先是Harris County Public Health Department发声明说死者没打疫苗死于omicron,然后媒体们纷纷大力宣传死者没打疫苗还曾经感染过新冠结果这次死于omicron。然后有人亲自打电话去Harris County Public Health Department询问被告知其实他们并不清楚死者是否死于omicron。。。 The Western Journal provided a transcript of part of the conversation between Cohen and the Harris County Public Health Department: The Health Dept: “We can’t confirm that the patient died from COVID, but we can say that he was omicron positive at the time of his death.” Cohen:: “So he died with COVID, but you can’t say he died from COVID?” The Health Dept: “Correct.” https://www.westernjournal.com/media-says-unvaxxed-man-died-omicron-look-public-health-officials-say/ 电话录音 https://mobile.twitter.com/dancohen3000/status/1473480933579923456
The Western Journal provided a transcript of part of the conversation between Cohen and the Harris County Public Health Department:
The Health Dept: “We can’t confirm that the patient died from COVID, but we can say that he was omicron positive at the time of his death.”
Cohen:: “So he died with COVID, but you can’t say he died from COVID?”
The Health Dept: “Correct.”
https://www.westernjournal.com/media-says-unvaxxed-man-died-omicron-look-public-health-officials-say/
电话录音 https://mobile.twitter.com/dancohen3000/status/1473480933579923456
美国这个流感死亡人数很宽泛,并不仅指流感死亡,而把因流感加重病情的死亡全部算进来。比如一位肺病、或心脏病、糖尿病重症病人,死前患了流感,就算作“与流感相关的死亡人数”。中国的统计方式不同,仅仅是直接流感死亡,那些因流感加重了基础病而导致的死亡一律不算。比如,一名患者老毛病是肺炎和心脏病,因患流感导致肺炎恶化,然后造成心脏病发作,最终因心脏病死亡。——在美国,其死亡原因就是“流感”。在中国,则不是死于流感,而是心脏病。也就是说,中美两国的“流感死亡”因统计方法不同,是没有可比性的。美国每年死成千上万,而中国仅仅是两位数。因此,那条轰动全中国的新闻,根本不敢列出中国的死亡数字。几十比1万,根本不是一个数量级,戏就作过了。
中国为了稳定独裁统治都是报喜不报忧往低了算,美国是反的,以后如果美国也独裁了不用选举了肯定就会变成也往低了算
我觉得以后如果美国也独裁了肯定会学厉害国报喜不报忧尽量少报才能制造出所谓的和谐社会有利于集权统治,现在西方各国在疫苗护照上就是学习厉害国的健康码
芝加哥那个卫生部长举的例子包括已经身患绝症被医生判了死刑没救了回家等死的最后是死于绝症跟新冠无关但是同时测试新冠阳性也算在新冠死亡里,流感也是这样算的?那个部长生怕大家听不明白解释的特别仔细。
是的
所以其实流感的杀伤力也是被夸大了,现在看来流感疫苗多半也是多余的
流感疫苗多数也是没什么用的,听说今年的也是猜错了那个variant,所以防重症那些也是忽悠。但起码打了没太多副作用,打了就当白打了。
流感疫苗的宣传一直是即使没猜中毒株也能帮助防重症。就像你说的,不管此说法是否真实反正打了没啥副作用所以也就无所谓了。