你对美国法律没有丝毫了解，自己去看看吧，美国法律禁止抚养权上任何的性别歧视。 As a father, you have the same parental rights as a mother, until a court says otherwise. What''s more, a judge cannot consider a parent''s gender when making custody decisions. Still, some fathers agree to less-than-ideal parenting plans and schedules because they expect the court to favor their children''s mother. Fathers'' Child Custody Rights
你对美国法律没有丝毫了解，自己去看看吧，美国法律禁止抚养权上任何的性别歧视。 As a father, you have the same parental rights as a mother, until a court says otherwise. What''''s more, a judge cannot consider a parent''''s gender when making custody decisions. Still, some fathers agree to less-than-ideal parenting plans and schedules because they expect the court to favor their children''''s mother. Fathers'''' Child Custody Rights purpledee 发表于 2021-12-23 14:24
你对美国法律没有丝毫了解，自己去看看吧，美国法律禁止抚养权上任何的性别歧视。
As a father, you have the same parental rights as a mother, until a court says otherwise. What''s more, a judge cannot consider a parent''s gender when making custody decisions. Still, some fathers agree to less-than-ideal parenting plans and schedules because they expect the court to favor their children''s mother.
Fathers'' Child Custody Rights
你太难为公司了，就那么点🆔养号也不是几天能养出来的，前两天他们连新注册的ID都派出来发帖洗白
你以为这边的法官是你这种逻辑不清毕业的阿？人家要看前因后果好吧，前有王家污蔑加月事大字报才有李某层层反击，法官一看李某有理有据要锤有锤反应了一个不受欺辱高智商母亲的形象，判给谁还不清楚吗？难道判给80多嘴上说儿媳月事的王家啊？美国法官心里应该觉得这个公公是不是对儿媳有不正当的企图才对吧……毕竟这里是美国哎，你不懂…
别搜了，你以为翻墙能用谷歌很了不起啊……我们不翻墙就能用，吼吼。鬼有和你讲性别歧视，你自己去洗洗眼睛都粗现幻觉了
不是婆婆好，而是因为一开始王家造谣离婚原因是婆媳关系不好，所以婆婆没法出动
有的，导致解约的话有可能要承担民事责任，interference with contractual relations
好奇怪了，你跟我吵干吗？我们在这里讨论美国法庭上应该是什么看法，你又在这里撒泼打滚的是干吗？并且我很迷惑啊你的目的是啥？阻止大家讨论一个离婚case？我们讨论能影响法官判？还是我们讨论能阻止力宏给钱？
治愈堡，还记得盒饭老板娘吗？