11. In or around June of 2018, Plaintiff began working for Millennium Management, LLC (“Millennium”) as an intern. 12. Around the same time, CHEN worked for Millennium as a Portfolio Manager. 13. In or around August of 2018, Plaintiff left work at Millennium. Despite not working at Millennium, CHEN and other Millennium employees continued to speak to Plaintiff. 14. On or about February 8, 2019, CHEN texted Plaintiff demanding her address. CHEN told Plaintiff he was “coming over to play pool.” Around this time, Plaintiff had a pool lounge in her building and frequently invited colleagues over to play pool. 15. That same day, CHEN went to Plaintiff’s apartment. The two began to play pool. During the game, CHEN stopped playing, looked directly at Plaintiff, and asked if he could kiss Plaintiff if he made a shot. Plaintiff immediately told CHEN “No.” In response, CHEN laughed. 16. Thereafter, CHEN stopped playing. CHEN then walked toward Plaintiff, forcibly grabbed Plaintiff’s head with both hands, and kissed Plaintiff on the lips. 17. Plaintiff, in shock, was unable to move. Once CHEN was done kissing Plaintiff and released Plaintiff’s face, Plaintiff—horrified at what just occurred—walked away. 18. Thereafter, Plaintiff sat on a couch in the pool lounge. Plaintiff’s hands were shaking. CHEN pointed out that Plaintiff’s hands were shaking. CHEN then stated “Last November when we were at the party, I accidentally touched your hand. I still remember that feeling and I have been liking you since.” 19. Thereafter, Plaintiff made it clear to CHEN that she viewed him as a friend and was not interested in a romantic relationship. 20. Despite this, CHEN told Plaintiff he wanted to see her “cute face again,” and that he would come back next week to play more pool. Thereafter, CHEN left Plaintiff’s apartment building. 21. After CHEN left, Plaintiff texted her friend about the unwelcomed experience. She was shocked and hurt that a married man had forcibly kissed her 22. At that time Plaintiff was horrified that a married, senior portfolio manager had engaged in unwanted sexual acts with her.
23. On or about February 13, 2019, CHEN texted Plaintiff and, in an act of intimidation, forbid her to speak to anyone at Millennium about them meeting in person. Plaintiff, in fear for her professional reputation, complied. 24. Thereafter, Plaintiff, in fear that her reputation in the financial industry would be harmed, remained cordial with CHEN. For example, CHEN made repeated promises to introduce Plaintiff to prominent female portfolio managers in their industry. Plaintiff wanted to remain on good-terms with CHEN strictly for professional benefits. 25. Thereafter, Plaintiff and CHEN met up on occasion. CHEN routinely asked and pressured Plaintiff to engage in sexual acts. Plaintiff would engage in sexual acts with CHEN out of fears for her professional reputation being harmed. 26. In or around June of 2019, CHEN became aware that Plaintiff went on a date with a mutual acquaintance. 27. Thereafter, in or around June of 2019, CHEN arrived at Plaintiff’s apartment uninvited. CHEN walked into Plaintiff’s bedroom’s doorway. As Plaintiff sat on her bed, CHEN accused Plaintiff of betraying him. CHEN then went on a rant. CHEN yelled at Plaintiff that she needed to apologize to him, find him a “new girl,” and find someone to engage in a three way with. CHEN then told Plaintiff that other girls had asked him to divorce his wife. CHEN was upset Plaintiff had never asked him to divorce his wife. 28. After ranting, CHEN became even more enraged. CHEN physically pushed Plaintiff down. CHEN then reached back and open-palm-slapped Plaintiff across the face. Plaintiff told CHEN to “stop” repeatedly. Despite Plaintiff unequivocally asserting she did not consent to physical contact, CHEN continued to slap Plaintiff harder and harder. Plaintiff shut her eyes while CHEN repeatedly slapped her face. 29. Thereafter, CHEN ripped off Plaintiff’s clothes and forced his penis inside her vagina. While forcibly penetrating Plaintiff and continuously beating her, CHEN told Plaintiff she was CHEN’s “little bitch” among other foul names. While forcibly penetrating Plaintiff and continuously beating her, CHEN told Plaintiff he wanted to watch other men rape Plaintiff, among other repulsive comments. 30. When CHEN was done raping and beating Plaintiff, CHEN got off Plaintiff and grabbed his phone that was sitting upright on a nearby table. Plaintiff could see CHEN had recorded the rape. CHEN, almost triumphantly, started to replay the rape video. 31. Almost immediately thereafter, CHEN told Plaintiff he had a “dinner date,” put his clothes on, and left. Plaintiff laid in bed, in shock, with her face and body burning from CHEN’s merciless assault. 32. Soon thereafter, CHEN reached out to Plaintiff to threaten her. CHEN told Plaintiff that if she disclosed the rape to anyone, he would “fuck” Plaintiff over and ruin her professional reputation. CHEN reiterated to Plaintiff that if Plaintiff “sold [him] out,” he “would destroy [Plaintiff].” 33. After the rape, at CHEN’s demand, Plaintiff and CHEN met up in person twice. Plaintiff, afraid for her professional reputation and recalling CHEN’s direct threats, agreed to meet up. Both times, CHEN and Plaintiff met in public locations. 34. At one in-person meeting, CHEN described his “tactics” to have sexual relationships with younger women, among other lurid topics of conversation. CHEN told Plaintiff that he forcibly kisses young women to see how they react. CHEN told Plaintiff he enjoys when the young women blush or their hearts beat fast. He told Plaintiff “When I first kissed you, I had that same feeling. I like to do that to young girls.” 35. Around the same time, in or around 2019, Plaintiff began an interview process for a new position. CHEN, informed of this, told Plaintiff that he knew her prospective colleagues and he was “good friends,” with her prospective manager. Plaintiff was intimidated by CHEN’s comments and feared for her future job security. 36. Thereafter, in or around 2021, CHEN attempted to contact Plaintiff. Plaintiff began to ignore CHEN’s requests for calls and flirtatious text. 37. Thereafter, in or around 2021, Plaintiff began working full time. Once again, CHEN reminded Plaintiff that he knew her colleagues. 38. In or around July of 2021, CHEN told Plaintiff he “watched the video again” and that he “missed that feeling a lot.” Plaintiff was disgusted that CHEN had the rape on video and continued to view it. Plaintiff was further discouraged as CHEN was connected to her colleagues and many other individuals in her profession. 39. In or around the summer of 2021, BlueCrest hired CHEN as a Portfolio Manager. 40. In or around October of 2021, CHEN demanded Plaintiff meet him. Plaintiff, fearing CHEN would harm her professional reputation among her new colleagues, agreed. Thereafter, Plaintiff rode her scooter to a public location near the Southeast corner of Central Park. 41. Around that time near Central Park, CHEN began to discuss with Plaintiff his work at BlueCrest. CHEN explained to Plaintiff, among other things, that he was currently a “oneman team” at BlueCrest but he needed to hire people to work directly underneath him. 42. CHEN then made an offer to hire Plaintiff to join his “team” as an Analyst at BlueCrest. 43. CHEN then reemphasized his offer to hire Plaintiff at BlueCrest, stating, among other things, that his former analyst from Millenium had not come with him to BlueCrest, that Plaintiff was “senior” enough to join, and that Plaintiff was a smart person and everything would be “easy” for Plaintiff to learn. 44. CHEN reemphasized his offer to hire Plaintiff at BlueCrest by describing the role Plaintiff would play at BlueCrest, describing his strategy at BlueCrest and how Plaintiff would help him implement his strategy, and describing new professional opportunities Plaintiff would have at BlueCrest that she did not currently have. CHEN showed Plaintiff graphs containing detailed information on the types of trading strategies CHEN was engaging in. CHEN explained how Plaintiff’s proposed role as an Analyst could help CHEN implement these strategies. CHEN then emphasized Plaintiff’s higher rate of pay at BlueCrest. 45. After extending the job offer, CHEN, in an attempted qui pro quo sexual exchange, then propositioned Plaintiff to walk into a secluded area of the park to have sex. Plaintiff declined and made it clear she was not interested in engaging in sexual behavior with CHEN. Suddenly, CHEN grabbed Plaintiff’s faced and kissed her. Plaintiff immediately pulled away and looked at CHEN in disgust. She abruptly stated she needed to get to a meeting immediately and fled. 46. Thereafter, Defendants failed to hire Plaintiff for the previously offered Analyst position. 47. Thereafter, Defendants continued to seek applications with Plaintiff’s qualifications for the Analyst position. 48. Defendants failed to hire Plaintiff for the Analyst position because Plaintiff did not engage in sexual acts with CHEN. 49. As a result of Defendants’ discriminatory and intolerable treatment, Plaintiff suffered and continues to suffer severe emotional distress. 50. As a result of Defendants’ unlawful and discriminatory actions, Plaintiff has endured unwarranted financial hardships and irreparable damage to her professional reputation. 51. As a result of the acts and conduct complained of herein, Plaintiff has suffered and will continue to suffer the loss of income, the loss of a salary, bonuses, benefits and other compensation, which such employment entails. Plaintiff has also suffered future pecuniary losses, emotional pain, suffering, inconvenience, loss of enjoyment of life, and other nonpecuniary losses. Plaintiff further claims aggravation, activation, and/or exacerbation of any preexisting condition. 52. As Defendants’ conduct has been malicious, willful, outrageous, and conducted with full knowledge of the law, Plaintiff demands Punitive Damages against Defendants. 53. The above are just some of the examples of unlawful, discriminatory, and retaliatory conduct to which Defendants subjected Plaintiff.
被告人陈开平，来自中国福建，是清华大学环境工程系毕业，之后赴美在Carnegie Mellon获得硕士学位，然后在华尔街多个银行基金任职。他的妻子是当年他清华大学教授的女儿， 育有两个孩子。陈平常给人一个平易近人的“大叔”， 经常把老婆孩子挂在嘴边，下班后也是马上坐火车回家，所有人都认为他是一名好丈夫、好爸爸。结果却是当代的陈世美！
概括： 原告女方指控BlueCrest一位经理，对方以对冲基金的工作机会诱导女方与他发生性关系。
这位Chen姓基金经理曾在2019年就追求并性侵过她。
录下强奸视频来要挟女方
事发后，多位女子爆料这位受害女子并非首位，陈多起侵害过年轻女性，大多女孩年纪甚至不到他的一半！
下面两个是转载新闻， 最先报道的是Businessinsider
https://www.businessinsider.com/lawsuit-claims-bluecrest-pm-raped-woman-tried-to-have-sex-in-exchange-for-job-offer-2022-2
https://www.163.com/dy/article/H14HCTFE0514BT3D.html
https://news.have8.tv/3001300.html
以下是起诉书原告的事实陈述。
11. In or around June of 2018, Plaintiff began working for Millennium Management, LLC (“Millennium”) as an intern.
12. Around the same time, CHEN worked for Millennium as a Portfolio Manager.
13. In or around August of 2018, Plaintiff left work at Millennium. Despite not working at Millennium, CHEN and other Millennium employees continued to speak to Plaintiff.
14. On or about February 8, 2019, CHEN texted Plaintiff demanding her address. CHEN told Plaintiff he was “coming over to play pool.” Around this time, Plaintiff had a pool lounge in her building and frequently invited colleagues over to play pool.
15. That same day, CHEN went to Plaintiff’s apartment. The two began to play pool. During the game, CHEN stopped playing, looked directly at Plaintiff, and asked if he could kiss Plaintiff if he made a shot. Plaintiff immediately told CHEN “No.” In response, CHEN laughed.
16. Thereafter, CHEN stopped playing. CHEN then walked toward Plaintiff, forcibly grabbed Plaintiff’s head with both hands, and kissed Plaintiff on the lips.
17. Plaintiff, in shock, was unable to move. Once CHEN was done kissing Plaintiff and released Plaintiff’s face, Plaintiff—horrified at what just occurred—walked away.
18. Thereafter, Plaintiff sat on a couch in the pool lounge. Plaintiff’s hands were shaking. CHEN pointed out that Plaintiff’s hands were shaking. CHEN then stated “Last November when we were at the party, I accidentally touched your hand. I still remember that feeling and I have been liking you since.”
19. Thereafter, Plaintiff made it clear to CHEN that she viewed him as a friend and was not interested in a romantic relationship.
20. Despite this, CHEN told Plaintiff he wanted to see her “cute face again,” and that he would come back next week to play more pool. Thereafter, CHEN left Plaintiff’s apartment building.
21. After CHEN left, Plaintiff texted her friend about the unwelcomed experience. She was shocked and hurt that a married man had forcibly kissed her
22. At that time Plaintiff was horrified that a married, senior portfolio manager had engaged in unwanted sexual acts with her.
23. On or about February 13, 2019, CHEN texted Plaintiff and, in an act of intimidation, forbid her to speak to anyone at Millennium about them meeting in person. Plaintiff, in fear for her professional reputation, complied.
24. Thereafter, Plaintiff, in fear that her reputation in the financial industry would be harmed, remained cordial with CHEN. For example, CHEN made repeated promises to introduce Plaintiff to prominent female portfolio managers in their industry. Plaintiff wanted to remain on good-terms with CHEN strictly for professional benefits.
25. Thereafter, Plaintiff and CHEN met up on occasion. CHEN routinely asked and pressured Plaintiff to engage in sexual acts. Plaintiff would engage in sexual acts with CHEN out of fears for her professional reputation being harmed.
26. In or around June of 2019, CHEN became aware that Plaintiff went on a date with a mutual acquaintance.
27. Thereafter, in or around June of 2019, CHEN arrived at Plaintiff’s apartment uninvited. CHEN walked into Plaintiff’s bedroom’s doorway. As Plaintiff sat on her bed, CHEN accused Plaintiff of betraying him. CHEN then went on a rant. CHEN yelled at Plaintiff that she needed to apologize to him, find him a “new girl,” and find someone to engage in a three way with. CHEN then told Plaintiff that other girls had asked him to divorce his wife. CHEN was upset Plaintiff had never asked him to divorce his wife.
28. After ranting, CHEN became even more enraged. CHEN physically pushed Plaintiff down. CHEN then reached back and open-palm-slapped Plaintiff across the face. Plaintiff told CHEN to “stop” repeatedly. Despite Plaintiff unequivocally asserting she did not consent to physical contact, CHEN continued to slap Plaintiff harder and harder. Plaintiff shut her eyes while CHEN repeatedly slapped her face.
29. Thereafter, CHEN ripped off Plaintiff’s clothes and forced his penis inside her vagina. While forcibly penetrating Plaintiff and continuously beating her, CHEN told Plaintiff she was CHEN’s “little bitch” among other foul names. While forcibly penetrating Plaintiff and continuously beating her, CHEN told Plaintiff he wanted to watch other men rape Plaintiff, among other repulsive comments.
30. When CHEN was done raping and beating Plaintiff, CHEN got off Plaintiff and grabbed his phone that was sitting upright on a nearby table. Plaintiff could see CHEN had recorded the rape. CHEN, almost triumphantly, started to replay the rape video.
31. Almost immediately thereafter, CHEN told Plaintiff he had a “dinner date,” put his clothes on, and left. Plaintiff laid in bed, in shock, with her face and body burning from CHEN’s merciless assault.
32. Soon thereafter, CHEN reached out to Plaintiff to threaten her. CHEN told Plaintiff that if she disclosed the rape to anyone, he would “fuck” Plaintiff over and ruin her professional reputation. CHEN reiterated to Plaintiff that if Plaintiff “sold [him] out,” he “would destroy [Plaintiff].”
33. After the rape, at CHEN’s demand, Plaintiff and CHEN met up in person twice. Plaintiff, afraid for her professional reputation and recalling CHEN’s direct threats, agreed to meet up. Both times, CHEN and Plaintiff met in public locations.
34. At one in-person meeting, CHEN described his “tactics” to have sexual relationships with younger women, among other lurid topics of conversation. CHEN told Plaintiff that he forcibly kisses young women to see how they react. CHEN told Plaintiff he enjoys when the young women blush or their hearts beat fast. He told Plaintiff “When I first kissed you, I had that same feeling. I like to do that to young girls.”
35. Around the same time, in or around 2019, Plaintiff began an interview process for a new position. CHEN, informed of this, told Plaintiff that he knew her prospective colleagues and he was “good friends,” with her prospective manager. Plaintiff was intimidated by CHEN’s comments and feared for her future job security.
36. Thereafter, in or around 2021, CHEN attempted to contact Plaintiff. Plaintiff began to ignore CHEN’s requests for calls and flirtatious text.
37. Thereafter, in or around 2021, Plaintiff began working full time. Once again, CHEN reminded Plaintiff that he knew her colleagues.
38. In or around July of 2021, CHEN told Plaintiff he “watched the video again” and that he “missed that feeling a lot.” Plaintiff was disgusted that CHEN had the rape on video and continued to view it. Plaintiff was further discouraged as CHEN was connected to her colleagues and many other individuals in her profession.
39. In or around the summer of 2021, BlueCrest hired CHEN as a Portfolio Manager.
40. In or around October of 2021, CHEN demanded Plaintiff meet him. Plaintiff, fearing CHEN would harm her professional reputation among her new colleagues, agreed. Thereafter, Plaintiff rode her scooter to a public location near the Southeast corner of Central Park.
41. Around that time near Central Park, CHEN began to discuss with Plaintiff his work at BlueCrest. CHEN explained to Plaintiff, among other things, that he was currently a “oneman team” at BlueCrest but he needed to hire people to work directly underneath him.
42. CHEN then made an offer to hire Plaintiff to join his “team” as an Analyst at BlueCrest.
43. CHEN then reemphasized his offer to hire Plaintiff at BlueCrest, stating, among other things, that his former analyst from Millenium had not come with him to BlueCrest, that Plaintiff was “senior” enough to join, and that Plaintiff was a smart person and everything would be “easy” for Plaintiff to learn.
44. CHEN reemphasized his offer to hire Plaintiff at BlueCrest by describing the role Plaintiff would play at BlueCrest, describing his strategy at BlueCrest and how Plaintiff would help him implement his strategy, and describing new professional opportunities Plaintiff would have at BlueCrest that she did not currently have. CHEN showed Plaintiff graphs containing detailed information on the types of trading strategies CHEN was engaging in. CHEN explained how Plaintiff’s proposed role as an Analyst could help CHEN implement these strategies. CHEN then emphasized Plaintiff’s higher rate of pay at BlueCrest.
45. After extending the job offer, CHEN, in an attempted qui pro quo sexual exchange, then propositioned Plaintiff to walk into a secluded area of the park to have sex. Plaintiff declined and made it clear she was not interested in engaging in sexual behavior with CHEN. Suddenly, CHEN grabbed Plaintiff’s faced and kissed her. Plaintiff immediately pulled away and looked at CHEN in disgust. She abruptly stated she needed to get to a meeting immediately and fled.
46. Thereafter, Defendants failed to hire Plaintiff for the previously offered Analyst position.
47. Thereafter, Defendants continued to seek applications with Plaintiff’s qualifications for the Analyst position.
48. Defendants failed to hire Plaintiff for the Analyst position because Plaintiff did not engage in sexual acts with CHEN.
49. As a result of Defendants’ discriminatory and intolerable treatment, Plaintiff suffered and continues to suffer severe emotional distress.
50. As a result of Defendants’ unlawful and discriminatory actions, Plaintiff has endured unwarranted financial hardships and irreparable damage to her professional reputation.
51. As a result of the acts and conduct complained of herein, Plaintiff has suffered and will continue to suffer the loss of income, the loss of a salary, bonuses, benefits and other compensation, which such employment entails. Plaintiff has also suffered future pecuniary losses, emotional pain, suffering, inconvenience, loss of enjoyment of life, and other nonpecuniary losses. Plaintiff further claims aggravation, activation, and/or exacerbation of any preexisting condition.
52. As Defendants’ conduct has been malicious, willful, outrageous, and conducted with full knowledge of the law, Plaintiff demands Punitive Damages against Defendants.
53. The above are just some of the examples of unlawful, discriminatory, and retaliatory conduct to which Defendants subjected Plaintiff.
亏好美国有ME2 运动！ 要是在国内。。。
国内女孩多，他这样的在国内性资源来的太便宜，不用费力气rape。在美国都是老移民欺负新移民，华人老男人欺负华人小女孩，不敢惹老外
金融行业容易出禽兽啊
纽约渣男多，湾区渣女多
这已经不是渣不渣的问题了， 这超出了做人的底线！