The Texas Senate passed a bill to ban higher education institutions in Texas from implementing tenure, a lifetime contract, with employees. The bill passed by a vote of 18-11, with two Republicans absent and one Democrat supporting it.
何止公立大学，如果选举结果不满意，选到我满意为止 Texas Senate Passes Bill Allowing State to Rerun Harris County Elections May 2, 2023 WASHINGTON, D.C. — On Tuesday, May 2, the Texas Senate passed Senate Bill 1993, which would give the secretary of state the authority to order a new election under certain circumstances in counties with at least 2.7 million people. Only Harris County, a Democratic stronghold and the country’s third most populous county, would be affected by this bill as it has 4.7 million people. S.B. 1993 now goes to the state House for consideration. S.B. 1993 would allow the secretary of state to order a new election in Harris County if at least 2% of polling places run out of usable ballots during voting hours and also if these polling places don’t receive extra ballots within one hour of running out. Under the terms of the law, the secretary of state wouldn’t actually have to prove that any polling places did run out of ballots; they would merely need to have “good cause to believe ” that there was a shortage. Additionally, they wouldn’t have to prove that election administration issues affected the outcome of the election.
何止公立大学，如果选举结果不满意，选到我满意为止 Texas Senate Passes Bill Allowing State to Rerun Harris County Elections May 2, 2023 WASHINGTON, D.C. — On Tuesday, May 2, the Texas Senate passed Senate Bill 1993, which would give the secretary of state the authority to order a new election under certain circumstances in counties with at least 2.7 million people. Only Harris County, a Democratic stronghold and the country’s third most populous county, would be affected by this bill as it has 4.7 million people. S.B. 1993 now goes to the state House for consideration. S.B. 1993 would allow the secretary of state to order a new election in Harris County if at least 2% of polling places run out of usable ballots during voting hours and also if these polling places don’t receive extra ballots within one hour of running out. Under the terms of the law, the secretary of state wouldn’t actually have to prove that any polling places did run out of ballots; they would merely need to have “good cause to believe ” that there was a shortage. Additionally, they wouldn’t have to prove that election administration issues affected the outcome of the election.
何止公立大学，如果选举结果不满意，选到我满意为止 Texas Senate Passes Bill Allowing State to Rerun Harris County Elections May 2, 2023 WASHINGTON, D.C. — On Tuesday, May 2, the Texas Senate passed Senate Bill 1993, which would give the secretary of state the authority to order a new election under certain circumstances in counties with at least 2.7 million people. Only Harris County, a Democratic stronghold and the country’s third most populous county, would be affected by this bill as it has 4.7 million people. S.B. 1993 now goes to the state House for consideration. S.B. 1993 would allow the secretary of state to order a new election in Harris County if at least 2% of polling places run out of usable ballots during voting hours and also if these polling places don’t receive extra ballots within one hour of running out. Under the terms of the law, the secretary of state wouldn’t actually have to prove that any polling places did run out of ballots; they would merely need to have “good cause to believe ” that there was a shortage. Additionally, they wouldn’t have to prove that election administration issues affected the outcome of the election.
This law like many in America are unconstitutional and also violates Florida's existing Sunshine Laws. — Rev. Dr. Paul P. Waldmiller🌏🌐 (@DrWaldmiller) May 3, 2023
Wow! There is currently a MASSIVE rally outside and inside the Ohio statehouse with folks wrapped around the building protesting the GOP effort to change the Ohio Constitution. This is democracy at work. (h/t @DavidPepper) pic.twitter.com/aTcWxrvEJj — MeidasTouch (@MeidasTouch) May 3, 2023
The Texas Senate passed a bill to ban higher education institutions in Texas from implementing tenure, a lifetime contract, with employees. The bill passed by a vote of 18-11, with two Republicans absent and one Democrat supporting it.
The Texas Senate passed a bill to ban higher education institutions in Texas from implementing tenure, a lifetime contract, with employees. The bill passed by a vote of 18-11, with two Republicans absent and one Democrat supporting it.
The Texas Senate passed a bill to ban higher education institutions in Texas from implementing tenure, a lifetime contract, with employees. The bill passed by a vote of 18-11, with two Republicans absent and one Democrat supporting it.
哪个有才能想当教授的新人吃饱撑的去一个没 tenure 还只赚一点点的红州公校啊。以后美国名校只有私立以及一些蓝州公立。哪天要是国家层面也过了这样的法案，美国做为世界上大学教育强国的历史也就画上了句号。
The Texas Senate passed a bill to ban higher education institutions in Texas from implementing tenure, a lifetime contract, with employees.
The bill passed by a vote of 18-11, with two Republicans absent and one Democrat supporting it.
🔥 最新回帖
你说这话看来连博士都没读过
你这一看就知道是没混过academia的
是啊，55岁怎么会干不动。 看到的都是55岁很多空巢了，早上到得最早，晚上走得最晚
🛋️ 沙发板凳
红州人民去教堂就行了 以后神职人员都给tenure
建议议员任期不超过四届
这也没道理 不是他想当议员，是人民要选他当议员，你凭啥拦着？
Texas Senate Passes Bill Allowing State to Rerun Harris County Elections May 2, 2023 WASHINGTON, D.C. — On Tuesday, May 2, the Texas Senate passed Senate Bill 1993, which would give the secretary of state the authority to order a new election under certain circumstances in counties with at least 2.7 million people. Only Harris County, a Democratic stronghold and the country’s third most populous county, would be affected by this bill as it has 4.7 million people. S.B. 1993 now goes to the state House for consideration. S.B. 1993 would allow the secretary of state to order a new election in Harris County if at least 2% of polling places run out of usable ballots during voting hours and also if these polling places don’t receive extra ballots within one hour of running out. Under the terms of the law, the secretary of state wouldn’t actually have to prove that any polling places did run out of ballots; they would merely need to have “good cause to believe ” that there was a shortage. Additionally, they wouldn’t have to prove that election administration issues affected the outcome of the election.
估计老美不会有人读了，都是外国留学生读，外国人做教授
影响议员们利益的法案那是绝对不会过的，大法官们是终身的。这些算不算三权分立制度的漏洞？
在位者有竞争优势
大头表示，早知如此，当年操作上可以技术性微调一下，就不会那么坏了名声
那总统为啥不能用你这个理由呢？
gop果然牛
唯一的负面影响就是企业很难招到受教育程度高的人才，对本地经济不太好。
不过呢，以前共和党还假装很在乎经济的，现在看着是只要能掌权，怎么都行。
fl的gop也牛，不能让tx独美。
挺好的 看红州人民怎么想吧 支持的就可以继续投狗屁党
公校直接变神学院多好
美国几十个州里面，经济垫底的都是红州，一直是蓝州的盈余来补贴红州的窟窿。支持美国分裂，红州一国，蓝州一国。赌一分钱，红州撑不过两年。
咋分裂? 开放的都在两岸。地理上都不连着。只能是中间分一个落后保守的 GOP 国。然后西海岸一个国。东岸North Carolina 以上一个国。然后重兵把守。很多女性会想逃到两边。
又不是农村包围城市。本来就是傻缺德州，冰雪天都搞不定，水灾也搞不定，但是整人绝对不落后。大米大学会不会是最后还有tenure track的地方。
你不会以为IL，WI,mi是红州吧
军工和军人基本都是红州，打起来蓝州大概跟当年法国差不多吧，尤其是精神层面
红州最后都变成west virginia
兰州要实现粮食自足根本不难，就算是纽约这样的，上州长岛东部啥的有的是田地
扯蛋，加州的军港军工相当厉害，真要打仗了兰州的一样勇猛保家卫国
马工们搞精准导弹drone打的红脖子鬼哭狼嚎，脑子永远比肌肉管用
德州洪波牛皮哄哄，几百个人在小学门口等着收尸
不要啊，最好有几个不红不蓝的州留给正常人……
只要团结一部分的加拿大，就连起来了
烦的就是这些发考题臭老九， 居然还有永久工作开除不了。 这下傻眼了吧
脑子确实比肌肉管用，这么说来你原来是红州的
参众两院里多少像Feinstein和Pelosi这样在议会一待几十年，做到七老八十走不动还不退休的，跟终身制有什么区别？
有道理。
你这。。。 够偏激的。
同意。很多发考题就是在瞎混不干活。真有水平, 有干劲的，还怕会掉到bottom 被开掉? 总有愿意上进的人进来的。
请问这个法案对已经tenured的有影响吗？ 比如：会不会取消所有已经tenured的？
另外，已经入职的tenure-track，将来能不能参评tenured，是能，还是不能？
最后，法案生效后，是所有入职的，都没有tenured，还是没有tenure-track？还是所有入职的，都是research non-tenure track.
可是年轻的时候干的好的，拼的也很带劲的FACULTY，年长后，比如到了55岁干劲不足了，拿不到funding了，但是还没有到可以退休的年龄 因为涉及到养老金。如果被FIRE了 可咋整？
跟其他的专业人士一样啊，年纪大了干劲不行了，就靠以前的积累啊，专业度，经验，人脉，都积累到一定程度是炒不掉的。 会炒掉的只有那些拿到 tenure 后就瞎混，根本也无所谓积累不积累的那种。
加州20年前还是gop大本营 现在大片地方还是红区
就是，其实真金不怕火炼，混日子的那就自求多福吧，出来混早晚要还的
这不是还有寒暑假吗？ 福利又好。
如果像你说的这种业务这么强的，不当教授也可以找到很多其它工作
不是赞成狗屁党，只是大学的tenure制度发展到现在早已经是糟粕了，就算不废除也应该彻底改革了
那就去工业界呗，反正现在大学本科教课的本来也都是些研究生，教授嫌待遇低就找待遇高的工业界工作
工业界直接创造价值，所以赚钱，学术界不赚钱，是烧钱的，而且烧钱烧出的产出绝大部份是废品，极少部分是指导工业界的有用知识，所以学术界绝大部分人根本不值得高报酬，只有极少部分人值得
把工资提上去？那额外需要的钱谁出呢？德州人民出？
当然我没意见啊。。。
真正了解academia 的都知道现在学术界有多烂。虽然不能说tenure制度是唯一的罪魁祸首，但是这个制度真的需要改革了。
何止光是中美？你去看看欧洲，这10年倒车速度更快
黄川粉不是一直对大学耿耿于怀，嫌弃他们教坏了孩子吗？现在最好了，都去教会念大学！
双向选择咯，工资低，又没保障，那就去同样没有保障，但是工资高一点的地方咯。
上学时候看到理工科大多数tenure以后的教授根本躺不平，必须要给自己找钱养活一个组多少口人。 就是想躺平这系里peer pressure大的不行，吃这口饭的不能让人看不起。否则资源就真的远离自己了。 当然助理教授一个个卷的更是不停。
刚刚55岁根本没有干不动的，天天起早贪黑打鸡血一样比学生博后体力好多了。不少教授是真心热爱科研甚至有点儿偏执。其实这样的人根本就不需要tenure来保障什么未来，他们也才是科学进步的希望。
文科不清楚。
公立学校很大的问题就是很多课都是TA教的，还都是刚跳船英语都不利索的。想想当年自己就这样。 好在学生都比较宽容评分还不错。换到出学费的家长身上就未必这样想了。
学校里面好的本科生instructor给个tenure我倒是支持。好讲师真太难遇到了。
这个主要是为了限制文科教授的发言自由的. 但最后造成的结果呢, 是理工科的人留不住. 就是因为红州, 我们已经好多年招不到人了. 来面试的中国人我都实话跟他讲这地方没法呆. 文科倒是应该总能招到人.
看起来美国也受不了言论自由了，右派要是说道左派的某些人群，工作不保，左派教授们要是说道教徒们不爱听的，搞掉 tenure 。
这个世界真是越变越差了。
纯文科读博的美国人不会少, 这些专业的其他普通工作工资也很低. 理工科读博的美国人本来也不多. 我能理解共和党讨厌大学. 那怕就是我这样理工专业, 看着这些学生从入学到毕业, 他们的观念也改变了很多. 再差的学生也学会了查资料, 找原始数据. covid期间大学要求带口罩, 学生都很讲规矩. 本地中学就不行了, 家长带着孩子各种抗议.
你知不支持LG B T，你总人口里都有3%到5%的人就是LGB T。他不是说你不支持了LGB T就没了。
这种事你也要拉个平衡，pg真歪。
哎, 你到红州来看看就知道了. 恢复不是竞争机制, 是领导看你不顺眼把你fire的权利. 公立学校又不自负盈亏, 主要靠政府拨款, 靠市场那一套没用. 所以现在招人要看connection, 和军队/政府的connection, 和学术没啥关系. 没听过某州立大学搞了个军队出身,连ph.d.都没有的人当校长. 这几年, 他们的搞法和很多年前国内大学的搞法差不多, 行政人员的权力越来越大. 喜欢国内那一套的肯定喜欢这个. 仔细看看就知道那些政客们浪费了多少纳税人的钱, 而不是某两个不合格的教授.
年轻时就那点工资，有啥积累呀。新人是不是就不用拼tenure了？
学术界的功能之一难道不是培养人才。版上整天吐槽有些中学老师不靠谱，大学难道不是更重要。最可能的一点就是行政人员外行指导内行，要求教授怎样教课。各种drama 就来了。倒霉的是学生。
为洪州叫好的川粉的大部分都是资深反华的，不知道怎么他们这么自我矛盾
这一点蓝州也没差别，我以前读书的某系里也是被政府部门塞进关系户，也是行政工作。最后只能靠魔法打败魔法，少数族裔+有工会主席经验的系主任把人见人厌的关系户……送到了别的系……
开玩笑呢，还海量，博士生是花学校钱的，一年学费加生活费得好几万，学校能有啥钱，就不可能海量。除非是自费的，那就不关科研经费啥事了
55岁正是faculty干劲儿十足的时候啊，不能拿国内五六十都退休了就像老人一样说事。如果在正规大学理工科读过书应该能看到，甚至七老八十的教授还在卷。teaching school就是another story了，反正以前也没多少funding，只能躺平。
美国有资格做tenure faculty的人数 恐怕是现有位置的10多倍 取消tenure 制度 只能让美国大学越来越有活力 竞争力越来越强 也会让那些真正想搞科研教学的人留下来
让TA教是因为便宜，跟tenure没关系。
多的是人干 想当non tenure faculty的人也是太多了 即使不给工资 都有好多外国博士 愿意来美国免费当faculty 如果单位愿意帮助绿卡申请的话
取消tenure制度 你一百个放心 红州的人才不会外流
胡扯谈 TX就是经济最好的红州 蓝州有海量的拿白卡 拿福利的
美国会上课的好讲师太多了 就是tenure制度 妨害好讲师留下来 废除了tenure制度 就可以年年考核 迫使faculty 不停进步
这10倍的人为啥现在不去竞争tenure track? 你不会以为把tenure取消，学校就扩招吧，那10倍的人都能当教授？还免费来美国当教授办绿卡，都是啥人干得事
你不要期望德州的红脖子黄右能听懂你在说什么
如果取消tenure制度后 就不会这样科研灌水 也不会培养海量的博士学生 科研经费的浪费就会减少 non tenure faculty的位置也可以适当增加一些
我觉得不光美国大学要取消tenure制度 小学 中学 高中都要取消teacher certificate 让外国人来美国教小学初高中 这样才能提高竞争力
怎么可能。 好的讲师不能留下来，或者教授不愿意花精力到讲课上 都是学校政策导致的 申请到的经费，学校可以拿~50% （各个学校不一样），所以学校考评都注重funding，不会有人管你是不是讲课讲得好。
是啊，55岁怎么会干不动。 看到的都是55岁很多空巢了，早上到得最早，晚上走得最晚