don't have time :(. Anyway, if you have time tomorrow, pls have a look. I properly need your support after I publish this one, but I don't know exactly how. Let's talk about it a bit later. Merry Xmas! attach4_by_sw_20051224_v3.doc Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:01:14 +0800 (CST) From: "belle gao" <[email protected]> View Contact Details Add
Mobile Alert Yahoo! DomainKeys has confirmed that this message was sent by yahoo.com.cn. Learn more Subject: 回复: new version for review To: "Yes No" <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected][email protected] Dear Niangzi, I have looked through the new version. This edition is more clear in stating reality. For content, I have no further advices. As I said, even the content is perfect, maybe there are still some captious persons. I think we will face more fireworks in internet, you must be strong and ready to face them. Once you publish it, tell us the link and also as more as possilbe friends. We also want to support you in situ in internet. Merry x-mas to you and xxx! Gao Yes No <[email protected]> 写道: Dear all As said, I'm speechless, so have nothing to say. Here is the new version after consolidating all your precious comment, not 100% yet cos I don't have time :(. Anyway, if you have time tomorrow, pls have a look. I properly need your support after I publish this one, but I don't know exactly how. Let's talk about it a bit later. Merry Xmas! __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL ?Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 23:40:32 -0800 (PST)
From: "Jin Ya" <[email protected]> View Contact Details Add Mobile Alert Yahoo! DomainKeys has confirmed that this message was sent by yahoo.com. Learn more Subject: Re: to open the 2nd version :( To: "Yes No" <[email protected]>, "Fei Gao" <[email protected]>, "Hanlin Li" <[email protected]>, "Qi Wang" <[email protected]> 娘子, 我看过第二版了,再提出几点意见,还是权作参考。 1。“...朱令也是校社团的积极分子。社团和团委的骨干成员有单独的宿舍楼,不分院系、年级,既没有熄灯和用电限制也不锁楼门,是大家聚会、活动的中心。朱令经常回宿舍很晚。她第一次中毒后返校期间仍然每天中午去社团或团委煎药,据她自己说也有时是别人提前帮她煎好了的。”这一段如果写得再圆滑一点就好了,象加个“举个例子来说”,“比如说”这样的词句。如果我是不知情的人,很可能会觉得你在暗示这个情况和中毒有密切关系,如果不是你的本意的话,可能会有一些反面作用。看你的考虑。 2。你爷爷那一段,我觉得挺好的。不过能不能稍微表达一下你爷爷出身贫寒,自己奋斗成材的意思,反正就是别让人觉得你们家是那种大的“世家”,有很多人罩着的那种。 3。“前不久的xxx杀妻案为什么会被判刑?就是因为“死者”家属有怀疑,而且又找到了一具女尸,看似证据确凿,而xxx又拿不出证据证明自己无罪。其实这也是许多未破案件时一些被怀疑人遇到的共同问题。”看到这一段我是想到了你说的应该是"Simpson"的案子,但我的印象不深,google以后才了解了详情和最后判决,但其他人会不会也能立刻想到?不过也许国内新闻曾广泛报道过?另外,我google后的感觉是这个案子实在太复杂了,所以好多人好像还是对Simpson到底杀妻没有心存疑虑。再让你家里人帮你参谋参谋,别起到了反作用。 我觉得你写得挺好的,这些意见都是我尽量站在不知情人的角度上吹毛求疵的结果:)。我和其他小猪的担心一样,写得再好,也会有人故意或不故意地曲解。而且这两天我在想,如果是朱家刻意地散布这些谣言,可能就是为了把你逼出来,现在也算达到了目的了,sigh。不过也没法再躲了。但你一定要做好心理准备,要我们帮忙的尽管说,另外怎么发表,从什么渠道,多少网站开始,还有对可能发生情况的应对(来自朱家,公安什么的),也要做好准备。虽然我知道你家里人和xxx肯定已经帮你想到了,还是忍不住多个嘴:P. 好了,正经事说完了,祝各个小猪圣诞快乐,新年好!


s
shengshengman
你连基本的事实都不清楚,贝志诚是北大力学系的,怎么就不可能买不到铊盐了?相反,孙维这么多同学,不可能封住每一个人的嘴,而贝志诚是单线联系,他写的帖子漏洞百出,但凡有一个其他佐证,他早露馅了
Thbzico777 发表于 2023-07-19 11:06

你要么没上过大学,要么故意搅浑水。九十年代大学生宿舍尤其女生宿舍都是封闭管理的,男生进去一次都很难,怎么能知道朱令宿舍里哪些东西是她的,哪些是她舍友的?
s
shengshengman
网络上被黑客破解的同宿舍pigs之间的email,没办法证明是孙下毒,而其他人帮忙cover。
chiffongirlx 发表于 2023-07-19 12:39

罪犯不是还怀疑过她家里被装窃听器了吗?所以她绝不会轻易透漏她的犯罪事实的,她肯定比谁都清楚一不小心说漏嘴是要丢了性命的。
f
feemy
前几天版上不是一个贴讲清华北大学生因为睡不好觉抑郁的很多吗,搞不好这个孙维也是如此,只不过她不是自己寻求正当帮助,而是对其他人下狠手
Ethangirl 发表于 2023-07-19 12:49

据说好像寻求过帮助,她们宿舍几个女生要求学校调宿舍,但是校方未予理睬,所以校方责任也挺大的,后来学校偏袒她们可能是因为知道一旦真相暴露自己也难辞其咎。当然,校方一开始也没想到她们会采取这么极端的手段,大学宿舍睡不好觉的人多了,最后也都挺过去了。
中国有句话:宁惹醉汉,莫惹睡汉。
驫龘麤靐
据说好像寻求过帮助,她们宿舍几个女生要求学校调宿舍,但是校方未予理睬,所以校方责任也挺大的,后来学校偏袒她们可能是因为知道一旦真相暴露自己也难辞其咎。当然,校方一开始也没想到她们会采取这么极端的手段,大学宿舍睡不好觉的人多了,最后也都挺过去了。
中国有句话:宁惹醉汉,莫惹睡汉。
feemy 发表于 2023-07-19 14:39

当年清华有个案子,上下铺,上铺睡觉总是开着walkman戴着耳机听点啥,自己听着听着就睡着了,漏出来的声音就吵得下铺睡不着,有一天下铺越想越生气,就抄起一个板凳砸过去,结果砸掉牙齿若干。
f
feemy
当年清华有个案子,上下铺,上铺睡觉总是开着walkman戴着耳机听点啥,自己听着听着就睡着了,漏出来的声音就吵得下铺睡不着,有一天下铺越想越生气,就抄起一个板凳砸过去,结果砸掉牙齿若干。
驫龘麤靐 发表于 2023-07-19 14:47

不奇怪,我老公睡觉打呼噜,我以前经常起杀心。幸好后来发现耳塞子可以救命。
s
shengshengman
不奇怪,我老公睡觉打呼噜,我以前经常起杀心。幸好后来发现耳塞子可以救命。
feemy 发表于 2023-07-19 14:50

你这太可怕了,为什么不分床睡呢?
c
charming999
回复 101楼一笑而过吗的帖子
有句老话,天下人悠悠众口,岂能堵之。这么多同学愿意出来为孙维澄清贝志诚扑风捉影泼的脏水,足见孙维没啥问题,经得起质疑。
相反,贝志诚跟孙维单线联系,没有进一步佐证,而且有的没的把脏水往孙维身上引,比如“清华不发毕业证”这种情节其实是“北大不发毕业证给他”嫁接到孙维身上,更是可疑
Thbzico777 发表于 2023-07-19 04:37

你说这么多同学为孙维辩护,有多少? 我们怎么觉得就你们几个呢!不就孙铊和她的舍友们吗?
九州事尽知
你连基本的事实都不清楚,贝志诚是北大力学系的,怎么就不可能买不到铊盐了?相反,孙维这么多同学,不可能封住每一个人的嘴,而贝志诚是单线联系,他写的帖子漏洞百出,但凡有一个其他佐证,他早露馅了
Thbzico777 发表于 2023-07-19 11:06

虽然你可能纯来搅浑水的,但我还是要回复你。孙维能接触到铊盐不是清华那边的实验室告诉公安的,是公安追踪铊盐的销售渠道确定了全北京能接触到铊盐的机构,就是清华的那个化学实验室,然后才发现和朱有交集并且在这个实验室里干活的就只有孙。94年还没有阿里巴巴,你以为铊盐能随便在网上买到么?那时候连网都没有。只有专门的供应机构,而且这样剧毒的化学品都得靠着单位的介绍信去购买的,要不然朱这件事之前被下毒的基本上都是耗子药。通过投毒的方式(第二次是小量多次,以及被偷盗的洗漱用品),基本上可以确定投毒的人在她们寝室 。假设不是孙,而是另外两个,偶尔听到孙跟她们吹嘘自己能接触到铊盐,悄悄跑到实验室去偷的铊盐然后给朱投的毒,那这案子能这么被压着不公开?所以真相只有一个,孙维大概率是投毒的凶手。