也许,我们可以称这个词为我们喜欢的任何东西,例如共同繁荣

E
EvenOdd
楼主 (北美华人网)
Q
解決三差距六問題
那到底該如何理解共同富裕呢?結合過去一年的各種訊息來看,筆者認為共同富裕要解決「三大差距」和「六大問題」。三大差距包括收入差距、地區差距和城鄉差距。而六大問題則包括學有所教、勞有所得、病有所醫、老有所養、住有所居、弱有所扶。從這三大差距和六大問題作為出發點,筆者認為宏觀層面有3點影響值得思考。
https://www2.hkej.com/wm/article/id/2995242/ 共同富裕目標下解決發展問題 謝棟銘 華僑銀行 經濟師 UQ
h
huawei6g
祝楼主和关心祖国统一大业的朋友们节假日快乐
E
EvenOdd
祝楼主和关心祖国统一大业的朋友们节假日快乐
huawei6g 发表于 2021-12-18 05:31

< 统一 >
Perhaps the upcoming unification could become much easier if the leaders of two sides can communicate and talk as recently suggested. 
Maybe for the purpose of improoving Taiwan's confidence, Mainland can propose and organise regularly various meetings by the civil, business and goverment leaders of both sides.
Particularly the public would have their rights to know and understand openly the positive and constructive invitations of talks and meetings by the top leaders directly.
I think the above should be a peaceful approach to avoid any wasteful conflict or confrontation.
Since possibly historically the losing personal reputation and producing public liability that are caused by no-talking and no-meeting by our respected leaders, (in case of any money-wasting war consequently due to not-accepting communication), would be huge potentially, I would guess. 
A concrete risk that should be not worth for the leaders to take!
Just my thought! 如果双方领导人能像最近建议的那样沟通和交谈,也许即将到来的统一会变得容易得多。 或许为了增进台湾的信心,大陆可以提议并定期组织双方文、商、政等领导人的各种会议。 特别是公众有权公开了解和理解最高领导人直接提出的积极和建设性的会谈和会晤邀请。 我认为以上应该是一种和平的方式,以避免任何浪费性的冲突或对抗。 由于历史上可能由于我们尊敬的领导人不说话和不见面而造成的个人声誉损失和公共责任的损失,(如果由于不接受沟通而导致任何浪费金钱的战争),将是巨大的潜在, 我猜。 一个不值得领导者承担的具体风险! 只是我的想法!

h
huawei6g
回复 3楼EvenOdd的帖子
台湾实质上是个殖民地而已,解决方案最终是中美实力决定的。俄国取乌克兰,中国取南海,只有这样,世界才能有长久的和平