事实上 3/16 的听证会上, Yellen 已经明确表示所有中国客户都可以全部提款。扯这些有的没的没有任何意义。Lankford 只是表示一下态度,目前为止根本就没有动议。 Yellen says Chinese customers of failed Silicon Valley Bank will get money from U.S. fund Sen. James Lankford, Oklahoma Republican, pressed Ms. Yellen on whether community banks in his state would be reimbursing Chinese citizens and companies that held accounts at the California bank. He cited public reporting that some Chinese investors in SVB have ties to the Chinese Communist Party. Ms. Yellen replied: “Uninsured investors will be made whole in that bank. I suppose that could include foreign depositors, but I don’t believe there’s any legal basis to discriminate among [the] uninsured.” With evident sarcasm, Mr. Lankford noted that the administration had promised that U.S. taxpayers wouldn’t pay for the bank bailout. “I’m sure my bankers are going to be very excited to know they are no longer paying taxes and their banks no longer pay taxes,” he said. “All banks make their revenue off of rates and fees and such to their account holders, which means every Oklahoman will pay higher fees in their community banks.” Ms. Yellen retorted, “If we had a collapse of the banking system and its economic consequences, that will have very severe effects on banks in Oklahoma that will also be threatened.” https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/mar/16/janet-yellen-says-chinese-customers-failed-silicon/
事实上 Yellen 已经明确表示所有中国客户都可以全部提款。扯这些有的没的没有任何意义。 Yellen says Chinese customers of failed Silicon Valley Bank will get money from U.S. fund Sen. James Lankford, Oklahoma Republican, pressed Ms. Yellen on whether community banks in his state would be reimbursing Chinese citizens and companies that held accounts at the California bank. He cited public reporting that some Chinese investors in SVB have ties to the Chinese Communist Party. Ms. Yellen replied: “Uninsured investors will be made whole in that bank. I suppose that could include foreign depositors, but I don’t believe there’s any legal basis to discriminate among [the] uninsured.” With evident sarcasm, Mr. Lankford noted that the administration had promised that U.S. taxpayers wouldn’t pay for the bank bailout. “I’m sure my bankers are going to be very excited to know they are no longer paying taxes and their banks no longer pay taxes,” he said. “All banks make their revenue off of rates and fees and such to their account holders, which means every Oklahoman will pay higher fees in their community banks.” Ms. Yellen retorted, “If we had a collapse of the banking system and its economic consequences, that will have very severe effects on banks in Oklahoma that will also be threatened.” https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/mar/16/janet-yellen-says-chinese-customers-failed-silicon/ nj_guy 发表于 2023-03-21 10:37
这人代表了GOP大部分人的想法
OK和ID两个红州的狗皮议员都公开发言反对赔偿SVB的中国储户
这种歇斯底里的无赖政客现在是狗屁党主流呢
为啥对犹太人,黑人就言论不自由,对华人就言论自由了
这些人可以把美国的银行,在国际上的信誉再打击一下。
你爱美国是没错的,也是要支持的,但都快爱成是非不清的傻蛋了,自己意识不到吗?美版小X红就是说的你们这些人。
有些白人政客,缺乏安全感下,自私自利、做事越来越没有底线的面目越来越清晰。
希特勒当时代表了德国绝大部分人的想法。 明白了?
对啊, 宗族灭绝也是言论自由。。。。。
你想让nj_guy 这种精神白人咬自己家主人, 还不是要了他的命
白人基督徒就这样,对弱的有救世主情节,对强的海盗本性就显露了。
其实还真未必,德国人传统不太排犹,犹太人比例非常小,只占德国0.5%,所以并不足以强大到招人恨。排犹是希特勒和早期纳粹党魁接触多了,才学来的,尤其是有个立陶宛人(名字忘了),因为东欧才是排犹的重灾区。希特勒其实是讨厌GCD,而当时国际共运主要是犹太知识分子领导,所以就恨屋及乌了。但是可怕的事情是,老百姓的想法是很容易左右的,希特勒不代表德国人的想法,但是他可以改变德国人的想法。这些美国政客也许现在还不代表美国民意,但是放任他们这么叫嚣,美国民意就会越来越极端狭隘。
农民怎么了? 还有红州基本都是强盗后代这么说有点离谱哈
德国人民的想法当时也到了一个很容易被左右的状态 经济太差对政府太不满。。。
你是那个west talk的马甲吧,这明晃晃的双标让人疑惑世界之大怎么有你这种“人”!
对弱的也没有多少救世主心态。还有用圣经justify own slaves 合理性的人。
这个人精神好像有些问题,只要看到别人说美国政策有不对、不好的地方,他马上能丧失一切理性的胡搅蛮缠,非常难理解这种情结。
如果不是为了选票,议员就不会这么跳出来。这说明这种想法大有民意基础。
存钱在这2个州的local banks/credit unions 啥的国人要注意,那些银行default, 很可能存款拿不回来
这是在帮助中国 防止资金外逃 外流
+1 利好香港
我也听说了🤣
对,而且欧洲基督教国家一直对犹太人仇视,有这个“杀害耶稣”的原罪基础,所以随便一煽动,就能燎原。
自我安慰本事了得。
这年头精神病患也与时俱进跑到网上发神经了,厉害
英国扣留委内瑞拉的钱和金砖不还,美国更恶,扣留阿富汗这种穷国的钱赔偿美国人
是的,不要忘了白人灭了几乎整个大陆的原地居民,抢了他们的地盘。
再过几年有议员建议没收中国人财产都有可能。it is a slippery slope.
历史总是惊人的相似, 因为人性不变,可以把原住居民灭绝、把犹太人送concentration camp, 可以把日裔公民剥夺财产,一样可以对华裔做出来。
只不过现在人口更加diversify, 没以前那么单一。
美国政府正在快速地拉美化
这个人,就是18年给提出法案给银行解链子的议员。他东拉西扯就是为了甩锅
https://news.yahoo.com/failure-silicon-valley-bank-idaho-100000491.html
中国文化是子所不欲勿施于人
西方是 杀了人去和娈童的神父忏悔一下, 从教堂出来又可以以神的名义杀人强占别人的土地财产了
神应许的留着蜜汁的土地 实际上留着原住民鲜血
是够 傻X的
不用过几年,德州议员不就在提案没收中国人财产么?
只要是符合他们觉得“通共”嫌疑,有高华觉得入籍前自己的身份是中国政府盖章背书的不算“通共”,白大人们并不认可
是谁不愿意正视自己的黑历史?
Exactly, 我特别不理解华人为什么要大力反对CRT, 正视历史有错吗? 那日本美化侵华战争中国人也应该支持
媒体还敢批评吗?被骂的还少吗?
舔腚舔出幻觉来了?
是你自己吧!时间会证明你腚舔多了总是有幻觉。如果 Fed 退给所有 SVB 客户(包括中国客户)的钱,你就是舔腚王!
Yellen says Chinese customers of failed Silicon Valley Bank will get money from U.S. fund
Sen. James Lankford, Oklahoma Republican, pressed Ms. Yellen on whether community banks in his state would be reimbursing Chinese citizens and companies that held accounts at the California bank. He cited public reporting that some Chinese investors in SVB have ties to the Chinese Communist Party.
Ms. Yellen replied: “Uninsured investors will be made whole in that bank. I suppose that could include foreign depositors, but I don’t believe there’s any legal basis to discriminate among [the] uninsured.”
With evident sarcasm, Mr. Lankford noted that the administration had promised that U.S. taxpayers wouldn’t pay for the bank bailout. “I’m sure my bankers are going to be very excited to know they are no longer paying taxes and their banks no longer pay taxes,” he said. “All banks make their revenue off of rates and fees and such to their account holders, which means every Oklahoman will pay higher fees in their community banks.”
Ms. Yellen retorted, “If we had a collapse of the banking system and its economic consequences, that will have very severe effects on banks in Oklahoma that will also be threatened.”
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/mar/16/janet-yellen-says-chinese-customers-failed-silicon/
这儿的讨论主要不是针对最后会不会赔偿吧?大家讨论的明明主要是这位(以及可能与他类似的)政治人物的行为而已,咋就成了“扯这些有的没的没有任何意义”?
国会议员对中国的态度是明显的而且几乎是一致的,但还不还中国客户的钱是由法律保障的。很多议员在感情上都不想给,但绝大多数都不会支持不给钱的动议,不管是民主党还是共和党。
没有几个人真的在担心最后的结果会是“不给钱”,这儿大部分人自己也没在那儿存钱吧?
大家讨论的中心明明就只是在讽刺八卦某些政治人物的行为,以及这种行为后面的意义而已。您来告诉大伙儿:“放心吧,肯定会给钱” - 话没错,但和大家讨论的不是一回事。要硬说意义的话,您这才真是“扯这些有的没的没有任何意义”呢。。。
好吧,不过 Lankford 恐怕代表国会所有议员的想法,虽然绝大多数不会支持。就比如说我,虽然也非常理解麦卡锡主义,但我不会支持。毕竟粉红的言论自由也是美国言论自由的一部分。
你的言论自由和议员的言论自由不一样。你代表了自己。议员的说明了他的constituent 里相当一部分人的态度。
看着您又把话题绕开了(这是指绕开我刚才说的问题),那么我不得不把话说的再明白点:
我前面回帖的中心意思是,您那句对这儿大家讨论的总结:“扯这些有的没的没有任何意义” - 这话才真的是没有意义。我帖子其他的,主要都是在说明这个。
您想说“大家放心,这个不会通过的”?没问题。您想说“Lankford 恐怕代表国会所有议员的想法。。。”,也没问题。但要想说大家的讨论是“扯这些有的没的没有任何意义” - 这个结论实在是既不怎么站的住脚,又明显是在挑衅。我只是说出我对您这个说法的看法而已。
当然,您还是可以这么说。
你要想扯就扯吧,你赢了。
您“输了”的根本原因是,您在正常讨论之外,非要嘴欠来一句对大家讨论的挑衅式总结:“扯这些有的没的没有任何意义”。
你对,还有啥?爽了吗?
这种passive aggressive 的方式除了说明你的low, 还能说明啥。