In a companywide meeting with Meta employees today that The Verge watched, the CEO said Apple’s device didn’t present any major breakthroughs in technology that Meta hadn’t “already explored” and that its vision for how people will use the device is “not the one that I want.” He also pointed to the fact that Meta’s upcoming Quest 3 headset will be much cheaper, at $499 compared to the Vision Pro’s $3,499 price tag, giving Meta the opening to reach a wider user base.
VisionPro is good for Quest actually. the price gap is so huge, some users who are enticed by the VR/AR experiences who could not afford VisionPro would go for a Quest. so it could be a win-win if VisionPro is truly good.
他要啥?
你确定非安卓用户都会去买$3499的vision pro?
both of them are just trying to put a TV on your nose.
所以估计希望都不大。
肯定不会。但是,iPhone的无线耳机没出的时候,好多人都买便宜的各种版本戴着。出了之后大部分人都用苹果的耳机了。各种适配功能和iOS更匹配。
哪个角度都秒杀小札的吧 。如何差不多?
但是小渣的便宜啊,他可以定个1299,苹果比得了这价钱吗?
明摆着价格优势在那, 另外oculus 的 eco system 好太多太多了。 VP 除了了放照片就是放视频, 还有啥? 竟然敢说各方面。还有带的舒畅度, VP 那宽厚的带,很容易让人后脑闷热, 如果做点有运动性的,肯定热得不行。 还有就是竟然还是有线的, 什么鬼。女的衣服绝少有口袋, 难道还有手拿着电池吗?
苹果以后就跟LV一样 是区分阶级的利器了 一个手机1500,头显3500, 各种配套2000,再来个laptop 3-5000 没有一万刀玩不起了
如果用来看电影的话,单身的会买。