收到选票了

m
mailist
楼主 (北美华人网)
西雅图选票里面有个议题:Approval voting Vs. Ranked choice voting。字面意思我是清楚的,但是2种投票方式利弊何在? 请熟悉投票的给解释一下。
g
gokgs
https://ballotpedia.org/Seattle,_Washington,_Proposition_1A_and_1B,_Approval_Voting_Initiative_and_Ranked-Choice_Voting_Measure_(November_2022)
g
gokgs
应该差不多,随便选一个就行
m
mailist
最后,在二者之间选择了Ranked choice voting。 投票设计可以让RCV有多于2个candidates进入General election,相比之下Approval voting最多只允许有2个candidates进入general election
g
gokgs
最后,在二者之间选择了Ranked choice voting。 投票设计可以让RCV有多于2个candidates进入General election,相比之下Approval voting最多只允许有2个candidates进入general election
mailist 发表于 2022-10-22 21:58

Proposition 1A, approval voting Adoption of Proposition 1A would implement Initiative 134, which would establish approval voting for Seattle primary elections for Mayor, City Attorney, and City Council. Under the approval voting system, voters would vote for however many candidates they approve of. The primary ballot would include instructions stating, "vote for AS MANY as you approve of" for each office. The top two candidates receiving the most votes would advance to the general election.[1][3]
Proposition 1B, ranked-choice voting Adoption of Proposition 1B would implement the city council's proposed alternative measure, which would establish ranked-choice voting for Seattle primary elections for Mayor, City Attorney, and City Council. Under the ranked-choice voting system, voters would rank candidates according to their preference. The candidates with the fewest votes would be eliminated and the voters' second choice would be counted for remaining candidates until two candidates remain to advance to the general election. Voters would be able to rank up to five candidates. Ballots would include instructions stating, “Rank candidates in the order of your choice.”[1][4]

R
Ruth
我今天已经投了,查了半天学区的候选人,他们也不打广告,网上也没啥资料,一直决定不了。。。我们这其它的职位和法案我早决定了。
g
gokgs
都是出两个, 纯粹是故弄玄虚。 要是我, 直接选 No, 不用新方法。 大部分政客都是吃饱了撑的, 瞎折腾。
A "no" vote opposes adopting an approval voting or ranked-choice voting system for Seattle primary elections for Mayor, City Attorney, and City Council, thereby leaving in place the current plurality voting system in which voters vote for one candidate.
m
mailist
回复 7楼的帖子 Edit: 烦gokgs友情提示,下面的关于RCV理解是错的。不删了,立此为证。


2者不一样。 AV只能有2个top candidates在primary出线,进入general election,这样会出现2人都属一个派别的可能性。
RCV初选只淘汰最后一名,其余都进入general election
s
sweetme
投票有时候真是也没多科学,大部分candidate是谁都没听说过。
m
mailist
回复 9楼sweetme的帖子
我也是。 不过华州至少会寄来Pamphlets,方便选民做点功课。 此外,去当本地政客campaign volunteer也有不少收获
R
Ruth
回复 9楼sweetme的帖子
我也是。 不过华州至少会寄来Pamphlets,方便选民做点功课。 此外,去当本地政客campaign volunteer也有不少收获
mailist 发表于 2022-10-22 22:15

我们学区委员有两个候选人在sample ballet 上都没简介,我就觉得,也太不上心了吧,是觉得稳进吗?
g
gokgs
回复 7楼的帖子
2者不一样。 AV只能有2个top candidates在primary出线,进入general election,这样会出现2人都属一个派别的可能性。
RCV初选只淘汰最后一名,其余都进入general election
mailist 发表于 2022-10-22 22:07

>>>  The candidates with the fewest votes would be eliminated and the voters'''' second choice would be counted for remaining candidates until two candidates remain to advance to the general election.
你竟然直接藐视我的建议, 哈哈。 仔细读一下原文?基本阅读理解都不过关。
m
mailist
回复 12楼gokgs的帖子
谢谢指出来!果然需要回炉重新学阅读😂